Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Cougs -1

ntxduck
ntxduck Member Posts: 6,268
Someone talk me out of betting the entire account on the cougs
«1

Comments

  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,791 Founders Club
    edited November 2021
    In 2015 UW was 5-6, cuog had just barely missed out on the North missing a fg against Stanford, and UW still ran them over.

    They've lost to every team with more talent than them outside of ASU who turned it over like 4 times in a half. This includes aids ridden SC obviously.

    Should be a good game and why bet on what's probably going to come down to flukey turnovers.
  • AtomicDawg
    AtomicDawg Member Posts: 7,375
    haie said:

    In 2015 UW was 5-6, cuog had just barely missed out on the North missing a fg against Stanford, and UW still ran them over.

    They've lost to every team with more talent than them outside of ASU who turned it over like 4 times in a half. This includes aids ridden SC obviously.

    Should be a good game and why bet on what's probably going to come down to flukey turnovers.

    This would be a coug it if epic proportions. This is a bad uw team. Probably will be a shit game That ends with wazzu storming the field. -1 is good value still.
  • HuskyJW
    HuskyJW Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 15,517 Founders Club
    This is their one shot

    You know they are gonna blow it
  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,791 Founders Club
    edited November 2021

    haie said:

    In 2015 UW was 5-6, cuog had just barely missed out on the North missing a fg against Stanford, and UW still ran them over.

    They've lost to every team with more talent than them outside of ASU who turned it over like 4 times in a half. This includes aids ridden SC obviously.

    Should be a good game and why bet on what's probably going to come down to flukey turnovers.

    This would be a coug it if epic proportions. This is a bad uw team. Probably will be a shit game That ends with wazzu storming the field. -1 is good value still.
    They're 1-3 against more talented teams, one who is worse than UW (SC). ASU was a freakshow, UW isn't going to implode like that 2 games in a row. Their other wins, they beat Beavlet (really) close, and beat Cal down pretty good whereas we got lucky. Stanford who we know is terrible lost to them on the road by a field goal.

    Seems obvious to everyone to just run the ball at UW but it probably comes down to picks from DeLaura vs Huard/Morris. I think they will have to throw the ball a decent amount which they tend to do no matter the opponent. They don't have a White/Charbonnet type of back.

    I haven't watched them much but it seems like DeLaura is awesome one game and mostly turnover prone the next. More of a toss-up than it looks because UW has found ways to lose in the end.

    Big question is Huard obviously.
  • SkipBoyd
    SkipBoyd Member Posts: 403
    Anyone who thinks we? are winning this one is delusional. We’ve got nothing. Reminds me of the Polish football team who still failed to score following their opponents’ forfeit.
  • CuntWaffle
    CuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,500
    I think UW takes this and I don't have a good reason why (I have thought they would lose the past few weeks as well).