Denzel Boston, 2022 3* WR, Puyallup (Emerald Ridge), WA (Committed)
Comments
-
I predicted 9-4 with us winning the bowl game. Hope I'm wrong but I think this is an average coaching staff that will underperform the talent on hand.KrunkJuice said:How you think we do this year @sonics1993 ? Our schedule is beyond favorable, Oregon's is not. I like us a lot this year and then is gets dicey next year cause we are losing a lot.
-
No reason for him to be on radars at the momentsonics1993 said:
Nobody in the NFL cares about or is looking at Jimmy to be their head coach. Jimmy can dream all he wants but it isn't happening.RaceBannon said:I'm pretty familiar with the talking points after 23 times
It's still just like your opinion man and I don't agree
At all
I'd love to have a coach that the NFL wants. James was the last one we had. Rick seemed to think he was but he wasn't
Throw out 2 conference winning seasons and your stock goes up
At minimum Jimmy is in consideration for interviews if for no other reason than satisfying the Rooney Rule
There’s nothing about what he’s doing at Washington that comes off as a long term strategy for him -
9-4 would be a full blown hit the iceberg kind of resultsonics1993 said:
I predicted 9-4 with us winning the bowl game. Hope I'm wrong but I think this is an average coaching staff that will underperform the talent on hand.KrunkJuice said:How you think we do this year @sonics1993 ? Our schedule is beyond favorable, Oregon's is not. I like us a lot this year and then is gets dicey next year cause we are losing a lot.
-
9-4 would be a "see an iceberg" scenario and not too far off from what last year would equal over a 12 game schedule. Compare that to the last full season, and it's... an improvement.Tequilla said:
9-4 would be a full blown hit the iceberg kind of resultsonics1993 said:
I predicted 9-4 with us winning the bowl game. Hope I'm wrong but I think this is an average coaching staff that will underperform the talent on hand.KrunkJuice said:How you think we do this year @sonics1993 ? Our schedule is beyond favorable, Oregon's is not. I like us a lot this year and then is gets dicey next year cause we are losing a lot.
-
Petersen could have coached for 20 more years at 8 and 5 to 10 and 3
The fear of a lot of folks here about Jimmy
Jimmy doesn't have that capital
Lucky Pete quit.
-
I’m dooging out because I do almost every year, but 9-4 would be my unbiased prediction.Tequilla said:
9-4 would be a full blown hit the iceberg kind of resultsonics1993 said:
I predicted 9-4 with us winning the bowl game. Hope I'm wrong but I think this is an average coaching staff that will underperform the talent on hand.KrunkJuice said:How you think we do this year @sonics1993 ? Our schedule is beyond favorable, Oregon's is not. I like us a lot this year and then is gets dicey next year cause we are losing a lot.
Not sold on the DL or safeties on D. I think our offense will be pretty good and probably better than expected, but still not great. We will have a few close games.
The reason I am optimistic is every other team seems worse than we are. -
This conference is truly awful. That’s why I think they can still win it.RoadDawg55 said:
I’m dooging out because I do almost every year, but 9-4 would be my unbiased prediction.Tequilla said:
9-4 would be a full blown hit the iceberg kind of resultsonics1993 said:
I predicted 9-4 with us winning the bowl game. Hope I'm wrong but I think this is an average coaching staff that will underperform the talent on hand.KrunkJuice said:How you think we do this year @sonics1993 ? Our schedule is beyond favorable, Oregon's is not. I like us a lot this year and then is gets dicey next year cause we are losing a lot.
Not sold on the DL or safeties on D. I think our offense will be pretty good and probably better than expected, but still not great. We will have a few close games.
The reason I am optimistic is every other team seems worse than we are.
Asu has some talent but always sucks, Utah’s best player died, usc is gross, Oregon is overrated but likes to win which is more than you can say about uw. Doog it up! -
I think the defense will suck. It kind of did last year.RoadDawg55 said:
I’m dooging out because I do almost every year, but 9-4 would be my unbiased prediction.Tequilla said:
9-4 would be a full blown hit the iceberg kind of resultsonics1993 said:
I predicted 9-4 with us winning the bowl game. Hope I'm wrong but I think this is an average coaching staff that will underperform the talent on hand.KrunkJuice said:How you think we do this year @sonics1993 ? Our schedule is beyond favorable, Oregon's is not. I like us a lot this year and then is gets dicey next year cause we are losing a lot.
Not sold on the DL or safeties on D. I think our offense will be pretty good and probably better than expected, but still not great. We will have a few close games.
The reason I am optimistic is every other team seems worse than we are.
If there is a legit 1,600-1,800 yard RB on the roster, or Myles-type gamer, the offense could be good. But probably not.
We'll look pretty good against Michigan but lose, sort of like the Auburn game.
Short QB (deep ball not included)+ stupid coach=mediocrity. IMVHO. -
It won’t suck, but without improvement, we are bad against the run. A healthy Tuli and a year of improvement from Tuitele and Bandes should help. Neither was close to ready last year tho. Lake signaling out Peihopa as probably getting playing time (before injury) wasn’t a great sign.Kingdome_Urinals said:
I think the defense will suck. It kind of did last year.RoadDawg55 said:
I’m dooging out because I do almost every year, but 9-4 would be my unbiased prediction.Tequilla said:
9-4 would be a full blown hit the iceberg kind of resultsonics1993 said:
I predicted 9-4 with us winning the bowl game. Hope I'm wrong but I think this is an average coaching staff that will underperform the talent on hand.KrunkJuice said:How you think we do this year @sonics1993 ? Our schedule is beyond favorable, Oregon's is not. I like us a lot this year and then is gets dicey next year cause we are losing a lot.
Not sold on the DL or safeties on D. I think our offense will be pretty good and probably better than expected, but still not great. We will have a few close games.
The reason I am optimistic is every other team seems worse than we are.
If there is a legit 1,600-1,800 yard RB on the roster, or Myles-type gamer, the offense could be good. But probably not.
We'll look pretty good against Michigan but lose, sort of like the Auburn game.
Short QB (deep ball not included)+ stupid coach=mediocrity. IMVHO.
LB depth is suspect. We still aren’t sure any safety we have is actually any good.
There are too many impact players on defense to suck, but above average seems more likely than 2016-2018 levels. -
The DL will be better, LBs will be better as long as Ulo stays healthy, and we are almost guaranteed to get more out of the safety position.RoadDawg55 said:
It won’t suck, but without improvement, we are bad against the run. A healthy Tuli and a year of improvement from Tuitele and Bandes should help. Neither was close to ready last year tho. Lake signaling out Peihopa as probably getting playing time (before injury) wasn’t a great sign.Kingdome_Urinals said:
I think the defense will suck. It kind of did last year.RoadDawg55 said:
I’m dooging out because I do almost every year, but 9-4 would be my unbiased prediction.Tequilla said:
9-4 would be a full blown hit the iceberg kind of resultsonics1993 said:
I predicted 9-4 with us winning the bowl game. Hope I'm wrong but I think this is an average coaching staff that will underperform the talent on hand.KrunkJuice said:How you think we do this year @sonics1993 ? Our schedule is beyond favorable, Oregon's is not. I like us a lot this year and then is gets dicey next year cause we are losing a lot.
Not sold on the DL or safeties on D. I think our offense will be pretty good and probably better than expected, but still not great. We will have a few close games.
The reason I am optimistic is every other team seems worse than we are.
If there is a legit 1,600-1,800 yard RB on the roster, or Myles-type gamer, the offense could be good. But probably not.
We'll look pretty good against Michigan but lose, sort of like the Auburn game.
Short QB (deep ball not included)+ stupid coach=mediocrity. IMVHO.
LB depth is suspect. We still aren’t sure any safety we have is actually any good.
There are too many impact players on defense to suck, but above average seems more likely than 2016-2018 levels.
I really don't think we'll see the massive issues against the run we saw last year. I honestly don't think we would have seen them by the end of a hypothetical full 2020. So many things had to go wrong for them to look that bad.
I don't think they'll be 2016-2018 levels of defense but much closer to that than 2019-2020 levels. -
This kid is better than every WR Oregon landed the last 2 cycles and it’s not close. Ballz just told me some good info on this kid, according to him he should be a 5 star and will end up playing for a decade in the NFL!
-
UW won the games but couldn't get opposing offenses off the field. I felt like Utah and Stanford controlled the gameflow and in both cases the Huskies were on there way to getting blown out before getting some turnovers. Then you think about it, Oregon St. was pesky and even Arizona scored a bunch of points late in the game.dnc said:
The DL will be better, LBs will be better as long as Ulo stays healthy, and we are almost guaranteed to get more out of the safety position.RoadDawg55 said:
It won’t suck, but without improvement, we are bad against the run. A healthy Tuli and a year of improvement from Tuitele and Bandes should help. Neither was close to ready last year tho. Lake signaling out Peihopa as probably getting playing time (before injury) wasn’t a great sign.Kingdome_Urinals said:
I think the defense will suck. It kind of did last year.RoadDawg55 said:
I’m dooging out because I do almost every year, but 9-4 would be my unbiased prediction.Tequilla said:
9-4 would be a full blown hit the iceberg kind of resultsonics1993 said:
I predicted 9-4 with us winning the bowl game. Hope I'm wrong but I think this is an average coaching staff that will underperform the talent on hand.KrunkJuice said:How you think we do this year @sonics1993 ? Our schedule is beyond favorable, Oregon's is not. I like us a lot this year and then is gets dicey next year cause we are losing a lot.
Not sold on the DL or safeties on D. I think our offense will be pretty good and probably better than expected, but still not great. We will have a few close games.
The reason I am optimistic is every other team seems worse than we are.
If there is a legit 1,600-1,800 yard RB on the roster, or Myles-type gamer, the offense could be good. But probably not.
We'll look pretty good against Michigan but lose, sort of like the Auburn game.
Short QB (deep ball not included)+ stupid coach=mediocrity. IMVHO.
LB depth is suspect. We still aren’t sure any safety we have is actually any good.
There are too many impact players on defense to suck, but above average seems more likely than 2016-2018 levels.
I really don't think we'll see the massive issues against the run we saw last year. I honestly don't think we would have seen them by the end of a hypothetical full 2020. So many things had to go wrong for them to look that bad.
I don't think they'll be 2016-2018 levels of defense but much closer to that than 2019-2020 levels.
None of those were even above average offenses in my estimation, without looking at the stats.
UW has some really good defensive players scattered around but unless some young guy emerges (Trice) seems kind of mediocre overall. -
Defense was behind the offense most places last year. Maybe defense needs more practice time
Made for some great games though
55-48 Bama over Ole Miss
If you see the replay watch it -
@mrdoog don't mention his name in my presence.
-
Despite having 4* recruits throughout the depth chart, our D line was absolutely gashed in all the games last year except Zona. On many plays,, Utah and Stanford's RBs could have picked up 5+ yards against our defensive line if they were walking. I kind of wonder if this was part of the reason Malloe was moved.
-
I feel scheme was a bigger factor, and I think we saw that as half-time adjustments between the first and second halves of Ute and Furdbananasnblondes said:Despite having 4* recruits throughout the depth chart, our D line was absolutely gashed in all the games last year except Zona. On many plays,, Utah and Stanford's RBs could have picked up 5+ yards against our defensive line if they were walking. I kind of wonder if this was part of the reason Malloe was moved.
-
Were you even here when he was around?dirtysouwfdawg said:@mrdoog don't mention his name in my presence.
-
I agree except that Jimmy is a black man and UW is UW. Ty got two years too many and that was pre-woke'ism. If Jimmy sucks he still gets 6 years.RaceBannon said:Petersen could have coached for 20 more years at 8 and 5 to 10 and 3
The fear of a lot of folks here about Jimmy
Jimmy doesn't have that capital
Lucky Pete quit. -
@BleachedAnusDawg gets if.BleachedAnusDawg said:
I agree except that Jimmy is a black man and UW is UW. Ty got two years too many and that was pre-woke'ism. If Jimmy sucks he still gets 6 years.RaceBannon said:Petersen could have coached for 20 more years at 8 and 5 to 10 and 3
The fear of a lot of folks here about Jimmy
Jimmy doesn't have that capital
Lucky Pete quit. -
I call for a final judgement on @BleachedAnusDawg.
-
The good news is they are supposedly hitting a lot more in camp and are aware we need to be more physical.bananasnblondes said:Despite having 4* recruits throughout the depth chart, our D line was absolutely gashed in all the games last year except Zona. On many plays,, Utah and Stanford's RBs could have picked up 5+ yards against our defensive line if they were walking. I kind of wonder if this was part of the reason Malloe was moved.
I think it would have gotten better in time, but when you give up short passes because of scheme, it amplifies the need to shut down the run. -
Scheme and piss poor reads and run fits by the linebackers and safeties. The DL isn't always to blame for bad run defense. They're not the ones who should be making all the tackles.whatshouldicareabout said:
I feel scheme was a bigger factor, and I think we saw that as half-time adjustments between the first and second halves of Ute and Furdbananasnblondes said:Despite having 4* recruits throughout the depth chart, our D line was absolutely gashed in all the games last year except Zona. On many plays,, Utah and Stanford's RBs could have picked up 5+ yards against our defensive line if they were walking. I kind of wonder if this was part of the reason Malloe was moved.
Ulofoshio was good, Sirmon was horrible, Tafisi is as fast as thick mud, and Turner struggled with his vagina flaring up. -
100%BleachedAnusDawg said:
I agree except that Jimmy is a black man and UW is UW. Ty got two years too many and that was pre-woke'ism. If Jimmy sucks he still gets 6 years.RaceBannon said:Petersen could have coached for 20 more years at 8 and 5 to 10 and 3
The fear of a lot of folks here about Jimmy
Jimmy doesn't have that capital
Lucky Pete quit.
in the woke 2020's, there is zero chance a black coach gets fired unless he molestes a kid. -
Did Kevin Sumlin diddle kids? Willie Taggart? Charlie Strong?TommySQC said:
100%BleachedAnusDawg said:
I agree except that Jimmy is a black man and UW is UW. Ty got two years too many and that was pre-woke'ism. If Jimmy sucks he still gets 6 years.RaceBannon said:Petersen could have coached for 20 more years at 8 and 5 to 10 and 3
The fear of a lot of folks here about Jimmy
Jimmy doesn't have that capital
Lucky Pete quit.
in the woke 2020's, there is zero chance a black coach gets fired unless he molestes a kid. -
Strange comment that isn’t true. Coaches that don’t win get fired. If Jimmy goes .500 the next two years he’s out.NEsnake12 said:
Did Kevin Sumlin diddle kids? Willie Taggart? Charlie Strong?TommySQC said:
100%BleachedAnusDawg said:
I agree except that Jimmy is a black man and UW is UW. Ty got two years too many and that was pre-woke'ism. If Jimmy sucks he still gets 6 years.RaceBannon said:Petersen could have coached for 20 more years at 8 and 5 to 10 and 3
The fear of a lot of folks here about Jimmy
Jimmy doesn't have that capital
Lucky Pete quit.
in the woke 2020's, there is zero chance a black coach gets fired unless he molestes a kid.
I do think 8-4 type seasons get him at least 5 years. -
you have more hope than I haveRoadDawg55 said:
Strange comment that isn’t true. Coaches that don’t win get fired. If Jimmy goes .500 the next two years he’s out.NEsnake12 said:
Did Kevin Sumlin diddle kids? Willie Taggart? Charlie Strong?TommySQC said:
100%BleachedAnusDawg said:
I agree except that Jimmy is a black man and UW is UW. Ty got two years too many and that was pre-woke'ism. If Jimmy sucks he still gets 6 years.RaceBannon said:Petersen could have coached for 20 more years at 8 and 5 to 10 and 3
The fear of a lot of folks here about Jimmy
Jimmy doesn't have that capital
Lucky Pete quit.
in the woke 2020's, there is zero chance a black coach gets fired unless he molestes a kid.
I do think 8-4 type seasons get him at least 5 years. -
maybeNEsnake12 said:
Did Kevin Sumlin diddle kids? Willie Taggart? Charlie Strong?TommySQC said:
100%BleachedAnusDawg said:
I agree except that Jimmy is a black man and UW is UW. Ty got two years too many and that was pre-woke'ism. If Jimmy sucks he still gets 6 years.RaceBannon said:Petersen could have coached for 20 more years at 8 and 5 to 10 and 3
The fear of a lot of folks here about Jimmy
Jimmy doesn't have that capital
Lucky Pete quit.
in the woke 2020's, there is zero chance a black coach gets fired unless he molestes a kid. -
What does this even mean? Is this a nerdy Game of Thrones thing?sinceredawg said:I call for a final judgement on @BleachedAnusDawg.
-
Taggart and Strong got canned before the woke stuff blew up. They also coached in the South, not the PNW.NEsnake12 said:
Did Kevin Sumlin diddle kids? Willie Taggart? Charlie Strong?TommySQC said:
100%BleachedAnusDawg said:
I agree except that Jimmy is a black man and UW is UW. Ty got two years too many and that was pre-woke'ism. If Jimmy sucks he still gets 6 years.RaceBannon said:Petersen could have coached for 20 more years at 8 and 5 to 10 and 3
The fear of a lot of folks here about Jimmy
Jimmy doesn't have that capital
Lucky Pete quit.
in the woke 2020's, there is zero chance a black coach gets fired unless he molestes a kid. -
Being black might but Jimmy an extra year. This isn’t Ty Willingham though. Jimmy didn’t inherit a downtrodden program and he didn’t come here after a high profile firing that the media wanted to blame on his race.
Jimmy’s skin isn’t the problem. Jen’s incompetence is.
We really need Jimmy to be good.