Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

The Economist nails it

1234579

Comments

  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,634 Founders Club
    The president that H lies about voting for raised SS taxes and wanted to cut spending

    The people that H did vote for accused him of wanting to kill grandma

    Bush 1 broke his promise to raise taxes like a good little soldier and the people that H votes for used that broken promise to elect tax and spend Bill

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,634 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    HHusky said:

    “Though rising total spending on the old is justified, a full-scale gerontocracy is not. Retirees with deep pockets do not need public handouts. On the contrary, they should bear a heavier burden as taxes shift from wages, towards property, inheritance and consumption.”

    Time to stop engaging in this fantasy about lowering taxes when you have a society filled with old fuckers living on entitlements. The olds are too numerous and too wealthy overall not to be paying more.

    Fuck the fuck off. There is no reason 'society' deserves the benefit of living frugally, investing soundly and leaving behind something for one's family. Or to charity or whoever the fuck they want?

    Fuck off. FUCK OFF.

    How about the government live within its means and stay the fuck out of the income distribution game?

    FUCK OFF.
    Throbber just wonders why we can't all be characters in Atlas Shrugged.
    RaceBannon said:

    H has successfully argued that social security isn't an entitlement but is an income tax

    So mission accomplished there

    Even though that destroyed his "point"

    Social security is plainly an entitlement. Don't make blob come here and correct you.
    Then why cut it?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,363
    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    HHusky said:

    “Though rising total spending on the old is justified, a full-scale gerontocracy is not. Retirees with deep pockets do not need public handouts. On the contrary, they should bear a heavier burden as taxes shift from wages, towards property, inheritance and consumption.”

    Time to stop engaging in this fantasy about lowering taxes when you have a society filled with old fuckers living on entitlements. The olds are too numerous and too wealthy overall not to be paying more.

    Fuck the fuck off. There is no reason 'society' deserves the benefit of living frugally, investing soundly and leaving behind something for one's family. Or to charity or whoever the fuck they want?

    Fuck off. FUCK OFF.

    How about the government live within its means and stay the fuck out of the income distribution game?

    FUCK OFF.
    Throbber just wonders why we can't all be characters in Atlas Shrugged.
    RaceBannon said:

    H has successfully argued that social security isn't an entitlement but is an income tax

    So mission accomplished there

    Even though that destroyed his "point"

    Social security is plainly an entitlement. Don't make blob come here and correct you.
    Then why cut it?
    Because euthanizing the elderly was an even less popular option.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,595 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    HHusky said:

    “Though rising total spending on the old is justified, a full-scale gerontocracy is not. Retirees with deep pockets do not need public handouts. On the contrary, they should bear a heavier burden as taxes shift from wages, towards property, inheritance and consumption.”

    Time to stop engaging in this fantasy about lowering taxes when you have a society filled with old fuckers living on entitlements. The olds are too numerous and too wealthy overall not to be paying more.

    Fuck the fuck off. There is no reason 'society' deserves the benefit of living frugally, investing soundly and leaving behind something for one's family. Or to charity or whoever the fuck they want?

    Fuck off. FUCK OFF.

    How about the government live within its means and stay the fuck out of the income distribution game?

    FUCK OFF.
    Throbber just wonders why we can't all be characters in Atlas Shrugged.
    RaceBannon said:

    H has successfully argued that social security isn't an entitlement but is an income tax

    So mission accomplished there

    Even though that destroyed his "point"

    Social security is plainly an entitlement. Don't make blob come here and correct you.
    Then why cut it?
    Because euthanizing the elderly was an even less popular option.
    You should try it on your old ass self.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,634 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    HHusky said:

    “Though rising total spending on the old is justified, a full-scale gerontocracy is not. Retirees with deep pockets do not need public handouts. On the contrary, they should bear a heavier burden as taxes shift from wages, towards property, inheritance and consumption.”

    Time to stop engaging in this fantasy about lowering taxes when you have a society filled with old fuckers living on entitlements. The olds are too numerous and too wealthy overall not to be paying more.

    Fuck the fuck off. There is no reason 'society' deserves the benefit of living frugally, investing soundly and leaving behind something for one's family. Or to charity or whoever the fuck they want?

    Fuck off. FUCK OFF.

    How about the government live within its means and stay the fuck out of the income distribution game?

    FUCK OFF.
    Throbber just wonders why we can't all be characters in Atlas Shrugged.
    RaceBannon said:

    H has successfully argued that social security isn't an entitlement but is an income tax

    So mission accomplished there

    Even though that destroyed his "point"

    Social security is plainly an entitlement. Don't make blob come here and correct you.
    Then why cut it?
    Because euthanizing the elderly was an even less popular option.
    Why not get your story straight and try it again

    This is embarrassing watching you argue against your own points
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,363
    PurpleThrobber said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    HHusky said:

    “Though rising total spending on the old is justified, a full-scale gerontocracy is not. Retirees with deep pockets do not need public handouts. On the contrary, they should bear a heavier burden as taxes shift from wages, towards property, inheritance and consumption.”

    Time to stop engaging in this fantasy about lowering taxes when you have a society filled with old fuckers living on entitlements. The olds are too numerous and too wealthy overall not to be paying more.

    Fuck the fuck off. There is no reason 'society' deserves the benefit of living frugally, investing soundly and leaving behind something for one's family. Or to charity or whoever the fuck they want?

    Fuck off. FUCK OFF.

    How about the government live within its means and stay the fuck out of the income distribution game?

    FUCK OFF.
    Throbber just wonders why we can't all be characters in Atlas Shrugged.
    RaceBannon said:

    H has successfully argued that social security isn't an entitlement but is an income tax

    So mission accomplished there

    Even though that destroyed his "point"

    Social security is plainly an entitlement. Don't make blob come here and correct you.
    Then why cut it?
    Because euthanizing the elderly was an even less popular option.
    You should try it on your old ass self.

    I'm a net maker. Let's revisit it in a few years.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,634 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    HHusky said:

    “Though rising total spending on the old is justified, a full-scale gerontocracy is not. Retirees with deep pockets do not need public handouts. On the contrary, they should bear a heavier burden as taxes shift from wages, towards property, inheritance and consumption.”

    Time to stop engaging in this fantasy about lowering taxes when you have a society filled with old fuckers living on entitlements. The olds are too numerous and too wealthy overall not to be paying more.

    Fuck the fuck off. There is no reason 'society' deserves the benefit of living frugally, investing soundly and leaving behind something for one's family. Or to charity or whoever the fuck they want?

    Fuck off. FUCK OFF.

    How about the government live within its means and stay the fuck out of the income distribution game?

    FUCK OFF.
    Throbber just wonders why we can't all be characters in Atlas Shrugged.
    RaceBannon said:

    H has successfully argued that social security isn't an entitlement but is an income tax

    So mission accomplished there

    Even though that destroyed his "point"

    Social security is plainly an entitlement. Don't make blob come here and correct you.
    Then why cut it?
    Because euthanizing the elderly was an even less popular option.
    You should try it on your old ass self.

    I'm a net maker. Let's revisit it in a few years.
    The old man and the sea

    You however, are a leach on society
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,363
    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    HHusky said:

    “Though rising total spending on the old is justified, a full-scale gerontocracy is not. Retirees with deep pockets do not need public handouts. On the contrary, they should bear a heavier burden as taxes shift from wages, towards property, inheritance and consumption.”

    Time to stop engaging in this fantasy about lowering taxes when you have a society filled with old fuckers living on entitlements. The olds are too numerous and too wealthy overall not to be paying more.

    Fuck the fuck off. There is no reason 'society' deserves the benefit of living frugally, investing soundly and leaving behind something for one's family. Or to charity or whoever the fuck they want?

    Fuck off. FUCK OFF.

    How about the government live within its means and stay the fuck out of the income distribution game?

    FUCK OFF.
    Throbber just wonders why we can't all be characters in Atlas Shrugged.
    RaceBannon said:

    H has successfully argued that social security isn't an entitlement but is an income tax

    So mission accomplished there

    Even though that destroyed his "point"

    Social security is plainly an entitlement. Don't make blob come here and correct you.
    Then why cut it?
    Because euthanizing the elderly was an even less popular option.
    You should try it on your old ass self.

    I'm a net maker. Let's revisit it in a few years.
    The old man and the sea

    You however, are a leach on society
    But highly taxed.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,634 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    HHusky said:

    “Though rising total spending on the old is justified, a full-scale gerontocracy is not. Retirees with deep pockets do not need public handouts. On the contrary, they should bear a heavier burden as taxes shift from wages, towards property, inheritance and consumption.”

    Time to stop engaging in this fantasy about lowering taxes when you have a society filled with old fuckers living on entitlements. The olds are too numerous and too wealthy overall not to be paying more.

    Fuck the fuck off. There is no reason 'society' deserves the benefit of living frugally, investing soundly and leaving behind something for one's family. Or to charity or whoever the fuck they want?

    Fuck off. FUCK OFF.

    How about the government live within its means and stay the fuck out of the income distribution game?

    FUCK OFF.
    Throbber just wonders why we can't all be characters in Atlas Shrugged.
    RaceBannon said:

    H has successfully argued that social security isn't an entitlement but is an income tax

    So mission accomplished there

    Even though that destroyed his "point"

    Social security is plainly an entitlement. Don't make blob come here and correct you.
    Then why cut it?
    Because euthanizing the elderly was an even less popular option.
    You should try it on your old ass self.

    I'm a net maker. Let's revisit it in a few years.
    The old man and the sea

    You however, are a leach on society
    But highly taxed.
    Really?

    In America?

    Let H go long enough and he'll defeat his own argument
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,363
    edited November 2021
    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    HHusky said:

    “Though rising total spending on the old is justified, a full-scale gerontocracy is not. Retirees with deep pockets do not need public handouts. On the contrary, they should bear a heavier burden as taxes shift from wages, towards property, inheritance and consumption.”

    Time to stop engaging in this fantasy about lowering taxes when you have a society filled with old fuckers living on entitlements. The olds are too numerous and too wealthy overall not to be paying more.

    Fuck the fuck off. There is no reason 'society' deserves the benefit of living frugally, investing soundly and leaving behind something for one's family. Or to charity or whoever the fuck they want?

    Fuck off. FUCK OFF.

    How about the government live within its means and stay the fuck out of the income distribution game?

    FUCK OFF.
    Throbber just wonders why we can't all be characters in Atlas Shrugged.
    RaceBannon said:

    H has successfully argued that social security isn't an entitlement but is an income tax

    So mission accomplished there

    Even though that destroyed his "point"

    Social security is plainly an entitlement. Don't make blob come here and correct you.
    Then why cut it?
    Because euthanizing the elderly was an even less popular option.
    You should try it on your old ass self.

    I'm a net maker. Let's revisit it in a few years.
    The old man and the sea

    You however, are a leach on society
    But highly taxed.
    Really?

    In America?

    Let H go long enough and he'll defeat his own argument
    The rich pay a lot of taxes. Never denied it. Said it myself here.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter