Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

PM to @HHusky fs

24

Comments

  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,515 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    Did you actually read it?

    It's not a study.

    Ask me how I know you didn't read it.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,654 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    Did you actually read it?

    It's not a study.

    Show us the masks work study. We'll wait.
  • doogie
    doogie Member Posts: 15,072
    HHusky said:

    Did you actually read it?

    It's not a study.

    Six of seven meta-analyses of IVM treatment RCTs reporting in 2021 found notable reductions in COVID-19 fatalities, with a mean 31% relative risk of mortality vs. controls. During mass IVM treatments in Peru, excess deaths fell by a mean of 74% over 30 days in its ten states with the most extensive treatments. Reductions in deaths correlated with the extent of IVM distributions in all 25 states with p < 0.002. Sharp reductions in morbidity using IVM were also observed in two animal models, of SARS-CoV-2 and a related betacoronavirus.




    Certainly nothing scholarly like what The Lincoln Project would turn out.
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,639 Standard Supporter
    doogie said:

    HHusky said:

    Did you actually read it?

    It's not a study.

    Six of seven meta-analyses of IVM treatment RCTs reporting in 2021 found notable reductions in COVID-19 fatalities, with a mean 31% relative risk of mortality vs. controls. During mass IVM treatments in Peru, excess deaths fell by a mean of 74% over 30 days in its ten states with the most extensive treatments. Reductions in deaths correlated with the extent of IVM distributions in all 25 states with p < 0.002. Sharp reductions in morbidity using IVM were also observed in two animal models, of SARS-CoV-2 and a related betacoronavirus.




    Certainly nothing scholarly like what The Lincoln Project would turn out.
    But the Dazzler is in the business of knowing the difference.....

  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,515 Founders Club
    pawz said:

    HHusky said:

    Did you actually read it?

    It's not a study.

    Ask me how I know you didn't read it.
    Bump. @HHusky
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,406
    pawz said:

    pawz said:

    HHusky said:

    Did you actually read it?

    It's not a study.

    Ask me how I know you didn't read it.
    Bump. @HHusky
    I don't care how you "know" something untrue.

    Btw:




    Peru approved Ivermectin use in early May 2020.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,406

    HHusky said:

    pawz said:

    pawz said:

    HHusky said:

    Did you actually read it?

    It's not a study.

    Ask me how I know you didn't read it.
    Bump. @HHusky
    I don't care how you "know" something untrue.

    Btw:




    Peru approved Ivermectin use in early May 2020.
    HOLY SHIT - the flu goes up in (southern hemisphere) winter.

    Who the fuck knew?

    God, you up your retard level damned near every day, Dazzler.

    Those are Covid deaths, lady. It's clearly labeled. The timing doesn't support the horse paste thesis.
  • doogie
    doogie Member Posts: 15,072
    Approved for use = used to treat, right critical thinker?
    HHusky said:

    pawz said:

    pawz said:

    HHusky said:

    Did you actually read it?

    It's not a study.

    Ask me how I know you didn't read it.
    Bump. @HHusky
    I don't care how you "know" something untrue.

    Btw:




    Peru approved Ivermectin use in early May 2020.