Denzel Boston, 2022 3* WR, Puyallup (Emerald Ridge), WA (Committed)

mrdoog

This kid is better than every WR Oregon landed the last 2 cycles and it’s not close. Ballz just told me some good info on this kid, according to him he should be a 5 star and will end up playing for a decade in the NFL!

Kingdome_Urinals

dnc said:

RoadDawg55 said:

Kingdome_Urinals said:

RoadDawg55 said:

Tequilla said:

sonics1993 said:

KrunkJuice said:

How you think we do this year @sonics1993 ? Our schedule is beyond favorable, Oregon's is not. I like us a lot this year and then is gets dicey next year cause we are losing a lot.

I predicted 9-4 with us winning the bowl game. Hope I'm wrong but I think this is an average coaching staff that will underperform the talent on hand.

9-4 would be a full blown hit the iceberg kind of result

I’m dooging out because I do almost every year, but 9-4 would be my unbiased prediction.

Not sold on the DL or safeties on D. I think our offense will be pretty good and probably better than expected, but still not great. We will have a few close games.

The reason I am optimistic is every other team seems worse than we are.

I think the defense will suck. It kind of did last year.

If there is a legit 1,600-1,800 yard RB on the roster, or Myles-type gamer, the offense could be good. But probably not.

We'll look pretty good against Michigan but lose, sort of like the Auburn game.

Short QB (deep ball not included)+ stupid coach=mediocrity. IMVHO.

It won’t suck, but without improvement, we are bad against the run. A healthy Tuli and a year of improvement from Tuitele and Bandes should help. Neither was close to ready last year tho. Lake signaling out Peihopa as probably getting playing time (before injury) wasn’t a great sign.

LB depth is suspect. We still aren’t sure any safety we have is actually any good.

There are too many impact players on defense to suck, but above average seems more likely than 2016-2018 levels.

The DL will be better, LBs will be better as long as Ulo stays healthy, and we are almost guaranteed to get more out of the safety position.

I really don't think we'll see the massive issues against the run we saw last year. I honestly don't think we would have seen them by the end of a hypothetical full 2020. So many things had to go wrong for them to look that bad.

I don't think they'll be 2016-2018 levels of defense but much closer to that than 2019-2020 levels.

UW won the games but couldn't get opposing offenses off the field. I felt like Utah and Stanford controlled the gameflow and in both cases the Huskies were on there way to getting blown out before getting some turnovers. Then you think about it, Oregon St. was pesky and even Arizona scored a bunch of points late in the game.

None of those were even above average offenses in my estimation, without looking at the stats.

UW has some really good defensive players scattered around but unless some young guy emerges (Trice) seems kind of mediocre overall.

RaceBannon

Defense was behind the offense most places last year. Maybe defense needs more practice time

Made for some great games though

55-48 Bama over Ole Miss

If you see the replay watch it

dirtysouwfdawg

@mrdoog don't mention his name in my presence.

bananasnblondes

Despite having 4* recruits throughout the depth chart, our D line was absolutely gashed in all the games last year except Zona. On many plays,, Utah and Stanford's RBs could have picked up 5+ yards against our defensive line if they were walking. I kind of wonder if this was part of the reason Malloe was moved.

whatshouldicareabout

bananasnblondes said:

Despite having 4* recruits throughout the depth chart, our D line was absolutely gashed in all the games last year except Zona. On many plays,, Utah and Stanford's RBs could have picked up 5+ yards against our defensive line if they were walking. I kind of wonder if this was part of the reason Malloe was moved.

I feel scheme was a bigger factor, and I think we saw that as half-time adjustments between the first and second halves of Ute and Furd

Ice_Holmvik

dirtysouwfdawg said:

@mrdoog don't mention his name in my presence.

Were you even here when he was around?

BleachedAnusDawg

RaceBannon said:

Petersen could have coached for 20 more years at 8 and 5 to 10 and 3

The fear of a lot of folks here about Jimmy

Jimmy doesn't have that capital

Lucky Pete quit.

I agree except that Jimmy is a black man and UW is UW. Ty got two years too many and that was pre-woke'ism. If Jimmy sucks he still gets 6 years.

AtomicDawg

BleachedAnusDawg said:

RaceBannon said:

Petersen could have coached for 20 more years at 8 and 5 to 10 and 3

The fear of a lot of folks here about Jimmy

Jimmy doesn't have that capital

Lucky Pete quit.

I agree except that Jimmy is a black man and UW is UW. Ty got two years too many and that was pre-woke'ism. If Jimmy sucks he still gets 6 years.

@BleachedAnusDawg gets if.

sinceredawg

I call for a final judgement on @BleachedAnusDawg.