Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Bountygate Update
hardhat
Member Posts: 8,344
in Tug Tavern
@HHusky Why didn't Biden ask pooty-toot about the totally real, not fake bounties? I thought it happened because Trump was compromised.
Comments
-
https://ariananews.af/biden-tackles-issue-of-bounties-on-us-troops-in-afghanistan-with-putin/
Imagine waiting 5 months to bring that up. -
Nice link
-
-
-
Fuck that was 1999.
-
Only the elderly understand my references.RaceBannon said:Fuck that was 1999.
-
65 tomorrow. Officially out living my dad
-
Happy (30th) 65th Birthday.RaceBannon said:65 tomorrow. Officially out living my dad
-
Lol, 'Ariana News'
-
LOL "Why didn't Biden ask pooty-toot about the totally real, not fake bounties? ".hardhat said:Lol, 'Ariana News'
-
What part of HE RAISED IT WITH HIM IMMEDIATELY AFTER TAKING OFFICE was too difficult for you?hardhat said: -
What part of this do you not understand. Also, why are you yelling?HHusky said:
What part of HE RAISED IT WITH HIM IMMEDIATELY AFTER TAKING OFFICE was too difficult for you?hardhat said:
The credibility of last summer’s bombshell report alleging the Russian government was paying bounties to Taliban fighters to kill U.S. troops in Afghanistan took another hit this week when a senior Biden administration official told reporters they only have “low-to-moderate confidence” in the intelligence behind the story.
The intelligence was based on notoriously unreliable “detainee reporting,” the official said on the call, meaning that it came from militants looking to get out of jail.
This was months after Biden allegedly brought it up to Putin on a phone call based on your news from ariana grande. -
None of which explains why you asked your ill-informed question. (And the bounty story has never "fallen apart", nor was it based solely upon detainee interviews.)hardhat said:
What part of this do you not understand. Also, why are you yelling?HHusky said:
What part of HE RAISED IT WITH HIM IMMEDIATELY AFTER TAKING OFFICE was too difficult for you?hardhat said:
The credibility of last summer’s bombshell report alleging the Russian government was paying bounties to Taliban fighters to kill U.S. troops in Afghanistan took another hit this week when a senior Biden administration official told reporters they only have “low-to-moderate confidence” in the intelligence behind the story.
The intelligence was based on notoriously unreliable “detainee reporting,” the official said on the call, meaning that it came from militants looking to get out of jail.
This was months after Biden allegedly brought it up to Putin on a phone call based on your news from ariana grande. -
zealots gonna zealotHHusky said:
None of which explains why you asked your ill-informed question. (And the bounty story has never "fallen apart", nor was it based solely upon detainee interviews.)hardhat said:
What part of this do you not understand. Also, why are you yelling?HHusky said:
What part of HE RAISED IT WITH HIM IMMEDIATELY AFTER TAKING OFFICE was too difficult for you?hardhat said:
The credibility of last summer’s bombshell report alleging the Russian government was paying bounties to Taliban fighters to kill U.S. troops in Afghanistan took another hit this week when a senior Biden administration official told reporters they only have “low-to-moderate confidence” in the intelligence behind the story.
The intelligence was based on notoriously unreliable “detainee reporting,” the official said on the call, meaning that it came from militants looking to get out of jail.
This was months after Biden allegedly brought it up to Putin on a phone call based on your news from ariana grande. -
awesomehardhat said:
zealots gonna zealotHHusky said:
None of which explains why you asked your ill-informed question. (And the bounty story has never "fallen apart", nor was it based solely upon detainee interviews.)hardhat said:
What part of this do you not understand. Also, why are you yelling?HHusky said:
What part of HE RAISED IT WITH HIM IMMEDIATELY AFTER TAKING OFFICE was too difficult for you?hardhat said:
The credibility of last summer’s bombshell report alleging the Russian government was paying bounties to Taliban fighters to kill U.S. troops in Afghanistan took another hit this week when a senior Biden administration official told reporters they only have “low-to-moderate confidence” in the intelligence behind the story.
The intelligence was based on notoriously unreliable “detainee reporting,” the official said on the call, meaning that it came from militants looking to get out of jail.
This was months after Biden allegedly brought it up to Putin on a phone call based on your news from ariana grande. -
What's more awesome is that if true, then Biden could have asked why he and his buddy barry allowed these to happen under their watch. As if it just only started happening under Trump. Sure.HHusky said:
awesomehardhat said:
zealots gonna zealotHHusky said:
None of which explains why you asked your ill-informed question. (And the bounty story has never "fallen apart", nor was it based solely upon detainee interviews.)hardhat said:
What part of this do you not understand. Also, why are you yelling?HHusky said:
What part of HE RAISED IT WITH HIM IMMEDIATELY AFTER TAKING OFFICE was too difficult for you?hardhat said:
The credibility of last summer’s bombshell report alleging the Russian government was paying bounties to Taliban fighters to kill U.S. troops in Afghanistan took another hit this week when a senior Biden administration official told reporters they only have “low-to-moderate confidence” in the intelligence behind the story.
The intelligence was based on notoriously unreliable “detainee reporting,” the official said on the call, meaning that it came from militants looking to get out of jail.
This was months after Biden allegedly brought it up to Putin on a phone call based on your news from ariana grande. -
Nobody blamed Daddy for anything but being a pussy about confronting his boss.hardhat said:
What's more awesome is that if true, then Biden could have asked why he and his buddy barry allowed these to happen under their watch. As if it just only started happening under Trump. Sure.HHusky said:
awesomehardhat said:
zealots gonna zealotHHusky said:
None of which explains why you asked your ill-informed question. (And the bounty story has never "fallen apart", nor was it based solely upon detainee interviews.)hardhat said:
What part of this do you not understand. Also, why are you yelling?HHusky said:
What part of HE RAISED IT WITH HIM IMMEDIATELY AFTER TAKING OFFICE was too difficult for you?hardhat said:
The credibility of last summer’s bombshell report alleging the Russian government was paying bounties to Taliban fighters to kill U.S. troops in Afghanistan took another hit this week when a senior Biden administration official told reporters they only have “low-to-moderate confidence” in the intelligence behind the story.
The intelligence was based on notoriously unreliable “detainee reporting,” the official said on the call, meaning that it came from militants looking to get out of jail.
This was months after Biden allegedly brought it up to Putin on a phone call based on your news from ariana grande. -
So he "raised" it with him. Big deal. Did do anything about it? Why didn't he "raise" it with again when he was speaking face to face with him? It was such a BIG fucking deal to you, why did you let yourself be bought off with a simple phone call where he "raised" that issue and then did nothing about it?HHusky said:
What part of HE RAISED IT WITH HIM IMMEDIATELY AFTER TAKING OFFICE was too difficult for you?hardhat said: -
I'm well aware of your obsession with Trump and anything that he allegedly did. As a disaffected liberal, that kind of obsession is what red-pilled me over the last 4 years. Why would someone believe that bullshit just because they think it 'owns Trump'? If anything, the bounties would have gone back years and would indicate that Obama and Biden were culpable for not doing anything about it. And that our intelligence services are idiots. I can assure you there are smart, decent people that work in that capacity that love America no matter who is president. No matter how much people hate Trump, this is just stupid.HHusky said:
Nobody blamed Daddy for anything but being a pussy about confronting his boss.hardhat said:
What's more awesome is that if true, then Biden could have asked why he and his buddy barry allowed these to happen under their watch. As if it just only started happening under Trump. Sure.HHusky said:
awesomehardhat said:
zealots gonna zealotHHusky said:
None of which explains why you asked your ill-informed question. (And the bounty story has never "fallen apart", nor was it based solely upon detainee interviews.)hardhat said:
What part of this do you not understand. Also, why are you yelling?HHusky said:
What part of HE RAISED IT WITH HIM IMMEDIATELY AFTER TAKING OFFICE was too difficult for you?hardhat said:
The credibility of last summer’s bombshell report alleging the Russian government was paying bounties to Taliban fighters to kill U.S. troops in Afghanistan took another hit this week when a senior Biden administration official told reporters they only have “low-to-moderate confidence” in the intelligence behind the story.
The intelligence was based on notoriously unreliable “detainee reporting,” the official said on the call, meaning that it came from militants looking to get out of jail.
This was months after Biden allegedly brought it up to Putin on a phone call based on your news from ariana grande. -
Great, then you should be able to cite all the evidence you have to support it. And if the claim is still valid why in the fuck isn't Biden doing anything about it? Was caving on the pipeline how Biden showed he was getting tough Dazzler?HHusky said:
None of which explains why you asked your ill-informed question. (And the bounty story has never "fallen apart", nor was it based solely upon detainee interviews.)hardhat said:
What part of this do you not understand. Also, why are you yelling?HHusky said:
What part of HE RAISED IT WITH HIM IMMEDIATELY AFTER TAKING OFFICE was too difficult for you?hardhat said:
The credibility of last summer’s bombshell report alleging the Russian government was paying bounties to Taliban fighters to kill U.S. troops in Afghanistan took another hit this week when a senior Biden administration official told reporters they only have “low-to-moderate confidence” in the intelligence behind the story.
The intelligence was based on notoriously unreliable “detainee reporting,” the official said on the call, meaning that it came from militants looking to get out of jail.
This was months after Biden allegedly brought it up to Putin on a phone call based on your news from ariana grande. -
So Trump didn't raise the issue because according to the dazzler Trump is a Putin stooge. So, Trump promoted fracking, the Keystone XL pipeline, strengthened our military, stopped CRT indoctrination in the military and got the Nord Stream 2 pipeline stopped. But Biden, who is not Putin's stooge, also does nothing about the fake bounty gate payments and then totally caves to the Russians on all the above issues. The story is a lie and the dazzler will never discuss Biden's policy decisions which strengthen Russia and weaken the US.SFGbob said:
So he "raised" it with him. Big deal. Did do anything about it? Why didn't he "raise" it with again when he was speaking face to face with him? It was such a BIG fucking deal to you, why did you let yourself be bought off with a simple phone call where he "raised" that issue and then did nothing about it?HHusky said:
What part of HE RAISED IT WITH HIM IMMEDIATELY AFTER TAKING OFFICE was too difficult for you?hardhat said: -
Trump hatred made people do a lot of stupid things.
-
Your attempt as a gotcha question was why Biden didn't raise bounties with Putin.hardhat said:
I'm well aware of your obsession with Trump and anything that he allegedly did. As a disaffected liberal, that kind of obsession is what red-pilled me over the last 4 years. Why would someone believe that bullshit just because they think it 'owns Trump'? If anything, the bounties would have gone back years and would indicate that Obama and Biden were culpable for not doing anything about it. And that our intelligence services are idiots. I can assure you there are smart, decent people that work in that capacity that love America no matter who is president. No matter how much people hate Trump, this is just stupid.HHusky said:
Nobody blamed Daddy for anything but being a pussy about confronting his boss.hardhat said:
What's more awesome is that if true, then Biden could have asked why he and his buddy barry allowed these to happen under their watch. As if it just only started happening under Trump. Sure.HHusky said:
awesomehardhat said:
zealots gonna zealotHHusky said:
None of which explains why you asked your ill-informed question. (And the bounty story has never "fallen apart", nor was it based solely upon detainee interviews.)hardhat said:
What part of this do you not understand. Also, why are you yelling?HHusky said:
What part of HE RAISED IT WITH HIM IMMEDIATELY AFTER TAKING OFFICE was too difficult for you?hardhat said:
The credibility of last summer’s bombshell report alleging the Russian government was paying bounties to Taliban fighters to kill U.S. troops in Afghanistan took another hit this week when a senior Biden administration official told reporters they only have “low-to-moderate confidence” in the intelligence behind the story.
The intelligence was based on notoriously unreliable “detainee reporting,” the official said on the call, meaning that it came from militants looking to get out of jail.
This was months after Biden allegedly brought it up to Putin on a phone call based on your news from ariana grande.
The answer is that he did that months ago.
You then retreat to an argument that the bounty story has "fallen apart". But the fact you wish to equate "unconfirmed" with "debunked" is a you problem. In any event, there never was a good excuse for Daddy's failure to even question Putin about it. Daddy's repeated willingness to side with Putin over our own people does raise questions for people who love America. It is nice to have a President who will challenge Putin. -
The straightforward argument is if there were bounty gate payments, that would have pissed Trump off. Certainly didn't piss anyone off in the State Department, our intelligence agencies or the military except as something to slander Trump with. This "story" has all the strength and factual support as the Steele Dossier. When you shout out wolf and there is no wolf you lose integrity. The fact that the dazzler lies and loves to be lied to, he still insists that we honor is thoughts and ignore the actual facts on the ground.
-
The dems obsession with Russia is sad. It’s a failing power. China is a far bigger threat, and notice what a pussy Biden and you are about it. Another hypocritical self own from you.HHusky said:
Your attempt as a gotcha question was why Biden didn't raise bounties with Putin.hardhat said:
I'm well aware of your obsession with Trump and anything that he allegedly did. As a disaffected liberal, that kind of obsession is what red-pilled me over the last 4 years. Why would someone believe that bullshit just because they think it 'owns Trump'? If anything, the bounties would have gone back years and would indicate that Obama and Biden were culpable for not doing anything about it. And that our intelligence services are idiots. I can assure you there are smart, decent people that work in that capacity that love America no matter who is president. No matter how much people hate Trump, this is just stupid.HHusky said:
Nobody blamed Daddy for anything but being a pussy about confronting his boss.hardhat said:
What's more awesome is that if true, then Biden could have asked why he and his buddy barry allowed these to happen under their watch. As if it just only started happening under Trump. Sure.HHusky said:
awesomehardhat said:
zealots gonna zealotHHusky said:
None of which explains why you asked your ill-informed question. (And the bounty story has never "fallen apart", nor was it based solely upon detainee interviews.)hardhat said:
What part of this do you not understand. Also, why are you yelling?HHusky said:
What part of HE RAISED IT WITH HIM IMMEDIATELY AFTER TAKING OFFICE was too difficult for you?hardhat said:
The credibility of last summer’s bombshell report alleging the Russian government was paying bounties to Taliban fighters to kill U.S. troops in Afghanistan took another hit this week when a senior Biden administration official told reporters they only have “low-to-moderate confidence” in the intelligence behind the story.
The intelligence was based on notoriously unreliable “detainee reporting,” the official said on the call, meaning that it came from militants looking to get out of jail.
This was months after Biden allegedly brought it up to Putin on a phone call based on your news from ariana grande.
The answer is that he did that months ago.
You then retreat to an argument that the bounty story has "fallen apart". But the fact you wish to equate "unconfirmed" with "debunked" is a you problem. In any event, there never was a good excuse for Daddy's failure to even question Putin about it. Daddy's repeated willingness to side with Putin over our own people does raise questions for people who love America. It is nice to have a President who will challenge Putin.
No retreat from me, it was never an issue, therefore ‘daddy’ never brought it up. -
So Biden used lies to bash Trump and also lies about cheating in the election. Being proven daily though.
-
Who approved the Nord 2 pipeline again?HHusky said:
Nobody blamed Daddy for anything but being a pussy about confronting his boss.hardhat said:
What's more awesome is that if true, then Biden could have asked why he and his buddy barry allowed these to happen under their watch. As if it just only started happening under Trump. Sure.HHusky said:
awesomehardhat said:
zealots gonna zealotHHusky said:
None of which explains why you asked your ill-informed question. (And the bounty story has never "fallen apart", nor was it based solely upon detainee interviews.)hardhat said:
What part of this do you not understand. Also, why are you yelling?HHusky said:
What part of HE RAISED IT WITH HIM IMMEDIATELY AFTER TAKING OFFICE was too difficult for you?hardhat said:
The credibility of last summer’s bombshell report alleging the Russian government was paying bounties to Taliban fighters to kill U.S. troops in Afghanistan took another hit this week when a senior Biden administration official told reporters they only have “low-to-moderate confidence” in the intelligence behind the story.
The intelligence was based on notoriously unreliable “detainee reporting,” the official said on the call, meaning that it came from militants looking to get out of jail.
This was months after Biden allegedly brought it up to Putin on a phone call based on your news from ariana grande.
Speed-limit IQ lemming... -
Good gravy. HH is still droning on about about a completely debunked lie called "bountygate"?
LOL! Hands UP HH!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The Russians are coming, the Russians are coming!!!!!!!!!!!! Stay in your mothers basement, don't come out! We are all going to die!
