Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

After you donate to Hardcore Husky, go donate to Joe Kent for Congress

DerekJohnson
DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 68,195 Founders Club
I just made a donation to his campaign.


https://joekentforcongress.com

Comments

  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,869
    #SaneRepublicansMustGo!
  • MelloDawg
    MelloDawg Member Posts: 6,835
    edited August 2021
    Far left…far left…radical left…mainstream media…far left…widespread election irregularities.

    Quite the drinking game he has going there.
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,034 Standard Supporter
    edited August 2021
    MelloDawg said:

    Far left…far left…radical left…mainstream media…far left…widespread election irregularities.

    Quite the drinking game he has going there.

    When you know for a fact there was fraud, you use phrases like "No Widespread Fraud" to make the actual fraud seem normal, minimal, acceptable and okay.

    And it obviously works on the Mello's of the world.
  • MelloDawg
    MelloDawg Member Posts: 6,835

    MelloDawg said:

    Far left…far left…radical left…mainstream media…far left…widespread election irregularities.

    Quite the drinking game he has going there.

    When you know for a fact there was fraud, you use phrases like "No Widespread Fraud" to make the actual fraud seem normal, minimal, acceptable and okay.

    And it obviously works on the Mello's of the world.
    I don’t think that’s why they’re quantifying the amount of fraud.
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,034 Standard Supporter
    MelloDawg said:

    MelloDawg said:

    Far left…far left…radical left…mainstream media…far left…widespread election irregularities.

    Quite the drinking game he has going there.

    When you know for a fact there was fraud, you use phrases like "No Widespread Fraud" to make the actual fraud seem normal, minimal, acceptable and okay.

    And it obviously works on the Mello's of the world.
    I don’t think that’s why they’re quantifying the amount of fraud.
    Show me where and when they are "quantifying the amount of fraud" with that phrase.

    Just let me grab my popcorn first. This should be amazing.
  • Rubberfist
    Rubberfist Member Posts: 1,373

    MelloDawg said:

    Far left…far left…radical left…mainstream media…far left…widespread election irregularities.

    Quite the drinking game he has going there.

    When you know for a fact there was fraud, you use phrases like "No Widespread Fraud" to make the actual fraud seem normal, minimal, acceptable and okay.

    And it obviously works on the Mello's of the world.
    There is fraud in every election. Show me an election where there hasn’t been fraud. There was fraud in the 2016 election. Any system that has 150+ million people voting is going to have some people committing fraud.

    To date, there is zero evidence that fraud took place to a degree that had any impact what so ever on the results. So to say that it wasn’t widespread is just being factually correct because we all read the article about the dude who muderred his wife and then used her vote to vote for Trump. So we all know about one dude who committed fraud.
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,003

    MelloDawg said:

    Far left…far left…radical left…mainstream media…far left…widespread election irregularities.

    Quite the drinking game he has going there.

    When you know for a fact there was fraud, you use phrases like "No Widespread Fraud" to make the actual fraud seem normal, minimal, acceptable and okay.

    And it obviously works on the Mello's of the world.
    There is fraud in every election. Show me an election where there hasn’t been fraud. There was fraud in the 2016 election. Any system that has 150+ million people voting is going to have some people committing fraud.

    To date, there is zero evidence that fraud took place to a degree that had any impact what so ever on the results. So to say that it wasn’t widespread is just being factually correct because we all read the article about the dude who muderred his wife and then used her vote to vote for Trump. So we all know about one dude who committed fraud.
    Everybody does it POTD.

  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,667 Founders Club
    From no fraud to sure there was fraud but not enough and 2016!!!!

  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,869

    MelloDawg said:

    Far left…far left…radical left…mainstream media…far left…widespread election irregularities.

    Quite the drinking game he has going there.

    When you know for a fact there was fraud, you use phrases like "No Widespread Fraud" to make the actual fraud seem normal, minimal, acceptable and okay.

    And it obviously works on the Mello's of the world.
    There is fraud in every election. Show me an election where there hasn’t been fraud. There was fraud in the 2016 election. Any system that has 150+ million people voting is going to have some people committing fraud.

    To date, there is zero evidence that fraud took place to a degree that had any impact what so ever on the results. So to say that it wasn’t widespread is just being factually correct because we all read the article about the dude who muderred his wife and then used her vote to vote for Trump. So we all know about one dude who committed fraud.
    Everybody does it POTD.

    We can't get Republicans to stop voting the ballots of their dead moms or the wives they've murdered. But it's not a lot of votes.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,667 Founders Club

    MelloDawg said:

    Far left…far left…radical left…mainstream media…far left…widespread election irregularities.

    Quite the drinking game he has going there.

    When you know for a fact there was fraud, you use phrases like "No Widespread Fraud" to make the actual fraud seem normal, minimal, acceptable and okay.

    And it obviously works on the Mello's of the world.
    There is fraud in every election. Show me an election where there hasn’t been fraud. There was fraud in the 2016 election. Any system that has 150+ million people voting is going to have some people committing fraud.

    To date, there is zero evidence that fraud took place to a degree that had any impact what so ever on the results. So to say that it wasn’t widespread is just being factually correct because we all read the article about the dude who muderred his wife and then used her vote to vote for Trump. So we all know about one dude who committed fraud.
    So we have not one, but two illiterate lefty lib morons who think "widespread" is a quantity.

    Time to refill my popcorn.
    The starters went home

    The scrubs are finishing out the blow out loss
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,661
    Will he send me a bottle opener?
  • DerekJohnson
    DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 68,195 Founders Club

    Will he send me a bottle opener?

    Fork, did you receive yours?
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,661

    Will he send me a bottle opener?

    Fork, did you receive yours?
    Haven't checked the mail tbh
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,034 Standard Supporter

    MelloDawg said:

    Far left…far left…radical left…mainstream media…far left…widespread election irregularities.

    Quite the drinking game he has going there.

    When you know for a fact there was fraud, you use phrases like "No Widespread Fraud" to make the actual fraud seem normal, minimal, acceptable and okay.

    And it obviously works on the Mello's of the world.
    There is fraud in every election. Show me an election where there hasn’t been fraud. There was fraud in the 2016 election. Any system that has 150+ million people voting is going to have some people committing fraud.

    To date, there is zero evidence that fraud took place to a degree that had any impact what so ever on the results. So to say that it wasn’t widespread is just being factually correct because we all read the article about the dude who muderred his wife and then used her vote to vote for Trump. So we all know about one dude who committed fraud.
    So we have not one, but two illiterate lefty lib morons who think "widespread" is a quantity.

    Time to refill my popcorn.
    The starters went home

    The scrubs are finishing out the blow out loss
    Well it is Friday.

    And the environment is target-rich.
  • Rubberfist
    Rubberfist Member Posts: 1,373
    edited August 2021

    MelloDawg said:

    Far left…far left…radical left…mainstream media…far left…widespread election irregularities.

    Quite the drinking game he has going there.

    When you know for a fact there was fraud, you use phrases like "No Widespread Fraud" to make the actual fraud seem normal, minimal, acceptable and okay.

    And it obviously works on the Mello's of the world.
    There is fraud in every election. Show me an election where there hasn’t been fraud. There was fraud in the 2016 election. Any system that has 150+ million people voting is going to have some people committing fraud.

    To date, there is zero evidence that fraud took place to a degree that had any impact what so ever on the results. So to say that it wasn’t widespread is just being factually correct because we all read the article about the dude who muderred his wife and then used her vote to vote for Trump. So we all know about one dude who committed fraud.
    So we have not one, but two illiterate lefty lib morons who think "widespread" is a quantity.

    Time to refill my popcorn.
    The Trump voter who murdered his wife and voted for her was caught and is being charged for murder AND voter fraud so I guess the system works.
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,034 Standard Supporter

    MelloDawg said:

    Far left…far left…radical left…mainstream media…far left…widespread election irregularities.

    Quite the drinking game he has going there.

    When you know for a fact there was fraud, you use phrases like "No Widespread Fraud" to make the actual fraud seem normal, minimal, acceptable and okay.

    And it obviously works on the Mello's of the world.
    There is fraud in every election. Show me an election where there hasn’t been fraud. There was fraud in the 2016 election. Any system that has 150+ million people voting is going to have some people committing fraud.

    To date, there is zero evidence that fraud took place to a degree that had any impact what so ever on the results. So to say that it wasn’t widespread is just being factually correct because we all read the article about the dude who muderred his wife and then used her vote to vote for Trump. So we all know about one dude who committed fraud.
    So we have not one, but two illiterate lefty lib morons who think "widespread" is a quantity.

    Time to refill my popcorn.
    The Trump voter who murdered his wife and voted for her was caught and is being charged for murder AND voter fraud so I guess the system works.
    Took you that long to come up with that? Wow.

    How shall I quantify your libtard response?
  • HuskyJW
    HuskyJW Member Posts: 15,251

    I just made a donation to his campaign.


    https://joekentforcongress.com

    Waste of money

    On both fronts
  • DerekJohnson
    DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 68,195 Founders Club

    Nobody fucking knows what happens, but only one group doesn’t want to open any books

    If you have 81M votes you would want to parade them around as much as possible.

    "The wicked flee when no man pursues: but the righteous are bold as a lion." Exodus 11:8
  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 17,534 Standard Supporter

    Nobody fucking knows what happens, but only one group doesn’t want to open any books

    If you have 81M votes you would want to parade them around as much as possible.

    "The wicked flee when no man pursues: but the righteous are bold as a lion." Exodus 11:8
    Exactly, when you want to steal and election you would do everything the dems did and subsequently block any oversight or investigation.

    PS Quoting wisdom from the Bible is clearly white institutional racism and indicting someone as wicked is almost as bad as calling their behavior as thuggish.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,869

    Nobody fucking knows what happens, but only one group doesn’t want to open any books

    If you have 81M votes you would want to parade them around as much as possible.

    We don't relitigate elections that have been checked and rechecked ( and litigated!) ad nauseum.

    You are just the Gore Won voters on steroids.
  • LoneStarDawg
    LoneStarDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,672 Founders Club
    Imagine having the track record of HH and thinking anyone would waste a breath on you
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,869

    Imagine having the track record of HH and thinking anyone would waste a breath on you

    And yet . . .
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,869
    Swaye said:

    Imagine having the track record of HH and thinking anyone would waste a breath on you

    HH in every thread:


    This is why you won't ban me, Stalin. What would all you hens do without me?