Nothing to hide

Comments
-
Tried to dodge a question
Grim -
He looks so totally not nervous at all, doesn't he?
-
I haven’t seen a crisis in government this bad since Don Jr met with a Russian honeypotRaceBannon said:Tried to dodge a question
Grim -
I didn't vote for Jim Jordan
Aaron Rupar is your source?
Checkmate -
Who'd they get to play Jordan?RaceBannon said:I didn't vote for Jim Jordan
Aaron Rupar is your source?
Checkmate -
When the subpoena arrives, the phrase is something to this effect: I decline to answer pursuant to the 5th Amendment of the US Constitution.doogie said:
I haven’t seen a crisis in government this bad since Don Jr met with a Russian honeypotRaceBannon said:Tried to dodge a question
Grim -
You got him now HH. Go get em' tiger.
Hands UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The Russians are coming the Russians are coming!!!!!!!!!!!
Trump started the "insurrection"!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Arghh the horror of it all. What a cruel cruel world! HH is melting.............
Ha ha ha Gonna throw your back out grasping for those straws.
The Trump TDS still has a firm hold on the rats.
-
So why does Jim Jordan look like he's about to undergo his Buckeye wrestling physical?Bendintheriver said:You got him now HH. Go get em' tiger.
Hands UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The Russians are coming the Russians are coming!!!!!!!!!!!
Trump started the "insurrection"!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Arghh the horror of it all. What a cruel cruel world! HH is melting.............
Ha ha ha Gonna throw your back out grasping for those straws.
The Trump TDS still has a firm hold on the rats. -
-
oh obviously!RaceBannon said:NOC
-
You’re not very good at this, Counselor.
Stick to pushing paper, Mr. Hands Up, Don’t Shoot! -
-
Friendly, free advice: take a fist full of Lorazepam before you testify, Jim.trublue said:You’re not very good at this, Counselor.
Stick to pushing paper, Mr. Hands Up, Don’t Shoot! -
2 years from now when this story too proves to be a figment of H's RAT fantasies, he'll say he never commented on Jim Jordan
-
The real question, Counselor, is if the FBI had feet on the ground, agents and informants, and were aware of what the plans were, why didn’t they have security increased at the “insurrection” instead of encouraging and participating in the event?HHusky said:
Hopefully, you’re smart enough to figure out who the unindicted co-conspirators are in the indictments.
Gawd, you’re a dumb fuck! -
Jim Jordan is either complicit or he heard Daddy say/admit to something. I'm not saying it will ever be proven, but at best, I think Jim may be faced with something you rubes like to call a "perjury trap" very soon. Perhaps he should just tell the truth or, if he's involved, invoke his right against self-incrimination.RoadTrip said:2 years from now when this story too proves to be a figment of H's RAT fantasies, he'll say he never commented on Jim Jordan
That boy is nervous. -
I'm going to need to see this proven in court Mr Lindell
-
The questions of what Jim and Daddy talked about and what the FBI knew or should have known are not mutually exclusive. But your attempted distraction is noted.trublue said:
The real question, Counselor, is if the FBI had feet on the ground, agents and informants, and were aware of what the plans were, why didn’t they have security increased at the “insurrection” instead of encouraging and participating in the event?HHusky said:
Hopefully, you’re smart enough to figure out who the unindicted co-conspirators are in the indictments.
Gawd, you’re a dumb fuck! -
You have quite a vivid imagination.HHusky said:
Jim Jordan is either complicit or he heard Daddy say/admit to something. I'm not saying it will ever be proven, but at best, I think Jim may be faced with something you rubes like to call a "perjury trap" very soon. Perhaps he should just tell the truth or, if he's involved, invoke his right against self-incrimination.RoadTrip said:2 years from now when this story too proves to be a figment of H's RAT fantasies, he'll say he never commented on Jim Jordan
That boy is nervous.
Be more specific about what YOU THINK Jordan is hiding, GOOFBALL. -
I don't want to speculate whether he's guilty of criminality or just a witness to it. Let's get him under oath.trublue said:
You have quite a vivid imagination.HHusky said:
Jim Jordan is either complicit or he heard Daddy say/admit to something. I'm not saying it will ever be proven, but at best, I think Jim may be faced with something you rubes like to call a "perjury trap" very soon. Perhaps he should just tell the truth or, if he's involved, invoke his right against self-incrimination.RoadTrip said:2 years from now when this story too proves to be a figment of H's RAT fantasies, he'll say he never commented on Jim Jordan
That boy is nervous.
Be more specific about what YOU THINK Jordan is hiding, GOOFBALL. -
Right after HunterHHusky said:
I don't want to speculate whether he's guilty of criminality or just a witness to it. Let's get him under oath.trublue said:
You have quite a vivid imagination.HHusky said:
Jim Jordan is either complicit or he heard Daddy say/admit to something. I'm not saying it will ever be proven, but at best, I think Jim may be faced with something you rubes like to call a "perjury trap" very soon. Perhaps he should just tell the truth or, if he's involved, invoke his right against self-incrimination.RoadTrip said:2 years from now when this story too proves to be a figment of H's RAT fantasies, he'll say he never commented on Jim Jordan
That boy is nervous.
Be more specific about what YOU THINK Jordan is hiding, GOOFBALL. -
NOCRaceBannon said:
Right after HunterHHusky said:
I don't want to speculate whether he's guilty of criminality or just a witness to it. Let's get him under oath.trublue said:
You have quite a vivid imagination.HHusky said:
Jim Jordan is either complicit or he heard Daddy say/admit to something. I'm not saying it will ever be proven, but at best, I think Jim may be faced with something you rubes like to call a "perjury trap" very soon. Perhaps he should just tell the truth or, if he's involved, invoke his right against self-incrimination.RoadTrip said:2 years from now when this story too proves to be a figment of H's RAT fantasies, he'll say he never commented on Jim Jordan
That boy is nervous.
Be more specific about what YOU THINK Jordan is hiding, GOOFBALL. -
Checkmate
-
Sounds like you’re speculating . . . What has he allegedly done?HHusky said:
I don't want to speculate whether he's guilty of criminality or just a witness to it. Let's get him under oath.trublue said:
You have quite a vivid imagination.HHusky said:
Jim Jordan is either complicit or he heard Daddy say/admit to something. I'm not saying it will ever be proven, but at best, I think Jim may be faced with something you rubes like to call a "perjury trap" very soon. Perhaps he should just tell the truth or, if he's involved, invoke his right against self-incrimination.RoadTrip said:2 years from now when this story too proves to be a figment of H's RAT fantasies, he'll say he never commented on Jim Jordan
That boy is nervous.
Be more specific about what YOU THINK Jordan is hiding, GOOFBALL.
A “fishing expedition”? How quaint. -
awesomeRaceBannon said:Checkmate
-
Oh, people care . . . Just not you.HHusky said:
NOCRaceBannon said:
Right after HunterHHusky said:
I don't want to speculate whether he's guilty of criminality or just a witness to it. Let's get him under oath.trublue said:
You have quite a vivid imagination.HHusky said:
Jim Jordan is either complicit or he heard Daddy say/admit to something. I'm not saying it will ever be proven, but at best, I think Jim may be faced with something you rubes like to call a "perjury trap" very soon. Perhaps he should just tell the truth or, if he's involved, invoke his right against self-incrimination.RoadTrip said:2 years from now when this story too proves to be a figment of H's RAT fantasies, he'll say he never commented on Jim Jordan
That boy is nervous.
Be more specific about what YOU THINK Jordan is hiding, GOOFBALL.
Hunter has actually committed provable crimes. -
Joe and Hunter like to provide a videotrublue said:
Oh, people care . . . Just not you.HHusky said:
NOCRaceBannon said:
Right after HunterHHusky said:
I don't want to speculate whether he's guilty of criminality or just a witness to it. Let's get him under oath.trublue said:
You have quite a vivid imagination.HHusky said:
Jim Jordan is either complicit or he heard Daddy say/admit to something. I'm not saying it will ever be proven, but at best, I think Jim may be faced with something you rubes like to call a "perjury trap" very soon. Perhaps he should just tell the truth or, if he's involved, invoke his right against self-incrimination.RoadTrip said:2 years from now when this story too proves to be a figment of H's RAT fantasies, he'll say he never commented on Jim Jordan
That boy is nervous.
Be more specific about what YOU THINK Jordan is hiding, GOOFBALL.
Hunter has actually committed provable crimes. -
Madam, he has (very) nervously and evasively said he spoke to Daddy the day the Capitol was attacked. He may just be a witness.trublue said:
Sounds like you’re speculating . . . What has he allegedly done?HHusky said:
I don't want to speculate whether he's guilty of criminality or just a witness to it. Let's get him under oath.trublue said:
You have quite a vivid imagination.HHusky said:
Jim Jordan is either complicit or he heard Daddy say/admit to something. I'm not saying it will ever be proven, but at best, I think Jim may be faced with something you rubes like to call a "perjury trap" very soon. Perhaps he should just tell the truth or, if he's involved, invoke his right against self-incrimination.RoadTrip said:2 years from now when this story too proves to be a figment of H's RAT fantasies, he'll say he never commented on Jim Jordan
That boy is nervous.
Be more specific about what YOU THINK Jordan is hiding, GOOFBALL.
A “fishing expedition”? How quaint. -
HHusky said:
Madam, he has (very) nervously and evasively said he spoke to Daddy the day the Capitol was attacked. He may just be a witness.trublue said:
Sounds like you’re speculating . . . What has he allegedly done?HHusky said:
I don't want to speculate whether he's guilty of criminality or just a witness to it. Let's get him under oath.trublue said:
You have quite a vivid imagination.HHusky said:
Jim Jordan is either complicit or he heard Daddy say/admit to something. I'm not saying it will ever be proven, but at best, I think Jim may be faced with something you rubes like to call a "perjury trap" very soon. Perhaps he should just tell the truth or, if he's involved, invoke his right against self-incrimination.RoadTrip said:2 years from now when this story too proves to be a figment of H's RAT fantasies, he'll say he never commented on Jim Jordan
That boy is nervous.
Be more specific about what YOU THINK Jordan is hiding, GOOFBALL.
A “fishing expedition”? How quaint.
This is the outrage? Jim talked to your daddy? Sounds like a personal problem