The Economist nails it
Time to stop engaging in this fantasy about lowering taxes when you have a society filled with old fuckers living on entitlements. The olds are too numerous and too wealthy overall not to be paying more.
Comments
-
Time for them all to move.HHusky said:“Though rising total spending on the old is justified, a full-scale gerontocracy is not. Retirees with deep pockets do not need public handouts. On the contrary, they should bear a heavier burden as taxes shift from wages, towards property, inheritance and consumption.”
Time to stop engaging in this fantasy about lowering taxes when you have a society filled with old fuckers living on entitlements. The olds are too numerous and too wealthy overall not to be paying more. -
Economist has had some dumb/bad click bait lately. H still likes it though.
-
Logan’s Run?hardhat said:
Time for them all to move.HHusky said:“Though rising total spending on the old is justified, a full-scale gerontocracy is not. Retirees with deep pockets do not need public handouts. On the contrary, they should bear a heavier burden as taxes shift from wages, towards property, inheritance and consumption.”
Time to stop engaging in this fantasy about lowering taxes when you have a society filled with old fuckers living on entitlements. The olds are too numerous and too wealthy overall not to be paying more. -
If you think they were wrong, take your shot.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Economist has had some dumb/bad click bait lately. H still likes it though.
-
IronicHHusky said:
If you think they were wrong, take your shot.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Economist has had some dumb/bad click bait lately. H still likes it though.
He said they should move. Same thing you said -
This is what happens when olds can no longer track the conversation.RaceBannon said:
IronicHHusky said:
If you think they were wrong, take your shot.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Economist has had some dumb/bad click bait lately. H still likes it though.
He said they should move. Same thing you said
Ice floe time? -
Sold out to the CCP a long time ago.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Economist has had some dumb/bad click bait lately. H still likes it though.
-
Pretty sure inheritance taxes aren't taxes on the old but sure.gifHHusky said:“Though rising total spending on the old is justified, a full-scale gerontocracy is not. Retirees with deep pockets do not need public handouts. On the contrary, they should bear a heavier burden as taxes shift from wages, towards property, inheritance and consumption.”
Time to stop engaging in this fantasy about lowering taxes when you have a society filled with old fuckers living on entitlements. The olds are too numerous and too wealthy overall not to be paying more. -
Did I embarrass you?HHusky said:
This is what happens when olds can no longer track the conversation.RaceBannon said:
IronicHHusky said:
If you think they were wrong, take your shot.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Economist has had some dumb/bad click bait lately. H still likes it though.
He said they should move. Same thing you said
Ice floe time?
I keep better track of your bullshit than you do and I ain't trying -
Double downRaceBannon said:
Did I embarrass you?HHusky said:
This is what happens when olds can no longer track the conversation.RaceBannon said:
IronicHHusky said:
If you think they were wrong, take your shot.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Economist has had some dumb/bad click bait lately. H still likes it though.
He said they should move. Same thing you said
Ice floe time?
I keep better track of your bullshit than you do and I ain't trying
Bold -
Death is the solution to all problems
-
You can fly speck the sentence, but the idea that the numerous and wealthy should continue to be subsidized by the fewer and less wealthy does need revisiting.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Pretty sure inheritance taxes aren't taxes on the old but sure.gifHHusky said:“Though rising total spending on the old is justified, a full-scale gerontocracy is not. Retirees with deep pockets do not need public handouts. On the contrary, they should bear a heavier burden as taxes shift from wages, towards property, inheritance and consumption.”
Time to stop engaging in this fantasy about lowering taxes when you have a society filled with old fuckers living on entitlements. The olds are too numerous and too wealthy overall not to be paying more. -
I’m with you, but there’s just not the level of support for the idea we need.hardhat said:Death is the solution to all problems
-
You're contradicting yourself. I heard from you we need to raise taxes on the lower class.HHusky said:
You can fly speck the sentence, but the idea that the numerous and wealthy should continue to be subsidized by the fewer and less wealthy does need revisiting.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Pretty sure inheritance taxes aren't taxes on the old but sure.gifHHusky said:“Though rising total spending on the old is justified, a full-scale gerontocracy is not. Retirees with deep pockets do not need public handouts. On the contrary, they should bear a heavier burden as taxes shift from wages, towards property, inheritance and consumption.”
Time to stop engaging in this fantasy about lowering taxes when you have a society filled with old fuckers living on entitlements. The olds are too numerous and too wealthy overall not to be paying more. -
Might have been voices in your head.UW_Doog_Bot said:
You're contradicting yourself. I heard from you we need to raise taxes on the lower class.HHusky said:
You can fly speck the sentence, but the idea that the numerous and wealthy should continue to be subsidized by the fewer and less wealthy does need revisiting.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Pretty sure inheritance taxes aren't taxes on the old but sure.gifHHusky said:“Though rising total spending on the old is justified, a full-scale gerontocracy is not. Retirees with deep pockets do not need public handouts. On the contrary, they should bear a heavier burden as taxes shift from wages, towards property, inheritance and consumption.”
Time to stop engaging in this fantasy about lowering taxes when you have a society filled with old fuckers living on entitlements. The olds are too numerous and too wealthy overall not to be paying more. -
So you believe that people should be taxed even more again when inheriting property or other assets that were ultimately paid for with after tax dollars in the first place.HHusky said:“Though rising total spending on the old is justified, a full-scale gerontocracy is not. Retirees with deep pockets do not need public handouts. On the contrary, they should bear a heavier burden as taxes shift from wages, towards property, inheritance and consumption.”
Time to stop engaging in this fantasy about lowering taxes when you have a society filled with old fuckers living on entitlements. The olds are too numerous and too wealthy overall not to be paying more.
Brilliant. -
Assuming you’re talking about some sort of “fairness” concept, it should be pointed out that the appreciation on these assets was never taxed and that large estates are primarily composed of appreciated assets.Kaepsknee said:
So you believe that people should be taxed even more again when inheriting property or other assets that were ultimately paid for with after tax dollars in the first place.HHusky said:“Though rising total spending on the old is justified, a full-scale gerontocracy is not. Retirees with deep pockets do not need public handouts. On the contrary, they should bear a heavier burden as taxes shift from wages, towards property, inheritance and consumption.”
Time to stop engaging in this fantasy about lowering taxes when you have a society filled with old fuckers living on entitlements. The olds are too numerous and too wealthy overall not to be paying more.
Brilliant. -
It's not your moneyHHusky said:
Assuming you’re talking about some sort of “fairness” concept, it should be pointed out that the appreciation on these assets was never taxed and that large estates are primarily composed of appreciated assets.Kaepsknee said:
So you believe that people should be taxed even more again when inheriting property or other assets that were ultimately paid for with after tax dollars in the first place.HHusky said:“Though rising total spending on the old is justified, a full-scale gerontocracy is not. Retirees with deep pockets do not need public handouts. On the contrary, they should bear a heavier burden as taxes shift from wages, towards property, inheritance and consumption.”
Time to stop engaging in this fantasy about lowering taxes when you have a society filled with old fuckers living on entitlements. The olds are too numerous and too wealthy overall not to be paying more.
Brilliant.
Fuck off -
It is, actually.RaceBannon said:
It's not your moneyHHusky said:
Assuming you’re talking about some sort of “fairness” concept, it should be pointed out that the appreciation on these assets was never taxed and that large estates are primarily composed of appreciated assets.Kaepsknee said:
So you believe that people should be taxed even more again when inheriting property or other assets that were ultimately paid for with after tax dollars in the first place.HHusky said:“Though rising total spending on the old is justified, a full-scale gerontocracy is not. Retirees with deep pockets do not need public handouts. On the contrary, they should bear a heavier burden as taxes shift from wages, towards property, inheritance and consumption.”
Time to stop engaging in this fantasy about lowering taxes when you have a society filled with old fuckers living on entitlements. The olds are too numerous and too wealthy overall not to be paying more.
Brilliant.
Fuck off -
You didn’t build that Business POTD.HHusky said:
Assuming you’re talking about some sort of “fairness” concept, it should be pointed out that the appreciation on these assets was never taxed and that large estates are primarily composed of appreciated assets.Kaepsknee said:
So you believe that people should be taxed even more again when inheriting property or other assets that were ultimately paid for with after tax dollars in the first place.HHusky said:“Though rising total spending on the old is justified, a full-scale gerontocracy is not. Retirees with deep pockets do not need public handouts. On the contrary, they should bear a heavier burden as taxes shift from wages, towards property, inheritance and consumption.”
Time to stop engaging in this fantasy about lowering taxes when you have a society filled with old fuckers living on entitlements. The olds are too numerous and too wealthy overall not to be paying more.
Brilliant. -
Kinda sounds like someone who would be fine with releasing a new virus that targets olds to get rid of them.HHusky said:“Though rising total spending on the old is justified, a full-scale gerontocracy is not. Retirees with deep pockets do not need public handouts. On the contrary, they should bear a heavier burden as taxes shift from wages, towards property, inheritance and consumption.”
Time to stop engaging in this fantasy about lowering taxes when you have a society filled with old fuckers living on entitlements. The olds are too numerous and too wealthy overall not to be paying more. -
No its not. My money is mine and the same for all the other people that you are volunteering higher taxes forHHusky said:
It is, actually.RaceBannon said:
It's not your moneyHHusky said:
Assuming you’re talking about some sort of “fairness” concept, it should be pointed out that the appreciation on these assets was never taxed and that large estates are primarily composed of appreciated assets.Kaepsknee said:
So you believe that people should be taxed even more again when inheriting property or other assets that were ultimately paid for with after tax dollars in the first place.HHusky said:“Though rising total spending on the old is justified, a full-scale gerontocracy is not. Retirees with deep pockets do not need public handouts. On the contrary, they should bear a heavier burden as taxes shift from wages, towards property, inheritance and consumption.”
Time to stop engaging in this fantasy about lowering taxes when you have a society filled with old fuckers living on entitlements. The olds are too numerous and too wealthy overall not to be paying more.
Brilliant.
Fuck off
Fuck off -
Jesus.Kaepsknee said:
You didn’t build that Business POTD.HHusky said:
Assuming you’re talking about some sort of “fairness” concept, it should be pointed out that the appreciation on these assets was never taxed and that large estates are primarily composed of appreciated assets.Kaepsknee said:
So you believe that people should be taxed even more again when inheriting property or other assets that were ultimately paid for with after tax dollars in the first place.HHusky said:“Though rising total spending on the old is justified, a full-scale gerontocracy is not. Retirees with deep pockets do not need public handouts. On the contrary, they should bear a heavier burden as taxes shift from wages, towards property, inheritance and consumption.”
Time to stop engaging in this fantasy about lowering taxes when you have a society filled with old fuckers living on entitlements. The olds are too numerous and too wealthy overall not to be paying more.
Brilliant.
You still buying the bullshit that we’re primarily talking about family businesses? Hate to break it to you, but we’re primarily talking about financial instruments. There is data on this you know. -
I actually agree with that particular take. It's fun to get under your skin though.HHusky said:
If you think they were wrong, take your shot.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Economist has had some dumb/bad click bait lately. H still likes it though.
-
You’re concerned about leaving a taxable estate? You’ve been sandbagging us then.RaceBannon said:
No its not. My money is mine and the same for all the other people that you are volunteering higher taxes forHHusky said:
It is, actually.RaceBannon said:
It's not your moneyHHusky said:
Assuming you’re talking about some sort of “fairness” concept, it should be pointed out that the appreciation on these assets was never taxed and that large estates are primarily composed of appreciated assets.Kaepsknee said:
So you believe that people should be taxed even more again when inheriting property or other assets that were ultimately paid for with after tax dollars in the first place.HHusky said:“Though rising total spending on the old is justified, a full-scale gerontocracy is not. Retirees with deep pockets do not need public handouts. On the contrary, they should bear a heavier burden as taxes shift from wages, towards property, inheritance and consumption.”
Time to stop engaging in this fantasy about lowering taxes when you have a society filled with old fuckers living on entitlements. The olds are too numerous and too wealthy overall not to be paying more.
Brilliant.
Fuck off
Fuck off -
So it was good for you too.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
I actually agree with that particular take. It's fun to get under your skin though.HHusky said:
If you think they were wrong, take your shot.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Economist has had some dumb/bad click bait lately. H still likes it though.
-
It's not your money and it's not the governmentsHHusky said:
Jesus.Kaepsknee said:
You didn’t build that Business POTD.HHusky said:
Assuming you’re talking about some sort of “fairness” concept, it should be pointed out that the appreciation on these assets was never taxed and that large estates are primarily composed of appreciated assets.Kaepsknee said:
So you believe that people should be taxed even more again when inheriting property or other assets that were ultimately paid for with after tax dollars in the first place.HHusky said:“Though rising total spending on the old is justified, a full-scale gerontocracy is not. Retirees with deep pockets do not need public handouts. On the contrary, they should bear a heavier burden as taxes shift from wages, towards property, inheritance and consumption.”
Time to stop engaging in this fantasy about lowering taxes when you have a society filled with old fuckers living on entitlements. The olds are too numerous and too wealthy overall not to be paying more.
Brilliant.
You still buying the bullshit that we’re primarily talking about family businesses? Hate to break it to you, but we’re primarily talking about financial instruments. There is data on this you know.
I could be retarded like you and just say that we will never raise taxes so we NEED to cut spending
But I'm not a retard
If you really want to raise taxes then spending has to be cut for any hope of anyone going along with the government robbing them some more
50% already goes to some kind of fucking tax
A point you have failed miserably to dispute
Kenosha needs a prosecutor. You should MOVE -
Now that’s how you exaggerate, Damone.RaceBannon said:HHusky said:
Jesus.Kaepsknee said:
You didn’t build that Business POTD.HHusky said:
Assuming you’re talking about some sort of “fairness” concept, it should be pointed out that the appreciation on these assets was never taxed and that large estates are primarily composed of appreciated assets.Kaepsknee said:
So you believe that people should be taxed even more again when inheriting property or other assets that were ultimately paid for with after tax dollars in the first place.HHusky said:“Though rising total spending on the old is justified, a full-scale gerontocracy is not. Retirees with deep pockets do not need public handouts. On the contrary, they should bear a heavier burden as taxes shift from wages, towards property, inheritance and consumption.”
Time to stop engaging in this fantasy about lowering taxes when you have a society filled with old fuckers living on entitlements. The olds are too numerous and too wealthy overall not to be paying more.
Brilliant.
You still buying the bullshit that we’re primarily talking about family businesses? Hate to break it to you, but we’re primarily talking about financial instruments. There is data on this you know.
50% already goes to some kind of fucking tax
-
The only time a rat like HH will mock "fairness" is when he wants to take your money for his politics. Otherwise "fairness" is every rats favorite word when they are trying purchase votes and enslave voters.HHusky said:
Assuming you’re talking about some sort of “fairness” concept, it should be pointed out that the appreciation on these assets was never taxed and that large estates are primarily composed of appreciated assets.Kaepsknee said:
So you believe that people should be taxed even more again when inheriting property or other assets that were ultimately paid for with after tax dollars in the first place.HHusky said:“Though rising total spending on the old is justified, a full-scale gerontocracy is not. Retirees with deep pockets do not need public handouts. On the contrary, they should bear a heavier burden as taxes shift from wages, towards property, inheritance and consumption.”
Time to stop engaging in this fantasy about lowering taxes when you have a society filled with old fuckers living on entitlements. The olds are too numerous and too wealthy overall not to be paying more.
Brilliant.
Hey HH, it isn't your money. You did shit to earn it or pay taxes on it the first time. Keep your fucking hands out of others pockets. The capital gains force many to liquidate the asset, that may not bother you because rats like to take other peoples money but it isn't right. Besides, the total collected isn't even going to move the needle when we are talking about rats spending trillions upon trillions.
How fucking vapid one must be to be a rat and believe that forcing people to sell the family farm so that rat politicians can piss the money away is a good and just thing to advocate?
The government never needs to increase taxes. They need to cut spending. -
Feel free to prove me wrongHHusky said:
Now that’s how you exaggerate, Damone.RaceBannon said:HHusky said:
Jesus.Kaepsknee said:
You didn’t build that Business POTD.HHusky said:
Assuming you’re talking about some sort of “fairness” concept, it should be pointed out that the appreciation on these assets was never taxed and that large estates are primarily composed of appreciated assets.Kaepsknee said:
So you believe that people should be taxed even more again when inheriting property or other assets that were ultimately paid for with after tax dollars in the first place.HHusky said:“Though rising total spending on the old is justified, a full-scale gerontocracy is not. Retirees with deep pockets do not need public handouts. On the contrary, they should bear a heavier burden as taxes shift from wages, towards property, inheritance and consumption.”
Time to stop engaging in this fantasy about lowering taxes when you have a society filled with old fuckers living on entitlements. The olds are too numerous and too wealthy overall not to be paying more.
Brilliant.
You still buying the bullshit that we’re primarily talking about family businesses? Hate to break it to you, but we’re primarily talking about financial instruments. There is data on this you know.
50% already goes to some kind of fucking tax
Why are you obfuscating so hard
Bring the facts
