We’re not banning speech, we’re creating boundaries.
A new low.
How is it banning speech….in your own words
Again, you just read the headline.
And why are you against financial literacy….oh wait, nevermind, don’t need it when you’re dependent on the government.
“A school district may not encourage classroom discussion about sexual orientation or gender identity in primary grade levels or in a manner that is not age appropriate or developmentally appropriate for students”
Parents “may bring action against a school district to obtain a declaratory judgement that a school district procedure or practice violates this paragraph and seek injunctive relief. A court may award damages…”
Oh you thought it was going to be very specific language and not so wildly vague that any students parents can now sue for any discussion around gender and orientation that they view as not age appropriate?
“Classical liberal”
You still don’t understand what classical liberalism is. That much is clear. A Classical liberal position is fuck this shit all together. There should be school vouchers with 100% school choice. Parents who want their kids taught in kindergarten how to use a condom can send their kids to the schools that teach that, parents that don’t can pick a different school. No law like this needed. Fucking dimwit.
Yet here we are…. Some dumb ass like you actually thinks this has something to do with the first amendment. JFC.
We’re not banning speech, we’re creating boundaries.
A new low.
How is it banning speech….in your own words
Again, you just read the headline.
And why are you against financial literacy….oh wait, nevermind, don’t need it when you’re dependent on the government.
“A school district may not encourage classroom discussion about sexual orientation or gender identity in primary grade levels or in a manner that is not age appropriate or developmentally appropriate for students”
Parents “may bring action against a school district to obtain a declaratory judgement that a school district procedure or practice violates this paragraph and seek injunctive relief. A court may award damages…”
Oh you thought it was going to be very specific language and not so wildly vague that any students parents can now sue for any discussion around gender and orientation that they view as not age appropriate?
“Classical liberal”
Since you're in favor of grade school children having their sex parts mutilated, it doesn't surprise me that you're in favor of sexual orientation being taught to these same kids. We are mostly talking about Kindergarten to 6th graders. Which makes you one sick son of a bitch.
There is no reason for a public school teacher to ever be discussing sexual orientation with an 8 year old yet Kobe the fucking freak, who I'll guarantee you has no kids, thinks it's perfectly fine and acceptable.
Comments
Yet here we are…. Some dumb ass like you actually thinks this has something to do with the first amendment. JFC.
Nothing to see here
Parents and the school bored can decide what to teach
The left knows this killed them in Virginia yet here they are
Get it yet?