Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Expanding the playoffs will bring parity
RaceBannon
Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,937 
Comments
-
Parity would be nice but it's not necessary. The question Is how to make more than two teams feel they have enough of a chance that it's worth playing. I dont care if the same team usually wins as long as there are more than 2-3 meaningful, competitive games in the whole fucking season.
-
Maybe it should be 11/11.RaceBannon said:Or not
9 out of 11
Each game is one more chance for an upset. -
Fuck it...We have NIL. Let's just create a salary cap.
-
What's happening now is not working. The current system is not a playoff. It's an invitational tournament. Give bids to conference winners, or go back to the traditional bowl system with winners of the NY6 games entering the playoff.RaceBannon said:Or not
9 out of 11 -
The best system would be let everyone play their crappy season for 10 games - then take every poll out there to rank all the teams 1-128 and put everyone in the playoff. 1-64 get home games, 65-128 visitors. Takes 7 weeks to determine the last team standing.
Start the playoffs the first week of December, Christmas off unless the University of Tel-Aviv in it, then take Hannukah off, finish the week before the Stupor Bowel. -
Agree, liked the historically more regional bowl games and think the NY6 games should be the entry games for the expanded playoffs… doing that might also help with regional balance from a media coverage standpoint as well especially if Las Vegas in addition to the Rose Bowl are included in the NY6 lineup.BleachedAnusDawg said:
What's happening now is not working. The current system is not a playoff. It's an invitational tournament. Give bids to conference winners, or go back to the traditional bowl system with winners of the NY6 games entering the playoff.RaceBannon said:Or not
9 out of 11
