Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
An offer you’ll probably refuse
CFetters_Nacho_Lover
Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 32,250 
After a lengthy discussion with my financial advisor @Swaye, I’ve decided to contribute 81 big dollars (American currency only - sorry @Canadawg) towards a wam membership* to anyone who is willing and quite honestly desperate enough to count how tims I’ve thanked Taft in 2021.
This is a limited tim offer so act fast.
You might be asking yourself if this is a worthwhile endeavor but don’t kid yourself, if you’re read this far you obviously have nothing better going on in your life.
Any poasters who have made or still make claims about possessing a sizable Ameritrade portfolio are excluded from this offer.
This is a limited tim offer so act fast.
You might be asking yourself if this is a worthwhile endeavor but don’t kid yourself, if you’re read this far you obviously have nothing better going on in your life.
Any poasters who have made or still make claims about possessing a sizable Ameritrade portfolio are excluded from this offer.
Tagged:
Comments
-
I failed in my initial poast to increase the malarkey levels of the poast.
@GrundleStiltzkin
@PurpleBaze
@pawz
@dnc
@Doog_de_Jour
@GrandpaSankey -
469
Weaponized Autism. -
Thanks, counter of thanker of Taft.UW_Doog_Bot said:469
Weaponized Autism. -
I’ll take your word for it, the autism not the count.UW_Doog_Bot said:469
Weaponized Autism. -
Who will check my work though?CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
I’ll take your word for it, the autism not the count.UW_Doog_Bot said:469
Weaponized Autism.
-
I suppose I should at some point. There’s still room for someone else to check your work and prove you wrong. After all, there’s a ton of autism round these parts. @PostGameOrangeSlices @backthepack @CallMeBigErn @CFetters_Nacho_LoverUW_Doog_Bot said:
Who will check my work though?CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
I’ll take your word for it, the autism not the count.UW_Doog_Bot said:469
Weaponized Autism. -
Seeing as I already paid my founder's fee can I roll this into either my Tug Tavern bid, some extra mugs, or do I get to pick the recipient at least?CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
I suppose I should at some point. There’s still room for someone else to check your work and prove you wrong. After all, there’s a ton of autism round these parts. @PostGameOrangeSlices @backthepack @CallMeBigErn @CFetters_Nacho_LoverUW_Doog_Bot said:
Who will check my work though?CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
I’ll take your word for it, the autism not the count.UW_Doog_Bot said:469
Weaponized Autism. -
Let me have a discussion with Stalin.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Seeing as I already paid my founder's fee can I roll this into either my Tug Tavern bid, some extra mugs, or do I get to pick the recipient at least?CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
I suppose I should at some point. There’s still room for someone else to check your work and prove you wrong. After all, there’s a ton of autism round these parts. @PostGameOrangeSlices @backthepack @CallMeBigErn @CFetters_Nacho_LoverUW_Doog_Bot said:
Who will check my work though?CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
I’ll take your word for it, the autism not the count.UW_Doog_Bot said:469
Weaponized Autism. -
768 (1 from DEC 2020)
-
-
I have no idea if this is actually right but you poasted some sort of screen shot so you've got me beat.Neighbor2972 said:768 (1 from DEC 2020)
-
I was not allowed to roll at double the current bid.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
Let me have a discussion with Stalin.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Seeing as I already paid my founder's fee can I roll this into either my Tug Tavern bid, some extra mugs, or do I get to pick the recipient at least?CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
I suppose I should at some point. There’s still room for someone else to check your work and prove you wrong. After all, there’s a ton of autism round these parts. @PostGameOrangeSlices @backthepack @CallMeBigErn @CFetters_Nacho_LoverUW_Doog_Bot said:
Who will check my work though?CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
I’ll take your word for it, the autism not the count.UW_Doog_Bot said:469
Weaponized Autism.
The injun claims it's two distinct 'buckets'
So no. -
You should challenge this. No telling if this accounted for capitalization, punctuation, misspellings, etc. #NotMyCommentTotalUW_Doog_Bot said:
I have no idea if this is actually right but you poasted some sort of screen shot so you've got me beat.Neighbor2972 said:768 (1 from DEC 2020)
-
Good to see I'm finally making a name for myself.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
I suppose I should at some point. There’s still room for someone else to check your work and prove you wrong. After all, there’s a ton of autism round these parts. @PostGameOrangeSlices @backthepack @CallMeBigErn @CFetters_Nacho_LoverUW_Doog_Bot said:
Who will check my work though?CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
I’ll take your word for it, the autism not the count.UW_Doog_Bot said:469
Weaponized Autism. -
I find myself agreeing more with your constant negativityCallMeBigErn said:
Good to see I'm finally making a name for myself.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
I suppose I should at some point. There’s still room for someone else to check your work and prove you wrong. After all, there’s a ton of autism round these parts. @PostGameOrangeSlices @backthepack @CallMeBigErn @CFetters_Nacho_LoverUW_Doog_Bot said:
Who will check my work though?CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
I’ll take your word for it, the autism not the count.UW_Doog_Bot said:469
Weaponized Autism.
Not sure how to feel about that -
The difference in counts is definitely suspect but *shrug. Were we talking 2021 from January or 2021 from last donation season aka August?Sources said:
You should challenge this. No telling if this accounted for capitalization, punctuation, misspellings, etc. #NotMyCommentTotalUW_Doog_Bot said:
I have no idea if this is actually right but you poasted some sort of screen shot so you've got me beat.Neighbor2972 said:768 (1 from DEC 2020)
Csb I once won a contest by guessing the exact number of jelly beans in a jar in 3rd grade at 97 just from eyeing it for 5 seconds. -
Kind of impressive how quickly this got taken up and then contested.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
I suppose I should at some point. There’s still room for someone else to check your work and prove you wrong. After all, there’s a ton of autism round these parts. @PostGameOrangeSlices @backthepack @CallMeBigErn @CFetters_Nacho_LoverUW_Doog_Bot said:
Who will check my work though?CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
I’ll take your word for it, the autism not the count.UW_Doog_Bot said:469
Weaponized Autism.
Overtones of Shialebuff
-
Holy thats 101 loonies
-
Agreeing with me is like Covid. You can't possibly believe that it could infect you, refuse to get vaccinated against it, and soon you're tweeting from your deathbed that you should have listened.RaceBannon said:
I find myself agreeing more with your constant negativityCallMeBigErn said:
Good to see I'm finally making a name for myself.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
I suppose I should at some point. There’s still room for someone else to check your work and prove you wrong. After all, there’s a ton of autism round these parts. @PostGameOrangeSlices @backthepack @CallMeBigErn @CFetters_Nacho_LoverUW_Doog_Bot said:
Who will check my work though?CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
I’ll take your word for it, the autism not the count.UW_Doog_Bot said:469
Weaponized Autism.
Not sure how to feel about that -
January 1, 2021 through yesterday’s poast.UW_Doog_Bot said:
The difference in counts is definitely suspect but *shrug. Were we talking 2021 from January or 2021 from last donation season aka August?Sources said:
You should challenge this. No telling if this accounted for capitalization, punctuation, misspellings, etc. #NotMyCommentTotalUW_Doog_Bot said:
I have no idea if this is actually right but you poasted some sort of screen shot so you've got me beat.Neighbor2972 said:768 (1 from DEC 2020)
Csb I once won a contest by guessing the exact number of jelly beans in a jar in 3rd grade at 97 just from eyeing it for 5 seconds. -
@CFetters_Nacho_Lover The correct answer is 490 for an exact "Thanks Taft!" with exclamation point included. Since this website was built using a drunken sorority girl's version of blogspot, it was not easy, but since i was pooping and Chrome mobile is better than safari, it made pretty quick work.
-
Stop the presses! Did the entire comment need to be just "Thanks Taft!" with nothing else attached? Sometimes you get a little squirrley with things such as:
- Grim. Thanks Taft!
- Thanks Taft! This is just further proof that Sark is the best playcaller in America!
- Hard hitting journalism from the Seattle Times! Thanks Taft!
- Grim. Thanks Taft!
-
nothing but respect for shiaUW_Doog_Bot said:
Kind of impressive how quickly this got taken up and then contested.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
I suppose I should at some point. There’s still room for someone else to check your work and prove you wrong. After all, there’s a ton of autism round these parts. @PostGameOrangeSlices @backthepack @CallMeBigErn @CFetters_Nacho_LoverUW_Doog_Bot said:
Who will check my work though?CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
I’ll take your word for it, the autism not the count.UW_Doog_Bot said:469
Weaponized Autism.
Overtones of Shialebuff
-
Can't spell Sharia without ShiaWilburHooksHands said:
nothing but respect for shiaUW_Doog_Bot said:
Kind of impressive how quickly this got taken up and then contested.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
I suppose I should at some point. There’s still room for someone else to check your work and prove you wrong. After all, there’s a ton of autism round these parts. @PostGameOrangeSlices @backthepack @CallMeBigErn @CFetters_Nacho_LoverUW_Doog_Bot said:
Who will check my work though?CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
I’ll take your word for it, the autism not the count.UW_Doog_Bot said:469
Weaponized Autism.
Overtones of Shialebuff -
I have no particular problem with Shia but his game of capture the flag with 4chan was peak internet malarkey when everything was still more innocent and fun. If you're going to bash internet malarkey then I'm out!WilburHooksHands said:
nothing but respect for shiaUW_Doog_Bot said:
Kind of impressive how quickly this got taken up and then contested.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
I suppose I should at some point. There’s still room for someone else to check your work and prove you wrong. After all, there’s a ton of autism round these parts. @PostGameOrangeSlices @backthepack @CallMeBigErn @CFetters_Nacho_LoverUW_Doog_Bot said:
Who will check my work though?CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
I’ll take your word for it, the autism not the count.UW_Doog_Bot said:469
Weaponized Autism.
Overtones of Shialebuff
@PurpleBaze
@GrundleStiltzkin
@CFetters_Nacho_Lover -
Something about being in Wall Street or the sequel makes you nuts
#charliesheen #winning -
Something about being in two Wall Streets makes you a cunnilingus expertRaceBannon said:Something about being in Wall Street or the sequel makes you nuts
#charliesheen #winning
#michaeldouglas #RIPcatherine’sLabia
-
I think 3 poasters took a shot at this. I'll be gone all weekend but will tally up how many tims I thanked Taft! (all thanks to Taft count, not just the standard Thanks Taft!) and whoever is closest wins. In the event of a tie, I'll just have the winners give each other $81 and I'll put it on the Underhill's tab.LB_33 said:Stop the presses! Did the entire comment need to be just "Thanks Taft!" with nothing else attached? Sometimes you get a little squirrley with things such as:
- Grim. Thanks Taft!
- Thanks Taft! This is just further proof that Sark is the best playcaller in America!
- Hard hitting journalism from the Seattle Times! Thanks Taft!
- Grim. Thanks Taft!
-
I hope you went through your out of office checklist and delegated your "Thanks Taft!" poasts to a willing and able cuck who's stuck poasting all weekend. Also, #AllTaftThanksMatter is our new rallying cry when Jon Don Juan runs three straight HB power when the huskies are down by 14 in the 4th against Michigan and Taft links a puff piece by Husky Maven defending #RunTheDamnBallCFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
I think 3 poasters took a shot at this. I'll be gone all weekend but will tally up how many tims I thanked Taft! (all thanks to Taft count, not just the standard Thanks Taft!) and whoever is closest wins. In the event of a tie, I'll just have the winners give each other $81 and I'll put it on the Underhill's tab.LB_33 said:Stop the presses! Did the entire comment need to be just "Thanks Taft!" with nothing else attached? Sometimes you get a little squirrley with things such as:
- Grim. Thanks Taft!
- Thanks Taft! This is just further proof that Sark is the best playcaller in America!
- Hard hitting journalism from the Seattle Times! Thanks Taft!
- Grim. Thanks Taft!
-
Announcing this contest was definitely not well thought out on my part as I just spent 30 minutes figuring out how many times I've thank Taft from January 1, 2021 through August 4, 2021.
3 esteemed poasters took a shot at this yuuuge prize of $81 towards a Wam subscription to be used for themselves or to be gifted to another poaster.
@UW_Doog_Bot came up with 469 thanks given to Taft. He was close.
@LB_33 who has slightly more poasts than thanks given to Taft but only if you count January came up with 490 thanks given to Taft.
@Neighbor2972 somehow came up with 768 Taft thanksgivings but he's way fucking off by my stupid count.
The winner and recipient of $81 whole U.S. dollars is @LB_33. By my fat nacho cheese sticky finger count I gave thanks to Taft 537 times during the time period.
By month, it looks like this:
through August 4 - 9 times
July - 62
June - 72
May - 75
April - 84
March - 68
February - 83
January - 84
@LB_33 talk to Stalin if you want to pony up the rest of the cash to join the Wam or figure out how you want to allocate you HH money.
Good job everyone. I'm really proud of you all.
