Dems Try To FORCE Conservative Justices To Retire So They Can Shoehorn Radical Judges In


Comments
-
Taken at face value, can you explain how this would be worse than what you guys did with what should have been Obama’s last Supreme Court seat?
-
You mean you are trying to equate a procedure in the Senate, one that can only take place when there is a vacancy, to rats trying to force Judges to retire?TheKobeStopper said:Taken at face value, can you explain how this would be worse than what you guys did with what should have been Obama’s last Supreme Court seat?
In your mind that is the same thing? -
The one where he failed at being a politician and screwed upTheKobeStopper said:Taken at face value, can you explain how this would be worse than what you guys did with what should have been Obama’s last Supreme Court seat?
-
No. Because you've gone full retard and have lost all ability to exercise critical thought, logic and common sense.TheKobeStopper said:Taken at face value, can you explain how this would be worse than what you guys did with what should have been Obama’s last Supreme Court seat?
-
TheKobeStopper said:
Taken at face value, can you explain how this would be worse than what you guys did with what should have been Obama’s last Supreme Court seat?
-
Discussing Conservative Judges with a pic of John Roberts. I laffed.
-
I always love apples to dogshit comparisons.TheKobeStopper said:Taken at face value, can you explain how this would be worse than what you guys did with what should have been Obama’s last Supreme Court seat?
-
And there's Mello the fucking pussy with a down vote. Hey Mello, pull on your big boy pants and tell us why anything he said was wrong you fucking Kunt.Bendintheriver said:
You mean you are trying to equate a procedure in the Senate, one that can only take place when there is a vacancy, to rats trying to force Judges to retire?TheKobeStopper said:Taken at face value, can you explain how this would be worse than what you guys did with what should have been Obama’s last Supreme Court seat?
In your mind that is the same thing? -
Now how is that worse than what you guy's did to Obama's last Supreme Court seat?hardhat said:TheKobeStopper said:Taken at face value, can you explain how this would be worse than what you guys did with what should have been Obama’s last Supreme Court seat?
-
Kobe to my knowledge has never made a comparison that wasn't. And I've been reading his moronic posts for a long time. I like to cut myself too.SFGbob said:
I always love apples to dogshit comparisons.TheKobeStopper said:Taken at face value, can you explain how this would be worse than what you guys did with what should have been Obama’s last Supreme Court seat?
-
Why are you assuming that Mello wears pants and not a diaper?SFGbob said:
And there's Mello the fucking pussy with a down vote. Hey Mello, pull on your big boy pants and tell us why anything he said was wrong you fucking Kunt.Bendintheriver said:
You mean you are trying to equate a procedure in the Senate, one that can only take place when there is a vacancy, to rats trying to force Judges to retire?TheKobeStopper said:Taken at face value, can you explain how this would be worse than what you guys did with what should have been Obama’s last Supreme Court seat?
In your mind that is the same thing? -
Let me help you out Kobe because I know you're a dipshit. First of all it's not Obama's Supreme Court seat. Obama's role is nominate someone when a vacancy on the court opens up. He did that. The Senate can then either take up nomination or not. The Republicans, who were in the majority decided not to take up the Garland's nomination. Given how he has preformed as AG, I'd say the Republicans decided wisely.TheKobeStopper said:Taken at face value, can you explain how this would be worse than what you guys did with what should have been Obama’s last Supreme Court seat?
-
Yup Garland has shown to be a shill...very glad he isn't on the court... moderate my assSFGbob said:
Let me help you out Kobe because I know you're a dipshit. First of all it's not Obama's Supreme Court seat. Obama's role is nominate someone when a vacancy on the court opens up. He did that. The Senate can then either take up nomination or not. The Republicans, who were in the majority decided not to take up the Garland's nomination. Given how he has preformed as AG, I'd say the Republicans decided wisely.TheKobeStopper said:Taken at face value, can you explain how this would be worse than what you guys did with what should have been Obama’s last Supreme Court seat?