Freedom Convoy organizer Tamara Lich denied bail
Comments
-
Biden thinks parents of school kids are terrorists. He routinely calls his opponents racist and his underlings call us terrorists and nazis and confederates
As does H. I know he agrees with the fascist. He is one
But no mean tweets
H also thinks the unvaxxed should be denied medical care
-
HHusky: "It's not tyranny if it's allowed under law."HHusky said:
Whether you think Canada's Emergency Powers Act is a good law or not, it is a lawfully enacted statute, and we are well removed from its 1988 passage, so it isn't some hastily erected device designed to give Justin Trudeau supreme and perpetual power. Those powers have to be renewed by Parliament, as I understand it. These things alone make the situation very much unlike Vlad Putin signing a bill he asked for that makes Vlad Putin President for Life. What we have in Canada is not tyranny and it may even be wise to have such a law on the books. Whether there were better options than invoking the law in any particular case is a fair question, of course.Swaye said:
I will not go into the summer of love and your position on that, but instead will pivot and say that I actually agree with you on one vital point - the truckers should not have been allowed to shut down city and bridge movement indefinitely. I think they should have made their point for a week, made a lot of discomfort, then gone and parked the trucks legally somewhere and continued their peaceful protest complete with bouncy castles on the streets, but sans illegally parked trucks. I actually believe just not delivering supplies to the cities for about a month would have made their point way better than the bridge fiasco to be completely honest.HHusky said:
I don't think "protests" should be permitted to shut a city down indefinitely. I don't really care what the cause is or whether I agree with it or not.hardhat said:Who was hysterical about 'fascism' and 'daddy' the past five years? And who is cheering on fascism and authoritarian actions now?
Ann Davison voter here.
See I can't be a "law and order" guy and say anything else. Make your point with civil disobedience, then follow the law and continue your protest. This is how I would have done things.
So, since we are all being honest now, will you concede that labelling them all as terrorists and freezing their bank accounts is an enormous overreach and tyrannical act? Couldn't some tow truck providers have been compelled to tow the trucks without stealing the bank accounts? And what about the people who sent them 100 bucks? Should they be labelled terrorists and have their bank accounts stolen as well? I mean that is what is happening. Or is Trudy acting like a fascist and a liar? I am wondering what your honest opinion is about BOTH sides.
@HHusky
"Make your point with civil disobedience, then follow the law and continue your protest." I strongly agree.
I was as weary with the "Summer of Love" as anyone. Cops kill too many people unnecessarily in this country. We get it; I've said it myself. But I still don't want my town to be a war zone, and I voted against any candidate who thought we could solve society's ills by cutting some arbitrary percentage of funding from the police. If anything, we need to make becoming a police officer a more competitive process, attracting better candidates. That would imply more funding, not less.
Freezing accounts? I prefer it to open warfare, and it is one of the emergency powers the Canadian statute provides, not something the current government invented on the spot. Freezing accounts is much different than seizing them. The former is potentially a useful, temporary emergency power; the latter should require due process. As with most harsh measures, the devil is in the details. -
The POS that murdered the Uber driver with 4 kids was out on bail. She begged for her life and he shot her in the back of the head. Cause too many black guys in prison or something, something.RaceBannon said:The guy who shot that mayor got bail
Many fine criminals get out on no bail and offend again and again
And people just take it because to point it out isn't classy
-
Shitty human being says what?HHusky said:Public bail hearing is fascist too? You gals do get hysterical.
-
Shitty human being says what?HHusky said: -
Shitty human being says what?HHusky said:
Mostly peaceful blockade.RaceBannon said:
Peaceful protest and no bail period -
Shitty human being says what?HHusky said:
I don't think "protests" should be permitted to shut a city down indefinitely. I don't really care what the cause is or whether I agree with it or not.hardhat said:Who was hysterical about 'fascism' and 'daddy' the past five years? And who is cheering on fascism and authoritarian actions now?
Ann Davison voter here. -
He gives bootlickers a bad name, they disown him because they have more character.RaceBannon said:
Fuck off boot lickerHHusky said:
Mostly peaceful blockade.RaceBannon said:
Peaceful protest and no bail period -
Shitty human being says what?HHusky said:
I didn't, but please add it to the list of my imagined sins.RaceBannon said:
You cared so much you stayed silent for the year of 2020HHusky said:
I don't think "protests" should be permitted to shut a city down indefinitely. I don't really care what the cause is or whether I agree with it or not.hardhat said:Who was hysterical about 'fascism' and 'daddy' the past five years? And who is cheering on fascism and authoritarian actions now?
Ann Davison voter here.
Fuck off -
Shitty human being says what?HHusky said:
Whether you think Canada's Emergency Powers Act is a good law or not, it is a lawfully enacted statute, and we are well removed from its 1988 passage, so it isn't some hastily erected device designed to give Justin Trudeau supreme and perpetual power. Those powers have to be renewed by Parliament, as I understand it. These things alone make the situation very much unlike Vlad Putin signing a bill he asked for that makes Vlad Putin President for Life. What we have in Canada is not tyranny and it may even be wise to have such a law on the books. Whether there were better options than invoking the law in any particular case is a fair question, of course.Swaye said:
I will not go into the summer of love and your position on that, but instead will pivot and say that I actually agree with you on one vital point - the truckers should not have been allowed to shut down city and bridge movement indefinitely. I think they should have made their point for a week, made a lot of discomfort, then gone and parked the trucks legally somewhere and continued their peaceful protest complete with bouncy castles on the streets, but sans illegally parked trucks. I actually believe just not delivering supplies to the cities for about a month would have made their point way better than the bridge fiasco to be completely honest.HHusky said:
I don't think "protests" should be permitted to shut a city down indefinitely. I don't really care what the cause is or whether I agree with it or not.hardhat said:Who was hysterical about 'fascism' and 'daddy' the past five years? And who is cheering on fascism and authoritarian actions now?
Ann Davison voter here.
See I can't be a "law and order" guy and say anything else. Make your point with civil disobedience, then follow the law and continue your protest. This is how I would have done things.
So, since we are all being honest now, will you concede that labelling them all as terrorists and freezing their bank accounts is an enormous overreach and tyrannical act? Couldn't some tow truck providers have been compelled to tow the trucks without stealing the bank accounts? And what about the people who sent them 100 bucks? Should they be labelled terrorists and have their bank accounts stolen as well? I mean that is what is happening. Or is Trudy acting like a fascist and a liar? I am wondering what your honest opinion is about BOTH sides.
@HHusky
"Make your point with civil disobedience, then follow the law and continue your protest." I strongly agree.
I was as weary with the "Summer of Love" as anyone. Cops kill too many people unnecessarily in this country. We get it; I've said it myself. But I still don't want my town to be a war zone, and I voted against any candidate who thought we could solve society's ills by cutting some arbitrary percentage of funding from the police. If anything, we need to make becoming a police officer a more competitive process, attracting better candidates. That would imply more funding, not less.
Freezing accounts? I prefer it to open warfare, and it is one of the emergency powers the Canadian statute provides, not something the current government invented on the spot. Freezing accounts is much different than seizing them. The former is potentially a useful, temporary emergency power; the latter should require due process. As with most harsh measures, the devil is in the details.


