Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
After you donate to Hardcore Husky, go donate to Joe Kent for Congress
Comments
-
The starters went homeTurdBomber said:
So we have not one, but two illiterate lefty lib morons who think "widespread" is a quantity.Rubberfist said:
There is fraud in every election. Show me an election where there hasn’t been fraud. There was fraud in the 2016 election. Any system that has 150+ million people voting is going to have some people committing fraud.TurdBomber said:
When you know for a fact there was fraud, you use phrases like "No Widespread Fraud" to make the actual fraud seem normal, minimal, acceptable and okay.MelloDawg said:Far left…far left…radical left…mainstream media…far left…widespread election irregularities.
Quite the drinking game he has going there.
And it obviously works on the Mello's of the world.
To date, there is zero evidence that fraud took place to a degree that had any impact what so ever on the results. So to say that it wasn’t widespread is just being factually correct because we all read the article about the dude who muderred his wife and then used her vote to vote for Trump. So we all know about one dude who committed fraud.
Time to refill my popcorn.
The scrubs are finishing out the blow out loss -
Will he send me a bottle opener?
-
Fork, did you receive yours?Pitchfork51 said:Will he send me a bottle opener?
-
Haven't checked the mail tbhDerekJohnson said:
Fork, did you receive yours?Pitchfork51 said:Will he send me a bottle opener?
-
Nobody fucking knows what happens, but only one group doesn’t want to open any books
If you have 81M votes you would want to parade them around as much as possible. -
Well it is Friday.RaceBannon said:
The starters went homeTurdBomber said:
So we have not one, but two illiterate lefty lib morons who think "widespread" is a quantity.Rubberfist said:
There is fraud in every election. Show me an election where there hasn’t been fraud. There was fraud in the 2016 election. Any system that has 150+ million people voting is going to have some people committing fraud.TurdBomber said:
When you know for a fact there was fraud, you use phrases like "No Widespread Fraud" to make the actual fraud seem normal, minimal, acceptable and okay.MelloDawg said:Far left…far left…radical left…mainstream media…far left…widespread election irregularities.
Quite the drinking game he has going there.
And it obviously works on the Mello's of the world.
To date, there is zero evidence that fraud took place to a degree that had any impact what so ever on the results. So to say that it wasn’t widespread is just being factually correct because we all read the article about the dude who muderred his wife and then used her vote to vote for Trump. So we all know about one dude who committed fraud.
Time to refill my popcorn.
The scrubs are finishing out the blow out loss
And the environment is target-rich. -
The Trump voter who murdered his wife and voted for her was caught and is being charged for murder AND voter fraud so I guess the system works.TurdBomber said:
So we have not one, but two illiterate lefty lib morons who think "widespread" is a quantity.Rubberfist said:
There is fraud in every election. Show me an election where there hasn’t been fraud. There was fraud in the 2016 election. Any system that has 150+ million people voting is going to have some people committing fraud.TurdBomber said:
When you know for a fact there was fraud, you use phrases like "No Widespread Fraud" to make the actual fraud seem normal, minimal, acceptable and okay.MelloDawg said:Far left…far left…radical left…mainstream media…far left…widespread election irregularities.
Quite the drinking game he has going there.
And it obviously works on the Mello's of the world.
To date, there is zero evidence that fraud took place to a degree that had any impact what so ever on the results. So to say that it wasn’t widespread is just being factually correct because we all read the article about the dude who muderred his wife and then used her vote to vote for Trump. So we all know about one dude who committed fraud.
Time to refill my popcorn. -
Took you that long to come up with that? Wow.Rubberfist said:
The Trump voter who murdered his wife and voted for her was caught and is being charged for murder AND voter fraud so I guess the system works.TurdBomber said:
So we have not one, but two illiterate lefty lib morons who think "widespread" is a quantity.Rubberfist said:
There is fraud in every election. Show me an election where there hasn’t been fraud. There was fraud in the 2016 election. Any system that has 150+ million people voting is going to have some people committing fraud.TurdBomber said:
When you know for a fact there was fraud, you use phrases like "No Widespread Fraud" to make the actual fraud seem normal, minimal, acceptable and okay.MelloDawg said:Far left…far left…radical left…mainstream media…far left…widespread election irregularities.
Quite the drinking game he has going there.
And it obviously works on the Mello's of the world.
To date, there is zero evidence that fraud took place to a degree that had any impact what so ever on the results. So to say that it wasn’t widespread is just being factually correct because we all read the article about the dude who muderred his wife and then used her vote to vote for Trump. So we all know about one dude who committed fraud.
Time to refill my popcorn.
How shall I quantify your libtard response? -
Waste of moneyDerekJohnson said:I just made a donation to his campaign.
https://joekentforcongress.com
On both fronts -
"The wicked flee when no man pursues: but the righteous are bold as a lion." Exodus 11:8LoneStarDawg said:Nobody fucking knows what happens, but only one group doesn’t want to open any books
If you have 81M votes you would want to parade them around as much as possible.
