Hey Kobe, what do you call it when the government and Big business team up...

SFGbob

in order to push policies that get rid of competition for the companies and silences critics of the government?

http://twitter.com/Mediaite/status/1481656301113331719

TheKobeStopper

I call it the consequences of the action of baby boomers. The dominant voting bloc for years that allowed and encouraged things like citizens united, creating an oligarchy.

Southerndawg

TheKobeStopper said:

I call it the consequences of the action of baby boomers. The dominant voting bloc for years that allowed and encouraged things like citizens united, creating an oligarchy.

MikeDamone

TheKobeStopper said:

I call it the consequences of the action of baby boomers. The dominant voting bloc for years that allowed and encouraged things like citizens united, creating an oligarchy.

Good Christ. Have ever cracked an Econ book not written by Engels or Marx?

I do have a tangent question. You’re against citizens United, but you didn’t comment on Union political contributions. I assume you have no issue there?


Also, to answer the original question for you, that is fascism defined. And you voted for it.

TheKobeStopper

MikeDamone said:

TheKobeStopper said:

I call it the consequences of the action of baby boomers. The dominant voting bloc for years that allowed and encouraged things like citizens united, creating an oligarchy.

Good Christ. Have ever cracked an Econ book not written by Engels or Marx?

I do have a tangent question. You’re against citizens United, but you didn’t comment on Union political contributions. I assume you have no issue there?


Also, to answer the original question for you, that is fascism defined. And you voted for it.

I think elections should be publicly funded with no outside money allowed. Within our current system, I view taking money from unions as a better option.

MikeDamone

TheKobeStopper said:

MikeDamone said:

TheKobeStopper said:

I call it the consequences of the action of baby boomers. The dominant voting bloc for years that allowed and encouraged things like citizens united, creating an oligarchy.

Good Christ. Have ever cracked an Econ book not written by Engels or Marx?

I do have a tangent question. You’re against citizens United, but you didn’t comment on Union political contributions. I assume you have no issue there?


Also, to answer the original question for you, that is fascism defined. And you voted for it.

I think elections should be publicly funded with no outside money allowed. Within our current system, I view taking money from unions as a better option.

See?

TheKobeStopper

MikeDamone said:

TheKobeStopper said:

MikeDamone said:

TheKobeStopper said:

I call it the consequences of the action of baby boomers. The dominant voting bloc for years that allowed and encouraged things like citizens united, creating an oligarchy.

Good Christ. Have ever cracked an Econ book not written by Engels or Marx?

I do have a tangent question. You’re against citizens United, but you didn’t comment on Union political contributions. I assume you have no issue there?


Also, to answer the original question for you, that is fascism defined. And you voted for it.

I think elections should be publicly funded with no outside money allowed. Within our current system, I view taking money from unions as a better option.

See?

No.

MikeDamone

TheKobeStopper said:

MikeDamone said:

TheKobeStopper said:

MikeDamone said:

TheKobeStopper said:

I call it the consequences of the action of baby boomers. The dominant voting bloc for years that allowed and encouraged things like citizens united, creating an oligarchy.

Good Christ. Have ever cracked an Econ book not written by Engels or Marx?

I do have a tangent question. You’re against citizens United, but you didn’t comment on Union political contributions. I assume you have no issue there?


Also, to answer the original question for you, that is fascism defined. And you voted for it.

I think elections should be publicly funded with no outside money allowed. Within our current system, I view taking money from unions as a better option.

See?

No.

We know you don't.

SFGbob

MikeDamone said:

TheKobeStopper said:

I call it the consequences of the action of baby boomers. The dominant voting bloc for years that allowed and encouraged things like citizens united, creating an oligarchy.

Good Christ. Have ever cracked an Econ book not written by Engels or Marx?

I do have a tangent question. You’re against citizens United, but you didn’t comment on Union political contributions. I assume you have no issue there?


Also, to answer the original question for you, that is fascism defined. And you voted for it.

Weird how Kobe has no problem voting for fascism.

Bob_C

It’s called libertarian socialism.

pawz

Bob_C said:

It’s called libertarian socialism.

I'll take Oxymoron's (emphasis on moron) for 500, Alex

TheKobeStopper

pawz said:

Bob_C said:

It’s called libertarian socialism.

I'll take Oxymoron's (emphasis on moron) for 500, Alex

We literally invented it.

pawz

TheKobeStopper said:

pawz said:

Bob_C said:

It’s called libertarian socialism.

I'll take Oxymoron's (emphasis on moron) for 500, Alex

We literally invented it.

And?

Fucktarded then, it's fucktarded now.


Also continues to be an oxymoron.

MikeDamone

TheKobeStopper said:

pawz said:

Bob_C said:

It’s called libertarian socialism.

I'll take Oxymoron's (emphasis on moron) for 500, Alex

We literally invented it.

JFC. Of course this from a person that believes a guy who thinks he is a women is an actual woman.

And thanks for admitting (again) that you are a communist.

But as we know from TKS copy pasta from last week, he has to google shit to have any thoughts to post.

SFGbob

TheKobeStopper said:

I call it the consequences of the action of baby boomers. The dominant voting bloc for years that allowed and encouraged things like citizens united, creating an oligarchy.

Anyone want to see a jackass dance?

Kobe, in your own words tell us how CU created an oligarchy?

TheKobeStopper

SFGbob said:

TheKobeStopper said:

I call it the consequences of the action of baby boomers. The dominant voting bloc for years that allowed and encouraged things like citizens united, creating an oligarchy.

Anyone want to see a jackass dance?

Kobe, in your own words tell us how CU created an oligarchy?

is a form of power structure in which power rests with a small number of people

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oligarchy

While wealthy donors, corporations, and special interest groups have long had an outsized influence in elections, that sway has dramatically expanded since the Citizens United decision

https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/citizens-united-explained

Respectful reminder Bobby, you’re dumb. Just because you can’t figure something out, doesn’t mean it’s hard to figure out.

Sources

TheKobeStopper said:

pawz said:

Bob_C said:

It’s called libertarian socialism.

I'll take Oxymoron's (emphasis on moron) for 500, Alex

We literally invented it.

We?

PurpleThrobber

Google says so. It has to be true.

MikeDamone

TheKobeStopper said:

SFGbob said:

TheKobeStopper said:

I call it the consequences of the action of baby boomers. The dominant voting bloc for years that allowed and encouraged things like citizens united, creating an oligarchy.

Anyone want to see a jackass dance?

Kobe, in your own words tell us how CU created an oligarchy?

is a form of power structure in which power rests with a small number of people

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oligarchy

While wealthy donors, corporations, and special interest groups have long had an outsized influence in elections, that sway has dramatically expanded since the Citizens United decision

https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/citizens-united-explained

Respectful reminder Bobby, you’re dumb. Just because you can’t figure something out, doesn’t mean it’s hard to figure out.

Wow. TKS googled some shit again. Impressive.

Now do unions.

SFGbob

TheKobeStopper said:

SFGbob said:

TheKobeStopper said:

I call it the consequences of the action of baby boomers. The dominant voting bloc for years that allowed and encouraged things like citizens united, creating an oligarchy.

Anyone want to see a jackass dance?

Kobe, in your own words tell us how CU created an oligarchy?

is a form of power structure in which power rests with a small number of people

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oligarchy

While wealthy donors, corporations, and special interest groups have long had an outsized influence in elections, that sway has dramatically expanded since the Citizens United decision

https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/citizens-united-explained

Respectful reminder Bobby, you’re dumb. Just because you can’t figure something out, doesn’t mean it’s hard to figure out.

So you couldn’t do it, and I’m dumb?

WestlinnDuck

TheKobeStopper said:

I call it the consequences of the action of baby boomers. The dominant voting bloc for years that allowed and encouraged things like citizens united, creating an oligarchy.

Citizens United was the result of the US Constitution and the clearly written first amendment. The only "oligarchy" that wants it illegal to make a movie critical of a Presidential candidate was the democratic party and all four leftards on the US Supreme Court. Other than that, you nailed it. Scratch a leftist, find a fascist.