Hey Kobe, what do you call it when the government and Big business team up...

Comments
-
I call it the consequences of the action of baby boomers. The dominant voting bloc for years that allowed and encouraged things like citizens united, creating an oligarchy.
-
TheKobeStopper said:
I call it the consequences of the action of baby boomers. The dominant voting bloc for years that allowed and encouraged things like citizens united, creating an oligarchy.
-
Good Christ. Have ever cracked an Econ book not written by Engels or Marx?TheKobeStopper said:I call it the consequences of the action of baby boomers. The dominant voting bloc for years that allowed and encouraged things like citizens united, creating an oligarchy.
I do have a tangent question. You’re against citizens United, but you didn’t comment on Union political contributions. I assume you have no issue there?
Also, to answer the original question for you, that is fascism defined. And you voted for it. -
I think elections should be publicly funded with no outside money allowed. Within our current system, I view taking money from unions as a better option.MikeDamone said:
Good Christ. Have ever cracked an Econ book not written by Engels or Marx?TheKobeStopper said:I call it the consequences of the action of baby boomers. The dominant voting bloc for years that allowed and encouraged things like citizens united, creating an oligarchy.
I do have a tangent question. You’re against citizens United, but you didn’t comment on Union political contributions. I assume you have no issue there?
Also, to answer the original question for you, that is fascism defined. And you voted for it. -
See?TheKobeStopper said:
I think elections should be publicly funded with no outside money allowed. Within our current system, I view taking money from unions as a better option.MikeDamone said:
Good Christ. Have ever cracked an Econ book not written by Engels or Marx?TheKobeStopper said:I call it the consequences of the action of baby boomers. The dominant voting bloc for years that allowed and encouraged things like citizens united, creating an oligarchy.
I do have a tangent question. You’re against citizens United, but you didn’t comment on Union political contributions. I assume you have no issue there?
Also, to answer the original question for you, that is fascism defined. And you voted for it.
-
No.MikeDamone said:
See?TheKobeStopper said:
I think elections should be publicly funded with no outside money allowed. Within our current system, I view taking money from unions as a better option.MikeDamone said:
Good Christ. Have ever cracked an Econ book not written by Engels or Marx?TheKobeStopper said:I call it the consequences of the action of baby boomers. The dominant voting bloc for years that allowed and encouraged things like citizens united, creating an oligarchy.
I do have a tangent question. You’re against citizens United, but you didn’t comment on Union political contributions. I assume you have no issue there?
Also, to answer the original question for you, that is fascism defined. And you voted for it. -
We know you don't.TheKobeStopper said:
No.MikeDamone said:
See?TheKobeStopper said:
I think elections should be publicly funded with no outside money allowed. Within our current system, I view taking money from unions as a better option.MikeDamone said:
Good Christ. Have ever cracked an Econ book not written by Engels or Marx?TheKobeStopper said:I call it the consequences of the action of baby boomers. The dominant voting bloc for years that allowed and encouraged things like citizens united, creating an oligarchy.
I do have a tangent question. You’re against citizens United, but you didn’t comment on Union political contributions. I assume you have no issue there?
Also, to answer the original question for you, that is fascism defined. And you voted for it. -
Weird how Kobe has no problem voting for fascism.MikeDamone said:
Good Christ. Have ever cracked an Econ book not written by Engels or Marx?TheKobeStopper said:I call it the consequences of the action of baby boomers. The dominant voting bloc for years that allowed and encouraged things like citizens united, creating an oligarchy.
I do have a tangent question. You’re against citizens United, but you didn’t comment on Union political contributions. I assume you have no issue there?
Also, to answer the original question for you, that is fascism defined. And you voted for it. -
It’s called libertarian socialism.
-
I'll take Oxymoron's (emphasis on moron) for 500, AlexBob_C said:It’s called libertarian socialism.
-
-
JFC. Of course this from a person that believes a guy who thinks he is a women is an actual woman.TheKobeStopper said:
And thanks for admitting (again) that you are a communist.
But as we know from TKS copy pasta from last week, he has to google shit to have any thoughts to post. -
Anyone want to see a jackass dance?TheKobeStopper said:I call it the consequences of the action of baby boomers. The dominant voting bloc for years that allowed and encouraged things like citizens united, creating an oligarchy.
Kobe, in your own words tell us how CU created an oligarchy?
-
is a form of power structure in which power rests with a small number of peopleSFGbob said:
Anyone want to see a jackass dance?TheKobeStopper said:I call it the consequences of the action of baby boomers. The dominant voting bloc for years that allowed and encouraged things like citizens united, creating an oligarchy.
Kobe, in your own words tell us how CU created an oligarchy?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oligarchy
While wealthy donors, corporations, and special interest groups have long had an outsized influence in elections, that sway has dramatically expanded since the Citizens United decision
https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/citizens-united-explained
Respectful reminder Bobby, you’re dumb. Just because you can’t figure something out, doesn’t mean it’s hard to figure out. -
We?TheKobeStopper said: -
Google says so. It has to be true.
-
Wow. TKS googled some shit again. Impressive.TheKobeStopper said:
is a form of power structure in which power rests with a small number of peopleSFGbob said:
Anyone want to see a jackass dance?TheKobeStopper said:I call it the consequences of the action of baby boomers. The dominant voting bloc for years that allowed and encouraged things like citizens united, creating an oligarchy.
Kobe, in your own words tell us how CU created an oligarchy?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oligarchy
While wealthy donors, corporations, and special interest groups have long had an outsized influence in elections, that sway has dramatically expanded since the Citizens United decision
https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/citizens-united-explained
Respectful reminder Bobby, you’re dumb. Just because you can’t figure something out, doesn’t mean it’s hard to figure out.
Now do unions. -
So you couldn’t do it, and I’m dumb?TheKobeStopper said:
is a form of power structure in which power rests with a small number of peopleSFGbob said:
Anyone want to see a jackass dance?TheKobeStopper said:I call it the consequences of the action of baby boomers. The dominant voting bloc for years that allowed and encouraged things like citizens united, creating an oligarchy.
Kobe, in your own words tell us how CU created an oligarchy?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oligarchy
While wealthy donors, corporations, and special interest groups have long had an outsized influence in elections, that sway has dramatically expanded since the Citizens United decision
https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/citizens-united-explained
Respectful reminder Bobby, you’re dumb. Just because you can’t figure something out, doesn’t mean it’s hard to figure out. -
Citizens United was the result of the US Constitution and the clearly written first amendment. The only "oligarchy" that wants it illegal to make a movie critical of a Presidential candidate was the democratic party and all four leftards on the US Supreme Court. Other than that, you nailed it. Scratch a leftist, find a fascist.TheKobeStopper said:I call it the consequences of the action of baby boomers. The dominant voting bloc for years that allowed and encouraged things like citizens united, creating an oligarchy.
-
TKS defined
-
To have your panties in a twist about Citizens United while you're completely silent about the influence and power of public employee unions is peak Kobe.MikeDamone said:
Wow. TKS googled some shit again. Impressive.TheKobeStopper said:
is a form of power structure in which power rests with a small number of peopleSFGbob said:
Anyone want to see a jackass dance?TheKobeStopper said:I call it the consequences of the action of baby boomers. The dominant voting bloc for years that allowed and encouraged things like citizens united, creating an oligarchy.
Kobe, in your own words tell us how CU created an oligarchy?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oligarchy
While wealthy donors, corporations, and special interest groups have long had an outsized influence in elections, that sway has dramatically expanded since the Citizens United decision
https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/citizens-united-explained
Respectful reminder Bobby, you’re dumb. Just because you can’t figure something out, doesn’t mean it’s hard to figure out.
Now do unions. -
Kobe do you have a single original thought in that smooth little brain of yours? JFC