Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Ron Paul

2»

Comments

  • PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 26,449 Swaye's Wigwam
    edited July 2014

    PurpleJ said:

    I stopped at letting the citizens vote for whether we go to war. Holy fucking pressing on a side salad. I'm sure the average joe has time to figure out complex geopolitical situations and assess the best course of action in between their Kardashian gossip and Facebook/twitter. Fuck me.

    Obviously it would be nuanced than that you stupid mother fucker. How about only people that score above 150 on an iq test....
    That would preclude anyone on this bored from voting.
    You might be surprised, and even 120+ would be a reasonable qualification
  • PurpleJPurpleJ Member Posts: 37,428 Founders Club
    An IQ test. Brilliant. I don't know why no one ever thought of that before.

    I take it you wouldn't be voting, in that case.
  • PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 26,449 Swaye's Wigwam
    PurpleJ said:

    An IQ test. Brilliant. I don't know why no one ever thought of that before.

    I take it you wouldn't be voting, in that case.

    How about you have to pass an IQ test, have to score above a certain percentage on a global politics familiarity quiz, and have to have a bachelors degree to vote? than only really informed people that want to vote will be influencing society, not dumbfucks? Makes about as much sense as our current system.

    But like I said, every system is a leaky ship waiting for clever people to exploit the weaknesses.
  • oregonblitzkriegoregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288

    PurpleJ said:

    An IQ test. Brilliant. I don't know why no one ever thought of that before.

    I take it you wouldn't be voting, in that case.

    How about you have to pass an IQ test, have to score above a certain percentage on a global politics familiarity quiz, and have to have a bachelors degree to vote? than only really informed people that want to vote will be influencing society, not dumbfucks? Makes about as much sense as our current system.

    But like I said, every system is a leaky ship waiting for clever people to exploit the weaknesses.
    Maybe we could call this new system Elitism.
  • SwayeSwaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,511 Founders Club
    brchco12 said:

    Endorses Putin's actions on MH17.

    finance.yahoo.com/news/ron-paul-defends-russia-malaysian-151731466.html

    The great libertarian project in American politics is rotten at its core.

    Agree. Paul needs to stay out of this. Our President is an accomplished peacemaker and has the medal to prove it.
    "Peacemaker" the same way a battered housewife thinks hollow warnings, excuses, and bending over keeps their marriage together
    To be fair, a certain amount of "bending over" is required to keep any marriage together.
  • CFetters_Nacho_LoverCFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,739 Founders Club

    brchco12 said:

    Endorses Putin's actions on MH17.

    finance.yahoo.com/news/ron-paul-defends-russia-malaysian-151731466.html

    The great libertarian project in American politics is rotten at its core.

    Agree. Paul needs to stay out of this. Our President is an accomplished peacemaker and has the medal to prove it.
    "Peacemaker" the same way a battered housewife thinks hollow warnings, excuses, and bending over keeps their marriage together
    President Obama will find a peaceful resolution to this situation just like he brought end to the war in Iraq.

    image

    The President will get another Peace Prize after this one too. Just watch.

    Where's Ron Paul's Nobel Peace Prize?

    waiting......
    Hardcore Husky is more deserving of a Nobel Peace Prize than Obama is.
    Finally someone recognizes our greatness.
  • CFetters_Nacho_LoverCFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,739 Founders Club

    PurpleJ said:

    An IQ test. Brilliant. I don't know why no one ever thought of that before.

    I take it you wouldn't be voting, in that case.

    How about you have to pass an IQ test, have to score above a certain percentage on a global politics familiarity quiz, and have to have a bachelors degree to vote? than only really informed people that want to vote will be influencing society, not dumbfucks? Makes about as much sense as our current system.

    But like I said, every system is a leaky ship waiting for clever people to exploit the weaknesses.
    Because I've met so many with bachelor's degrees that always know what is going and so many, almost all who don't have one are simple folk who can't even find 'Merica on a goddamn map.
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,789

    Ron Paul has good ideas and fucking stupid ideas, just like everyone else.

    Get rid of the executive branch of the government. #PureDemocracy

    This idea is stupiderer than some of Ron Paul's ideas. Who would make quick decisions when they're needed? That squirming mass of bickering mice on Capitol Hill?
    How often is it that quick fucking decisions are needed to be made? Whether or not to get a blowie while the first lady is getting botox? If the US gets nuked first it nukes back instantly...the military can handle its own shit and is highly capable and based on the merit system. Let the fucking citizens vote on whether or not to go to war with a cuntry for all I care. I bet we would've never gone to Iraq or Nam.

    Every political system conceivable will be exploited by sociopaths and power hungry individuals. The system we have in place now just makes it easily susceptible to a bunch of bs.

    Long story short, I have no fucking idea what exactly the most efficient system would be. It's easy to criticize the system we have now, and there are issues with it (rising tuition costs, 1% controlling more of the pie than necessary, grade school public education, etc.), but coming up with a better system is pretty much unfeasible at this point. It's just interesting to talk about as we sit here in our mother's basement with boners in our sweatpants, waving at the NSA watching us on there lunch break through our webcams.
    Wasn't born til 1980 so Nam I cunt speak to, but the nation was well in favor of going to war in Iraq when we do, that vote would have passed easily - it wasn't until we had been there for months with no sign of WMD's that public opinion started swinging hard against being in Iraq. Unless you're suggesting we do a year long campaign before a vote, in which case that illustrates OBK's poont about the necessity of quickness.

  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    dnc said:

    Ron Paul has good ideas and fucking stupid ideas, just like everyone else.

    Get rid of the executive branch of the government. #PureDemocracy

    This idea is stupiderer than some of Ron Paul's ideas. Who would make quick decisions when they're needed? That squirming mass of bickering mice on Capitol Hill?
    How often is it that quick fucking decisions are needed to be made? Whether or not to get a blowie while the first lady is getting botox? If the US gets nuked first it nukes back instantly...the military can handle its own shit and is highly capable and based on the merit system. Let the fucking citizens vote on whether or not to go to war with a cuntry for all I care. I bet we would've never gone to Iraq or Nam.

    Every political system conceivable will be exploited by sociopaths and power hungry individuals. The system we have in place now just makes it easily susceptible to a bunch of bs.

    Long story short, I have no fucking idea what exactly the most efficient system would be. It's easy to criticize the system we have now, and there are issues with it (rising tuition costs, 1% controlling more of the pie than necessary, grade school public education, etc.), but coming up with a better system is pretty much unfeasible at this point. It's just interesting to talk about as we sit here in our mother's basement with boners in our sweatpants, waving at the NSA watching us on there lunch break through our webcams.
    Wasn't born til 1980 so Nam I cunt speak to, but the nation was well in favor of going to war in Iraq when we do, that vote would have passed easily - it wasn't until we had been there for months with no sign of WMD's that public opinion started swinging hard against being in Iraq. Unless you're suggesting we do a year long campaign before a vote, in which case that illustrates OBK's poont about the necessity of quickness.

    BUSH, CHENEY , HALIBURTON LIED!
  • GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,506 Standard Supporter

    brchco12 said:

    Endorses Putin's actions on MH17.

    finance.yahoo.com/news/ron-paul-defends-russia-malaysian-151731466.html

    The great libertarian project in American politics is rotten at its core.

    Agree. Paul needs to stay out of this. Our President is an accomplished peacemaker and has the medal to prove it.
    "Peacemaker" the same way a battered housewife thinks hollow warnings, excuses, and bending over keeps their marriage together
    President Obama will find a peaceful resolution to this situation just like he brought end to the war in Iraq.

    image

    The President will get another Peace Prize after this one too. Just watch.

    Where's Ron Paul's Nobel Peace Prize?

    waiting......
    Hardcore Husky is more deserving of a Nobel Peace Prize than Obama is.
    I find that comment to be extremely disrespectful of our President. Perhaps you just resent having a man of color in the Highest office?
Sign In or Register to comment.