keep Cook as a DB or back to WR?
Comments
-
The fact we lost 4 to the portal….and 4 to injury and they still didn’t move him.
I think speaks for itself -
John Ross played CB and ASJ played DE and Shaq played RB
Coaches need to find ways to put the best players on the field for each position group. Wouldn't be surprised to see some of our TEs play WR this week unless Bynum or Odunze are back -
Odunze separated his should he won't be back yet imo
-
A one-armed Odunze would be our #1 WR right nowCanadawg said:Odunze separated his should he won't be back yet imo
-
Why the fuck did we need WR’s against Montana. Should have played 3 tight ends ala Stanford and let Dick go wild. I’m still not understanding the offensive importance of Lake and Donovan. -
3 TE’s doesn’t help you run better and is archaic thinking. Those TE’s aren’t good enough blockers either.NeGgaPlEaSe said:
Why the fuck did we need WR’s against Montana. Should have played 3 tight ends ala Stanford and let Dick go wild. I’m still not understanding the offensive importance of Lake and Donovan. -
Dissly and Sample ain't walking through that doorRoadDawg55 said:
3 TE’s doesn’t help you run better and is archaic thinking. Those TE’s aren’t good enough blockers either.NeGgaPlEaSe said:
Why the fuck did we need WR’s against Montana. Should have played 3 tight ends ala Stanford and let Dick go wild. I’m still not understanding the offensive importance of Lake and Donovan. -
It’s MontanaRoadDawg55 said:
3 TE’s doesn’t help you run better and is archaic thinking. Those TE’s aren’t good enough blockers either.NeGgaPlEaSe said:
Why the fuck did we need WR’s against Montana. Should have played 3 tight ends ala Stanford and let Dick go wild. I’m still not understanding the offensive importance of Lake and Donovan. -
And we lostNeGgaPlEaSe said:
It’s MontanaRoadDawg55 said:
3 TE’s doesn’t help you run better and is archaic thinking. Those TE’s aren’t good enough blockers either.NeGgaPlEaSe said:
Why the fuck did we need WR’s against Montana. Should have played 3 tight ends ala Stanford and let Dick go wild. I’m still not understanding the offensive importance of Lake and Donovan. -
We shouldn’t need to line up 3 TE’s but point taken. Yes, UW should be able to dominate Montana up front. Kent Baer shouldn’t be shutting us down.NeGgaPlEaSe said:
It’s MontanaRoadDawg55 said:
3 TE’s doesn’t help you run better and is archaic thinking. Those TE’s aren’t good enough blockers either.NeGgaPlEaSe said:
Why the fuck did we need WR’s against Montana. Should have played 3 tight ends ala Stanford and let Dick go wild. I’m still not understanding the offensive importance of Lake and Donovan. -
Cook was practicing at WR this week. Don't know if it's for emergency or whether he will be in the game plan.
-
@sonics1993 update on Tuli? Training staff were checking his knee when he went down
-
Kent Baer... JFC.RoadDawg55 said:
We shouldn’t need to line up 3 TE’s but point taken. Yes, UW should be able to dominate Montana up front. Kent Baer shouldn’t be shutting us down.NeGgaPlEaSe said:
It’s MontanaRoadDawg55 said:
3 TE’s doesn’t help you run better and is archaic thinking. Those TE’s aren’t good enough blockers either.NeGgaPlEaSe said:
Why the fuck did we need WR’s against Montana. Should have played 3 tight ends ala Stanford and let Dick go wild. I’m still not understanding the offensive importance of Lake and Donovan. -
When I was writing Bow Down to Willingham, Kent Baer was DC at San Jose State. I contacted their athletic department, and they got back to me with something very close to "Coach Baer said to tell you that he appreciates your offer to discuss his time at UW, but feels it is best to focus on the future. He wishes you good luck with your project."digits said:
Kent Baer... JFC.RoadDawg55 said:
We shouldn’t need to line up 3 TE’s but point taken. Yes, UW should be able to dominate Montana up front. Kent Baer shouldn’t be shutting us down.NeGgaPlEaSe said:
It’s MontanaRoadDawg55 said:
3 TE’s doesn’t help you run better and is archaic thinking. Those TE’s aren’t good enough blockers either.NeGgaPlEaSe said:
Why the fuck did we need WR’s against Montana. Should have played 3 tight ends ala Stanford and let Dick go wild. I’m still not understanding the offensive importance of Lake and Donovan. -
Gosh we are fucked if the best wr option we have is a safetysonics1993 said:Cook was practicing at WR this week. Don't know if it's for emergency or whether he will be in the game plan.
-
I sent some pointed emails to UW coaches when Baer was around and he actually replied to me and we traded emails for a couple days. He questioned how I could have any opinion when I hadn't played or coached and basically said I was an asshole. He even invited me to attend a practice and I took him up on it. Never heard back after that.DerekJohnson said:
When I was writing Bow Down to Willingham, Kent Baer was DC at San Jose State. I contacted their athletic department, and they got back to me with something very close to "Coach Baer said to tell you that he appreciates your offer to discuss his time at UW, but feels it is best to focus on the future. He wishes you good luck with your project."digits said:
Kent Baer... JFC.RoadDawg55 said:
We shouldn’t need to line up 3 TE’s but point taken. Yes, UW should be able to dominate Montana up front. Kent Baer shouldn’t be shutting us down.NeGgaPlEaSe said:
It’s MontanaRoadDawg55 said:
3 TE’s doesn’t help you run better and is archaic thinking. Those TE’s aren’t good enough blockers either.NeGgaPlEaSe said:
Why the fuck did we need WR’s against Montana. Should have played 3 tight ends ala Stanford and let Dick go wild. I’m still not understanding the offensive importance of Lake and Donovan.
