Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Okay, the Russo-Ukrainian Separatists are Fucking Hilarious

1356

Comments

  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    dnc said:

    OZONE said:

    Swaye said:

    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:



    topdawgnc said:

    Reagan was right. The bombing should have started in five minutes.

    This shit wouldn't be happening under Reagan's watch. The vapid empty suit currently occupying the White House is completely out of his realm .... and we have a voting populace rife with dumbasses to thank for that.
    Many of us voters aren't interested in being the world's police force.

    If Russia taking part of the Ukraine is bad for Europe, then let the fucking Europeans deal with it.
    You should feel proud of the spineless jackass that morons like you voted in for a second term. We now support terrorists (give money to the Palestinians, which ends up going to Hamas), betray allies (Israel), are letting Iran buttfuck us with the sanctions concessions we're giving them on their nuclear program when they've done NOTHING to change, do nothing about Putin shooting down an airliner, let Iraq be turned into a breeding ground of terrorist maggots by leaving no residual force there, and this is just the international bungling. If you did vote for him, please tie a rock around your ankle and drown yourself in the nearest lake.
    Your anger us misdirected. Be angry at your parents for raising you in whatever school district you came from that produces such ignorant people with such a small minded grasp of the world.
    What foreign policy triumphs orchestrated by Obama are you proud of?
    You mean besides getting us out of two wars started by the prior guy that have cost our economy 4 trillion dollars?

    As I said, many of us voters aren't interested in being the world's police force, or paying for it.


    HRYK. I don't see any other presidents running around with these.

    image
    None other than Jimmy Carter. President Obama is part of a rich heritage of our progressive leadership bringing peace throughout the world.

    image
  • AZDuck
    AZDuck Member Posts: 15,468
    edited July 2014
    Never forget that the Nobel Prize is based upon one man's guilty conscience.
    Alfred Nobel ( listen (help·info)) was born on 21 October 1833 in Stockholm, Sweden, into a family of engineers.[6] He was a chemist, engineer, and inventor. In 1894, Nobel purchased the Bofors iron and steel mill, which he made into a major armaments manufacturer. Nobel also invented ballistite. This invention was a precursor to many smokeless military explosives, especially the British smokeless powder cordite. As a consequence of his patent claims, Nobel was eventually involved in a patent infringement lawsuit over cordite. Nobel amassed a fortune during his lifetime, with most of his wealth from his 355 inventions, of which dynamite is the most famous.[7]

    In 1888, Nobel was astonished to read his own obituary, titled The merchant of death is dead, in a French newspaper. As it was Alfred's brother Ludvig who had died, the obituary was eight years premature. The article disconcerted Nobel and made him apprehensive about how he would be remembered. This inspired him to change his will.[8] On 10 December 1896, Alfred Nobel died in his villa in San Remo, Italy, from a cerebral haemorrhage. He was 63 years old.[9]

    Nobel wrote several wills during his lifetime. He composed the last over a year before he died, signing it at the Swedish–Norwegian Club in Paris on 27 November 1895.[10][11] To widespread astonishment, Nobel's last will specified that his fortune be used to create a series of prizes for those who confer the "greatest benefit on mankind" in physics, chemistry, peace, physiology or medicine, and literature.[12] Nobel bequeathed 94% of his total assets, 31 million SEK (c. US$186 million, €150 million in 2008), to establish the five Nobel Prizes.[13] Because of scepticism surrounding the will, it was not until 26 April 1897 that it was approved by the Storting in Norway.[14] The executors of Nobel's will, Ragnar Sohlman and Rudolf Lilljequist, formed the Nobel Foundation to take care of Nobel's fortune and organise the award of prizes.[15]

    Nobel's instructions named a Norwegian Nobel Committee to award the Peace Prize, the members of whom were appointed shortly after the will was approved in April 1897. Soon thereafter, the other prize-awarding organisations were designated or established. These were Karolinska Institutet on 7 June, the Swedish Academy on 9 June, and the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences on 11 June.[16] The Nobel Foundation reached an agreement on guidelines for how the prizes should be awarded; and, in 1900, the Nobel Foundation's newly created statutes were promulgated by King Oscar II.[12] In 1905, the personal union between Sweden and Norway was dissolved. Thereafter, Norway's Nobel Committee was responsible for awarding the Nobel Peace Prize and the Swedish institutions retained responsibility for the other prizes.[14]
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    edited July 2014
    Swaye said:

    Swaye said:

    OZONE said:

    Swaye said:

    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:



    topdawgnc said:

    Reagan was right. The bombing should have started in five minutes.

    This shit wouldn't be happening under Reagan's watch. The vapid empty suit currently occupying the White House is completely out of his realm .... and we have a voting populace rife with dumbasses to thank for that.
    Many of us voters aren't interested in being the world's police force.

    If Russia taking part of the Ukraine is bad for Europe, then let the fucking Europeans deal with it.
    You should feel proud of the spineless jackass that morons like you voted in for a second term. We now support terrorists (give money to the Palestinians, which ends up going to Hamas), betray allies (Israel), are letting Iran buttfuck us with the sanctions concessions we're giving them on their nuclear program when they've done NOTHING to change, do nothing about Putin shooting down an airliner, let Iraq be turned into a breeding ground of terrorist maggots by leaving no residual force there, and this is just the international bungling. If you did vote for him, please tie a rock around your ankle and drown yourself in the nearest lake.
    Your anger us misdirected. Be angry at your parents for raising you in whatever school district you came from that produces such ignorant people with such a small minded grasp of the world.
    What foreign policy triumphs orchestrated by Obama are you proud of?
    You mean besides getting us out of two wars started by the prior guy that have cost our economy 4 trillion dollars?

    As I said, many of us voters aren't interested in being the world's police force, or paying for it.
    We will suspend judgment on whether or not his decisions to remove us from the region will be viewed positively or negatively in the next 10 years, but okay, you see removing us as a good thing. Got it.

    Is there anything else you think he has done a fine job on? Situation at the border? Ukraine? Iran? Syria? ISIS? Israel? Any others? I'm not trying to be a dick. I want to know what policies this guy has put in place that you think are really stabilizing the world and our place in it.
    Ozone's silence in this thread after your poast speaks volumes. He doesn't have shit for a response. Also, what has Obama done domestically that hasn't been a horrendous failure that negatively affects most Americans? I'm sure he doesn't have shit to say about that either.
    Some liberals actually think ObamaCare is good legislation. Idiots.
    We prefer the term Progessives. We have worked hard to deliver progress to our country and our movement's name should reflect that.
    And if you can see the need to gently direct our citizens into making the right choices for themselves, then I can't help you.
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855
    AZDuck said:

    Never forget that the Nobel Prize is based upon one man's guilty conscience.

    Alfred Nobel ( listen (help·info)) was born on 21 October 1833 in Stockholm, Sweden, into a family of engineers.[6] He was a chemist, engineer, and inventor. In 1894, Nobel purchased the Bofors iron and steel mill, which he made into a major armaments manufacturer. Nobel also invented ballistite. This invention was a precursor to many smokeless military explosives, especially the British smokeless powder cordite. As a consequence of his patent claims, Nobel was eventually involved in a patent infringement lawsuit over cordite. Nobel amassed a fortune during his lifetime, with most of his wealth from his 355 inventions, of which dynamite is the most famous.[7]

    In 1888, Nobel was astonished to read his own obituary, titled The merchant of death is dead, in a French newspaper. As it was Alfred's brother Ludvig who had died, the obituary was eight years premature. The article disconcerted Nobel and made him apprehensive about how he would be remembered. This inspired him to change his will.[8] On 10 December 1896, Alfred Nobel died in his villa in San Remo, Italy, from a cerebral haemorrhage. He was 63 years old.[9]

    Nobel wrote several wills during his lifetime. He composed the last over a year before he died, signing it at the Swedish–Norwegian Club in Paris on 27 November 1895.[10][11] To widespread astonishment, Nobel's last will specified that his fortune be used to create a series of prizes for those who confer the "greatest benefit on mankind" in physics, chemistry, peace, physiology or medicine, and literature.[12] Nobel bequeathed 94% of his total assets, 31 million SEK (c. US$186 million, €150 million in 2008), to establish the five Nobel Prizes.[13] Because of scepticism surrounding the will, it was not until 26 April 1897 that it was approved by the Storting in Norway.[14] The executors of Nobel's will, Ragnar Sohlman and Rudolf Lilljequist, formed the Nobel Foundation to take care of Nobel's fortune and organise the award of prizes.[15]

    Nobel's instructions named a Norwegian Nobel Committee to award the Peace Prize, the members of whom were appointed shortly after the will was approved in April 1897. Soon thereafter, the other prize-awarding organisations were designated or established. These were Karolinska Institutet on 7 June, the Swedish Academy on 9 June, and the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences on 11 June.[16] The Nobel Foundation reached an agreement on guidelines for how the prizes should be awarded; and, in 1900, the Nobel Foundation's newly created statutes were promulgated by King Oscar II.[12] In 1905, the personal union between Sweden and Norway was dissolved. Thereafter, Norway's Nobel Committee was responsible for awarding the Nobel Peace Prize and the Swedish institutions retained responsibility for the other prizes.[14]
    Excellent poont. Guess we should start calling them the White Guilt Awards.

    Certainly makes Obama a much more worthy recipient.
  • OZONE
    OZONE Member Posts: 2,510
    edited July 2014
    Swaye said:

    OZONE said:

    Swaye said:

    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:



    topdawgnc said:

    Reagan was right. The bombing should have started in five minutes.

    This shit wouldn't be happening under Reagan's watch. The vapid empty suit currently occupying the White House is completely out of his realm .... and we have a voting populace rife with dumbasses to thank for that.
    Many of us voters aren't interested in being the world's police force.

    If Russia taking part of the Ukraine is bad for Europe, then let the fucking Europeans deal with it.
    You should feel proud of the spineless jackass that morons like you voted in for a second term. We now support terrorists (give money to the Palestinians, which ends up going to Hamas), betray allies (Israel), are letting Iran buttfuck us with the sanctions concessions we're giving them on their nuclear program when they've done NOTHING to change, do nothing about Putin shooting down an airliner, let Iraq be turned into a breeding ground of terrorist maggots by leaving no residual force there, and this is just the international bungling. If you did vote for him, please tie a rock around your ankle and drown yourself in the nearest lake.
    Your anger us misdirected. Be angry at your parents for raising you in whatever school district you came from that produces such ignorant people with such a small minded grasp of the world.
    What foreign policy triumphs orchestrated by Obama are you proud of?
    You mean besides getting us out of two wars started by the prior guy that have cost our economy 4 trillion dollars?

    As I said, many of us voters aren't interested in being the world's police force, or paying for it.
    We will suspend judgment on whether or not his decisions to remove us from the region will be viewed positively or negatively in the next 10 years, but okay, you see removing us as a good thing. Got it.

    Is there anything else you think he has done a fine job on? Situation at the border? Ukraine? Iran? Syria? ISIS? Israel? Any others? I'm not trying to be a dick. I want to know what policies this guy has put in place that you think are really stabilizing the world and our place in it.
    I'm not here to prop him up as a great prez, but I think that criticism about the Russia / Ukraine situation is dumb. As I've said, many of us voters aren't interested in being the world's police force, and financing it.

    I'd much rather see our tax dollars spent on things like schools, roads, hospitals, high speed rail systems, parks with sports fields, bridges, and sea plane harbors... and less money spent on building more nuclear aircraft carriers or submarines or exotic expensive weapons or aid to some random jihadist that will become terrorists in 15 years and use the weapons and training we gave them on us.
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    edited July 2014
    OZONE said:

    Swaye said:

    OZONE said:

    Swaye said:

    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:



    topdawgnc said:

    Reagan was right. The bombing should have started in five minutes.

    This shit wouldn't be happening under Reagan's watch. The vapid empty suit currently occupying the White House is completely out of his realm .... and we have a voting populace rife with dumbasses to thank for that.
    Many of us voters aren't interested in being the world's police force.

    If Russia taking part of the Ukraine is bad for Europe, then let the fucking Europeans deal with it.
    You should feel proud of the spineless jackass that morons like you voted in for a second term. We now support terrorists (give money to the Palestinians, which ends up going to Hamas), betray allies (Israel), are letting Iran buttfuck us with the sanctions concessions we're giving them on their nuclear program when they've done NOTHING to change, do nothing about Putin shooting down an airliner, let Iraq be turned into a breeding ground of terrorist maggots by leaving no residual force there, and this is just the international bungling. If you did vote for him, please tie a rock around your ankle and drown yourself in the nearest lake.
    Your anger us misdirected. Be angry at your parents for raising you in whatever school district you came from that produces such ignorant people with such a small minded grasp of the world.
    What foreign policy triumphs orchestrated by Obama are you proud of?
    You mean besides getting us out of two wars started by the prior guy that have cost our economy 4 trillion dollars?

    As I said, many of us voters aren't interested in being the world's police force, or paying for it.
    We will suspend judgment on whether or not his decisions to remove us from the region will be viewed positively or negatively in the next 10 years, but okay, you see removing us as a good thing. Got it.

    Is there anything else you think he has done a fine job on? Situation at the border? Ukraine? Iran? Syria? ISIS? Israel? Any others? I'm not trying to be a dick. I want to know what policies this guy has put in place that you think are really stabilizing the world and our place in it.
    I'm not here to prop him up as a great prez, but I think that criticism about the Russia / Ukraine situation is dumb. As I've said, many of us voters aren't interested in being the world's police force, and financing it.

    I'd much rather see our tax dollars spent on things like schools, roads, hospitals, high speed rail systems, parks with sports fields, bridges, and sea plane harbors... and less money spent on building more nuclear aircraft carriers or submarines or exotic expensive weapons or aid to some random jihadist that will become terrorists in 15 years and use the weapons and training we gave them on us.
    I'd much rather have the force of government steal less of peoples earnings.
  • OZONE
    OZONE Member Posts: 2,510

    OZONE said:

    Swaye said:

    OZONE said:

    Swaye said:

    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:



    topdawgnc said:

    Reagan was right. The bombing should have started in five minutes.

    This shit wouldn't be happening under Reagan's watch. The vapid empty suit currently occupying the White House is completely out of his realm .... and we have a voting populace rife with dumbasses to thank for that.
    Many of us voters aren't interested in being the world's police force.

    If Russia taking part of the Ukraine is bad for Europe, then let the fucking Europeans deal with it.
    You should feel proud of the spineless jackass that morons like you voted in for a second term. We now support terrorists (give money to the Palestinians, which ends up going to Hamas), betray allies (Israel), are letting Iran buttfuck us with the sanctions concessions we're giving them on their nuclear program when they've done NOTHING to change, do nothing about Putin shooting down an airliner, let Iraq be turned into a breeding ground of terrorist maggots by leaving no residual force there, and this is just the international bungling. If you did vote for him, please tie a rock around your ankle and drown yourself in the nearest lake.
    Your anger us misdirected. Be angry at your parents for raising you in whatever school district you came from that produces such ignorant people with such a small minded grasp of the world.
    What foreign policy triumphs orchestrated by Obama are you proud of?
    You mean besides getting us out of two wars started by the prior guy that have cost our economy 4 trillion dollars?

    As I said, many of us voters aren't interested in being the world's police force, or paying for it.
    We will suspend judgment on whether or not his decisions to remove us from the region will be viewed positively or negatively in the next 10 years, but okay, you see removing us as a good thing. Got it.

    Is there anything else you think he has done a fine job on? Situation at the border? Ukraine? Iran? Syria? ISIS? Israel? Any others? I'm not trying to be a dick. I want to know what policies this guy has put in place that you think are really stabilizing the world and our place in it.
    I'm not here to prop him up as a great prez, but I think that criticism about the Russia / Ukraine situation is dumb. As I've said, many of us voters aren't interested in being the world's police force, and financing it.

    I'd much rather see our tax dollars spent on things like schools, roads, hospitals, high speed rail systems, parks with sports fields, bridges, and sea plane harbors... and less money spent on building more nuclear aircraft carriers or submarines or exotic expensive weapons or aid to some random jihadist that will become terrorists in 15 years and use the weapons and training we gave them on us.
    I'd much rather have the force of government steal less of peoples earnings.
    Sure you would.

    Do you have a plan for how we get that war debt paid off... without taxes?
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:

    Swaye said:

    OZONE said:

    Swaye said:

    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:



    topdawgnc said:

    Reagan was right. The bombing should have started in five minutes.

    This shit wouldn't be happening under Reagan's watch. The vapid empty suit currently occupying the White House is completely out of his realm .... and we have a voting populace rife with dumbasses to thank for that.
    Many of us voters aren't interested in being the world's police force.

    If Russia taking part of the Ukraine is bad for Europe, then let the fucking Europeans deal with it.
    You should feel proud of the spineless jackass that morons like you voted in for a second term. We now support terrorists (give money to the Palestinians, which ends up going to Hamas), betray allies (Israel), are letting Iran buttfuck us with the sanctions concessions we're giving them on their nuclear program when they've done NOTHING to change, do nothing about Putin shooting down an airliner, let Iraq be turned into a breeding ground of terrorist maggots by leaving no residual force there, and this is just the international bungling. If you did vote for him, please tie a rock around your ankle and drown yourself in the nearest lake.
    Your anger us misdirected. Be angry at your parents for raising you in whatever school district you came from that produces such ignorant people with such a small minded grasp of the world.
    What foreign policy triumphs orchestrated by Obama are you proud of?
    You mean besides getting us out of two wars started by the prior guy that have cost our economy 4 trillion dollars?

    As I said, many of us voters aren't interested in being the world's police force, or paying for it.
    We will suspend judgment on whether or not his decisions to remove us from the region will be viewed positively or negatively in the next 10 years, but okay, you see removing us as a good thing. Got it.

    Is there anything else you think he has done a fine job on? Situation at the border? Ukraine? Iran? Syria? ISIS? Israel? Any others? I'm not trying to be a dick. I want to know what policies this guy has put in place that you think are really stabilizing the world and our place in it.
    I'm not here to prop him up as a great prez, but I think that criticism about the Russia / Ukraine situation is dumb. As I've said, many of us voters aren't interested in being the world's police force, and financing it.

    I'd much rather see our tax dollars spent on things like schools, roads, hospitals, high speed rail systems, parks with sports fields, bridges, and sea plane harbors... and less money spent on building more nuclear aircraft carriers or submarines or exotic expensive weapons or aid to some random jihadist that will become terrorists in 15 years and use the weapons and training we gave them on us.
    I'd much rather have the force of government steal less of peoples earnings.
    Sure you would.

    Do you have a plan for how we get that war debt paid off... without taxes?
    I thought you were talking about using the same money for schools, roads...etc.
  • OZONE
    OZONE Member Posts: 2,510

    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:

    Swaye said:

    OZONE said:

    Swaye said:

    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:



    topdawgnc said:

    Reagan was right. The bombing should have started in five minutes.

    This shit wouldn't be happening under Reagan's watch. The vapid empty suit currently occupying the White House is completely out of his realm .... and we have a voting populace rife with dumbasses to thank for that.
    Many of us voters aren't interested in being the world's police force.

    If Russia taking part of the Ukraine is bad for Europe, then let the fucking Europeans deal with it.
    You should feel proud of the spineless jackass that morons like you voted in for a second term. We now support terrorists (give money to the Palestinians, which ends up going to Hamas), betray allies (Israel), are letting Iran buttfuck us with the sanctions concessions we're giving them on their nuclear program when they've done NOTHING to change, do nothing about Putin shooting down an airliner, let Iraq be turned into a breeding ground of terrorist maggots by leaving no residual force there, and this is just the international bungling. If you did vote for him, please tie a rock around your ankle and drown yourself in the nearest lake.
    Your anger us misdirected. Be angry at your parents for raising you in whatever school district you came from that produces such ignorant people with such a small minded grasp of the world.
    What foreign policy triumphs orchestrated by Obama are you proud of?
    You mean besides getting us out of two wars started by the prior guy that have cost our economy 4 trillion dollars?

    As I said, many of us voters aren't interested in being the world's police force, or paying for it.
    We will suspend judgment on whether or not his decisions to remove us from the region will be viewed positively or negatively in the next 10 years, but okay, you see removing us as a good thing. Got it.

    Is there anything else you think he has done a fine job on? Situation at the border? Ukraine? Iran? Syria? ISIS? Israel? Any others? I'm not trying to be a dick. I want to know what policies this guy has put in place that you think are really stabilizing the world and our place in it.
    I'm not here to prop him up as a great prez, but I think that criticism about the Russia / Ukraine situation is dumb. As I've said, many of us voters aren't interested in being the world's police force, and financing it.

    I'd much rather see our tax dollars spent on things like schools, roads, hospitals, high speed rail systems, parks with sports fields, bridges, and sea plane harbors... and less money spent on building more nuclear aircraft carriers or submarines or exotic expensive weapons or aid to some random jihadist that will become terrorists in 15 years and use the weapons and training we gave them on us.
    I'd much rather have the force of government steal less of peoples earnings.
    Sure you would.

    Do you have a plan for how we get that war debt paid off... without taxes?
    I thought you were talking about using the same money for schools, roads...etc.
    What I'm saying is that I'd have rather seen the 4 trillion dollar war cost spent on the things I listed, but now the cost is there as a debt, and has to be paid off.

    Were you this vocal about gov't spending with the prior guy was racking up this debt?
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    edited July 2014
    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:

    Swaye said:

    OZONE said:

    Swaye said:

    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:



    topdawgnc said:

    Reagan was right. The bombing should have started in five minutes.

    This shit wouldn't be happening under Reagan's watch. The vapid empty suit currently occupying the White House is completely out of his realm .... and we have a voting populace rife with dumbasses to thank for that.
    Many of us voters aren't interested in being the world's police force.

    If Russia taking part of the Ukraine is bad for Europe, then let the fucking Europeans deal with it.
    You should feel proud of the spineless jackass that morons like you voted in for a second term. We now support terrorists (give money to the Palestinians, which ends up going to Hamas), betray allies (Israel), are letting Iran buttfuck us with the sanctions concessions we're giving them on their nuclear program when they've done NOTHING to change, do nothing about Putin shooting down an airliner, let Iraq be turned into a breeding ground of terrorist maggots by leaving no residual force there, and this is just the international bungling. If you did vote for him, please tie a rock around your ankle and drown yourself in the nearest lake.
    Your anger us misdirected. Be angry at your parents for raising you in whatever school district you came from that produces such ignorant people with such a small minded grasp of the world.
    What foreign policy triumphs orchestrated by Obama are you proud of?
    You mean besides getting us out of two wars started by the prior guy that have cost our economy 4 trillion dollars?

    As I said, many of us voters aren't interested in being the world's police force, or paying for it.
    We will suspend judgment on whether or not his decisions to remove us from the region will be viewed positively or negatively in the next 10 years, but okay, you see removing us as a good thing. Got it.

    Is there anything else you think he has done a fine job on? Situation at the border? Ukraine? Iran? Syria? ISIS? Israel? Any others? I'm not trying to be a dick. I want to know what policies this guy has put in place that you think are really stabilizing the world and our place in it.
    I'm not here to prop him up as a great prez, but I think that criticism about the Russia / Ukraine situation is dumb. As I've said, many of us voters aren't interested in being the world's police force, and financing it.

    I'd much rather see our tax dollars spent on things like schools, roads, hospitals, high speed rail systems, parks with sports fields, bridges, and sea plane harbors... and less money spent on building more nuclear aircraft carriers or submarines or exotic expensive weapons or aid to some random jihadist that will become terrorists in 15 years and use the weapons and training we gave them on us.
    I'd much rather have the force of government steal less of peoples earnings.
    Sure you would.

    Do you have a plan for how we get that war debt paid off... without taxes?
    I thought you were talking about using the same money for schools, roads...etc.
    What I'm saying is that I'd have rather seen the 4 trillion dollar war cost spent on the things I listed, but now the cost is there as a debt, and has to be paid off.

    Were you this vocal about gov't spending with the prior guy was racking up this debt?
    Yes, I was. Not just war debt either. And we shouldn't go into debt to spend the things you list either.

    Also, I said tax on earnings...