Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Joe does it again
Comments
-
PurpleThrobber said:
Reason enough to send your kid to WV.
Man I just tried finding it. I used to have picture of a hella hot chick in a West Virginia outfit. My google skills were not strong enough today. -
So much better than an uniformed hustlinowl shitpost. Lovely!PurpleThrobber said: -
Use Bing for porn. Safe filter offhuskyhooligan said:PurpleThrobber said:
Reason enough to send your kid to WV.
Man I just tried finding it. I used to have picture of a hella hot chick in a West Virginia outfit. My google skills were not strong enough today.
You’re welcome
-
600 bucks? Fuck you're a moron!HustlinOwl said:You have to question a person that is opposed to legislation designed to find tax evaders.
-
Dumbfuck. This country was literally founded on the concept of evading taxes.HustlinOwl said:You have to question a person that is opposed to legislation designed to find tax evaders.
-
😍PurpleThrobber said:
Dumbfuck. This country was literally founded on the concept of evading taxes.HustlinOwl said:You have to question a person that is opposed to legislation designed to find tax evaders.
-
Joe Manchin is actually what @MelloDawg claims himself to be.
-
That faggot downvoting shill would be lucky to be Joe Manchin's piss boy.Swaye said:Joe Manchin is actually what @MelloDawg claims himself to be.
-
You would have to ask the IRS or tax cheats on that one. Maybe start by asking former President Trump.hardhat said:
Enlighten us about how $600 transactions are red flags to 'tax evasion'. Since real tax fraud would involve quite a bit more money, and would most likely involve more complicated matters like trusts, carried interest, etc. You sound brilliant!HustlinOwl said:You have to question a person that is opposed to legislation designed to find tax evaders.
-
This shitpoast is awesome. You think the question hasn't been asked? There's zero explanation for it and actually, it would be the Biden administration that would have to answer for it, since they're proposing it. Next, you really have no other option but to bring up 'Trump', because you have nothing else. You continue to be ignorant and gullible.HustlinOwl said:
You would have to ask the IRS or tax cheats on that one. Maybe start by asking former President Trump.hardhat said:
Enlighten us about how $600 transactions are red flags to 'tax evasion'. Since real tax fraud would involve quite a bit more money, and would most likely involve more complicated matters like trusts, carried interest, etc. You sound brilliant!HustlinOwl said:You have to question a person that is opposed to legislation designed to find tax evaders.
