Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
FDA approves Pfizer vaccine
Comments
-
Utah how long are the standard vaccine trials? Years. I'll pass.
-
They've had these 'vaccines' prepped for decades, for this moment. In animalTequilla said:
New product/technology was my pointLebamDawg said:
Hard to understand some of that logic. Buy a first year new car then wait to see if the model can make it to year two? People get new things based on track record of a company or a product.Tequilla said:
More power to you for making your own choice …BleachedAnusDawg said:
I've not seen many people saying "it's not FDA approved" as their reason. I'm not getting any COVID shot because there is no long-term track record associated with it. And it's also proving to not work all that well as time goes by.MelloDawg said:I’m just here to see the goalposts move.
But that’s fucktarded logic
Unless you’re someone that doesn’t adopt anything “new” because you don’t know long term effects it’s fairly selective reasoning
When it comes to the human body I am very leery of trying anything new.
That is not a fucktarded way to look at things. Since 1995 they have been trying mRNA vaccines and NONE have been approved, now a vaccine that appears to not work until the 3rd shot and then only deflecting a little of the symptoms get approved get jabbed? no thanks.
I get the concern about putting things into my body … it’s a concern I share
But I do think that the logic that this was just whipped up hap hazzardly is more inaccurate than nottrialstesting, every animal was killed by these so called vaccines, without exception. -
Gotta link?oregonblitzkrieg said:
They've had these 'vaccines' prepped for decades, for this moment. In animalTequilla said:
New product/technology was my pointLebamDawg said:
Hard to understand some of that logic. Buy a first year new car then wait to see if the model can make it to year two? People get new things based on track record of a company or a product.Tequilla said:
More power to you for making your own choice …BleachedAnusDawg said:
I've not seen many people saying "it's not FDA approved" as their reason. I'm not getting any COVID shot because there is no long-term track record associated with it. And it's also proving to not work all that well as time goes by.MelloDawg said:I’m just here to see the goalposts move.
But that’s fucktarded logic
Unless you’re someone that doesn’t adopt anything “new” because you don’t know long term effects it’s fairly selective reasoning
When it comes to the human body I am very leery of trying anything new.
That is not a fucktarded way to look at things. Since 1995 they have been trying mRNA vaccines and NONE have been approved, now a vaccine that appears to not work until the 3rd shot and then only deflecting a little of the symptoms get approved get jabbed? no thanks.
I get the concern about putting things into my body … it’s a concern I share
But I do think that the logic that this was just whipped up hap hazzardly is more inaccurate than nottrialstesting, every animal was killed by these so called vaccines, without exception. -
MelloDawg said:
I’m just here to see the goalposts move.
-
lol what a shit head.
-
Not the case.Tequilla said:
New product/technology was my pointLebamDawg said:
Hard to understand some of that logic. Buy a first year new car then wait to see if the model can make it to year two? People get new things based on track record of a company or a product.Tequilla said:
More power to you for making your own choice …BleachedAnusDawg said:
I've not seen many people saying "it's not FDA approved" as their reason. I'm not getting any COVID shot because there is no long-term track record associated with it. And it's also proving to not work all that well as time goes by.MelloDawg said:I’m just here to see the goalposts move.
But that’s fucktarded logic
Unless you’re someone that doesn’t adopt anything “new” because you don’t know long term effects it’s fairly selective reasoning
When it comes to the human body I am very leery of trying anything new.
That is not a fucktarded way to look at things. Since 1995 they have been trying mRNA vaccines and NONE have been approved, now a vaccine that appears to not work until the 3rd shot and then only deflecting a little of the symptoms get approved get jabbed? no thanks.
I get the concern about putting things into my body … it’s a concern I share
Like you said … this is something they’ve been working on for a while … so there’s the glass half empty it full approach
Empty says they haven’t got the results prior to COVID so it’s really coincidental that they magically got it working
Half full says the fact they weren’t starting from scratch allowed them the opportunity to accelerate and find a suitable blockage to the key element of the bad parts of COVID
But I do think that the logic that this was just whipped up hap hazzardly is more inaccurate than not -
-
Still today, not a single person in the US has taken the vaccine that was approved. All a liability shell game, that one is on the scoreboard.
-
Moral high ground potd.MelloDawg said:
I support your right to have that choice.BleachedAnusDawg said:
I've not seen many people saying "it's not FDA approved" as their reason. I'm not getting any COVID shot because there is no long-term track record associated with it. And it's also proving to not work all that well as time goes by.MelloDawg said:I’m just here to see the goalposts move.
