Another Stellar Incoming OLine Class

He_Needs_More_Time said:

IrishDawg22 said:

He_Needs_More_Time said:

Wilcox is not head coach material. Harv was right about you guys and you can't seem to hide your inner doog.

Wilcox in 2011 at Tennessee saw his defense ranked 8th in the SEC in points allowed. I guess that's head coach material guys. He was 7th in the SEC in yards.

Also in 2009 Tennessee allowed 308.8 yards per game which was ranked 4th in the SEC, then Wilcox arrived and they allowed 381.9 and was ranked 10th in the SEC.

In 2009 Tennessee allowed 21 points per game which was good for 6th in the SEC. In 2010 Wilcox allowed 24.7 PPG which was good for 9th in the SEC.

So I guess I should add this to the Doog myth of "Wilcox improves defenses everywhere he goes" because in reality they took a step back.

Maybe I need to start typing SLLLLLOOOOOOOWWWWWWEEEEEERRRRR for you. You must have missed the part about "not saying he is head coach material".

And I love how your facts are incorrect, so you scramble back and try and save your argument.

So let me get this straight, Wilcox sucks, but DeRuyter's team gives up 42 points to freakin' SMU in their bowl game and he is already good to go.

You are such a Noog.

I wasn't responding to you as I generally don't waste my time with your posts. Beatmychest and Road Doog seem to think Wilcox is head coach material.

As for DeRuyter he's produced an 11th ranked defense in the nation with Air Force and as a head coach won 9 games.

I'd say I'm open to hiring him especially if he has another 9-10 win season. If UW doesn't some big program will.

As for Wilcox despite some moron lying saying Texas interviewed him for being a head coach nobody has contacted Wilcox to be a head coach.

I've said before I think Wilcox is a fine DC but he's not so good where I fear about losing him.

He_Needs_More_Time said:

RoadDawg55 said:

He_Needs_More_Time said:

Wilcox is not head coach material. Harv was right about you guys and you can't seem to hide your inner doog.

Wilcox in 2011 at Tennessee saw his defense ranked 8th in the SEC in points allowed. I guess that's head coach material guys. He was 7th in the SEC in yards.

Also in 2009 Tennessee allowed 308.8 yards per game which was ranked 4th in the SEC, then Wilcox arrived and they allowed 381.9 and was ranked 10th in the SEC.

In 2009 Tennessee allowed 21 points per game which was good for 6th in the SEC. In 2010 Wilcox allowed 24.7 PPG which was good for 9th in the SEC.

So I guess I should add this to the Doog myth of "Wilcox improves defenses everywhere he goes" because in reality they took a step back.

Well Tennessee did lose Eric Berry and Dan Williams (DT, another first round pick) from their defense after the 2009 season. Call me crazy, but when you lose a Jim Thorpe winner and another first rounder, it hurts your defense. Does pointing that out make me a doog as well?

Typical Doog response. When called out on their bullshit that Wilcox "improved their defense" gotta make up excuses.

So I thought you said Wilcox improved them now you are making excuses for why he didn't improve them.

So was Holt excused for sucking in 2011 because he lost Foster?

He_Needs_More_Time said:

RoadDawg55 said:

He_Needs_More_Time said:

RoadDawg55 said:

He_Needs_More_Time said:

Wilcox is not head coach material. Harv was right about you guys and you can't seem to hide your inner doog.

Wilcox in 2011 at Tennessee saw his defense ranked 8th in the SEC in points allowed. I guess that's head coach material guys. He was 7th in the SEC in yards.

Also in 2009 Tennessee allowed 308.8 yards per game which was ranked 4th in the SEC, then Wilcox arrived and they allowed 381.9 and was ranked 10th in the SEC.

In 2009 Tennessee allowed 21 points per game which was good for 6th in the SEC. In 2010 Wilcox allowed 24.7 PPG which was good for 9th in the SEC.

So I guess I should add this to the Doog myth of "Wilcox improves defenses everywhere he goes" because in reality they took a step back.

Well Tennessee did lose Eric Berry and Dan Williams (DT, another first round pick) from their defense after the 2009 season. Call me crazy, but when you lose a Jim Thorpe winner and another first rounder, it hurts your defense. Does pointing that out make me a doog as well?

Typical Doog response. When called out on their bullshit that Wilcox "improved their defense" gotta make up excuses.

So I thought you said Wilcox improved them now you are making excuses for why he didn't improve them.

So was Holt excused for sucking in 2011 because he lost Foster?

I'm not gonna keep arguing because no matter what I say, you won't change your mind. I normally like your posts, but you have gone Section14A today.

I've gone Section14AFS(his real name there dumbass) ? Umm disagree.

You and your podcast butt buddy($75,000) are the ones pumping up the newest doog myth of Wilcox. I bet you were all over the Holt hire and LOVED Sark in 2009 cause he's so much better than Ty.

You idiots even like PLSS and say he's a "good" poster.

He_Needs_More_Time said:

RoadDawg55 said:

He_Needs_More_Time said:

RoadDawg55 said:

He_Needs_More_Time said:

RoadDawg55 said:

He_Needs_More_Time said:

Wilcox is not head coach material. Harv was right about you guys and you can't seem to hide your inner doog.

Wilcox in 2011 at Tennessee saw his defense ranked 8th in the SEC in points allowed. I guess that's head coach material guys. He was 7th in the SEC in yards.

Also in 2009 Tennessee allowed 308.8 yards per game which was ranked 4th in the SEC, then Wilcox arrived and they allowed 381.9 and was ranked 10th in the SEC.

In 2009 Tennessee allowed 21 points per game which was good for 6th in the SEC. In 2010 Wilcox allowed 24.7 PPG which was good for 9th in the SEC.

So I guess I should add this to the Doog myth of "Wilcox improves defenses everywhere he goes" because in reality they took a step back.

Well Tennessee did lose Eric Berry and Dan Williams (DT, another first round pick) from their defense after the 2009 season. Call me crazy, but when you lose a Jim Thorpe winner and another first rounder, it hurts your defense. Does pointing that out make me a doog as well?

Typical Doog response. When called out on their bullshit that Wilcox "improved their defense" gotta make up excuses.

So I thought you said Wilcox improved them now you are making excuses for why he didn't improve them.

So was Holt excused for sucking in 2011 because he lost Foster?

I'm not gonna keep arguing because no matter what I say, you won't change your mind. I normally like your posts, but you have gone Section14A today.

I've gone Section14AFS(his real name there dumbass) ? Umm disagree.

You and your podcast butt buddy($75,000) are the ones pumping up the newest doog myth of Wilcox. I bet you were all over the Holt hire and LOVED Sark in 2009 cause he's so much better than Ty.

You idiots even like PLSS and say he's a "good" poster.

I haven't said anything except I like Wilcox and he is a proven DC. Nowhere did I say he should be the next coach. You keep making shit up that I never said. This whole thread, you have just twisted and made up because you posted some Section14A level shit.

PLSS really let me down today. He mixed up his meds, so don't be so hard on the guy. He will bounce back.

You're Boobs or Harv. Shit is stupid, but have fun buddy.