Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Audit Live @ AZAudit.org

1…1213151718…26

Comments

  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,561 Standard Supporter
    MelloDawg said:

    Bob_C said:

    MelloDawg said:

    Bob_C said:

    Bump


    Still true. HTH.
    First rule of auditing, where you find resistance, there is either fraud or sloppiness lying below. So you work up from the accounting manager to the CFO to the audit committee. Usually the resistance loosens as you go up the chain, which indicates sloppiness in all likelihood. When it’s still there at the audit committee level, the fraud likelihood goes way up. No one that is clean gives this kind of resistance.

    HTH
    That actually sounds logical. Either way, I’m sure you’ll get the confirmation bias you need when this is over.
    You got yours in the selection. Hey 70K unregistered votes that got counted is OK right? Perfectly normal I'm sure.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Bob_C
    Bob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,225 Founders Club
    GreenRiverGatorz said:

    Bob_C said:

    MelloDawg said:

    Bob_C said:

    Bump


    Still true. HTH.
    First rule of auditing, where you find resistance, there is either fraud or sloppiness lying below. So you work up from the accounting manager to the CFO to the audit committee. Usually the resistance loosens as you go up the chain, which indicates sloppiness in all likelihood. When it’s still there at the audit committee level, the fraud likelihood goes way up. No one that is clean gives this kind of resistance.

    HTH
    Who's the AC in this analogy?
    County elections board.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MelloDawg
    MelloDawg Member Posts: 6,917
    doogie said:

    Nope. This is a constitutionally elected AZ Senate audit that has been supported by the AZ Courts.

    Deflection, is it working for you yet?

    But I thought the AZ Senate is against this and, therefore, is now in on the steal? Sorry, I can’t keep track of who the good guys and bad guys are in this.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,561 Standard Supporter
    MelloDawg said:

    doogie said:

    Nope. This is a constitutionally elected AZ Senate audit that has been supported by the AZ Courts.

    Deflection, is it working for you yet?

    But I thought the AZ Senate is against this and, therefore, is now in on the steal? Sorry, I can’t keep track of who the good guys and bad guys are in this.
    The Arizona senate is who authorized the audit and issued the subpoenas. But hey you're obviously up to date and well informed.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MelloDawg
    MelloDawg Member Posts: 6,917
    Sledog said:

    MelloDawg said:

    doogie said:

    Nope. This is a constitutionally elected AZ Senate audit that has been supported by the AZ Courts.

    Deflection, is it working for you yet?

    But I thought the AZ Senate is against this and, therefore, is now in on the steal? Sorry, I can’t keep track of who the good guys and bad guys are in this.
    The Arizona senate is who authorized the audit and issued the subpoenas. But hey you're obviously up to date and well informed.
    Right, it was the GOP election officials and GOP Sec. of State that are in on the steal, not the Senate, my mistake and I appreciate the clarification.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MelloDawg
    MelloDawg Member Posts: 6,917
    doogie said:

    MelloDawg said:

    doogie said:

    Nope. This is a constitutionally elected AZ Senate audit that has been supported by the AZ Courts.

    Deflection, is it working for you yet?

    But I thought the AZ Senate is against this and, therefore, is now in on the steal? Sorry, I can’t keep track of who the good guys and bad guys are in this.
    Why don’t you try pulling your head out of your ass and start trying to pay attention?
    I do pay attention, I just come to different conclusions.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Bob_C
    Bob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,225 Founders Club
    MelloDawg said:

    Sledog said:

    MelloDawg said:

    doogie said:

    Nope. This is a constitutionally elected AZ Senate audit that has been supported by the AZ Courts.

    Deflection, is it working for you yet?

    But I thought the AZ Senate is against this and, therefore, is now in on the steal? Sorry, I can’t keep track of who the good guys and bad guys are in this.
    The Arizona senate is who authorized the audit and issued the subpoenas. But hey you're obviously up to date and well informed.
    Right, it was the GOP election officials and GOP Sec. of State that are in on the steal, not the Senate, my mistake and I appreciate the clarification.
    The SOS is a democrat.

    Also, no one has suggested that Republicans are clean in this.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MelloDawg
    MelloDawg Member Posts: 6,917
    edited May 2021
    Bob_C said:

    MelloDawg said:

    Sledog said:

    MelloDawg said:

    doogie said:

    Nope. This is a constitutionally elected AZ Senate audit that has been supported by the AZ Courts.

    Deflection, is it working for you yet?

    But I thought the AZ Senate is against this and, therefore, is now in on the steal? Sorry, I can’t keep track of who the good guys and bad guys are in this.
    The Arizona senate is who authorized the audit and issued the subpoenas. But hey you're obviously up to date and well informed.
    Right, it was the GOP election officials and GOP Sec. of State that are in on the steal, not the Senate, my mistake and I appreciate the clarification.
    The SOS is a democrat.

    Also, no one has suggested that Republicans are clean in this.
    That's true, got me again. I was thinking of the Georgia SOS that's a Republican (who I'm sure also did something wrong).

    Sounds like a concerted effort though if both the Dems and Republicans are in on this.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter