Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Ron Paul

doogsinparadise
doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
Endorses Putin's actions on MH17.

finance.yahoo.com/news/ron-paul-defends-russia-malaysian-151731466.html

The great libertarian project in American politics is rotten at its core.
«1

Comments

  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    edited July 2014
    The idea that America is responsible for helping to destabilize Ukraine's government is fucking idiotic. Does anyone actually believe that Obama, who is an inept clown, is even capable of this? Putin is responsible for invading Ukraine and destabilizing the region. End of story.
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781

    The idea that America is responsible for helping to destabilize Ukraine's government is fucking idiotic. Does anyone actually believe that Obama, who is an inept clown, is even capable of this? Putin is responsible for invading Ukraine and destabilizing the region. End of story.

    Worst edit ever.
  • doogsinparadise
    doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    Popcornguy.gif
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781

    Popcornguy.gif

    This thread is delivering.
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter

    Endorses Putin's actions on MH17.

    finance.yahoo.com/news/ron-paul-defends-russia-malaysian-151731466.html

    The great libertarian project in American politics is rotten at its core.

    Agree. Paul needs to stay out of this. Our President is an accomplished peacemaker and has the medal to prove it.
  • OZONE
    OZONE Member Posts: 2,510
    Jon Galt endorses this thread
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643 Founders Club
    Ironic that you cite the same biased media outlets that he referred to in those quotes.
  • doogsinparadise
    doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    PurpleJ said:

    Ironic that you cite the same biased media outlets that he referred to in those quotes.

    Not sure if serious?
  • LoneStarDawg
    LoneStarDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,679 Founders Club

    Endorses Putin's actions on MH17.

    finance.yahoo.com/news/ron-paul-defends-russia-malaysian-151731466.html

    The great libertarian project in American politics is rotten at its core.

    Agree. Paul needs to stay out of this. Our President is an accomplished peacemaker and has the medal to prove it.
    "Peacemaker" the same way a battered housewife thinks hollow warnings, excuses, and bending over keeps their marriage together
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    brchco12 said:

    Endorses Putin's actions on MH17.

    finance.yahoo.com/news/ron-paul-defends-russia-malaysian-151731466.html

    The great libertarian project in American politics is rotten at its core.

    Agree. Paul needs to stay out of this. Our President is an accomplished peacemaker and has the medal to prove it.
    "Peacemaker" the same way a battered housewife thinks hollow warnings, excuses, and bending over keeps their marriage together
    President Obama will find a peaceful resolution to this situation just like he brought end to the war in Iraq.

    image

    The President will get another Peace Prize after this one too. Just watch.

    Where's Ron Paul's Nobel Peace Prize?

    waiting......
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288

    brchco12 said:

    Endorses Putin's actions on MH17.

    finance.yahoo.com/news/ron-paul-defends-russia-malaysian-151731466.html

    The great libertarian project in American politics is rotten at its core.

    Agree. Paul needs to stay out of this. Our President is an accomplished peacemaker and has the medal to prove it.
    "Peacemaker" the same way a battered housewife thinks hollow warnings, excuses, and bending over keeps their marriage together
    President Obama will find a peaceful resolution to this situation just like he brought end to the war in Iraq.

    image

    The President will get another Peace Prize after this one too. Just watch.

    Where's Ron Paul's Nobel Peace Prize?

    waiting......
    Hardcore Husky is more deserving of a Nobel Peace Prize than Obama is.
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643 Founders Club

    brchco12 said:

    Endorses Putin's actions on MH17.

    finance.yahoo.com/news/ron-paul-defends-russia-malaysian-151731466.html

    The great libertarian project in American politics is rotten at its core.

    Agree. Paul needs to stay out of this. Our President is an accomplished peacemaker and has the medal to prove it.
    "Peacemaker" the same way a battered housewife thinks hollow warnings, excuses, and bending over keeps their marriage together
    President Obama will find a peaceful resolution to this situation just like he brought end to the war in Iraq.

    image

    The President will get another Peace Prize after this one too. Just watch.

    Where's Ron Paul's Nobel Peace Prize?

    waiting......
    Hardcore Husky is more deserving of a Nobel Peace Prize than Obama is.
    We brought peace to the I-5 corridor with our gracious offering of blow, hookers, and a duck half brain bored.
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,158
    Ron Paul has good ideas and fucking stupid ideas, just like everyone else.

    Get rid of the executive branch of the government. #PureDemocracy
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    edited July 2014

    Ron Paul has good ideas and fucking stupid ideas, just like everyone else.

    Get rid of the executive branch of the government. #PureDemocracy

    This idea is stupiderer than some of Ron Paul's ideas. Who would make quick decisions when they're needed? That squirming mass of bickering mice on Capitol Hill?
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,158

    Ron Paul has good ideas and fucking stupid ideas, just like everyone else.

    Get rid of the executive branch of the government. #PureDemocracy

    This idea is stupiderer than some of Ron Paul's ideas. Who would make quick decisions when they're needed? That squirming mass of bickering mice on Capitol Hill?
    How often is it that quick fucking decisions are needed to be made? Whether or not to get a blowie while the first lady is getting botox? If the US gets nuked first it nukes back instantly...the military can handle its own shit and is highly capable and based on the merit system. Let the fucking citizens vote on whether or not to go to war with a cuntry for all I care. I bet we would've never gone to Iraq or Nam.

    Every political system conceivable will be exploited by sociopaths and power hungry individuals. The system we have in place now just makes it easily susceptible to a bunch of bs.

    Long story short, I have no fucking idea what exactly the most efficient system would be. It's easy to criticize the system we have now, and there are issues with it (rising tuition costs, 1% controlling more of the pie than necessary, grade school public education, etc.), but coming up with a better system is pretty much unfeasible at this point. It's just interesting to talk about as we sit here in our mother's basement with boners in our sweatpants, waving at the NSA watching us on there lunch break through our webcams.
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643 Founders Club
    I stopped at letting the citizens vote for whether we go to war. Holy fucking pressing on a side salad. I'm sure the average joe has time to figure out complex geopolitical situations and assess the best course of action in between their Kardashian gossip and Facebook/twitter. Fuck me.
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    edited July 2014

    Ron Paul has good ideas and fucking stupid ideas, just like everyone else.

    Get rid of the executive branch of the government. #PureDemocracy

    This idea is stupiderer than some of Ron Paul's ideas. Who would make quick decisions when they're needed? That squirming mass of bickering mice on Capitol Hill?
    How often is it that quick fucking decisions are needed to be made? Whether or not to get a blowie while the first lady is getting botox? If the US gets nuked first it nukes back instantly...the military can handle its own shit and is highly capable and based on the merit system. Let the fucking citizens vote on whether or not to go to war with a cuntry for all I care. I bet we would've never gone to Iraq or Nam.

    Every political system conceivable will be exploited by sociopaths and power hungry individuals. The system we have in place now just makes it easily susceptible to a bunch of bs.

    Long story short, I have no fucking idea what exactly the most efficient system would be. It's easy to criticize the system we have now, and there are issues with it (rising tuition costs, 1% controlling more of the pie than necessary, grade school public education, etc.), but coming up with a better system is pretty much unfeasible at this point. It's just interesting to talk about as we sit here in our mother's basement with boners in our sweatpants, waving at the NSA watching us on there lunch break through our webcams.
    I don't want the NSA to see my boner either. That's why I put tape over my computer's webcam lens.
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,158
    PurpleJ said:

    I stopped at letting the citizens vote for whether we go to war. Holy fucking pressing on a side salad. I'm sure the average joe has time to figure out complex geopolitical situations and assess the best course of action in between their Kardashian gossip and Facebook/twitter. Fuck me.

    Obviously it would be nuanced than that you stupid mother fucker. How about only people that score above 150 on an iq test and have a bachelors degree can vote? I'm not designing a whole new fucking government in a message board post. htfh
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288

    PurpleJ said:

    I stopped at letting the citizens vote for whether we go to war. Holy fucking pressing on a side salad. I'm sure the average joe has time to figure out complex geopolitical situations and assess the best course of action in between their Kardashian gossip and Facebook/twitter. Fuck me.

    Obviously it would be nuanced than that you stupid mother fucker. How about only people that score above 150 on an iq test....
    That would preclude anyone on this bored from voting.
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,158
    edited July 2014

    PurpleJ said:

    I stopped at letting the citizens vote for whether we go to war. Holy fucking pressing on a side salad. I'm sure the average joe has time to figure out complex geopolitical situations and assess the best course of action in between their Kardashian gossip and Facebook/twitter. Fuck me.

    Obviously it would be nuanced than that you stupid mother fucker. How about only people that score above 150 on an iq test....
    That would preclude anyone on this bored from voting.
    You might be surprised, and even 120+ would be a reasonable qualification
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643 Founders Club
    An IQ test. Brilliant. I don't know why no one ever thought of that before.

    I take it you wouldn't be voting, in that case.
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,158
    PurpleJ said:

    An IQ test. Brilliant. I don't know why no one ever thought of that before.

    I take it you wouldn't be voting, in that case.

    How about you have to pass an IQ test, have to score above a certain percentage on a global politics familiarity quiz, and have to have a bachelors degree to vote? than only really informed people that want to vote will be influencing society, not dumbfucks? Makes about as much sense as our current system.

    But like I said, every system is a leaky ship waiting for clever people to exploit the weaknesses.
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288

    PurpleJ said:

    An IQ test. Brilliant. I don't know why no one ever thought of that before.

    I take it you wouldn't be voting, in that case.

    How about you have to pass an IQ test, have to score above a certain percentage on a global politics familiarity quiz, and have to have a bachelors degree to vote? than only really informed people that want to vote will be influencing society, not dumbfucks? Makes about as much sense as our current system.

    But like I said, every system is a leaky ship waiting for clever people to exploit the weaknesses.
    Maybe we could call this new system Elitism.
  • Swaye
    Swaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,738 Founders Club
    brchco12 said:

    Endorses Putin's actions on MH17.

    finance.yahoo.com/news/ron-paul-defends-russia-malaysian-151731466.html

    The great libertarian project in American politics is rotten at its core.

    Agree. Paul needs to stay out of this. Our President is an accomplished peacemaker and has the medal to prove it.
    "Peacemaker" the same way a battered housewife thinks hollow warnings, excuses, and bending over keeps their marriage together
    To be fair, a certain amount of "bending over" is required to keep any marriage together.
  • CFetters_Nacho_Lover
    CFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 32,241 Founders Club

    brchco12 said:

    Endorses Putin's actions on MH17.

    finance.yahoo.com/news/ron-paul-defends-russia-malaysian-151731466.html

    The great libertarian project in American politics is rotten at its core.

    Agree. Paul needs to stay out of this. Our President is an accomplished peacemaker and has the medal to prove it.
    "Peacemaker" the same way a battered housewife thinks hollow warnings, excuses, and bending over keeps their marriage together
    President Obama will find a peaceful resolution to this situation just like he brought end to the war in Iraq.

    image

    The President will get another Peace Prize after this one too. Just watch.

    Where's Ron Paul's Nobel Peace Prize?

    waiting......
    Hardcore Husky is more deserving of a Nobel Peace Prize than Obama is.
    Finally someone recognizes our greatness.
  • CFetters_Nacho_Lover
    CFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 32,241 Founders Club

    PurpleJ said:

    An IQ test. Brilliant. I don't know why no one ever thought of that before.

    I take it you wouldn't be voting, in that case.

    How about you have to pass an IQ test, have to score above a certain percentage on a global politics familiarity quiz, and have to have a bachelors degree to vote? than only really informed people that want to vote will be influencing society, not dumbfucks? Makes about as much sense as our current system.

    But like I said, every system is a leaky ship waiting for clever people to exploit the weaknesses.
    Because I've met so many with bachelor's degrees that always know what is going and so many, almost all who don't have one are simple folk who can't even find 'Merica on a goddamn map.
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839

    Ron Paul has good ideas and fucking stupid ideas, just like everyone else.

    Get rid of the executive branch of the government. #PureDemocracy

    This idea is stupiderer than some of Ron Paul's ideas. Who would make quick decisions when they're needed? That squirming mass of bickering mice on Capitol Hill?
    How often is it that quick fucking decisions are needed to be made? Whether or not to get a blowie while the first lady is getting botox? If the US gets nuked first it nukes back instantly...the military can handle its own shit and is highly capable and based on the merit system. Let the fucking citizens vote on whether or not to go to war with a cuntry for all I care. I bet we would've never gone to Iraq or Nam.

    Every political system conceivable will be exploited by sociopaths and power hungry individuals. The system we have in place now just makes it easily susceptible to a bunch of bs.

    Long story short, I have no fucking idea what exactly the most efficient system would be. It's easy to criticize the system we have now, and there are issues with it (rising tuition costs, 1% controlling more of the pie than necessary, grade school public education, etc.), but coming up with a better system is pretty much unfeasible at this point. It's just interesting to talk about as we sit here in our mother's basement with boners in our sweatpants, waving at the NSA watching us on there lunch break through our webcams.
    Wasn't born til 1980 so Nam I cunt speak to, but the nation was well in favor of going to war in Iraq when we do, that vote would have passed easily - it wasn't until we had been there for months with no sign of WMD's that public opinion started swinging hard against being in Iraq. Unless you're suggesting we do a year long campaign before a vote, in which case that illustrates OBK's poont about the necessity of quickness.

  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    dnc said:

    Ron Paul has good ideas and fucking stupid ideas, just like everyone else.

    Get rid of the executive branch of the government. #PureDemocracy

    This idea is stupiderer than some of Ron Paul's ideas. Who would make quick decisions when they're needed? That squirming mass of bickering mice on Capitol Hill?
    How often is it that quick fucking decisions are needed to be made? Whether or not to get a blowie while the first lady is getting botox? If the US gets nuked first it nukes back instantly...the military can handle its own shit and is highly capable and based on the merit system. Let the fucking citizens vote on whether or not to go to war with a cuntry for all I care. I bet we would've never gone to Iraq or Nam.

    Every political system conceivable will be exploited by sociopaths and power hungry individuals. The system we have in place now just makes it easily susceptible to a bunch of bs.

    Long story short, I have no fucking idea what exactly the most efficient system would be. It's easy to criticize the system we have now, and there are issues with it (rising tuition costs, 1% controlling more of the pie than necessary, grade school public education, etc.), but coming up with a better system is pretty much unfeasible at this point. It's just interesting to talk about as we sit here in our mother's basement with boners in our sweatpants, waving at the NSA watching us on there lunch break through our webcams.
    Wasn't born til 1980 so Nam I cunt speak to, but the nation was well in favor of going to war in Iraq when we do, that vote would have passed easily - it wasn't until we had been there for months with no sign of WMD's that public opinion started swinging hard against being in Iraq. Unless you're suggesting we do a year long campaign before a vote, in which case that illustrates OBK's poont about the necessity of quickness.

    BUSH, CHENEY , HALIBURTON LIED!