Florida Lawmakers Want Students to Take Financial Literacy Course Before Graduating High School
Comments
-
Seriously, that’s a great idea.
-
I've heard that come up locally and it's dismissed as being racist.
-
and people are fighting this, if you can believe it.
-
Sadly, I believe it. Kids really need help in this area. Start them out with the tools they need and many will realize financial independence. The left cannot stand this. They rely on a dependent class to retain power.DerekJohnson said:and people are fighting this, if you can believe it.
-
Do they really need to know how to create a budget? Next, you will be expecting students to understand a credit score, the rule of compound interest, the actual cost of debt. Then what? An understanding of return on investment? Geezus, the insanity of these white supremacists. Let's stick to the basics like getting a state ID and logging on to a computer.Southerndawg said:
Sadly, I believe it. Kids really need help in this area. Start them out with the tools they need and many will realize financial independence. The left cannot stand this. They rely on a dependent class to retain power.DerekJohnson said:and people are fighting this, if you can believe it.
-
Well it isBleachedAnusDawg said:I've heard that come up locally and it's dismissed as being racist.
-
https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-politics-and-policy/florida-house-passes-dont-say-gay-bill-rcna17532
They also passed a law banning talking about sexual orientation. I can’t wait for you free speech warriors to get ahold of this. -
"Creating boundaries at an early age of what is appropriate in our schools, when we are funding our schools, is not hate," Harding said. "It’s actually providing boundaries, and it’s fair to our teachers and our school districts to know what we expect."
Harding has repeatedly stressed that the bill would not prohibit students from talking about their LGBTQ families or classroom discussions about LGBTQ history, including events such as the 2016 attack on the Pulse nightclub, a gay club in Orlando.
Good. Schools and parents set the curriculum
Run against it. It worked in Virginia -
Crowds out CRT trainingDerekJohnson said:and people are fighting this, if you can believe it.
-
Can't wait for you who love to restrict speech have a problem with itTheKobeStopper said:https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-politics-and-policy/florida-house-passes-dont-say-gay-bill-rcna17532
They also passed a law banning talking about sexual orientation. I can’t wait for you free speech warriors to get ahold of this. -
We’re not banning speech, we’re creating boundaries.
A new low. -
And usual, TKS only read the headline before he posted a red hearing.RaceBannon said:
Can't wait for you who love to restrict speech have a problem with itTheKobeStopper said:https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-politics-and-policy/florida-house-passes-dont-say-gay-bill-rcna17532
They also passed a law banning talking about sexual orientation. I can’t wait for you free speech warriors to get ahold of this. -
RaceBannon said:
"Creating boundaries at an early age of what is appropriate in our schools, when we are funding our schools, is not hate," Harding said. "It’s actually providing boundaries, and it’s fair to our teachers and our school districts to know what we expect."
Harding has repeatedly stressed that the bill would not prohibit students from talking about their LGBTQ families or classroom discussions about LGBTQ history, including events such as the 2016 attack on the Pulse nightclub, a gay club in Orlando.
Good. Schools and parents set the curriculum
Run against it. It worked in Virginia
Horrific.
“Classroom instruction by school personnel or third parties on sexual orientation or gender identity may not occur in kindergarten through grade 3 or in a manner that is not age-appropriate or developmentally appropriate for students in accordance with state standards.”
I can see why this would offend a person who is aghast that someone would suggest giving a child sex hormones is wrong. -
Political correctness fan says what?TheKobeStopper said:We’re not banning speech, we’re creating boundaries.
A new low. -
How is it banning speech….in your own wordsTheKobeStopper said:We’re not banning speech, we’re creating boundaries.
A new low.
Again, you just read the headline.
And why are you against financial literacy….oh wait, nevermind, don’t need it when you’re dependent on the government. -
“A school district may not encourage classroom discussion about sexual orientation or gender identity in primary grade levels or in a manner that is not age appropriate or developmentally appropriate for students”MikeDamone said:
How is it banning speech….in your own wordsTheKobeStopper said:We’re not banning speech, we’re creating boundaries.
A new low.
Again, you just read the headline.
And why are you against financial literacy….oh wait, nevermind, don’t need it when you’re dependent on the government.
Parents “may bring action against a school district to obtain a declaratory judgement that a school district procedure or practice violates this paragraph and seek injunctive relief. A court may award damages…”
Oh you thought it was going to be very specific language and not so wildly vague that any students parents can now sue for any discussion around gender and orientation that they view as not age appropriate?
“Classical liberal” -
Classical woketard.TheKobeStopper said:
“A school district may not encourage classroom discussion about sexual orientation or gender identity in primary grade levels or in a manner that is not age appropriate or developmentally appropriate for students”MikeDamone said:
How is it banning speech….in your own wordsTheKobeStopper said:We’re not banning speech, we’re creating boundaries.
A new low.
Again, you just read the headline.
And why are you against financial literacy….oh wait, nevermind, don’t need it when you’re dependent on the government.
Parents “may bring action against a school district to obtain a declaratory judgement that a school district procedure or practice violates this paragraph and seek injunctive relief. A court may award damages…”
Oh you thought it was going to be very specific language and not so wildly vague that any students parents can now sue for any discussion around gender and orientation that they view as not age appropriate?
“Classical liberal” -
They already understand credit scores. They're racist. There is no debt, the government should just forgive it.WestlinnDuck said:
Do they really need to know how to create a budget? Next, you will be expecting students to understand a credit score, the rule of compound interest, the actual cost of debt. Then what? An understanding of return on investment? Geezus, the insanity of these white supremacists. Let's stick to the basics like getting a state ID and logging on to a computer.Southerndawg said:
Sadly, I believe it. Kids really need help in this area. Start them out with the tools they need and many will realize financial independence. The left cannot stand this. They rely on a dependent class to retain power.DerekJohnson said:and people are fighting this, if you can believe it.
-
Someone starts a thread about a positive topic, wokester feels the need to engage in whataboutism.
-
“A school district may not encourage classroom discussion about sexual orientation or gender identity in primary grade levels or in a manner that is not age appropriate or developmentally appropriate for students”
Kobe is OUTRAGED that there isn't more trannie talk with 2nd graders. Or are you so fucking ignorant that you don't know what the "primary grade levels" are Kobe? Go ahead Kobe, tell us why 1st graders should be discussing sexual orientation you fucking freak. -
You still don’t understand what classical liberalism is. That much is clear. A Classical liberal position is fuck this shit all together. There should be school vouchers with 100% school choice. Parents who want their kids taught in kindergarten how to use a condom can send their kids to the schools that teach that, parents that don’t can pick a different school. No law like this needed. Fucking dimwit.TheKobeStopper said:
“A school district may not encourage classroom discussion about sexual orientation or gender identity in primary grade levels or in a manner that is not age appropriate or developmentally appropriate for students”MikeDamone said:
How is it banning speech….in your own wordsTheKobeStopper said:We’re not banning speech, we’re creating boundaries.
A new low.
Again, you just read the headline.
And why are you against financial literacy….oh wait, nevermind, don’t need it when you’re dependent on the government.
Parents “may bring action against a school district to obtain a declaratory judgement that a school district procedure or practice violates this paragraph and seek injunctive relief. A court may award damages…”
Oh you thought it was going to be very specific language and not so wildly vague that any students parents can now sue for any discussion around gender and orientation that they view as not age appropriate?
“Classical liberal”
Yet here we are…. Some dumb ass like you actually thinks this has something to do with the first amendment. JFC. -
Kobe wants schools to be prohibited from saying things he doesn't like such as there are two genders
Nothing to see here
Parents and the school bored can decide what to teach
The left knows this killed them in Virginia yet here they are
Get it yet? -
You can run around claiming your switch hitting identity all you want but it doesn't belong in schools. Now fuck off moron!TheKobeStopper said:https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-politics-and-policy/florida-house-passes-dont-say-gay-bill-rcna17532
They also passed a law banning talking about sexual orientation. I can’t wait for you free speech warriors to get ahold of this. -
Since you're in favor of grade school children having their sex parts mutilated, it doesn't surprise me that you're in favor of sexual orientation being taught to these same kids. We are mostly talking about Kindergarten to 6th graders. Which makes you one sick son of a bitch.TheKobeStopper said:
“A school district may not encourage classroom discussion about sexual orientation or gender identity in primary grade levels or in a manner that is not age appropriate or developmentally appropriate for students”MikeDamone said:
How is it banning speech….in your own wordsTheKobeStopper said:We’re not banning speech, we’re creating boundaries.
A new low.
Again, you just read the headline.
And why are you against financial literacy….oh wait, nevermind, don’t need it when you’re dependent on the government.
Parents “may bring action against a school district to obtain a declaratory judgement that a school district procedure or practice violates this paragraph and seek injunctive relief. A court may award damages…”
Oh you thought it was going to be very specific language and not so wildly vague that any students parents can now sue for any discussion around gender and orientation that they view as not age appropriate?
“Classical liberal” -
But the first amendment!Sledog said:
You can run around claiming your switch hitting identity all you want but it doesn't belong in schools. Now fuck off moron!TheKobeStopper said:https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-politics-and-policy/florida-house-passes-dont-say-gay-bill-rcna17532
They also passed a law banning talking about sexual orientation. I can’t wait for you free speech warriors to get ahold of this. -
Kobe mad because first graders can't learn about the pleasure of blowing a trannie.TheKobeStopper said:https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-politics-and-policy/florida-house-passes-dont-say-gay-bill-rcna17532
They also passed a law banning talking about sexual orientation. I can’t wait for you free speech warriors to get ahold of this. -
Someone seems to be into grooming them young.
-
Schools should not be training grounds for you commie pieces of garbage. You are a braindead idiot.TheKobeStopper said:We’re not banning speech, we’re creating boundaries.
A new low. -
There is no reason for a public school teacher to ever be discussing sexual orientation with an 8 year old yet Kobe the fucking freak, who I'll guarantee you has no kids, thinks it's perfectly fine and acceptable.46XiJCAB said:Someone seems to be into grooming them young.
-
Can we just keep all of the leftist lunatics out of FL and TX? We're debating where to spend our golden years and we don't want any trash around us.
