Bikini Bottom Pole (2nd attempt)
Comments
-
Traditional / Full
Yuck. Still probably a wood on the younger version of her wife.oregonblitzkrieg said:Victoria Secret then
Victoria Secret now
-
Cheeky BottomsAs Yella says in a worst case scenario you take non-cheeky to err on the side of caution, but I've never been known for my caution and let's face it when done right cheeky is as good as it gets. So let's be bold and daring and hope the 300 pound ladies stick to the full cheeks.
-
This is the slow strategy, play-it-safe take. Never get too low, never get too high.YellowSnow said:
It's a binary pole. Cheeky vs Non Cheeky.chuck said:My vote is being suppressed. I want to vote Brazillian.
So here's my take take: 81% of the women I see wearing cheeky bottoms have no fucking bidness going full cheek and it yucks me out. Therefore, for the good of society, we need to return to the puritanical, full bottoms.
Squarely on brand. -
This is the fast strategy, maybe-I'll-get-AIDs-but-have-you-seen-her-she's-worth-it take.Swaye said:As Yella says in a worst case scenario you take non-cheeky to err on the side of caution, but I've never been known for my caution and let's face it when done right cheeky is as good as it gets. So let's be bold and daring and hope the 300 pound ladies stick to the full cheeks.
Squarely on brand.
-
Traditional / Full
Ironic that the biggest atheist fag of the board is so biased towards old timey, Judeo-Christian morality.dnc said:
This is the slow strategy, play-it-safe take. Never get too low, never get too high.YellowSnow said:
It's a binary pole. Cheeky vs Non Cheeky.chuck said:My vote is being suppressed. I want to vote Brazillian.
So here's my take take: 81% of the women I see wearing cheeky bottoms have no fucking bidness going full cheek and it yucks me out. Therefore, for the good of society, we need to return to the puritanical, full bottoms.
Squarely on brand. -
I wood not call you the biggest atheist on the bored. Tallest maybe.YellowSnow said:
Ironic that the biggest atheist fag of the board is so biased towards old timey, Judeo-Christian morality.dnc said:
This is the slow strategy, play-it-safe take. Never get too low, never get too high.YellowSnow said:
It's a binary pole. Cheeky vs Non Cheeky.chuck said:My vote is being suppressed. I want to vote Brazillian.
So here's my take take: 81% of the women I see wearing cheeky bottoms have no fucking bidness going full cheek and it yucks me out. Therefore, for the good of society, we need to return to the puritanical, full bottoms.
Squarely on brand. -
Traditional / Full
looking at that I don't see how anyone could be an atheist, tall? yes, atheist? noSwaye said:As Yella says in a worst case scenario you take non-cheeky to err on the side of caution, but I've never been known for my caution and let's face it when done right cheeky is as good as it gets. So let's be bold and daring and hope the 300 pound ladies stick to the full cheeks.
-
Cheeky Bottoms
Low rise is about 1000 times better than high rise.Doog_de_Jour said:
In defense of those ladies, women’s fashion and stores tend to force a particular cut or style of garment down your throat whether you like it or not, body type be dammed. I remember when super low rise jeans were all the rage. It was fucking impossible to find any mid-rise (read “normal”) pairs ANYWHERE unless you went for some older brand.YellowSnow said:
It's a binary pole. Cheeky vs Non Cheeky.chuck said:My vote is being suppressed. I want to vote Brazillian.
So here's my take take: 81% of the women I see wearing cheeky bottoms have no fucking bidness going full cheek and it yucks me out. Therefore, for the good of society, we need to return to the puritanical, full bottoms.
It’s the same thing with swimwear I imagine.
I’m just waiting for this look to come back.
-
Traditional / Full
Darwin made those cheeks.LebamDawg said:
looking at that I don't see how anyone could be an atheist, tall? yes, atheist? noSwaye said:As Yella says in a worst case scenario you take non-cheeky to err on the side of caution, but I've never been known for my caution and let's face it when done right cheeky is as good as it gets. So let's be bold and daring and hope the 300 pound ladies stick to the full cheeks.
-
Is this a modified version of the Kirk Cameron divinely inspired banana theory?...LebamDawg said:
looking at that I don't see how anyone could be an atheist, tall? yes, atheist? noSwaye said:As Yella says in a worst case scenario you take non-cheeky to err on the side of caution, but I've never been known for my caution and let's face it when done right cheeky is as good as it gets. So let's be bold and daring and hope the 300 pound ladies stick to the full cheeks.
