Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Notice how there isn’t a single leftist here supporting this verdict?

SFGbob
SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
in Tug Tavern
Fucking frauds
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1

Comments

  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    Shocking! But look what their leaders are saying. Newsom just threw gas on the fire.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    They want violence. The corrupt media and leftist Pols are saying so today. They need this.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TheKobeStopper
    TheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959
    I’m uncomfortable with someone going looking to kill someone, killing someone and then claiming self defense. But, legally, it seems to be correct.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,662
    TheKobeStopper said:

    I’m uncomfortable with someone going looking to kill someone, killing someone and then claiming self defense. But, legally, it seems to be correct.

    See I'm thinking there will be more of it

    Of course this time they'll go to jail

    But I'm okay with that. Take out some leftists rioters and take a nutjub off the streets.


    Kinda like George Floyd. Win for everybody
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Goduckies
    Goduckies Member Posts: 7,968 Standard Supporter
    TheKobeStopper said:

    I’m uncomfortable with someone going looking to kill someone, killing someone and then claiming self defense. But, legally, it seems to be correct.

    How was he going there looking to kill someone? If that was the case more people would have been shot... good god you are a Moran
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Goduckies
    Goduckies Member Posts: 7,968 Standard Supporter
    TheKobeStopper said:

    I’m uncomfortable with someone going looking to kill someone, killing someone and then claiming self defense. But, legally, it seems to be correct.

    How was he going there looking to kill someone? If that was the case more people would have been shot... good god you are a Moran
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,085
    TheKobeStopper said:

    I’m uncomfortable with someone going looking to kill someone, killing someone and then claiming self defense. But, legally, it seems to be correct.

    Kobe all about the feels, as per usual.

    Feels ain't evidence, bubby.

    Get over it.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TheKobeStopper
    TheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959
    PurpleThrobber said:

    TheKobeStopper said:

    I’m uncomfortable with someone going looking to kill someone, killing someone and then claiming self defense. But, legally, it seems to be correct.

    Kobe all about the feels, as per usual.

    Feels ain't evidence, bubby.

    Get over it.

    TheKobeStopper said:

    I’m uncomfortable with someone going looking to kill someone, killing someone and then claiming self defense. But, legally, it seems to be correct.

    ????
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,789 Standard Supporter
    edited November 2021
    TheKobeStopper said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    TheKobeStopper said:

    I’m uncomfortable with someone going looking to kill someone, killing someone and then claiming self defense. But, legally, it seems to be correct.

    Kobe all about the feels, as per usual.

    Feels ain't evidence, bubby.

    Get over it.

    TheKobeStopper said:

    I’m uncomfortable with someone going looking to kill someone, killing someone and then claiming self defense. But, legally, it seems to be correct.

    ????
    You don't actually believe that. You think that kid should be in jail. You'd be happier if they killed him too.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,662
    Sledog said:

    TheKobeStopper said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    TheKobeStopper said:

    I’m uncomfortable with someone going looking to kill someone, killing someone and then claiming self defense. But, legally, it seems to be correct.

    Kobe all about the feels, as per usual.

    Feels ain't evidence, bubby.

    Get over it.

    TheKobeStopper said:

    I’m uncomfortable with someone going looking to kill someone, killing someone and then claiming self defense. But, legally, it seems to be correct.

    ????
    You don't actually believe that. You think that kid should be in jail. You'd be happier if they killed him too.
    I'm kinda bummed he miss that gaige loser.

    Guy will be in jail soon enough anyway though so whatevs
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,085
    edited November 2021
    TheKobeStopper said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    TheKobeStopper said:

    I’m uncomfortable with someone going looking to kill someone, killing someone and then claiming self defense. But, legally, it seems to be correct.

    Kobe all about the feels, as per usual.

    Feels ain't evidence, bubby.

    Get over it.

    TheKobeStopper said:

    I’m uncomfortable with someone going looking to kill someone, killing someone and then claiming self defense. But, legally, it seems to be correct.

    ????
    Did that bullshit disclaimer help your feelers, Kobe? Good.

    Now get over it.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 17,580 Standard Supporter
    TheKobeStopper said:

    I’m uncomfortable with someone going looking to kill someone, killing someone and then claiming self defense. But, legally, it seems to be correct.

    What kind of education did you get slobberer? Geezus you are one dumbphucking idiot. I always carry med supplies and a fire extinguisher when I'm out hunting antifa. I'd feel uncomfortable if the facts supported your claim, but they don't do they? At best, you are lying and and much worse if you are just proudly ignorant. But, you are both. If your facts were accurate, then the self-defense argument fails. But outside of the video and eye witness accounts you have no facts. The case should never have been brought and what ever education degree you have you should give it back as unearned. That includes a kindergarten certificate.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BleachedAnusDawg
    BleachedAnusDawg Member Posts: 13,245 Standard Supporter
    TheKobeStopper said:

    I’m uncomfortable with someone going looking to kill someone, killing someone and then claiming self defense. But, legally, it seems to be correct.

    I must have missed the evidence introduced for the jury which cited that Rittenhouse was there with intent to kill someone.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HustlinOwl
    HustlinOwl Member Posts: 953
    I have no problem with the verdict. The whole ordeal is punishment enough for the kid. He did a really stupid thing.

    Happy Bob? Please stop lying with every other post.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    TheKobeStopper said:

    I’m uncomfortable with someone going looking to kill someone, killing someone and then claiming self defense. But, legally, it seems to be correct.

    This^^^^^is why CNN and MSNBC survive.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    HustlinOwl said:

    I have no problem with the verdict. The whole ordeal is punishment enough for the kid. He did a really stupid thing.

    Happy Bob? Please stop lying with every other post.

    Dumber than chasing a guy with an AR, or going skateboard, or attempt to snipe with a handgun?

    All much dumber.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sources
    Sources Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 4,333 Founders Club
    TheKobeStopper said:

    I’m uncomfortable with someone going looking to kill someone, killing someone and then claiming self defense. But, legally, it seems to be correct.

    Do you have any actual evidence he was there to cause harm? I'm honestly curious why you took this position outside of the media narrative that's largely been squelched.

    (and no, editorials from MSNBC and CNN don't count)
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    I’m uncomfortable with someone as ill informed as Kobe being allowed to vote. But, them’s the rules.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    HustlinOwl said:

    I have no problem with the verdict. The whole ordeal is punishment enough for the kid. He did a really stupid thing.

    Happy Bob? Please stop lying with every other post.

    You’re the first lib to say this. Where’s my lie?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,468 Founders Club
    Sources said:

    TheKobeStopper said:

    I’m uncomfortable with someone going looking to kill someone, killing someone and then claiming self defense. But, legally, it seems to be correct.

    Do you have any actual evidence he was there to cause harm? I'm honestly curious why you took this position outside of the media narrative that's largely been squelched.

    (and no, editorials from MSNBC and CNN don't count)
    Exactly this.

    We? all know @TheKobeStopper is unlikely to produce anything that resembles actual evidence.


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,085
    edited November 2021
    pawz said:

    Sources said:

    TheKobeStopper said:

    I’m uncomfortable with someone going looking to kill someone, killing someone and then claiming self defense. But, legally, it seems to be correct.

    Do you have any actual evidence he was there to cause harm? I'm honestly curious why you took this position outside of the media narrative that's largely been squelched.

    (and no, editorials from MSNBC and CNN don't count)
    Exactly this.

    We? all know @TheKobeStopper is unlikely to produce anything that resembles actual evidence.


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CyBcHUe4WeQ

    Teardrops, rollling down on @TheKobeStopper's face.

    Wo-oh-oh


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 17,580 Standard Supporter
    SFGbob said:

    HustlinOwl said:

    I have no problem with the verdict. The whole ordeal is punishment enough for the kid. He did a really stupid thing.

    Happy Bob? Please stop lying with every other post.

    You’re the first lib to say this. Where’s my lie?
    Dodo is lying. You think if Rittenhouse was found guilty dodo would be hear complaining about the verdict? You think that dodo would say anything like, "The clear evidence was that Rittenhouse was innocent because he defended himself from people who were trying to kill him. There not only was reasonable doubt about any guilt, there were no facts supporting a murder and attempted murder charge."
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,789 Standard Supporter
    edited November 2021
    "MSNBC covered it once - only for Nicolle Wallace to scoff at the GOP uproar"

    https://www.foxnews.com/media/abc-cbs-nbc-cnn-skip-doj-whistleblower-threat-tag

    BidenBros get their news from only the most thorough and ethical sources with no agenda.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter