Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Bikini Bottom Pole (2nd attempt)

2»

Comments

  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,128 Standard Supporter
    LebamDawg said:

    Swaye said:

    As Yella says in a worst case scenario you take non-cheeky to err on the side of caution, but I've never been known for my caution and let's face it when done right cheeky is as good as it gets. So let's be bold and daring and hope the 300 pound ladies stick to the full cheeks.



    looking at that I don't see how anyone could be an atheist, tall? yes, atheist? no
    Oh god...oh god

  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,324 Founders Club
    Traditional / Full

    Sad to see how far this bored has fallen

    Nothing's changed with me. I've always been a prude.
  • rodmansrage
    rodmansrage Member Posts: 6,379

    chuck said:

    My vote is being suppressed. I want to vote Brazillian.

    It's a binary pole. Cheeky vs Non Cheeky.

    So here's my take take: 81% of the women I see wearing cheeky bottoms have no fucking bidness going full cheek and it yucks me out. Therefore, for the good of society, we need to return to the puritanical, full bottoms.
    In defense of those ladies, women’s fashion and stores tend to force a particular cut or style of garment down your throat whether you like it or not, body type be dammed. I remember when super low rise jeans were all the rage. It was fucking impossible to find any mid-rise (read “normal”) pairs ANYWHERE unless you went for some older brand.

    It’s the same thing with swimwear I imagine.

    I’m just waiting for this look to come back.


    you clearly havent been to many pools in provo....
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,129 Founders Club
    Bunch of Islamophobes here


  • DerekJohnson
    DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 68,539 Founders Club
    Traditional / Full

    dnc said:

    chuck said:

    My vote is being suppressed. I want to vote Brazillian.

    It's a binary pole. Cheeky vs Non Cheeky.

    So here's my take take: 81% of the women I see wearing cheeky bottoms have no fucking bidness going full cheek and it yucks me out. Therefore, for the good of society, we need to return to the puritanical, full bottoms.
    This is the slow strategy, play-it-safe take. Never get too low, never get too high.

    Squarely on brand.
    Ironic that the biggest atheist fag of the board is so biased towards old timey, Judeo-Christian morality.
    Hardcore Husky is not for sermon seekers
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,102
    Cheeky Bottoms

    chuck said:

    My vote is being suppressed. I want to vote Brazillian.

    It's a binary pole. Cheeky vs Non Cheeky.

    So here's my take take: 81% of the women I see wearing cheeky bottoms have no fucking bidness going full cheek and it yucks me out. Therefore, for the good of society, we need to return to the puritanical, full bottoms.
    You didn't put that qualifier in ...

    I'm strictly going off of a hot woman wearing ...

    I'm not looking at those that have no business wearing bottoms regardless of style ... I don't need those images
  • LebamDawg
    LebamDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,792 Swaye's Wigwam
    Traditional / Full

    LebamDawg said:

    Swaye said:

    As Yella says in a worst case scenario you take non-cheeky to err on the side of caution, but I've never been known for my caution and let's face it when done right cheeky is as good as it gets. So let's be bold and daring and hope the 300 pound ladies stick to the full cheeks.



    looking at that I don't see how anyone could be an atheist, tall? yes, atheist? no
    Is this a modified version of the Kirk Cameron divinely inspired banana theory?...
    well it inspired the hell out of my banana, if that helps
  • Fenderbender123
    Fenderbender123 Member Posts: 2,989
    Traditional / Full
    For some reason having a well-covered ass looks better to me, as long as the fit is still tight. I always liked those tight-fitting short swimming shorts things that women (used to?) wear, too. Basically fit like boyshorts, but for swimming. Haven't seen them as much lately.

    But, if I'm being honest...I think hot women look good in anything. And nothing.

  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,324 Founders Club
    Traditional / Full

    For some reason having a well-covered ass looks better to me, as long as the fit is still tight. I always liked those tight-fitting short swimming shorts things that women (used to?) wear, too. Basically fit like boyshorts, but for swimming. Haven't seen them as much lately.

    But, if I'm being honest...I think hot women look good in anything. And nothing.

    This
  • huskyhooligan
    huskyhooligan Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 5,956 Swaye's Wigwam
    Cheeky Bottoms
    This bitch who friendzoned me but keeps me around has a vast collection of the cheeky's, which makes the friendzone thing much more tolerable.
  • UW_Doog_Bot
    UW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 18,187 Founders Club
  • huskyhooligan
    huskyhooligan Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 5,956 Swaye's Wigwam
    edited July 2021
    Cheeky Bottoms

    This bitch who friendzoned me but keeps me around has a vast collection of the cheeky's, which makes the friendzone thing much more tolerable.

    Don’t take that friendzone bullshit lying down! Fight fire with fire and let her know what she’s missing!


    Yes madame.