PM to @HHusky fs

Comments

• Swaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,738

  September 2021

  Inb4 "text alerts" defense.

  6 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• doogie Member Posts: 15,072

  September 2021

  Joy Reid says if you read this study, you are the American Taliban

  10 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• Bob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,500

  September 2021

  https://twitter.com/hell_era_2021/status/1436713596654862341?s=21

  6 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,168

  September 2021

  Bob_C said:

  https://twitter.com/hell_era_2021/status/1436713596654862341?s=21

  There's a reason we? never saw any actual video of any of this bullshit
  
  Most obvious revelation ever to anyone with half a brain

  1 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• HHusky Member Posts: 23,647

  September 2021

  Did you actually read it?
  
  It's not a study.

  -1 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 47,899

  September 2021

  HHusky said:

  Did you actually read it?
  
  It's not a study.

  Doubletalking Dazzler.
  
  Shifts from 'reliable evidence' to 'not a study'.
  
  Fuck off, shill.
  

  2 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 47,899

  September 2021

  doogie said:

  Joy Reid says if you read this study, you are the American Taliban

  The new whiteboard hoax term is "domestic terrorist".
  
  Please utilize repeatedly so it can be engrained into the narrative.
  
  

  3 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• HHusky Member Posts: 23,647

  September 2021

  PurpleThrobber said:

  HHusky said:

  Did you actually read it?
  
  It's not a study.

  Doubletalking Dazzler.
  
  Shifts from 'reliable evidence' to 'not a study'.
  
  Fuck off, shill.
  

  It's an argument, Madam. It's not evidence.
  
  I'm in the business of knowing the difference.

  -7 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 47,899

  September 2021

  HHusky said:

  PurpleThrobber said:

  HHusky said:

  Did you actually read it?
  
  It's not a study.

  Doubletalking Dazzler.
  
  Shifts from 'reliable evidence' to 'not a study'.
  
  Fuck off, shill.
  

  It's an argument, Madam. It's not evidence.
  
  I'm in the business of knowing the difference.

  Sure.
  
  We all know how you got your nickname, Dazzler.

  3 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• LoneStarDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,668

  September 2021

  Imagine how ignored the dazzler is in real life if he thinks this place is a good use of his time

  4 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,352

  September 2021

  HHusky said:

  Did you actually read it?
  
  It's not a study.

  Ask me how I know you didn't read it.

  2 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• Sledog Member Posts: 37,236

  September 2021

  HHusky said:

  Did you actually read it?
  
  It's not a study.

  Show us the masks work study. We'll wait.

  2 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• doogie Member Posts: 15,072

  September 2021

  HHusky said:

  Did you actually read it?
  
  It's not a study.

  Six of seven meta-analyses of IVM treatment RCTs reporting in 2021 found notable reductions in COVID-19 fatalities, with a mean 31% relative risk of mortality vs. controls. During mass IVM treatments in Peru, excess deaths fell by a mean of 74% over 30 days in its ten states with the most extensive treatments. Reductions in deaths correlated with the extent of IVM distributions in all 25 states with p < 0.002. Sharp reductions in morbidity using IVM were also observed in two animal models, of SARS-CoV-2 and a related betacoronavirus.
  
  
  
  
  Certainly nothing scholarly like what The Lincoln Project would turn out.

  0 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 47,899

  September 2021

  doogie said:

  HHusky said:

  Did you actually read it?
  
  It's not a study.

  Six of seven meta-analyses of IVM treatment RCTs reporting in 2021 found notable reductions in COVID-19 fatalities, with a mean 31% relative risk of mortality vs. controls. During mass IVM treatments in Peru, excess deaths fell by a mean of 74% over 30 days in its ten states with the most extensive treatments. Reductions in deaths correlated with the extent of IVM distributions in all 25 states with p < 0.002. Sharp reductions in morbidity using IVM were also observed in two animal models, of SARS-CoV-2 and a related betacoronavirus.
  
  
  
  
  Certainly nothing scholarly like what The Lincoln Project would turn out.

  But the Dazzler is in the business of knowing the difference.....
  
  

  0 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,352

  September 2021

  pawz said:

  HHusky said:

  Did you actually read it?
  
  It's not a study.

  Ask me how I know you didn't read it.

  Bump. @HHusky

  -1 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• HHusky Member Posts: 23,647

  September 2021

  pawz said:

  pawz said:

  HHusky said:

  Did you actually read it?
  
  It's not a study.

  Ask me how I know you didn't read it.

  Bump. @HHusky

  I don't care how you "know" something untrue.
  
  Btw:
  
  
  
  
  Peru approved Ivermectin use in early May 2020.

  -1 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 47,899

  September 2021

  HHusky said:

  pawz said:

  pawz said:

  HHusky said:

  Did you actually read it?
  
  It's not a study.

  Ask me how I know you didn't read it.

  Bump. @HHusky

  I don't care how you "know" something untrue.
  
  Btw:
  
  
  
  
  Peru approved Ivermectin use in early May 2020.

  HOLY SHIT - the flu goes up in (southern hemisphere) winter.
  
  Who the fuck knew?
  
  God, you up your retard level damned near every day, Dazzler.
  
  

  5 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• HHusky Member Posts: 23,647

  September 2021

  PurpleThrobber said:

  HHusky said:

  pawz said:

  pawz said:

  HHusky said:

  Did you actually read it?
  
  It's not a study.

  Ask me how I know you didn't read it.

  Bump. @HHusky

  I don't care how you "know" something untrue.
  
  Btw:
  
  
  
  
  Peru approved Ivermectin use in early May 2020.

  HOLY SHIT - the flu goes up in (southern hemisphere) winter.
  
  Who the fuck knew?
  
  God, you up your retard level damned near every day, Dazzler.
  
  

  Those are Covid deaths, lady. It's clearly labeled. The timing doesn't support the horse paste thesis.

  -1 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 47,899

  September 2021

  HHusky said:

  PurpleThrobber said:

  HHusky said:

  pawz said:

  pawz said:

  HHusky said:

  Did you actually read it?
  
  It's not a study.

  Ask me how I know you didn't read it.

  Bump. @HHusky

  I don't care how you "know" something untrue.
  
  Btw:
  
  
  
  
  Peru approved Ivermectin use in early May 2020.

  HOLY SHIT - the flu goes up in (southern hemisphere) winter.
  
  Who the fuck knew?
  
  God, you up your retard level damned near every day, Dazzler.
  
  

  Those are Covid deaths, lady. It's clearly labeled. The timing doesn't support the horse paste thesis.

  Sure it does. Submit 'evidence' that those are 'from' not 'with'.
  
  And fuck off.
  
  

  5 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• doogie Member Posts: 15,072

  September 2021

  Approved for use = used to treat, right critical thinker?

  HHusky said:

  pawz said:

  pawz said:

  HHusky said:

  Did you actually read it?
  
  It's not a study.

  Ask me how I know you didn't read it.

  Bump. @HHusky

  I don't care how you "know" something untrue.
  
  Btw:
  
  
  
  
  Peru approved Ivermectin use in early May 2020.

  0 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter