Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Compare and contrast

«13

Comments

  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    Vindman is a HERO!
  • HustlinOwl
    HustlinOwl Member Posts: 953
    The aid worker story is very sad. That takes the civilian death toll from estimated 47,245 to 47,255.

    https://apnews.com/article/middle-east-business-afghanistan-43d8f53b35e80ec18c130cd683e1a38f
  • hardhat
    hardhat Member Posts: 8,344

    The aid worker story is very sad. That takes the civilian death toll from estimated 47,245 to 47,255.

    https://apnews.com/article/middle-east-business-afghanistan-43d8f53b35e80ec18c130cd683e1a38f

    Is the border open?
  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,467 Founders Club

    The aid worker story is very sad. That takes the civilian death toll from estimated 47,245 to 47,255.

    https://apnews.com/article/middle-east-business-afghanistan-43d8f53b35e80ec18c130cd683e1a38f

    1m civilians dies in Iraq.

    You're telling me < 50k died in Afghanistan?

    I'm taking the over. For any number.

    Thus validating your poont. So Congratulations, first tim for everything
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,082

    The aid worker story is very sad. That takes the civilian death toll from estimated 47,245 to 47,255.

    https://apnews.com/article/middle-east-business-afghanistan-43d8f53b35e80ec18c130cd683e1a38f

    Great strawman. Try and keep up.

    99% of us here weren't against the removal from the Afghanistan. We were against the way it was done.

    1) The most important rule is the civilians are the first to leave. Period.

    2) Supplies and anything else that can be used against you, gets removed.

    3) Finally the soldiers

    As you can see, when you start with step 3, steps 1 and 2 go to hell. It's really not that hard, but apparently, anything the requires 10 seconds of thought is difficult for the dementia patient you and your retarded friends voted for.

    Imagine voting for this...

  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    edited September 2021

    The aid worker story is very sad. That takes the civilian death toll from estimated 47,245 to 47,255.

    https://apnews.com/article/middle-east-business-afghanistan-43d8f53b35e80ec18c130cd683e1a38f

    How many of those civilian deaths were then touted as a great success and a righteous kill by the CIC and the Head of the Joint Chiefs? And how many of them were on account of the fact that we got our intel on who to target from the Taliban?


    What do you want to bet that Owl was OUTRAGED when Trump took out Soleimani and now he is just, ho hum, lots of civilians have died.

    On the old Shed Owl blamed George W. Bush personally for every civilian killed in the Iraq war even if they'd been killed by ISIS. According to Owl all of their blood what on Bush's hands. But now when Biden's dick is in his mouth, he runs interference for him.
  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967

    @Swaye made a good post on this and the chain of command and all that

    The difference being that if was a lefty going after Trump the media and the generals would have had his back. They actively conspired against Trump

    I think more guys may need to be "crazy" before this is done

    And another difference between the left and the soft GOP is shown by yet another "insider" book on Trump being released by some WH staffer who worked for both Trump and Melania and is now savaging them with the usual bullshit

    No leftist or democrat president would have that happen

    The GOP can't get anyone decent to work in DC because they either get arrested or have their reputation ruined. Easier to stay private and make money

    That's not by accident

    I believe this is the lady that was Melania's personal secretary and was actually Trump's press secretary for about an hour. Maybe I'm wrong.
  • HustlinOwl
    HustlinOwl Member Posts: 953

    The aid worker story is very sad. That takes the civilian death toll from estimated 47,245 to 47,255.

    https://apnews.com/article/middle-east-business-afghanistan-43d8f53b35e80ec18c130cd683e1a38f

    Great strawman. Try and keep up.

    99% of us here aren't against the removal from the Afghanistan. We were against the when and way it was done.

    We should not have left until the Taliban followed through on the conditions. Which they didn't.

    Then once they complied, you leave in this order:

    1) Civilians/US Citizens are the first to leave. Period.

    2) Supplies and anything else that can be used by the enemy gets destroyed or taken away.

    3) Finally the soldiers

    As you can see, when you start with step 3, steps 1 and 2 go to hell. It's really not that hard. But apparently, anything the requires 10 seconds of thought is difficult for the dementia patient you and your retarded friends voted for.

    Imagine voting for this...
    You should go to work for the Pentagon. You're obviously way better than the best military strategist in the world.
  • HustlinOwl
    HustlinOwl Member Posts: 953
    SFGbob said:

    The aid worker story is very sad. That takes the civilian death toll from estimated 47,245 to 47,255.

    https://apnews.com/article/middle-east-business-afghanistan-43d8f53b35e80ec18c130cd683e1a38f

    How many of those civilian deaths were then touted as a great success and a righteous kill by the CIC and the Head of the Joint Chiefs? And how many of them were on account of the fact that we got our intel on who to target from the Taliban?


    What do you want to bet that Owl was OUTRAGED when Trump took out Soleimani and now he is just, ho hum, lots of civilians have died.

    On the old Shed Owl blamed George W. Bush personally for every civilian killed in the Iraq war even if they'd been killed by ISIS. According to Owl all of their blood what on Bush's hands. But now when Biden's dick is in his mouth, he runs interference for him.
    It's absolutely blood on Biden's hands. Thankfully he's doing what should have been done shortly after getting OBL. The Taliban was never going to comply with any of our demands. The exit was always going to be messy.
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,082
    edited September 2021

    SFGbob said:

    The aid worker story is very sad. That takes the civilian death toll from estimated 47,245 to 47,255.

    https://apnews.com/article/middle-east-business-afghanistan-43d8f53b35e80ec18c130cd683e1a38f

    How many of those civilian deaths were then touted as a great success and a righteous kill by the CIC and the Head of the Joint Chiefs? And how many of them were on account of the fact that we got our intel on who to target from the Taliban?


    What do you want to bet that Owl was OUTRAGED when Trump took out Soleimani and now he is just, ho hum, lots of civilians have died.

    On the old Shed Owl blamed George W. Bush personally for every civilian killed in the Iraq war even if they'd been killed by ISIS. According to Owl all of their blood what on Bush's hands. But now when Biden's dick is in his mouth, he runs interference for him.
    It's absolutely blood on Biden's hands. Thankfully he's doing what should have been done shortly after getting OBL. The Taliban was never going to comply with any of our demands. The exit was always going to be messy.
    Noted nothing to see here Stooge weighs in.

    But it's ok to leave behind the weapons used to kill the remaining Afghans and Americans. Because, well, it was going to be messy.

    God, you're nearing Kobe levels of stupid shilling. But in his case, he might be a troll. You're just a fekking idjut, Curly.

  • HustlinOwl
    HustlinOwl Member Posts: 953

    SFGbob said:

    The aid worker story is very sad. That takes the civilian death toll from estimated 47,245 to 47,255.

    https://apnews.com/article/middle-east-business-afghanistan-43d8f53b35e80ec18c130cd683e1a38f

    How many of those civilian deaths were then touted as a great success and a righteous kill by the CIC and the Head of the Joint Chiefs? And how many of them were on account of the fact that we got our intel on who to target from the Taliban?


    What do you want to bet that Owl was OUTRAGED when Trump took out Soleimani and now he is just, ho hum, lots of civilians have died.

    On the old Shed Owl blamed George W. Bush personally for every civilian killed in the Iraq war even if they'd been killed by ISIS. According to Owl all of their blood what on Bush's hands. But now when Biden's dick is in his mouth, he runs interference for him.
    It's absolutely blood on Biden's hands. Thankfully he's doing what should have been done shortly after getting OBL. The Taliban was never going to comply with any of our demands. The exit was always going to be messy.
    Noted nothing to see here Stooge weighs in.

    But it's ok to leave behind the weapons used to kill the remaining Afghans and Americans. Because, well, it was going to be messy.

    God, you're nearing Kobe levels of stupid shilling. But in his case, he might be a troll. You're just a fekking idjut, Curly.

    I'd like to hear the reasoning of leaving behind basically anything. You and I have no details on the process so STFU.
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,082
    edited September 2021

    SFGbob said:

    The aid worker story is very sad. That takes the civilian death toll from estimated 47,245 to 47,255.

    https://apnews.com/article/middle-east-business-afghanistan-43d8f53b35e80ec18c130cd683e1a38f

    How many of those civilian deaths were then touted as a great success and a righteous kill by the CIC and the Head of the Joint Chiefs? And how many of them were on account of the fact that we got our intel on who to target from the Taliban?


    What do you want to bet that Owl was OUTRAGED when Trump took out Soleimani and now he is just, ho hum, lots of civilians have died.

    On the old Shed Owl blamed George W. Bush personally for every civilian killed in the Iraq war even if they'd been killed by ISIS. According to Owl all of their blood what on Bush's hands. But now when Biden's dick is in his mouth, he runs interference for him.
    It's absolutely blood on Biden's hands. Thankfully he's doing what should have been done shortly after getting OBL. The Taliban was never going to comply with any of our demands. The exit was always going to be messy.
    Noted nothing to see here Stooge weighs in.

    But it's ok to leave behind the weapons used to kill the remaining Afghans and Americans. Because, well, it was going to be messy.

    God, you're nearing Kobe levels of stupid shilling. But in his case, he might be a troll. You're just a fekking idjut, Curly.

    I'd like to hear the reasoning of leaving behind basically anything. You and I have no details on the process so STFU.
    I'll say and poast whatever the fuck I'd like, shill.

    Go share a semen stained towel with your boy @HuskyJW and wipe Lying Joe's cum off your chin.

  • hardhat
    hardhat Member Posts: 8,344
    edited September 2021
    HustlinOwl said:

    I have no details
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,773 Standard Supporter

    https://newsmax.com/politics/milley-biden-afghanistan/2021/09/28/id/1038262/

    Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Mark Milley on Tuesday said he recommended keeping 2,500 U.S. troops in Afghanistan prior to the chaotic military withdrawal in August — a bombshell that contradicts President Joe Biden’s assertion he got no such direction.

    "I won't share my personal recommendation to the president, but I will give you my honest opinion and my honest opinion and view shaped my recommendation," Milley said in a hearing before the Senate Armed Services Committee, Fox News reported.

    "And I recommended that we maintain 2,500 troops in Afghanistan."

    On Aug. 18, Biden denied his top military commanders recommended leaving 2,500 troops behind, telling ABC News' George Stephanopoulos,"No they didn’t. It was split. That wasn’t true," a transcript of the exchange showed.

    When pressed, Biden added, "No one said that to me that I can recall."

    Milley also told the Senate committee he won’t resign his post out of protest over Biden’s refusing his advice.

    "Resigning is a really serious thing. It's a political act, if I’m resigning in protest," Milley testified, Fox News reported.

    "My job is to provide advice. My statutory responsibility is to provide legal advice or best military advice to the president. And that's my legal requirement. That's what the law is. The president doesn't have to agree with that advice," he continued.


    Yet this fuckstick called China when he disagreed with Trump

    Dude needs to swing from a rope

    Anyway he called Biden a fucking liar dog faced pony soldier

    In his defense Joe can't recall 10 minute ago Tapioca pudding.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183

    SFGbob said:

    The aid worker story is very sad. That takes the civilian death toll from estimated 47,245 to 47,255.

    https://apnews.com/article/middle-east-business-afghanistan-43d8f53b35e80ec18c130cd683e1a38f

    How many of those civilian deaths were then touted as a great success and a righteous kill by the CIC and the Head of the Joint Chiefs? And how many of them were on account of the fact that we got our intel on who to target from the Taliban?


    What do you want to bet that Owl was OUTRAGED when Trump took out Soleimani and now he is just, ho hum, lots of civilians have died.

    On the old Shed Owl blamed George W. Bush personally for every civilian killed in the Iraq war even if they'd been killed by ISIS. According to Owl all of their blood what on Bush's hands. But now when Biden's dick is in his mouth, he runs interference for him.
    It's absolutely blood on Biden's hands. Thankfully he's doing what should have been done shortly after getting OBL. The Taliban was never going to comply with any of our demands. The exit was always going to be messy.
    My, my how your tune has change. I thought Afghanistan was where the "real" war on terror was Owl and that Obama was going to go in there and kick ass after Bush took his eye off the ball. Why should we have left after getting OBL Owl? He wasn't in Afghanistan. So the blood is on Biden's hands but you were just too circumspect to say so until now. Weird how tempered your responses are depending on who it is that's sitting in the Oval Office.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183

    SFGbob said:

    The aid worker story is very sad. That takes the civilian death toll from estimated 47,245 to 47,255.

    https://apnews.com/article/middle-east-business-afghanistan-43d8f53b35e80ec18c130cd683e1a38f

    How many of those civilian deaths were then touted as a great success and a righteous kill by the CIC and the Head of the Joint Chiefs? And how many of them were on account of the fact that we got our intel on who to target from the Taliban?


    What do you want to bet that Owl was OUTRAGED when Trump took out Soleimani and now he is just, ho hum, lots of civilians have died.

    On the old Shed Owl blamed George W. Bush personally for every civilian killed in the Iraq war even if they'd been killed by ISIS. According to Owl all of their blood what on Bush's hands. But now when Biden's dick is in his mouth, he runs interference for him.
    It's absolutely blood on Biden's hands. Thankfully he's doing what should have been done shortly after getting OBL. The Taliban was never going to comply with any of our demands. The exit was always going to be messy.
    Noted nothing to see here Stooge weighs in.

    But it's ok to leave behind the weapons used to kill the remaining Afghans and Americans. Because, well, it was going to be messy.

    God, you're nearing Kobe levels of stupid shilling. But in his case, he might be a troll. You're just a fekking idjut, Curly.

    I'd like to hear the reasoning of leaving behind basically anything. You and I have no details on the process so STFU.
    Pathetic. Not knowing the details never detoured you from running your mouth when Bush was in office Owl. Now unless we "know the details" we can't really comment on leaving behind $85 Billion in military equipment. There might be a really good reason we did so, if we "knew the details."
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,560

    SFGbob said:

    The aid worker story is very sad. That takes the civilian death toll from estimated 47,245 to 47,255.

    https://apnews.com/article/middle-east-business-afghanistan-43d8f53b35e80ec18c130cd683e1a38f

    How many of those civilian deaths were then touted as a great success and a righteous kill by the CIC and the Head of the Joint Chiefs? And how many of them were on account of the fact that we got our intel on who to target from the Taliban?


    What do you want to bet that Owl was OUTRAGED when Trump took out Soleimani and now he is just, ho hum, lots of civilians have died.

    On the old Shed Owl blamed George W. Bush personally for every civilian killed in the Iraq war even if they'd been killed by ISIS. According to Owl all of their blood what on Bush's hands. But now when Biden's dick is in his mouth, he runs interference for him.
    It's absolutely blood on Biden's hands. Thankfully he's doing what should have been done shortly after getting OBL. The Taliban was never going to comply with any of our demands. The exit was always going to be messy.
    Then you get the citizens out first followed by our resources, and the military last.
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,560
    edited September 2021

    The aid worker story is very sad. That takes the civilian death toll from estimated 47,245 to 47,255.

    https://apnews.com/article/middle-east-business-afghanistan-43d8f53b35e80ec18c130cd683e1a38f

    Great strawman. Try and keep up.

    99% of us here aren't against the removal from the Afghanistan. We were against the when and way it was done.

    We should not have left until the Taliban followed through on the conditions. Which they didn't.

    Then once they complied, you leave in this order:

    1) Civilians/US Citizens are the first to leave. Period.

    2) Supplies and anything else that can be used by the enemy gets destroyed or taken away.

    3) Finally the soldiers

    As you can see, when you start with step 3, steps 1 and 2 go to hell. It's really not that hard. But apparently, anything the requires 10 seconds of thought is difficult for the dementia patient you and your retarded friends voted for.

    Imagine voting for this...
    You should go to work for the Pentagon. You're obviously way better than the best military strategist in the world.
    https://www.google.com/amp/s/news.yahoo.com/amphtml/top-generals-said-they-advised-keeping-troops-in-afghanistan-contradicting-biden-191000921.html

    Looks like the military strategists were on the same page as me, but the dementia president you voted for overruled them. Imagine being a pathetic loser that voted for this…
  • Goduckies
    Goduckies Member Posts: 7,966 Standard Supporter

    The aid worker story is very sad. That takes the civilian death toll from estimated 47,245 to 47,255.

    https://apnews.com/article/middle-east-business-afghanistan-43d8f53b35e80ec18c130cd683e1a38f

    Great strawman. Try and keep up.

    99% of us here aren't against the removal from the Afghanistan. We were against the when and way it was done.

    We should not have left until the Taliban followed through on the conditions. Which they didn't.

    Then once they complied, you leave in this order:

    1) Civilians/US Citizens are the first to leave. Period.

    2) Supplies and anything else that can be used by the enemy gets destroyed or taken away.

    3) Finally the soldiers

    As you can see, when you start with step 3, steps 1 and 2 go to hell. It's really not that hard. But apparently, anything the requires 10 seconds of thought is difficult for the dementia patient you and your retarded friends voted for.

    Imagine voting for this...
    You should go to work for the Pentagon. You're obviously way better than the best military strategist in the world.
    https://www.google.com/amp/s/news.yahoo.com/amphtml/top-generals-said-they-advised-keeping-troops-in-afghanistan-contradicting-biden-191000921.html

    Looks like the military strategists were on the same page as me, but the dementia president you voted for overruled them. Imagine being a pathetic loser that voted for this…
    Time to run and hide
  • HustlinOwl
    HustlinOwl Member Posts: 953

    The aid worker story is very sad. That takes the civilian death toll from estimated 47,245 to 47,255.

    https://apnews.com/article/middle-east-business-afghanistan-43d8f53b35e80ec18c130cd683e1a38f

    Great strawman. Try and keep up.

    99% of us here aren't against the removal from the Afghanistan. We were against the when and way it was done.

    We should not have left until the Taliban followed through on the conditions. Which they didn't.

    Then once they complied, you leave in this order:

    1) Civilians/US Citizens are the first to leave. Period.

    2) Supplies and anything else that can be used by the enemy gets destroyed or taken away.

    3) Finally the soldiers

    As you can see, when you start with step 3, steps 1 and 2 go to hell. It's really not that hard. But apparently, anything the requires 10 seconds of thought is difficult for the dementia patient you and your retarded friends voted for.

    Imagine voting for this...
    You should go to work for the Pentagon. You're obviously way better than the best military strategist in the world.
    https://www.google.com/amp/s/news.yahoo.com/amphtml/top-generals-said-they-advised-keeping-troops-in-afghanistan-contradicting-biden-191000921.html

    Looks like the military strategists were on the same page as me, but the dementia president you voted for overruled them. Imagine being a pathetic loser that voted for this…
    You should read further on the hearings. The military made a terrible assumption about the stength of the Afghan security force and government. They had no idea they would fold in 10 days. 2500 troops left would be like laying your dick on the track to stop a freight train.

    Anybody travelling to Afghanistan in the last 20 years knew the risks they were taking.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183

    The aid worker story is very sad. That takes the civilian death toll from estimated 47,245 to 47,255.

    https://apnews.com/article/middle-east-business-afghanistan-43d8f53b35e80ec18c130cd683e1a38f

    Great strawman. Try and keep up.

    99% of us here aren't against the removal from the Afghanistan. We were against the when and way it was done.

    We should not have left until the Taliban followed through on the conditions. Which they didn't.

    Then once they complied, you leave in this order:

    1) Civilians/US Citizens are the first to leave. Period.

    2) Supplies and anything else that can be used by the enemy gets destroyed or taken away.

    3) Finally the soldiers

    As you can see, when you start with step 3, steps 1 and 2 go to hell. It's really not that hard. But apparently, anything the requires 10 seconds of thought is difficult for the dementia patient you and your retarded friends voted for.

    Imagine voting for this...
    You should go to work for the Pentagon. You're obviously way better than the best military strategist in the world.
    https://www.google.com/amp/s/news.yahoo.com/amphtml/top-generals-said-they-advised-keeping-troops-in-afghanistan-contradicting-biden-191000921.html

    Looks like the military strategists were on the same page as me, but the dementia president you voted for overruled them. Imagine being a pathetic loser that voted for this…
    You should read further on the hearings. The military made a terrible assumption about the stength of the Afghan security force and government. They had no idea they would fold in 10 days. 2500 troops left would be like laying your dick on the track to stop a freight train.

    Anybody travelling to Afghanistan in the last 20 years knew the risks they were taking.
    I think if you give it a little more effort you can get that dick even further down your throat Owl. They could have held the airbase and evacuated everyone they needed to evacuate with 2500 troops and air support Owl. The military made the assumption that they needed Bagram. The guy who's dick is currently past your tonsils, overrode them. Would you let Biden shit in your mouth if you thought it would help your team Owl?
  • hardhat
    hardhat Member Posts: 8,344
    edited September 2021

    The aid worker story is very sad. That takes the civilian death toll from estimated 47,245 to 47,255.

    https://apnews.com/article/middle-east-business-afghanistan-43d8f53b35e80ec18c130cd683e1a38f

    Great strawman. Try and keep up.

    99% of us here aren't against the removal from the Afghanistan. We were against the when and way it was done.

    We should not have left until the Taliban followed through on the conditions. Which they didn't.

    Then once they complied, you leave in this order:

    1) Civilians/US Citizens are the first to leave. Period.

    2) Supplies and anything else that can be used by the enemy gets destroyed or taken away.

    3) Finally the soldiers

    As you can see, when you start with step 3, steps 1 and 2 go to hell. It's really not that hard. But apparently, anything the requires 10 seconds of thought is difficult for the dementia patient you and your retarded friends voted for.

    Imagine voting for this...
    You should go to work for the Pentagon. You're obviously way better than the best military strategist in the world.
    https://www.google.com/amp/s/news.yahoo.com/amphtml/top-generals-said-they-advised-keeping-troops-in-afghanistan-contradicting-biden-191000921.html

    Looks like the military strategists were on the same page as me, but the dementia president you voted for overruled them. Imagine being a pathetic loser that voted for this…
    You should read further on the hearings. The military made a terrible assumption about the stength of the Afghan security force and government. They had no idea they would fold in 10 days. 2500 troops left would be like laying your dick on the track to stop a freight train.

    Anybody travelling to Afghanistan in the last 20 years knew the risks they were taking.
    You should consider why there is a need for investigation. If it was a kickass withdrawal planned with the might and intelligence of the world's most powerful military, why are there hearings to investigate how fucked up it was? Even when you're contradicting yourself, you are smug about it.
  • Alexis
    Alexis Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 3,387 Founders Club

    The aid worker story is very sad. That takes the civilian death toll from estimated 47,245 to 47,255.

    https://apnews.com/article/middle-east-business-afghanistan-43d8f53b35e80ec18c130cd683e1a38f

    Great strawman. Try and keep up.

    99% of us here aren't against the removal from the Afghanistan. We were against the when and way it was done.

    We should not have left until the Taliban followed through on the conditions. Which they didn't.

    Then once they complied, you leave in this order:

    1) Civilians/US Citizens are the first to leave. Period.

    2) Supplies and anything else that can be used by the enemy gets destroyed or taken away.

    3) Finally the soldiers

    As you can see, when you start with step 3, steps 1 and 2 go to hell. It's really not that hard. But apparently, anything the requires 10 seconds of thought is difficult for the dementia patient you and your retarded friends voted for.

    Imagine voting for this...
    You should go to work for the Pentagon. You're obviously way better than the best military strategist in the world.
    https://www.google.com/amp/s/news.yahoo.com/amphtml/top-generals-said-they-advised-keeping-troops-in-afghanistan-contradicting-biden-191000921.html

    Looks like the military strategists were on the same page as me, but the dementia president you voted for overruled them. Imagine being a pathetic loser that voted for this…
    You should read further on the hearings. The military made a terrible assumption about the stength of the Afghan security force and government. They had no idea they would fold in 10 days. 2500 troops left would be like laying your dick on the track to stop a freight train.

    Anybody travelling to Afghanistan in the last 20 years knew the risks they were taking.
    She deserved it. Did you see what she was wearing, Post of the day.
  • HustlinOwl
    HustlinOwl Member Posts: 953
    SFGbob said:

    The aid worker story is very sad. That takes the civilian death toll from estimated 47,245 to 47,255.

    https://apnews.com/article/middle-east-business-afghanistan-43d8f53b35e80ec18c130cd683e1a38f

    Great strawman. Try and keep up.

    99% of us here aren't against the removal from the Afghanistan. We were against the when and way it was done.

    We should not have left until the Taliban followed through on the conditions. Which they didn't.

    Then once they complied, you leave in this order:

    1) Civilians/US Citizens are the first to leave. Period.

    2) Supplies and anything else that can be used by the enemy gets destroyed or taken away.

    3) Finally the soldiers

    As you can see, when you start with step 3, steps 1 and 2 go to hell. It's really not that hard. But apparently, anything the requires 10 seconds of thought is difficult for the dementia patient you and your retarded friends voted for.

    Imagine voting for this...
    You should go to work for the Pentagon. You're obviously way better than the best military strategist in the world.
    https://www.google.com/amp/s/news.yahoo.com/amphtml/top-generals-said-they-advised-keeping-troops-in-afghanistan-contradicting-biden-191000921.html

    Looks like the military strategists were on the same page as me, but the dementia president you voted for overruled them. Imagine being a pathetic loser that voted for this…
    You should read further on the hearings. The military made a terrible assumption about the stength of the Afghan security force and government. They had no idea they would fold in 10 days. 2500 troops left would be like laying your dick on the track to stop a freight train.

    Anybody travelling to Afghanistan in the last 20 years knew the risks they were taking.
    I think if you give it a little more effort you can get that dick even further down your throat Owl. They could have held the airbase and evacuated everyone they needed to evacuate with 2500 troops and air support Owl. The military made the assumption that they needed Bagram. The guy who's dick is currently past your tonsils, overrode them. Would you let Biden shit in your mouth if you thought it would help your team Owl?
    Bagram was abandoned in July.
  • HustlinOwl
    HustlinOwl Member Posts: 953
    hardhat said:

    The aid worker story is very sad. That takes the civilian death toll from estimated 47,245 to 47,255.

    https://apnews.com/article/middle-east-business-afghanistan-43d8f53b35e80ec18c130cd683e1a38f

    Great strawman. Try and keep up.

    99% of us here aren't against the removal from the Afghanistan. We were against the when and way it was done.

    We should not have left until the Taliban followed through on the conditions. Which they didn't.

    Then once they complied, you leave in this order:

    1) Civilians/US Citizens are the first to leave. Period.

    2) Supplies and anything else that can be used by the enemy gets destroyed or taken away.

    3) Finally the soldiers

    As you can see, when you start with step 3, steps 1 and 2 go to hell. It's really not that hard. But apparently, anything the requires 10 seconds of thought is difficult for the dementia patient you and your retarded friends voted for.

    Imagine voting for this...
    You should go to work for the Pentagon. You're obviously way better than the best military strategist in the world.
    https://www.google.com/amp/s/news.yahoo.com/amphtml/top-generals-said-they-advised-keeping-troops-in-afghanistan-contradicting-biden-191000921.html

    Looks like the military strategists were on the same page as me, but the dementia president you voted for overruled them. Imagine being a pathetic loser that voted for this…
    You should read further on the hearings. The military made a terrible assumption about the stength of the Afghan security force and government. They had no idea they would fold in 10 days. 2500 troops left would be like laying your dick on the track to stop a freight train.

    Anybody travelling to Afghanistan in the last 20 years knew the risks they were taking.
    You should consider why there is a need for investigation. If it was a kickass withdrawal planned with the might and intelligence of the world's most powerful military, why are there hearings to investigate how fucked up it was? Even when you're contradicting yourself, you are smug about it.
    We'll find out. From today's hearings the military thought billions of dollars of hardware and 20 years of training would last for more than 10 days. Certainly much of what was left behind was intended for Afghan security forces supposed friendly to the US.
  • hardhat
    hardhat Member Posts: 8,344

    hardhat said:

    The aid worker story is very sad. That takes the civilian death toll from estimated 47,245 to 47,255.

    https://apnews.com/article/middle-east-business-afghanistan-43d8f53b35e80ec18c130cd683e1a38f

    Great strawman. Try and keep up.

    99% of us here aren't against the removal from the Afghanistan. We were against the when and way it was done.

    We should not have left until the Taliban followed through on the conditions. Which they didn't.

    Then once they complied, you leave in this order:

    1) Civilians/US Citizens are the first to leave. Period.

    2) Supplies and anything else that can be used by the enemy gets destroyed or taken away.

    3) Finally the soldiers

    As you can see, when you start with step 3, steps 1 and 2 go to hell. It's really not that hard. But apparently, anything the requires 10 seconds of thought is difficult for the dementia patient you and your retarded friends voted for.

    Imagine voting for this...
    You should go to work for the Pentagon. You're obviously way better than the best military strategist in the world.
    https://www.google.com/amp/s/news.yahoo.com/amphtml/top-generals-said-they-advised-keeping-troops-in-afghanistan-contradicting-biden-191000921.html

    Looks like the military strategists were on the same page as me, but the dementia president you voted for overruled them. Imagine being a pathetic loser that voted for this…
    You should read further on the hearings. The military made a terrible assumption about the stength of the Afghan security force and government. They had no idea they would fold in 10 days. 2500 troops left would be like laying your dick on the track to stop a freight train.

    Anybody travelling to Afghanistan in the last 20 years knew the risks they were taking.
    You should consider why there is a need for investigation. If it was a kickass withdrawal planned with the might and intelligence of the world's most powerful military, why are there hearings to investigate how fucked up it was? Even when you're contradicting yourself, you are smug about it.
    We'll find out. From today's hearings the military thought billions of dollars of hardware and 20 years of training would last for more than 10 days. Certainly much of what was left behind was intended for Afghan security forces supposed friendly to the US.
    I'm sure our independent press will make sure we get to the bottom of it.