Depth chart vs. Montana
Comments
-
1 Senior starting on offense? One on defense? That is awfully young.
-
I didn't think Julius Irvin or Kam Fab would ever actually play football at UW... and they're the starting safeties for Montana... huh. Unless they're putting Radley at safety and KF at slot like he was listed last year.
Was hoping to see Jacobe Covington at safety... and Bralen Trice is 3rd string? Huh.
Seems like some odd choices. I guess it doesn't matter all that much... *knock on wood* that the bulk of the "backup" players will get to play the 2nd half. -
Fixed. And, yes, take it to the tug flows much better. Oh, well. . . . .chuck said:
I love arguments that try to disprove the rule with exceptions. It works well on retards, but not all of us are. Take that shit to "The Blue Oyster Pump n Dump Bored" where it belongs.NeGgaPlEaSe said:
DaFuq you meanATLDawg said:With all the talk of DB depth we are Gordon away from a walk-on starting next year, recruiting doesn’t matter.
Signed Myles Bryant
-
There's only like 5 "seniors" on the teamdoogie said:1 Senior starting on offense? One on defense? That is awfully young.
-
Eddie, yes. Bowman, no.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Bowman and Edie both could potentially start for top 10 programs. They are legit ballers.ATLDawg said:Bowman is 28 year old senior that will not be starting for most top 10 programs, the fact we will be depending on multiple walk-ons including Fowler at the 2 positions recruiting have been terrible speaks for itself. That’s a total of 4 walk-ons in your 2 deeps.. Where they do that at and expect to win at a high level. But my bigger point recruiting misses are already showing on the roster.
-
Bowman would star at OUNorwegianHusky said:
Eddie, yes. Bowman, no.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Bowman and Edie both could potentially start for top 10 programs. They are legit ballers.ATLDawg said:Bowman is 28 year old senior that will not be starting for most top 10 programs, the fact we will be depending on multiple walk-ons including Fowler at the 2 positions recruiting have been terrible speaks for itself. That’s a total of 4 walk-ons in your 2 deeps.. Where they do that at and expect to win at a high level. But my bigger point recruiting misses are already showing on the roster.
-
I think he would at least it play for quite a few top 10 teams.NorwegianHusky said:
Eddie, yes. Bowman, no.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Bowman and Edie both could potentially start for top 10 programs. They are legit ballers.ATLDawg said:Bowman is 28 year old senior that will not be starting for most top 10 programs, the fact we will be depending on multiple walk-ons including Fowler at the 2 positions recruiting have been terrible speaks for itself. That’s a total of 4 walk-ons in your 2 deeps.. Where they do that at and expect to win at a high level. But my bigger point recruiting misses are already showing on the roster.
-
Quite honestly, Eddie could start for some top 10 teams and Bowman would probably be in the rotation.
-
You didn't think either of them would play at UW? Especially Irvin?BroadcastingDawg said:I didn't think Julius Irvin or Kam Fab would ever actually play football at UW... and they're the starting safeties for Montana... huh. Unless they're putting Radley at safety and KF at slot like he was listed last year.
Was hoping to see Jacobe Covington at safety... and Bralen Trice is 3rd string? Huh.
Seems like some odd choices. I guess it doesn't matter all that much... *knock on wood* that the bulk of the "backup" players will get to play the 2nd half.
What the fuck.
