Bill Gates destruction of the country begins
Comments
-
I'm afraid of nuclear power because on average it kills almost one whole person a year worldwide. Sure, coal mining alone kills 5 people just in the US every year... But still.
-
Is it "THE" scientists pouring water on nuclear or just plain scientists?
The Throbber only follows THE science like a good little quisling.
-
Even it takes 5 lives in the process… as long as it saves one life…Fenderbender123 said:I'm afraid of nuclear power because on average it kills almost one whole person a year worldwide. Sure, coal mining alone kills 5 people just in the US every year... But still.
-
Hell nuclear is less pollution that wind power. Makes one hell of a lot more juice too.
-
Nuke power is the future.... Sadly the left would rather kill birds
-
The fact that it was abandoned in the first place is absurd. Then again, facts rarely matter
-
Jane Fonda is to blame. As alwaysSources said:The fact that it was abandoned in the first place is absurd. Then again, facts rarely matter
That was after Three Mile Island and before Chernoble
-
Chernobyl and Fukushima would beg to differ. A few people are always going to die, but having to abandon full blown cities for 1,000 years is a little more risky than a windmill falling over.Sledog said:Hell nuclear is less pollution that wind power. Makes one hell of a lot more juice too.
-
Yeah show me a picture of Nagasaki and Hiroshima. I recall 500,000 years until habitable.HustlinOwl said:
Chernobyl and Fukushima would beg to differ. A few people are always going to die, but having to abandon full blown cities for 1,000 years is a little more risky than a windmill falling over.Sledog said:Hell nuclear is less pollution that wind power. Makes one hell of a lot more juice too.
Science and shit. -
How many nuke powerplants on US naval vessels since 1954 and we haven't had a single accidental release of radiation and no deaths. The recipe is pretty easy. Get industry and some real government scientist to design a standard 1,000 megawatt nuclear reactor and supporting infrastructure. No more custom nukes with huge cost overruns as it is designed on the run. Have the design federally permitted with no state or environmental court challenges. Don't build them in earthquake zones. Open up Yucca Mountain for permanent waste disposal.
-
It's not a windmill falling over. It's millions killed because of climate change.HustlinOwl said:
Chernobyl and Fukushima would beg to differ. A few people are always going to die, but having to abandon full blown cities for 1,000 years is a little more risky than a windmill falling over.Sledog said:Hell nuclear is less pollution that wind power. Makes one hell of a lot more juice too.
PS Chernobyl had nothing to do with US nukes and don't build a nuke in an earthquake tsunami zone. You suck at this. -
100%WestlinnDuck said:How many nuke powerplants on US naval vessels since 1954 and we haven't had a single accidental release of radiation and no deaths. The recipe is pretty easy. Get industry and some real government scientist to design a standard 1,000 megawatt nuclear reactor and supporting infrastructure. No more custom nukes with huge cost overruns as it is designed on the run. Have the design federally permitted with no state or environmental court challenges. Don't build them in earthquake zones. Open up Yucca Mountain for permanent waste disposal.
-
How can Al Gore and his friends get rich off of nuclear power plants? There's your real answer.
