Oregon has 1 rose bowl win in a century
Comments
-
I like what you're trying to do here but you picked the wrong bored. Here you go.
-
Arizona has never been to a rose bowl. In case you're wondering
-
-
DOOG POST O' THE WEEK!
-
-
From 2006 to 2013 Boise's SRS was #11. During that tenure Oregon was #1. I can guarantee UW has never been #1 over more than 90-92. Pretty incredible feat for Oregon.
-
College football history started in 2006.HeretoBeatmyChest said:From 2006 to 2013 Boise's SRS was #11. During that tenure Oregon was #1. I can guarantee UW has never been #1 over more than 90-92. Pretty incredible feat for Oregon.
Also, any system that considers Oregon better than Alabama from 2006 to 2013 is fucking stupid. -
Gil Dobie and I laugh at that statement.HeretoBeatmyChest said:From 2006 to 2013 Boise's SRS was #11. During that tenure Oregon was #1. I can guarantee UW has never been #1 over more than 90-92. Pretty incredible feat for Oregon.
-
When one of my good buddies told me he was going to Oregon, I told him they had a great gas pumping degree ROFL!!!12!!!!!
-
It's a flawed system, gives too much credit for blow out wins, and too little credit to teams that win with defense.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
College football history started in 2006.HeretoBeatmyChest said:From 2006 to 2013 Boise's SRS was #11. During that tenure Oregon was #1. I can guarantee UW has never been #1 over more than 90-92. Pretty incredible feat for Oregon.
Also, any system that considers Oregon better than Alabama from 2006 to 2013 is fucking stupid. -
agree and disagree. Yes it puts way too much into blow out wins.Southerndawg said:
It's a flawed system, gives too much credit for blow out wins, and too little credit to teams that win with defense.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
College football history started in 2006.HeretoBeatmyChest said:From 2006 to 2013 Boise's SRS was #11. During that tenure Oregon was #1. I can guarantee UW has never been #1 over more than 90-92. Pretty incredible feat for Oregon.
Also, any system that considers Oregon better than Alabama from 2006 to 2013 is fucking stupid.
Winning with defense doesn't necessarily not produce blowouts though. Look at the seahawks this season
-
In the most important game, the Seahawk defense outscored the supposedly best offense in football. That's what I saw.dhdawg said:
agree and disagree. Yes it puts way too much into blow out wins.Southerndawg said:
It's a flawed system, gives too much credit for blow out wins, and too little credit to teams that win with defense.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
College football history started in 2006.HeretoBeatmyChest said:From 2006 to 2013 Boise's SRS was #11. During that tenure Oregon was #1. I can guarantee UW has never been #1 over more than 90-92. Pretty incredible feat for Oregon.
Also, any system that considers Oregon better than Alabama from 2006 to 2013 is fucking stupid.
Winning with defense doesn't necessarily not produce blowouts though. Look at the seahawks this season -
...and it was against Russell Wilson
-
Oregon also has 1 appearance in an actual BCS championship game that's won or lost on the field, not voted on and shared with other teams we've never played. Rather be us than you. Fuck off. Duckade.
-
TierbsHsotBoobs said:
DOOG POST O' THE MONTH!
-
oregonblitzkrieg said:
Oregon also has 1 appearance in an actual BCS championship game that's won or lost on the field, not voted on and shared with other teams we've never played. Rather be us than you. Fuck off. Duckade.
-
You beat Sark and Ty and made t-shirts?
