Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Scout.kom Wants Your Opinion
AZDuck
Member Posts: 15,381
Comments
-
I have no problem with scout as a website and a service. It's the cockgobblers they pick to run their sites locally that suck.
-
You should maybe say that to them. I specifically mentioned the Balkanization of the team websites and how fans cannot talk across teams the way they used to because of all the tiny-dicked moderators
-
Thanks for the link, @AZDuck. I just took a huge dump on them. I also suggested they fire the people who run dawgman.com.
-
I have no problem with the national side of Scout. But the people that run the individual sites all blow.
-
I did the same. Told them I would go back to their service if they get rid of the Dawgman.com ownership. I won't of course, but whatever.PurpleBaze said:Thanks for the link, @AZDuck. I just took a huge dump on them. I also suggested they fire the people who run dawgman.com.
-
So this what I'm hearing....while you support scout.com you are against you are against the individual sites.
-
Scout works for them, it's not the other way around.PurpleBaze said:Thanks for the link, @AZDuck. I just took a huge dump on them. I also suggested they fire the people who run dawgman.com.
-
You're correct. I forgot how things really work over there at dm.c / Scout.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Scout works for them, it's not the other way around.
-
Right. I don't mind people like Brandon Huffman, Greg Biggins, and people like that. Those people are scout.com to me. The individual sites are the fan sites, like Doogman, Ginafarm, eQook and SCGaybook. The people that run those sites are terrible and a liability for college football.HuskyJW said:So this what I'm hearing....while you support scout.com you are against you are against the individual sites.
-
Biggins and Huffman are professionals who do jobs.
