Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Denzel Boston, 2022 3* WR, Puyallup (Emerald Ridge), WA (Committed)

1235

Comments

  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,102

    I'm pretty familiar with the talking points after 23 times

    It's still just like your opinion man and I don't agree

    At all

    I'd love to have a coach that the NFL wants. James was the last one we had. Rick seemed to think he was but he wasn't

    Nobody in the NFL cares about or is looking at Jimmy to be their head coach. Jimmy can dream all he wants but it isn't happening.
    No reason for him to be on radars at the moment

    Throw out 2 conference winning seasons and your stock goes up

    At minimum Jimmy is in consideration for interviews if for no other reason than satisfying the Rooney Rule

    There’s nothing about what he’s doing at Washington that comes off as a long term strategy for him
  • LB_33
    LB_33 Member Posts: 324
    Tequilla said:

    How you think we do this year @sonics1993 ? Our schedule is beyond favorable, Oregon's is not. I like us a lot this year and then is gets dicey next year cause we are losing a lot.

    I predicted 9-4 with us winning the bowl game. Hope I'm wrong but I think this is an average coaching staff that will underperform the talent on hand.
    9-4 would be a full blown hit the iceberg kind of result
    9-4 would be a "see an iceberg" scenario and not too far off from what last year would equal over a 12 game schedule. Compare that to the last full season, and it's... an improvement.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,013 Founders Club
    Petersen could have coached for 20 more years at 8 and 5 to 10 and 3

    The fear of a lot of folks here about Jimmy

    Jimmy doesn't have that capital

    Lucky Pete quit.

  • AtomicDawg
    AtomicDawg Member Posts: 7,331

    Tequilla said:

    How you think we do this year @sonics1993 ? Our schedule is beyond favorable, Oregon's is not. I like us a lot this year and then is gets dicey next year cause we are losing a lot.

    I predicted 9-4 with us winning the bowl game. Hope I'm wrong but I think this is an average coaching staff that will underperform the talent on hand.
    9-4 would be a full blown hit the iceberg kind of result
    I’m dooging out because I do almost every year, but 9-4 would be my unbiased prediction.

    Not sold on the DL or safeties on D. I think our offense will be pretty good and probably better than expected, but still not great. We will have a few close games.

    The reason I am optimistic is every other team seems worse than we are.
    This conference is truly awful. That’s why I think they can still win it.

    Asu has some talent but always sucks, Utah’s best player died, usc is gross, Oregon is overrated but likes to win which is more than you can say about uw. Doog it up!
  • Kingdome_Urinals
    Kingdome_Urinals Member Posts: 2,799

    Tequilla said:

    How you think we do this year @sonics1993 ? Our schedule is beyond favorable, Oregon's is not. I like us a lot this year and then is gets dicey next year cause we are losing a lot.

    I predicted 9-4 with us winning the bowl game. Hope I'm wrong but I think this is an average coaching staff that will underperform the talent on hand.
    9-4 would be a full blown hit the iceberg kind of result
    I’m dooging out because I do almost every year, but 9-4 would be my unbiased prediction.

    Not sold on the DL or safeties on D. I think our offense will be pretty good and probably better than expected, but still not great. We will have a few close games.

    The reason I am optimistic is every other team seems worse than we are.
    I think the defense will suck. It kind of did last year.

    If there is a legit 1,600-1,800 yard RB on the roster, or Myles-type gamer, the offense could be good. But probably not.

    We'll look pretty good against Michigan but lose, sort of like the Auburn game.

    Short QB (deep ball not included)+ stupid coach=mediocrity. IMVHO.
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,142

    Tequilla said:

    How you think we do this year @sonics1993 ? Our schedule is beyond favorable, Oregon's is not. I like us a lot this year and then is gets dicey next year cause we are losing a lot.

    I predicted 9-4 with us winning the bowl game. Hope I'm wrong but I think this is an average coaching staff that will underperform the talent on hand.
    9-4 would be a full blown hit the iceberg kind of result
    I’m dooging out because I do almost every year, but 9-4 would be my unbiased prediction.

    Not sold on the DL or safeties on D. I think our offense will be pretty good and probably better than expected, but still not great. We will have a few close games.

    The reason I am optimistic is every other team seems worse than we are.
    I think the defense will suck. It kind of did last year.

    If there is a legit 1,600-1,800 yard RB on the roster, or Myles-type gamer, the offense could be good. But probably not.

    We'll look pretty good against Michigan but lose, sort of like the Auburn game.

    Short QB (deep ball not included)+ stupid coach=mediocrity. IMVHO.
    It won’t suck, but without improvement, we are bad against the run. A healthy Tuli and a year of improvement from Tuitele and Bandes should help. Neither was close to ready last year tho. Lake signaling out Peihopa as probably getting playing time (before injury) wasn’t a great sign.

    LB depth is suspect. We still aren’t sure any safety we have is actually any good.

    There are too many impact players on defense to suck, but above average seems more likely than 2016-2018 levels.
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839

    Tequilla said:

    How you think we do this year @sonics1993 ? Our schedule is beyond favorable, Oregon's is not. I like us a lot this year and then is gets dicey next year cause we are losing a lot.

    I predicted 9-4 with us winning the bowl game. Hope I'm wrong but I think this is an average coaching staff that will underperform the talent on hand.
    9-4 would be a full blown hit the iceberg kind of result
    I’m dooging out because I do almost every year, but 9-4 would be my unbiased prediction.

    Not sold on the DL or safeties on D. I think our offense will be pretty good and probably better than expected, but still not great. We will have a few close games.

    The reason I am optimistic is every other team seems worse than we are.
    I think the defense will suck. It kind of did last year.

    If there is a legit 1,600-1,800 yard RB on the roster, or Myles-type gamer, the offense could be good. But probably not.

    We'll look pretty good against Michigan but lose, sort of like the Auburn game.

    Short QB (deep ball not included)+ stupid coach=mediocrity. IMVHO.
    It won’t suck, but without improvement, we are bad against the run. A healthy Tuli and a year of improvement from Tuitele and Bandes should help. Neither was close to ready last year tho. Lake signaling out Peihopa as probably getting playing time (before injury) wasn’t a great sign.

    LB depth is suspect. We still aren’t sure any safety we have is actually any good.

    There are too many impact players on defense to suck, but above average seems more likely than 2016-2018 levels.
    The DL will be better, LBs will be better as long as Ulo stays healthy, and we are almost guaranteed to get more out of the safety position.

    I really don't think we'll see the massive issues against the run we saw last year. I honestly don't think we would have seen them by the end of a hypothetical full 2020. So many things had to go wrong for them to look that bad.

    I don't think they'll be 2016-2018 levels of defense but much closer to that than 2019-2020 levels.
  • mrdoog
    mrdoog Member Posts: 203
    This kid is better than every WR Oregon landed the last 2 cycles and it’s not close. Ballz just told me some good info on this kid, according to him he should be a 5 star and will end up playing for a decade in the NFL!
  • Kingdome_Urinals
    Kingdome_Urinals Member Posts: 2,799
    dnc said:

    Tequilla said:

    How you think we do this year @sonics1993 ? Our schedule is beyond favorable, Oregon's is not. I like us a lot this year and then is gets dicey next year cause we are losing a lot.

    I predicted 9-4 with us winning the bowl game. Hope I'm wrong but I think this is an average coaching staff that will underperform the talent on hand.
    9-4 would be a full blown hit the iceberg kind of result
    I’m dooging out because I do almost every year, but 9-4 would be my unbiased prediction.

    Not sold on the DL or safeties on D. I think our offense will be pretty good and probably better than expected, but still not great. We will have a few close games.

    The reason I am optimistic is every other team seems worse than we are.
    I think the defense will suck. It kind of did last year.

    If there is a legit 1,600-1,800 yard RB on the roster, or Myles-type gamer, the offense could be good. But probably not.

    We'll look pretty good against Michigan but lose, sort of like the Auburn game.

    Short QB (deep ball not included)+ stupid coach=mediocrity. IMVHO.
    It won’t suck, but without improvement, we are bad against the run. A healthy Tuli and a year of improvement from Tuitele and Bandes should help. Neither was close to ready last year tho. Lake signaling out Peihopa as probably getting playing time (before injury) wasn’t a great sign.

    LB depth is suspect. We still aren’t sure any safety we have is actually any good.

    There are too many impact players on defense to suck, but above average seems more likely than 2016-2018 levels.
    The DL will be better, LBs will be better as long as Ulo stays healthy, and we are almost guaranteed to get more out of the safety position.

    I really don't think we'll see the massive issues against the run we saw last year. I honestly don't think we would have seen them by the end of a hypothetical full 2020. So many things had to go wrong for them to look that bad.

    I don't think they'll be 2016-2018 levels of defense but much closer to that than 2019-2020 levels.
    UW won the games but couldn't get opposing offenses off the field. I felt like Utah and Stanford controlled the gameflow and in both cases the Huskies were on there way to getting blown out before getting some turnovers. Then you think about it, Oregon St. was pesky and even Arizona scored a bunch of points late in the game.

    None of those were even above average offenses in my estimation, without looking at the stats.

    UW has some really good defensive players scattered around but unless some young guy emerges (Trice) seems kind of mediocre overall.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,013 Founders Club
    Defense was behind the offense most places last year. Maybe defense needs more practice time

    Made for some great games though

    55-48 Bama over Ole Miss

    If you see the replay watch it
  • dirtysouwfdawg
    dirtysouwfdawg Member Posts: 14,113
    @mrdoog don't mention his name in my presence.
  • whatshouldicareabout
    whatshouldicareabout Member Posts: 12,991

    Despite having 4* recruits throughout the depth chart, our D line was absolutely gashed in all the games last year except Zona. On many plays,, Utah and Stanford's RBs could have picked up 5+ yards against our defensive line if they were walking. I kind of wonder if this was part of the reason Malloe was moved.

    I feel scheme was a bigger factor, and I think we saw that as half-time adjustments between the first and second halves of Ute and Furd
  • Ice_Holmvik
    Ice_Holmvik Member Posts: 2,912

    @mrdoog don't mention his name in my presence.

    Were you even here when he was around?
  • BleachedAnusDawg
    BleachedAnusDawg Member Posts: 13,279 Standard Supporter

    Petersen could have coached for 20 more years at 8 and 5 to 10 and 3

    The fear of a lot of folks here about Jimmy

    Jimmy doesn't have that capital

    Lucky Pete quit.

    I agree except that Jimmy is a black man and UW is UW. Ty got two years too many and that was pre-woke'ism. If Jimmy sucks he still gets 6 years.
  • AtomicDawg
    AtomicDawg Member Posts: 7,331

    Petersen could have coached for 20 more years at 8 and 5 to 10 and 3

    The fear of a lot of folks here about Jimmy

    Jimmy doesn't have that capital

    Lucky Pete quit.

    I agree except that Jimmy is a black man and UW is UW. Ty got two years too many and that was pre-woke'ism. If Jimmy sucks he still gets 6 years.
    @BleachedAnusDawg gets if.
  • sinceredawg
    sinceredawg Member Posts: 838
    I call for a final judgement on @BleachedAnusDawg.
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,142

    Despite having 4* recruits throughout the depth chart, our D line was absolutely gashed in all the games last year except Zona. On many plays,, Utah and Stanford's RBs could have picked up 5+ yards against our defensive line if they were walking. I kind of wonder if this was part of the reason Malloe was moved.

    The good news is they are supposedly hitting a lot more in camp and are aware we need to be more physical.

    I think it would have gotten better in time, but when you give up short passes because of scheme, it amplifies the need to shut down the run.
  • chuck
    chuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,683 Swaye's Wigwam

    Despite having 4* recruits throughout the depth chart, our D line was absolutely gashed in all the games last year except Zona. On many plays,, Utah and Stanford's RBs could have picked up 5+ yards against our defensive line if they were walking. I kind of wonder if this was part of the reason Malloe was moved.

    I feel scheme was a bigger factor, and I think we saw that as half-time adjustments between the first and second halves of Ute and Furd
    Scheme and piss poor reads and run fits by the linebackers and safeties. The DL isn't always to blame for bad run defense. They're not the ones who should be making all the tackles.

    Ulofoshio was good, Sirmon was horrible, Tafisi is as fast as thick mud, and Turner struggled with his vagina flaring up.
  • TommySQC
    TommySQC Member Posts: 5,813

    Petersen could have coached for 20 more years at 8 and 5 to 10 and 3

    The fear of a lot of folks here about Jimmy

    Jimmy doesn't have that capital

    Lucky Pete quit.

    I agree except that Jimmy is a black man and UW is UW. Ty got two years too many and that was pre-woke'ism. If Jimmy sucks he still gets 6 years.
    100%

    in the woke 2020's, there is zero chance a black coach gets fired unless he molestes a kid.
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,142
    NEsnake12 said:

    TommySQC said:

    Petersen could have coached for 20 more years at 8 and 5 to 10 and 3

    The fear of a lot of folks here about Jimmy

    Jimmy doesn't have that capital

    Lucky Pete quit.

    I agree except that Jimmy is a black man and UW is UW. Ty got two years too many and that was pre-woke'ism. If Jimmy sucks he still gets 6 years.
    100%

    in the woke 2020's, there is zero chance a black coach gets fired unless he molestes a kid.
    Did Kevin Sumlin diddle kids? Willie Taggart? Charlie Strong?
    Strange comment that isn’t true. Coaches that don’t win get fired. If Jimmy goes .500 the next two years he’s out.

    I do think 8-4 type seasons get him at least 5 years.
  • TommySQC
    TommySQC Member Posts: 5,813

    NEsnake12 said:

    TommySQC said:

    Petersen could have coached for 20 more years at 8 and 5 to 10 and 3

    The fear of a lot of folks here about Jimmy

    Jimmy doesn't have that capital

    Lucky Pete quit.

    I agree except that Jimmy is a black man and UW is UW. Ty got two years too many and that was pre-woke'ism. If Jimmy sucks he still gets 6 years.
    100%

    in the woke 2020's, there is zero chance a black coach gets fired unless he molestes a kid.
    Did Kevin Sumlin diddle kids? Willie Taggart? Charlie Strong?
    Strange comment that isn’t true. Coaches that don’t win get fired. If Jimmy goes .500 the next two years he’s out.

    I do think 8-4 type seasons get him at least 5 years.
    you have more hope than I have
  • TommySQC
    TommySQC Member Posts: 5,813
    NEsnake12 said:

    TommySQC said:

    Petersen could have coached for 20 more years at 8 and 5 to 10 and 3

    The fear of a lot of folks here about Jimmy

    Jimmy doesn't have that capital

    Lucky Pete quit.

    I agree except that Jimmy is a black man and UW is UW. Ty got two years too many and that was pre-woke'ism. If Jimmy sucks he still gets 6 years.
    100%

    in the woke 2020's, there is zero chance a black coach gets fired unless he molestes a kid.
    Did Kevin Sumlin diddle kids? Willie Taggart? Charlie Strong?
    maybe
  • BleachedAnusDawg
    BleachedAnusDawg Member Posts: 13,279 Standard Supporter

    I call for a final judgement on @BleachedAnusDawg.

    What does this even mean? Is this a nerdy Game of Thrones thing?
  • BleachedAnusDawg
    BleachedAnusDawg Member Posts: 13,279 Standard Supporter
    NEsnake12 said:

    TommySQC said:

    Petersen could have coached for 20 more years at 8 and 5 to 10 and 3

    The fear of a lot of folks here about Jimmy

    Jimmy doesn't have that capital

    Lucky Pete quit.

    I agree except that Jimmy is a black man and UW is UW. Ty got two years too many and that was pre-woke'ism. If Jimmy sucks he still gets 6 years.
    100%

    in the woke 2020's, there is zero chance a black coach gets fired unless he molestes a kid.
    Did Kevin Sumlin diddle kids? Willie Taggart? Charlie Strong?
    Taggart and Strong got canned before the woke stuff blew up. They also coached in the South, not the PNW.