Home› Hardcore Husky Board

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Ed Cunningham sucking off on sark on 710

dhdawgdhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
in Hardcore Husky Board
mynorthwest.com/category/pod_player_sports/?a=9975989&p=1013&n=Danny,%20Dave%20and%20Moore
Beginning of the podcast. "I don't know if Peterson is an upgrade"
"Sark didn't get enough credit"
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1

Comments

  • gmogmo Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 3,725 Swaye's Wigwam
    voted up for Cuntingham
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CokeGreaterThanPepsiCokeGreaterThanPepsi Member Posts: 7,646
    Sweet Jake Locker, what is he talking about?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • haiehaie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 21,506 Swaye's Wigwam
    HuskyJW said:

    Sark did an ok job....to say he sucked would be inaccurate. To say he brought us back would be inaccurate also.

    We paid him a shitload of money though to do an ok job. A lot of coaches could have done what he did though.....Peterman is an upgrade and anybody that says different needs to DIAFF.

    Harbaug and Chimp had a belly laugh over this.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HeretoBeatmyChestHeretoBeatmyChest Member Posts: 4,295
    edited August 2014
    Ed will say something smart and insightful and then something totally ridiculous.

    He spoke highly of UW's DL & defense and said Oregon is just a touch better. He basically intimated that UW should be 5-0 into Eugene and that if a few things go wrong for Oregon (over the course of the year) UW could be in the Pac12 title game.

    Then he goes on to blow Sark and say Petersen is a great hire but not an upgrade. Then he says Oregon's strong program is a result of marketing/branding and Rich Brooks set the foundation.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    HeretoBeatmyChest said:

    Ed will say something smart and insightful and then something totally ridiculous.

    He spoke highly of UW's DL & defense and said Oregon is just a touch better. He basically intimated that UW should be 1-0 into Eugene and that if a few things go wrong for Oregon (over the course of the year) UW could be in the Pac12 title game.

    Then he goes on to blow Sark and say Petersen is a great hire but not an upgrade. Then he says Oregon's strong program is a result of marketing/branding and Rich Brooks set the foundation.

    Fixed. Look at the fucking schedule.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HuskyJWHuskyJW Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 14,332 Swaye's Wigwam
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    HuskyJW said:

    Sark did an ok job....to say he sucked would be inaccurate. To say he brought us back would be inaccurate also.

    We paid him a shitload of money though to do an ok job. A lot of coaches could have done what he did though.....Peterman is an upgrade and anybody that says different needs to DIAFF.

    24-21 in the conference is OK at Oregon State.

    At WASHINGTON (RIP), it fucking sucks.
    If you are going to skew the stats by looking at his entire body of work than I can't help you.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • sarktasticsarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    Cuntingham will be proven right when Sark gets to 35-29 at USC that includes impressive blowout wins over a handful of FCS schools
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HeretoBeatmyChestHeretoBeatmyChest Member Posts: 4,295
    24-21 in the pac-12.

    19-21 in the pac-10.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • EsophagealFecesEsophagealFeces Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,895 Swaye's Wigwam
    You guys still have no idea the damage Ty did. Owen Twelve was crippling, and he left no talent on the roster. Sark practically saved Warshington.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • whatshouldicareaboutwhatshouldicareabout Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,708 Swaye's Wigwam
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    HeretoBeatmyChest said:

    24-21 in the pac-12.

    19-21 in the pac-10.

    You still have Cal too high.

    14-21 in the Pac-9.

    So you're telling me OSU and Wazzu are equal to USC and Oregon??

    7-18 versus the important Pac-12 teams
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • sarktasticsarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    HeretoBeatmyChest said:

    24-21 in the pac-12.

    19-21 in the pac-10.</blockquote

    While it makes sense to give credit to Sark for those 19 wins, 20 of those 21 losses can be directly tied to Ty

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    whatshouldicareabout said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    HeretoBeatmyChest said:

    24-21 in the pac-12.

    19-21 in the pac-10.

    You still have Cal too high.

    14-21 in the Pac-9.

    So you're telling me OSU and Wazzu are equal to USC and Oregon??

    7-18 versus the important Pac-12 teams

    My post had nothing to do with OS, WSU, USC, or Oregon.

    Hope this helps.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.