PSA: The comparison with Lake is Gilby
Comments
-
I've got 7-0ntxduck said:
A 6-1 finish for Jimmy seems unlikelyhaie said:Jimmy is what Pete was for 3 out of his 6 years at UW, but a little shittier than that even.
6-8 wins, bend and break, overly conservative D. Get up by at least 10 at half and you're really conservative on both sides of the ball and holding on, and the opponent knows it. And absolutely shit offense in need of a Gaskin-type to keep the sticks moving to apologize for bad play calling/scheme (this year that's McGrew).
Pete lost to Utah, Arizona, Cal, Graham ASU, all sorts of teams he should have handled. Jimmy's just done it with Beavlet and Montana (Pete barely scraped by Eastern). -
Ty and Gilby were known failures as a head coach when UW hired them
Gilby was horrible at Cal
If you wanted to talk yourself into it you pretend Ty did good at Stanford and was treated unfair at Notre Dame.
Not the case but you could at least make it
Jimmy is Lambo. Alleged great DC who had a head coach who ran the defense
Over their heads on running an organization
-
Jimmy would give up up a nut to have the success Pete had so he could parlay it into a more prestigious jobhaie said:
Super hurtful FO while you're making zero counterpoints here.Tequilla said:
FUCK OFFhaie said:
We've lost close games except Michigan, which is an outlier circumstance and our second game of the year.AtomicDawg said:
We should beat wazzu. But they actually look way better than us right now. You have a melt down every game like everyone else and then have weird undeserved optimism during the week because were Washington. . This team sucks really bad.haie said:
4 minimum because of the Apple Cup and Arizona.AtomicDawg said:
Dude is probably winning 3-4 games. This is not close.haie said:Jimmy is what Pete was for 3 out of his 6 years at UW, but a little shittier than that even.
6-8 wins, bend and break, overly conservative D. Get up by at least 10 at half and you're really conservative on both sides of the ball and holding on, and the opponent knows it. And absolutely shit offense in need of a Gaskin-type to keep the sticks moving to apologize for bad play calling/scheme (this year that's McGrew).
Pete lost to Utah, Arizona, Cal, Graham ASU, all sorts of teams he should have handled. Jimmy's just done it with Beavlet and Montana (Pete barely scraped by Eastern).
There will be a blowout loss somewhere in there from UCLA/ASU/Oregon.
But it's been close losses in every game except Mishitagain.
We might have a blowout loss to Stanford on the road again or one of UCLA/ASU/Oregon. But most likely Stanford will be close as well, because they're aren't a good football team either.
The 3 better teams are at home. It will be hard to blow us out at home unless the team has quit completely.
We'll have, at worst, a close loss to Wazzu and/or Colorado because that's how every game has gone except one. But then we'll take another close, lucky win somewhere else.
Math says based on everything this year, it's unlikely that we win just 3-4.
But most likely we beat Wazzu (not going to get into that, but expect a W) and Colorado (who somehow made a worse hire than we did), and Arizona who is not currently Power 5.
5 wins. 2/3 of UCLA/ASU/Oregon will be close, conservatively. Stanford a close game, most likely.
We win 5-7. Upper bound is 7-8 wins.
That is a Pete year 3/6 years.
Michigan being an outlier I guess is fair … we’re clearly out of their league with Jimmy at the helm and Michigan still likely sucks until they prove otherwise
Everyone wants them to lose every single game. I get that.
But I'm focusing on conference play of not just UW, but all other teams too.
Beavlet 2-0 (convincing win and unconvincing win over 2 bad staffs with more talent)
@GhostofMosster47 0-2 (they need to go to FCS NOW)
Everyone else is mediocre.
Hard to see raw talent winning just 3-4 games. Maybe Jimmy gets it done but it's unlikely given our schedule and the teams we're playing.
AGAIN: who is Jimmy most like? It's like everyone forgot that Pete was mediocre, close to being less than mediocre, 3/6 years with this same mindset/schemes every fucking game.
I was on board with him doing well in the short term and bolting … but this was always going to end badly IF he didn’t leave on his own -
No one would give their left nut for 3/6 years being mediocre, and the other 3 losing to end the season. DoogTequilla said:
Jimmy would give up up a nut to have the success Pete had so he could parlay it into a more prestigious jobhaie said:
Super hurtful FO while you're making zero counterpoints here.Tequilla said:
FUCK OFFhaie said:
We've lost close games except Michigan, which is an outlier circumstance and our second game of the year.AtomicDawg said:
We should beat wazzu. But they actually look way better than us right now. You have a melt down every game like everyone else and then have weird undeserved optimism during the week because were Washington. . This team sucks really bad.haie said:
4 minimum because of the Apple Cup and Arizona.AtomicDawg said:
Dude is probably winning 3-4 games. This is not close.haie said:Jimmy is what Pete was for 3 out of his 6 years at UW, but a little shittier than that even.
6-8 wins, bend and break, overly conservative D. Get up by at least 10 at half and you're really conservative on both sides of the ball and holding on, and the opponent knows it. And absolutely shit offense in need of a Gaskin-type to keep the sticks moving to apologize for bad play calling/scheme (this year that's McGrew).
Pete lost to Utah, Arizona, Cal, Graham ASU, all sorts of teams he should have handled. Jimmy's just done it with Beavlet and Montana (Pete barely scraped by Eastern).
There will be a blowout loss somewhere in there from UCLA/ASU/Oregon.
But it's been close losses in every game except Mishitagain.
We might have a blowout loss to Stanford on the road again or one of UCLA/ASU/Oregon. But most likely Stanford will be close as well, because they're aren't a good football team either.
The 3 better teams are at home. It will be hard to blow us out at home unless the team has quit completely.
We'll have, at worst, a close loss to Wazzu and/or Colorado because that's how every game has gone except one. But then we'll take another close, lucky win somewhere else.
Math says based on everything this year, it's unlikely that we win just 3-4.
But most likely we beat Wazzu (not going to get into that, but expect a W) and Colorado (who somehow made a worse hire than we did), and Arizona who is not currently Power 5.
5 wins. 2/3 of UCLA/ASU/Oregon will be close, conservatively. Stanford a close game, most likely.
We win 5-7. Upper bound is 7-8 wins.
That is a Pete year 3/6 years.
Michigan being an outlier I guess is fair … we’re clearly out of their league with Jimmy at the helm and Michigan still likely sucks until they prove otherwise
Everyone wants them to lose every single game. I get that.
But I'm focusing on conference play of not just UW, but all other teams too.
Beavlet 2-0 (convincing win and unconvincing win over 2 bad staffs with more talent)
@GhostofMosster47 0-2 (they need to go to FCS NOW)
Everyone else is mediocre.
Hard to see raw talent winning just 3-4 games. Maybe Jimmy gets it done but it's unlikely given our schedule and the teams we're playing.
AGAIN: who is Jimmy most like? It's like everyone forgot that Pete was mediocre, close to being less than mediocre, 3/6 years with this same mindset/schemes every fucking game.
I was on board with him doing well in the short term and bolting … but this was always going to end badly IF he didn’t leave on his own -
I disagree. Mainly because I turned it back on and the game was already over. So it's mostly about my imagination. Babushka is like shang tsung. He took their soulhaie said:
Ugghhh, I've been to every fucking game in person except Mich.Pitchfork51 said:
The team has quit completelyhaie said:
We've lost close games except Michigan, which is an outlier circumstance and our second game of the year.AtomicDawg said:
We should beat wazzu. But they actually look way better than us right now. You have a melt down every game like everyone else and then have weird undeserved optimism during the week because were Washington. . This team sucks really bad.haie said:
4 minimum because of the Apple Cup and Arizona.AtomicDawg said:
Dude is probably winning 3-4 games. This is not close.haie said:Jimmy is what Pete was for 3 out of his 6 years at UW, but a little shittier than that even.
6-8 wins, bend and break, overly conservative D. Get up by at least 10 at half and you're really conservative on both sides of the ball and holding on, and the opponent knows it. And absolutely shit offense in need of a Gaskin-type to keep the sticks moving to apologize for bad play calling/scheme (this year that's McGrew).
Pete lost to Utah, Arizona, Cal, Graham ASU, all sorts of teams he should have handled. Jimmy's just done it with Beavlet and Montana (Pete barely scraped by Eastern).
There will be a blowout loss somewhere in there from UCLA/ASU/Oregon.
But it's been close losses in every game except Mishitagain.
We might have a blowout loss to Stanford on the road again or one of UCLA/ASU/Oregon. But most likely Stanford will be close as well, because they're aren't a good football team either.
The 3 better teams are at home. It will be hard to blow us out at home unless the team has quit completely.
We'll have, at worst, a close loss to Wazzu and/or Colorado because that's how every game has gone except one. But then we'll take another close, lucky win somewhere else.
Math says based on everything this year, it's unlikely that we win just 3-4.
But most likely we beat Wazzu (not going to get into that, but expect a W) and Colorado (who somehow made a worse hire than we did), and Arizona who is not currently Power 5.
5 wins. 2/3 of UCLA/ASU/Oregon will be close, conservatively. Stanford a close game, most likely.
We win 5-7. Upper bound is 7-8 wins.
That is a Pete year 3/6 years.
Hth
They did not quit against Beavlet. Actually everyone looked pretty fucking confident except when they were watching Morris bounce balls off of fucking OL heads.
As a matter of fact, when they went up 24-17 with 8 minutes to go and Little Seanny McGrew was running them over, their fans started getting really fucking scared. Pete Squad saved the day though. -
How many remember the Gilby days on dogman.com? All the arguments, guys like PeopleMuncher.
"Coach Gilbertson did not throw one pass or make a single block. It's not Gilby's fault that the program became soft under Slick Rick. Gilby needs time to get his recruits in there and clean up the mess left by Slick Rick. You could see the discipline falling badly under Slick. It's Neuheisel's fault. Gilby needs more time!!! -
Listen to the wise manRaceBannon said:
I've got 7-0ntxduck said:
A 6-1 finish for Jimmy seems unlikelyhaie said:Jimmy is what Pete was for 3 out of his 6 years at UW, but a little shittier than that even.
6-8 wins, bend and break, overly conservative D. Get up by at least 10 at half and you're really conservative on both sides of the ball and holding on, and the opponent knows it. And absolutely shit offense in need of a Gaskin-type to keep the sticks moving to apologize for bad play calling/scheme (this year that's McGrew).
Pete lost to Utah, Arizona, Cal, Graham ASU, all sorts of teams he should have handled. Jimmy's just done it with Beavlet and Montana (Pete barely scraped by Eastern). -
I love that the guys that gilby recruited when he worked for Rick were not his guys. He was the OC.AOG said:How many remember the Gilby days on dogman.com? All the arguments, guys like PeopleMuncher.
"Coach Gilbertson did not throw one pass or make a single block. It's not Gilby's fault that the program became soft under Slick Rick. Gilby needs time to get his recruits in there and clean up the mess left by Slick Rick. You could see the discipline falling badly under Slick. It's Neuheisel's fault. Gilby needs more time!!! -
Jimmy coached for Gilby in the Owen prequel year. Wonder how often he thinks about that these days.
-
