Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Compare and contrast

13567

Comments

  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,566

    SFGbob said:

    The aid worker story is very sad. That takes the civilian death toll from estimated 47,245 to 47,255.

    https://apnews.com/article/middle-east-business-afghanistan-43d8f53b35e80ec18c130cd683e1a38f

    How many of those civilian deaths were then touted as a great success and a righteous kill by the CIC and the Head of the Joint Chiefs? And how many of them were on account of the fact that we got our intel on who to target from the Taliban?


    What do you want to bet that Owl was OUTRAGED when Trump took out Soleimani and now he is just, ho hum, lots of civilians have died.

    On the old Shed Owl blamed George W. Bush personally for every civilian killed in the Iraq war even if they'd been killed by ISIS. According to Owl all of their blood what on Bush's hands. But now when Biden's dick is in his mouth, he runs interference for him.
    It's absolutely blood on Biden's hands. Thankfully he's doing what should have been done shortly after getting OBL. The Taliban was never going to comply with any of our demands. The exit was always going to be messy.
    Then you get the citizens out first followed by our resources, and the military last.
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,566
    edited September 2021

    The aid worker story is very sad. That takes the civilian death toll from estimated 47,245 to 47,255.

    https://apnews.com/article/middle-east-business-afghanistan-43d8f53b35e80ec18c130cd683e1a38f

    Great strawman. Try and keep up.

    99% of us here aren't against the removal from the Afghanistan. We were against the when and way it was done.

    We should not have left until the Taliban followed through on the conditions. Which they didn't.

    Then once they complied, you leave in this order:

    1) Civilians/US Citizens are the first to leave. Period.

    2) Supplies and anything else that can be used by the enemy gets destroyed or taken away.

    3) Finally the soldiers

    As you can see, when you start with step 3, steps 1 and 2 go to hell. It's really not that hard. But apparently, anything the requires 10 seconds of thought is difficult for the dementia patient you and your retarded friends voted for.

    Imagine voting for this...
    You should go to work for the Pentagon. You're obviously way better than the best military strategist in the world.
    https://www.google.com/amp/s/news.yahoo.com/amphtml/top-generals-said-they-advised-keeping-troops-in-afghanistan-contradicting-biden-191000921.html

    Looks like the military strategists were on the same page as me, but the dementia president you voted for overruled them. Imagine being a pathetic loser that voted for this…
  • Goduckies
    Goduckies Member Posts: 8,076 Standard Supporter

    The aid worker story is very sad. That takes the civilian death toll from estimated 47,245 to 47,255.

    https://apnews.com/article/middle-east-business-afghanistan-43d8f53b35e80ec18c130cd683e1a38f

    Great strawman. Try and keep up.

    99% of us here aren't against the removal from the Afghanistan. We were against the when and way it was done.

    We should not have left until the Taliban followed through on the conditions. Which they didn't.

    Then once they complied, you leave in this order:

    1) Civilians/US Citizens are the first to leave. Period.

    2) Supplies and anything else that can be used by the enemy gets destroyed or taken away.

    3) Finally the soldiers

    As you can see, when you start with step 3, steps 1 and 2 go to hell. It's really not that hard. But apparently, anything the requires 10 seconds of thought is difficult for the dementia patient you and your retarded friends voted for.

    Imagine voting for this...
    You should go to work for the Pentagon. You're obviously way better than the best military strategist in the world.
    https://www.google.com/amp/s/news.yahoo.com/amphtml/top-generals-said-they-advised-keeping-troops-in-afghanistan-contradicting-biden-191000921.html

    Looks like the military strategists were on the same page as me, but the dementia president you voted for overruled them. Imagine being a pathetic loser that voted for this…
    Time to run and hide
  • HustlinOwl
    HustlinOwl Member Posts: 953

    The aid worker story is very sad. That takes the civilian death toll from estimated 47,245 to 47,255.

    https://apnews.com/article/middle-east-business-afghanistan-43d8f53b35e80ec18c130cd683e1a38f

    Great strawman. Try and keep up.

    99% of us here aren't against the removal from the Afghanistan. We were against the when and way it was done.

    We should not have left until the Taliban followed through on the conditions. Which they didn't.

    Then once they complied, you leave in this order:

    1) Civilians/US Citizens are the first to leave. Period.

    2) Supplies and anything else that can be used by the enemy gets destroyed or taken away.

    3) Finally the soldiers

    As you can see, when you start with step 3, steps 1 and 2 go to hell. It's really not that hard. But apparently, anything the requires 10 seconds of thought is difficult for the dementia patient you and your retarded friends voted for.

    Imagine voting for this...
    You should go to work for the Pentagon. You're obviously way better than the best military strategist in the world.
    https://www.google.com/amp/s/news.yahoo.com/amphtml/top-generals-said-they-advised-keeping-troops-in-afghanistan-contradicting-biden-191000921.html

    Looks like the military strategists were on the same page as me, but the dementia president you voted for overruled them. Imagine being a pathetic loser that voted for this…
    You should read further on the hearings. The military made a terrible assumption about the stength of the Afghan security force and government. They had no idea they would fold in 10 days. 2500 troops left would be like laying your dick on the track to stop a freight train.

    Anybody travelling to Afghanistan in the last 20 years knew the risks they were taking.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188

    The aid worker story is very sad. That takes the civilian death toll from estimated 47,245 to 47,255.

    https://apnews.com/article/middle-east-business-afghanistan-43d8f53b35e80ec18c130cd683e1a38f

    Great strawman. Try and keep up.

    99% of us here aren't against the removal from the Afghanistan. We were against the when and way it was done.

    We should not have left until the Taliban followed through on the conditions. Which they didn't.

    Then once they complied, you leave in this order:

    1) Civilians/US Citizens are the first to leave. Period.

    2) Supplies and anything else that can be used by the enemy gets destroyed or taken away.

    3) Finally the soldiers

    As you can see, when you start with step 3, steps 1 and 2 go to hell. It's really not that hard. But apparently, anything the requires 10 seconds of thought is difficult for the dementia patient you and your retarded friends voted for.

    Imagine voting for this...
    You should go to work for the Pentagon. You're obviously way better than the best military strategist in the world.
    https://www.google.com/amp/s/news.yahoo.com/amphtml/top-generals-said-they-advised-keeping-troops-in-afghanistan-contradicting-biden-191000921.html

    Looks like the military strategists were on the same page as me, but the dementia president you voted for overruled them. Imagine being a pathetic loser that voted for this…
    You should read further on the hearings. The military made a terrible assumption about the stength of the Afghan security force and government. They had no idea they would fold in 10 days. 2500 troops left would be like laying your dick on the track to stop a freight train.

    Anybody travelling to Afghanistan in the last 20 years knew the risks they were taking.
    I think if you give it a little more effort you can get that dick even further down your throat Owl. They could have held the airbase and evacuated everyone they needed to evacuate with 2500 troops and air support Owl. The military made the assumption that they needed Bagram. The guy who's dick is currently past your tonsils, overrode them. Would you let Biden shit in your mouth if you thought it would help your team Owl?
  • hardhat
    hardhat Member Posts: 8,344
    edited September 2021

    The aid worker story is very sad. That takes the civilian death toll from estimated 47,245 to 47,255.

    https://apnews.com/article/middle-east-business-afghanistan-43d8f53b35e80ec18c130cd683e1a38f

    Great strawman. Try and keep up.

    99% of us here aren't against the removal from the Afghanistan. We were against the when and way it was done.

    We should not have left until the Taliban followed through on the conditions. Which they didn't.

    Then once they complied, you leave in this order:

    1) Civilians/US Citizens are the first to leave. Period.

    2) Supplies and anything else that can be used by the enemy gets destroyed or taken away.

    3) Finally the soldiers

    As you can see, when you start with step 3, steps 1 and 2 go to hell. It's really not that hard. But apparently, anything the requires 10 seconds of thought is difficult for the dementia patient you and your retarded friends voted for.

    Imagine voting for this...
    You should go to work for the Pentagon. You're obviously way better than the best military strategist in the world.
    https://www.google.com/amp/s/news.yahoo.com/amphtml/top-generals-said-they-advised-keeping-troops-in-afghanistan-contradicting-biden-191000921.html

    Looks like the military strategists were on the same page as me, but the dementia president you voted for overruled them. Imagine being a pathetic loser that voted for this…
    You should read further on the hearings. The military made a terrible assumption about the stength of the Afghan security force and government. They had no idea they would fold in 10 days. 2500 troops left would be like laying your dick on the track to stop a freight train.

    Anybody travelling to Afghanistan in the last 20 years knew the risks they were taking.
    You should consider why there is a need for investigation. If it was a kickass withdrawal planned with the might and intelligence of the world's most powerful military, why are there hearings to investigate how fucked up it was? Even when you're contradicting yourself, you are smug about it.
  • Alexis
    Alexis Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 3,431 Founders Club

    The aid worker story is very sad. That takes the civilian death toll from estimated 47,245 to 47,255.

    https://apnews.com/article/middle-east-business-afghanistan-43d8f53b35e80ec18c130cd683e1a38f

    Great strawman. Try and keep up.

    99% of us here aren't against the removal from the Afghanistan. We were against the when and way it was done.

    We should not have left until the Taliban followed through on the conditions. Which they didn't.

    Then once they complied, you leave in this order:

    1) Civilians/US Citizens are the first to leave. Period.

    2) Supplies and anything else that can be used by the enemy gets destroyed or taken away.

    3) Finally the soldiers

    As you can see, when you start with step 3, steps 1 and 2 go to hell. It's really not that hard. But apparently, anything the requires 10 seconds of thought is difficult for the dementia patient you and your retarded friends voted for.

    Imagine voting for this...
    You should go to work for the Pentagon. You're obviously way better than the best military strategist in the world.
    https://www.google.com/amp/s/news.yahoo.com/amphtml/top-generals-said-they-advised-keeping-troops-in-afghanistan-contradicting-biden-191000921.html

    Looks like the military strategists were on the same page as me, but the dementia president you voted for overruled them. Imagine being a pathetic loser that voted for this…
    You should read further on the hearings. The military made a terrible assumption about the stength of the Afghan security force and government. They had no idea they would fold in 10 days. 2500 troops left would be like laying your dick on the track to stop a freight train.

    Anybody travelling to Afghanistan in the last 20 years knew the risks they were taking.
    She deserved it. Did you see what she was wearing, Post of the day.
  • HustlinOwl
    HustlinOwl Member Posts: 953
    SFGbob said:

    The aid worker story is very sad. That takes the civilian death toll from estimated 47,245 to 47,255.

    https://apnews.com/article/middle-east-business-afghanistan-43d8f53b35e80ec18c130cd683e1a38f

    Great strawman. Try and keep up.

    99% of us here aren't against the removal from the Afghanistan. We were against the when and way it was done.

    We should not have left until the Taliban followed through on the conditions. Which they didn't.

    Then once they complied, you leave in this order:

    1) Civilians/US Citizens are the first to leave. Period.

    2) Supplies and anything else that can be used by the enemy gets destroyed or taken away.

    3) Finally the soldiers

    As you can see, when you start with step 3, steps 1 and 2 go to hell. It's really not that hard. But apparently, anything the requires 10 seconds of thought is difficult for the dementia patient you and your retarded friends voted for.

    Imagine voting for this...
    You should go to work for the Pentagon. You're obviously way better than the best military strategist in the world.
    https://www.google.com/amp/s/news.yahoo.com/amphtml/top-generals-said-they-advised-keeping-troops-in-afghanistan-contradicting-biden-191000921.html

    Looks like the military strategists were on the same page as me, but the dementia president you voted for overruled them. Imagine being a pathetic loser that voted for this…
    You should read further on the hearings. The military made a terrible assumption about the stength of the Afghan security force and government. They had no idea they would fold in 10 days. 2500 troops left would be like laying your dick on the track to stop a freight train.

    Anybody travelling to Afghanistan in the last 20 years knew the risks they were taking.
    I think if you give it a little more effort you can get that dick even further down your throat Owl. They could have held the airbase and evacuated everyone they needed to evacuate with 2500 troops and air support Owl. The military made the assumption that they needed Bagram. The guy who's dick is currently past your tonsils, overrode them. Would you let Biden shit in your mouth if you thought it would help your team Owl?
    Bagram was abandoned in July.
  • HustlinOwl
    HustlinOwl Member Posts: 953
    hardhat said:

    The aid worker story is very sad. That takes the civilian death toll from estimated 47,245 to 47,255.

    https://apnews.com/article/middle-east-business-afghanistan-43d8f53b35e80ec18c130cd683e1a38f

    Great strawman. Try and keep up.

    99% of us here aren't against the removal from the Afghanistan. We were against the when and way it was done.

    We should not have left until the Taliban followed through on the conditions. Which they didn't.

    Then once they complied, you leave in this order:

    1) Civilians/US Citizens are the first to leave. Period.

    2) Supplies and anything else that can be used by the enemy gets destroyed or taken away.

    3) Finally the soldiers

    As you can see, when you start with step 3, steps 1 and 2 go to hell. It's really not that hard. But apparently, anything the requires 10 seconds of thought is difficult for the dementia patient you and your retarded friends voted for.

    Imagine voting for this...
    You should go to work for the Pentagon. You're obviously way better than the best military strategist in the world.
    https://www.google.com/amp/s/news.yahoo.com/amphtml/top-generals-said-they-advised-keeping-troops-in-afghanistan-contradicting-biden-191000921.html

    Looks like the military strategists were on the same page as me, but the dementia president you voted for overruled them. Imagine being a pathetic loser that voted for this…
    You should read further on the hearings. The military made a terrible assumption about the stength of the Afghan security force and government. They had no idea they would fold in 10 days. 2500 troops left would be like laying your dick on the track to stop a freight train.

    Anybody travelling to Afghanistan in the last 20 years knew the risks they were taking.
    You should consider why there is a need for investigation. If it was a kickass withdrawal planned with the might and intelligence of the world's most powerful military, why are there hearings to investigate how fucked up it was? Even when you're contradicting yourself, you are smug about it.
    We'll find out. From today's hearings the military thought billions of dollars of hardware and 20 years of training would last for more than 10 days. Certainly much of what was left behind was intended for Afghan security forces supposed friendly to the US.
  • hardhat
    hardhat Member Posts: 8,344

    hardhat said:

    The aid worker story is very sad. That takes the civilian death toll from estimated 47,245 to 47,255.

    https://apnews.com/article/middle-east-business-afghanistan-43d8f53b35e80ec18c130cd683e1a38f

    Great strawman. Try and keep up.

    99% of us here aren't against the removal from the Afghanistan. We were against the when and way it was done.

    We should not have left until the Taliban followed through on the conditions. Which they didn't.

    Then once they complied, you leave in this order:

    1) Civilians/US Citizens are the first to leave. Period.

    2) Supplies and anything else that can be used by the enemy gets destroyed or taken away.

    3) Finally the soldiers

    As you can see, when you start with step 3, steps 1 and 2 go to hell. It's really not that hard. But apparently, anything the requires 10 seconds of thought is difficult for the dementia patient you and your retarded friends voted for.

    Imagine voting for this...
    You should go to work for the Pentagon. You're obviously way better than the best military strategist in the world.
    https://www.google.com/amp/s/news.yahoo.com/amphtml/top-generals-said-they-advised-keeping-troops-in-afghanistan-contradicting-biden-191000921.html

    Looks like the military strategists were on the same page as me, but the dementia president you voted for overruled them. Imagine being a pathetic loser that voted for this…
    You should read further on the hearings. The military made a terrible assumption about the stength of the Afghan security force and government. They had no idea they would fold in 10 days. 2500 troops left would be like laying your dick on the track to stop a freight train.

    Anybody travelling to Afghanistan in the last 20 years knew the risks they were taking.
    You should consider why there is a need for investigation. If it was a kickass withdrawal planned with the might and intelligence of the world's most powerful military, why are there hearings to investigate how fucked up it was? Even when you're contradicting yourself, you are smug about it.
    We'll find out. From today's hearings the military thought billions of dollars of hardware and 20 years of training would last for more than 10 days. Certainly much of what was left behind was intended for Afghan security forces supposed friendly to the US.
    I'm sure our independent press will make sure we get to the bottom of it.