Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

I would totally eat at this restaurant.

2»

Comments

  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,114 Standard Supporter

    Free market economics determines right and wrong?

    Acting up and annoying the shit out of other customers is definitely wrong. The policy is behavior based. Yes, it makes an assumption that those in strollers and high chairs are going to misbehave.

    Same type of policy should be adopted regarding people talking on their cell phones in restaurants.

    BTW, do you think the "no shirts, no shoes, no service" policy is wrong too?
    No shoes, no shirt is a little different. That's just common decency, although a lot of people disregard it here ans seem to get away with it. Nobody likes obnoxious kids. I tend to avoid restaurants that are kid friendly, but every time there's an annoying kid on my flight I cringe.

    Restaurants should have every right to refuse service to obnoxious customers, including parents who make no attempt to discipline their spawn, but banning all kids (I know that's not exactly the case here) seems over the line.
    If your going to ban brats that's fine, but the banning of strollers, high chairs, and boosters seems to ban all children. If you have a well-behaved child I guess they have to sit on your lap? I say keep the accessories, but if a child gets out of line. Ass. Door. Out to the entire dining party.
    So in the interim, while Little Johnny Fuckwad throws a raging temper tantrum, the remainder of the patrons have to sit through the process of mommy pulling out her teet and trying to calm the little bastard?

    So conflicted on that scenario. So conflicted. Boobs, dining?: Boobs, dining? Boobs, dining?

    Solution: Kids allowed if mom is at least a D cup.

  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,091 Founders Club
    topdawgnc said:

    I don't agree with the policy, so I would not eat there.

    However, I admire the man:

    He said: 'Let's put it this way, I haven't had a down year for over 20 years. Our business continues to grow.'

    I wonder what would happen if a black person tried to eat there with a crying kid.

    Any who ... good for him.

    What about two Black dads, one gay and one transgendered with Central American refuge kids who crossed the border illegally and are eating on a ICE dinner coupon? That would test the law I bet
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781

    topdawgnc said:

    I don't agree with the policy, so I would not eat there.

    However, I admire the man:

    He said: 'Let's put it this way, I haven't had a down year for over 20 years. Our business continues to grow.'

    I wonder what would happen if a black person tried to eat there with a crying kid.

    Any who ... good for him.

    What about two Black dads, one gay and one transgendered with Central American refuge kids who crossed the border illegally and are eating on a ICE dinner coupon? That would test the law I bet
    Race does it again!!!!!1!