Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

After you donate to Hardcore Husky, go donate to Joe Kent for Congress

DerekJohnson
DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 70,029 Founders Club
I just made a donation to his campaign.


https://joekentforcongress.com
«13

Comments

  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,468
    #SaneRepublicansMustGo!
  • MelloDawg
    MelloDawg Member Posts: 6,917
    edited August 2021
    Far left…far left…radical left…mainstream media…far left…widespread election irregularities.

    Quite the drinking game he has going there.
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,056 Standard Supporter
    edited August 2021
    MelloDawg said:

    Far left…far left…radical left…mainstream media…far left…widespread election irregularities.

    Quite the drinking game he has going there.

    When you know for a fact there was fraud, you use phrases like "No Widespread Fraud" to make the actual fraud seem normal, minimal, acceptable and okay.

    And it obviously works on the Mello's of the world.
  • MelloDawg
    MelloDawg Member Posts: 6,917

    MelloDawg said:

    Far left…far left…radical left…mainstream media…far left…widespread election irregularities.

    Quite the drinking game he has going there.

    When you know for a fact there was fraud, you use phrases like "No Widespread Fraud" to make the actual fraud seem normal, minimal, acceptable and okay.

    And it obviously works on the Mello's of the world.
    I don’t think that’s why they’re quantifying the amount of fraud.
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,056 Standard Supporter
    MelloDawg said:

    MelloDawg said:

    Far left…far left…radical left…mainstream media…far left…widespread election irregularities.

    Quite the drinking game he has going there.

    When you know for a fact there was fraud, you use phrases like "No Widespread Fraud" to make the actual fraud seem normal, minimal, acceptable and okay.

    And it obviously works on the Mello's of the world.
    I don’t think that’s why they’re quantifying the amount of fraud.
    Show me where and when they are "quantifying the amount of fraud" with that phrase.

    Just let me grab my popcorn first. This should be amazing.
  • Rubberfist
    Rubberfist Member Posts: 1,373

    MelloDawg said:

    Far left…far left…radical left…mainstream media…far left…widespread election irregularities.

    Quite the drinking game he has going there.

    When you know for a fact there was fraud, you use phrases like "No Widespread Fraud" to make the actual fraud seem normal, minimal, acceptable and okay.

    And it obviously works on the Mello's of the world.
    There is fraud in every election. Show me an election where there hasn’t been fraud. There was fraud in the 2016 election. Any system that has 150+ million people voting is going to have some people committing fraud.

    To date, there is zero evidence that fraud took place to a degree that had any impact what so ever on the results. So to say that it wasn’t widespread is just being factually correct because we all read the article about the dude who muderred his wife and then used her vote to vote for Trump. So we all know about one dude who committed fraud.
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,742 Standard Supporter

    MelloDawg said:

    Far left…far left…radical left…mainstream media…far left…widespread election irregularities.

    Quite the drinking game he has going there.

    When you know for a fact there was fraud, you use phrases like "No Widespread Fraud" to make the actual fraud seem normal, minimal, acceptable and okay.

    And it obviously works on the Mello's of the world.
    There is fraud in every election. Show me an election where there hasn’t been fraud. There was fraud in the 2016 election. Any system that has 150+ million people voting is going to have some people committing fraud.

    To date, there is zero evidence that fraud took place to a degree that had any impact what so ever on the results. So to say that it wasn’t widespread is just being factually correct because we all read the article about the dude who muderred his wife and then used her vote to vote for Trump. So we all know about one dude who committed fraud.
    Everybody does it POTD.

  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,872 Founders Club
    From no fraud to sure there was fraud but not enough and 2016!!!!

  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,468

    MelloDawg said:

    Far left…far left…radical left…mainstream media…far left…widespread election irregularities.

    Quite the drinking game he has going there.

    When you know for a fact there was fraud, you use phrases like "No Widespread Fraud" to make the actual fraud seem normal, minimal, acceptable and okay.

    And it obviously works on the Mello's of the world.
    There is fraud in every election. Show me an election where there hasn’t been fraud. There was fraud in the 2016 election. Any system that has 150+ million people voting is going to have some people committing fraud.

    To date, there is zero evidence that fraud took place to a degree that had any impact what so ever on the results. So to say that it wasn’t widespread is just being factually correct because we all read the article about the dude who muderred his wife and then used her vote to vote for Trump. So we all know about one dude who committed fraud.
    Everybody does it POTD.

    We can't get Republicans to stop voting the ballots of their dead moms or the wives they've murdered. But it's not a lot of votes.