Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Hey Kobe, what do you call it when the government and Big business team up...

SFGbob
SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
in order to push policies that get rid of competition for the companies and silences critics of the government?

Comments

  • TheKobeStopper
    TheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959
    I call it the consequences of the action of baby boomers. The dominant voting bloc for years that allowed and encouraged things like citizens united, creating an oligarchy.
  • Southerndawg
    Southerndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,347 Founders Club

    I call it the consequences of the action of baby boomers. The dominant voting bloc for years that allowed and encouraged things like citizens united, creating an oligarchy.


  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    edited January 2022

    I call it the consequences of the action of baby boomers. The dominant voting bloc for years that allowed and encouraged things like citizens united, creating an oligarchy.

    Good Christ. Have ever cracked an Econ book not written by Engels or Marx?

    I do have a tangent question. You’re against citizens United, but you didn’t comment on Union political contributions. I assume you have no issue there?


    Also, to answer the original question for you, that is fascism defined. And you voted for it.
  • TheKobeStopper
    TheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959

    I call it the consequences of the action of baby boomers. The dominant voting bloc for years that allowed and encouraged things like citizens united, creating an oligarchy.

    Good Christ. Have ever cracked an Econ book not written by Engels or Marx?

    I do have a tangent question. You’re against citizens United, but you didn’t comment on Union political contributions. I assume you have no issue there?


    Also, to answer the original question for you, that is fascism defined. And you voted for it.
    I think elections should be publicly funded with no outside money allowed. Within our current system, I view taking money from unions as a better option.
  • TheKobeStopper
    TheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959

    I call it the consequences of the action of baby boomers. The dominant voting bloc for years that allowed and encouraged things like citizens united, creating an oligarchy.

    Good Christ. Have ever cracked an Econ book not written by Engels or Marx?

    I do have a tangent question. You’re against citizens United, but you didn’t comment on Union political contributions. I assume you have no issue there?


    Also, to answer the original question for you, that is fascism defined. And you voted for it.
    I think elections should be publicly funded with no outside money allowed. Within our current system, I view taking money from unions as a better option.
    See?
    No.
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781

    I call it the consequences of the action of baby boomers. The dominant voting bloc for years that allowed and encouraged things like citizens united, creating an oligarchy.

    Good Christ. Have ever cracked an Econ book not written by Engels or Marx?

    I do have a tangent question. You’re against citizens United, but you didn’t comment on Union political contributions. I assume you have no issue there?


    Also, to answer the original question for you, that is fascism defined. And you voted for it.
    I think elections should be publicly funded with no outside money allowed. Within our current system, I view taking money from unions as a better option.
    See?
    No.
    We know you don't.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183

    I call it the consequences of the action of baby boomers. The dominant voting bloc for years that allowed and encouraged things like citizens united, creating an oligarchy.

    Good Christ. Have ever cracked an Econ book not written by Engels or Marx?

    I do have a tangent question. You’re against citizens United, but you didn’t comment on Union political contributions. I assume you have no issue there?


    Also, to answer the original question for you, that is fascism defined. And you voted for it.
    Weird how Kobe has no problem voting for fascism.
  • Bob_C
    Bob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,709 Founders Club
    It’s called libertarian socialism.
  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,470 Founders Club
    Bob_C said:

    It’s called libertarian socialism.

    I'll take Oxymoron's (emphasis on moron) for 500, Alex

  • TheKobeStopper
    TheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959
    pawz said:

    Bob_C said:

    It’s called libertarian socialism.

    I'll take Oxymoron's (emphasis on moron) for 500, Alex

    We literally invented it.


  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,470 Founders Club

    pawz said:

    Bob_C said:

    It’s called libertarian socialism.

    I'll take Oxymoron's (emphasis on moron) for 500, Alex

    We literally invented it.


    And?

    Fucktarded then, it's fucktarded now.


    Also continues to be an oxymoron.

  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    edited January 2022

    pawz said:

    Bob_C said:

    It’s called libertarian socialism.

    I'll take Oxymoron's (emphasis on moron) for 500, Alex

    We literally invented it.


    JFC. Of course this from a person that believes a guy who thinks he is a women is an actual woman.

    And thanks for admitting (again) that you are a communist.

    But as we know from TKS copy pasta from last week, he has to google shit to have any thoughts to post.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183

    I call it the consequences of the action of baby boomers. The dominant voting bloc for years that allowed and encouraged things like citizens united, creating an oligarchy.

    Anyone want to see a jackass dance?

    Kobe, in your own words tell us how CU created an oligarchy?

  • TheKobeStopper
    TheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959
    SFGbob said:

    I call it the consequences of the action of baby boomers. The dominant voting bloc for years that allowed and encouraged things like citizens united, creating an oligarchy.

    Anyone want to see a jackass dance?

    Kobe, in your own words tell us how CU created an oligarchy?

    is a form of power structure in which power rests with a small number of people

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oligarchy

    While wealthy donors, corporations, and special interest groups have long had an outsized influence in elections, that sway has dramatically expanded since the Citizens United decision

    https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/citizens-united-explained

    Respectful reminder Bobby, you’re dumb. Just because you can’t figure something out, doesn’t mean it’s hard to figure out.
  • Sources
    Sources Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 4,344 Founders Club

    pawz said:

    Bob_C said:

    It’s called libertarian socialism.

    I'll take Oxymoron's (emphasis on moron) for 500, Alex

    We literally invented it.


    We?
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,103
    Google says so. It has to be true.
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781

    SFGbob said:

    I call it the consequences of the action of baby boomers. The dominant voting bloc for years that allowed and encouraged things like citizens united, creating an oligarchy.

    Anyone want to see a jackass dance?

    Kobe, in your own words tell us how CU created an oligarchy?

    is a form of power structure in which power rests with a small number of people

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oligarchy

    While wealthy donors, corporations, and special interest groups have long had an outsized influence in elections, that sway has dramatically expanded since the Citizens United decision

    https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/citizens-united-explained

    Respectful reminder Bobby, you’re dumb. Just because you can’t figure something out, doesn’t mean it’s hard to figure out.
    Wow. TKS googled some shit again. Impressive.

    Now do unions.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183

    SFGbob said:

    I call it the consequences of the action of baby boomers. The dominant voting bloc for years that allowed and encouraged things like citizens united, creating an oligarchy.

    Anyone want to see a jackass dance?

    Kobe, in your own words tell us how CU created an oligarchy?

    is a form of power structure in which power rests with a small number of people

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oligarchy

    While wealthy donors, corporations, and special interest groups have long had an outsized influence in elections, that sway has dramatically expanded since the Citizens United decision

    https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/citizens-united-explained

    Respectful reminder Bobby, you’re dumb. Just because you can’t figure something out, doesn’t mean it’s hard to figure out.
    So you couldn’t do it, and I’m dumb?
  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 17,616 Standard Supporter

    I call it the consequences of the action of baby boomers. The dominant voting bloc for years that allowed and encouraged things like citizens united, creating an oligarchy.

    Citizens United was the result of the US Constitution and the clearly written first amendment. The only "oligarchy" that wants it illegal to make a movie critical of a Presidential candidate was the democratic party and all four leftards on the US Supreme Court. Other than that, you nailed it. Scratch a leftist, find a fascist.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183

    SFGbob said:

    I call it the consequences of the action of baby boomers. The dominant voting bloc for years that allowed and encouraged things like citizens united, creating an oligarchy.

    Anyone want to see a jackass dance?

    Kobe, in your own words tell us how CU created an oligarchy?

    is a form of power structure in which power rests with a small number of people

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oligarchy

    While wealthy donors, corporations, and special interest groups have long had an outsized influence in elections, that sway has dramatically expanded since the Citizens United decision

    https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/citizens-united-explained

    Respectful reminder Bobby, you’re dumb. Just because you can’t figure something out, doesn’t mean it’s hard to figure out.
    Wow. TKS googled some shit again. Impressive.

    Now do unions.
    To have your panties in a twist about Citizens United while you're completely silent about the influence and power of public employee unions is peak Kobe.