First rule of auditing, where you find resistance, there is either fraud or sloppiness lying below. So you work up from the accounting manager to the CFO to the audit committee. Usually the resistance loosens as you go up the chain, which indicates sloppiness in all likelihood. When it’s still there at the audit committee level, the fraud likelihood goes way up. No one that is clean gives this kind of resistance.
HTH
That actually sounds logical. Either way, I’m sure you’ll get the confirmation bias you need when this is over.
There's a ton of sloppiness. Was some of it just carelessness and incompetence? Sure
First rule of auditing, where you find resistance, there is either fraud or sloppiness lying below. So you work up from the accounting manager to the CFO to the audit committee. Usually the resistance loosens as you go up the chain, which indicates sloppiness in all likelihood. When it’s still there at the audit committee level, the fraud likelihood goes way up. No one that is clean gives this kind of resistance.
HTH
That actually sounds logical. Either way, I’m sure you’ll get the confirmation bias you need when this is over.
There's a ton of sloppiness. Was some of it just carelessness and incompetence? Sure
If you were going to commit fraud and get away with it, you’d make a dedicated effort to pre burn down internal controls before you commit it. “The Big Lie” talking point is trying to make it seem like some giant conspiracy where everyone is in on it, which makes it seem impossible. And that’s true. You could literally have one person in a county in on it that knows the weak points and a sea of idiots that aren’t smart enough to spot it.
The optics of trying to stop and audit, interfere with the process, ridicule and condemn the auditors and refuse to turn over equipment that belongs to the public do not portray innocence, lack of guilt, or a malarkey-free election.
The optics of trying to stop and audit, interfere with the process, ridicule and condemn the auditors and refuse to turn over equipment that belongs to the public do not portray innocence, lack of guilt, or a malarkey-free election.
The optics of trying to stop and audit, interfere with the process, ridicule and condemn the auditors and refuse to turn over equipment that belongs to the public do not portray innocence, lack of guilt, or a malarkey-free election.
And yet there is no price to pay for doing so
The MC Bored of Supervisors doesn't take it seriously and won't until either their careers or reputations are threatened
The optics of trying to stop and audit, interfere with the process, ridicule and condemn the auditors and refuse to turn over equipment that belongs to the public do not portray innocence, lack of guilt, or a malarkey-free election.
And yet there is no price to pay for doing so
Probably true. But I just wanted to write something antiquated with malarkey in it.
Wow, what a sad spectacle...you’d think that after searching for Qanon watermarks and Chinese bamboo ballots you guys would come to the realization that this whole “audit” was sham. I guess when you get a taste of that sweet sweet hopium you can’t let go of your delusions. Hope you guys can make it out of this.
Wow, what a sad spectacle...you’d think that after searching for Qanon watermarks and Chinese bamboo ballots you guys would come to the realization that this whole “audit” was sham. I guess when you get a taste of that sweet sweet hopium you can’t let go of your delusions. Hope you guys can make it out of this.
If they're stonewalling subpoenas, something's amiss
Slow Joe won MC(which not that long ago voted in guys like Joe Arpaio) by 45,000 votes and I'm assured by many liberals that demographics are changing!!!1!!!! Voter fraud is as rare as lightning!!
So it was deleted but recovered? So still deleted?
When you delete a file on a hard disk, the digital file remains until over ridden with new data or the disk is formatted. The "deleted" file just doesn't show up anymore on a file registry. So, yes it was deleted, but the data from a forensic digital file expert was recovered because it was over riden or formatted.
So it was deleted but recovered? So still deleted?
When you delete a file on a hard disk, the digital file remains until over ridden with new data or the disk is formatted. The "deleted" file just doesn't show up anymore on a file registry. So, yes it was deleted, but the data from a forensic digital file expert was recovered because it was over riden or formatted.
For about the past 15 years, all hard disks containing any important data have created "images" of the hard disks, saved on backup or separate drives. Anyone not doing image backups is stuck in the 1990s, Norton Utilities days.
Destroying important data for good is virtually impossible today, without destroying several copies.
Comments
which is about as far main stream as I get so I did hear about it on MSM. I did not read an additional 6 pages since I last posted on said subject.
Is the odd-it still on?
Cyber Ninjas must be in on it too, I guess.
If they're stonewalling subpoenas, something's amiss
Slow Joe won MC(which not that long ago voted in guys like Joe Arpaio) by 45,000 votes and I'm assured by many liberals that demographics are changing!!!1!!!! Voter fraud is as rare as lightning!!
51:00 mark. Don't fuck with the MFAT.
Destroying important data for good is virtually impossible today, without destroying several copies.