Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Comments

  • Options
    Fenderbender123Fenderbender123 Member Posts: 2,869
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Standard Supporter
    I'm afraid of nuclear power because on average it kills almost one whole person a year worldwide. Sure, coal mining alone kills 5 people just in the US every year... But still.
  • Options
    PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 41,914
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Is it "THE" scientists pouring water on nuclear or just plain scientists?

    The Throbber only follows THE science like a good little quisling.



  • Options
    SledogSledog Member Posts: 30,927
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Hell nuclear is less pollution that wind power. Makes one hell of a lot more juice too.
  • Options
    GoduckiesGoduckies Member Posts: 5,384
    First Comment 5 Awesomes First Anniversary 5 Up Votes
    Nuke power is the future.... Sadly the left would rather kill birds
  • Options
    SourcesSources Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 3,810
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    The fact that it was abandoned in the first place is absurd. Then again, facts rarely matter
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 101,562
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    Sources said:

    The fact that it was abandoned in the first place is absurd. Then again, facts rarely matter

    Jane Fonda is to blame. As always



    That was after Three Mile Island and before Chernoble
  • Options
    HustlinOwlHustlinOwl Member Posts: 953
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes First Comment 5 Awesomes
    Sledog said:

    Hell nuclear is less pollution that wind power. Makes one hell of a lot more juice too.

    Chernobyl and Fukushima would beg to differ. A few people are always going to die, but having to abandon full blown cities for 1,000 years is a little more risky than a windmill falling over.
  • Options
    SledogSledog Member Posts: 30,927
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes

    Sledog said:

    Hell nuclear is less pollution that wind power. Makes one hell of a lot more juice too.

    Chernobyl and Fukushima would beg to differ. A few people are always going to die, but having to abandon full blown cities for 1,000 years is a little more risky than a windmill falling over.
    Yeah show me a picture of Nagasaki and Hiroshima. I recall 500,000 years until habitable.

    Science and shit.
  • Options
    WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 13,969
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment 5 Up Votes
    Standard Supporter
    How many nuke powerplants on US naval vessels since 1954 and we haven't had a single accidental release of radiation and no deaths. The recipe is pretty easy. Get industry and some real government scientist to design a standard 1,000 megawatt nuclear reactor and supporting infrastructure. No more custom nukes with huge cost overruns as it is designed on the run. Have the design federally permitted with no state or environmental court challenges. Don't build them in earthquake zones. Open up Yucca Mountain for permanent waste disposal.
  • Options
    WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 13,969
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment 5 Up Votes
    Standard Supporter

    Sledog said:

    Hell nuclear is less pollution that wind power. Makes one hell of a lot more juice too.

    Chernobyl and Fukushima would beg to differ. A few people are always going to die, but having to abandon full blown cities for 1,000 years is a little more risky than a windmill falling over.
    It's not a windmill falling over. It's millions killed because of climate change.

    PS Chernobyl had nothing to do with US nukes and don't build a nuke in an earthquake tsunami zone. You suck at this.
  • Options
    GoduckiesGoduckies Member Posts: 5,384
    First Comment 5 Awesomes First Anniversary 5 Up Votes

    How many nuke powerplants on US naval vessels since 1954 and we haven't had a single accidental release of radiation and no deaths. The recipe is pretty easy. Get industry and some real government scientist to design a standard 1,000 megawatt nuclear reactor and supporting infrastructure. No more custom nukes with huge cost overruns as it is designed on the run. Have the design federally permitted with no state or environmental court challenges. Don't build them in earthquake zones. Open up Yucca Mountain for permanent waste disposal.

    100%
  • Options
    46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    5 Up Votes First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment
    How can Al Gore and his friends get rich off of nuclear power plants? There's your real answer.
Sign In or Register to comment.