Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Audit Live @ AZAudit.org
Comments
-
Lot of concern over a meaningless audit of the cleanest election ever
-
So why has the voted computer data base been erased? After the subpoena was issued? Just one of many telling anomalies and all repubs aren't actually repubs. They can be bought as well. They fear this so greatly why?
-
Bump
-
Expect a fire soon to take out the equipment kinda like the fire a few months ago that magically took out the shredded ballots.
You are a blind moron if you can’t look at this and see that election was corrupt as can be but I expect nothing will come of it...the County officials are right. Stopping it is for the good of the country...can’t have too many folks realizing we live in a Banana Republic now. -
Still true. HTH.Bob_C said:Bump
-
Maricopa County board of Superlosers begs AZ Senate to stop the Audit
-
-
First rule of auditing, where you find resistance, there is either fraud or sloppiness lying below. So you work up from the accounting manager to the CFO to the audit committee. Usually the resistance loosens as you go up the chain, which indicates sloppiness in all likelihood. When it’s still there at the audit committee level, the fraud likelihood goes way up. No one that is clean gives this kind of resistance.MelloDawg said:
Still true. HTH.Bob_C said:Bump
HTH -
Our democracy is imperiled?
I thought it dies in darkness? Staff???
Fuck off -
@ArthurAndersonDawg, true?Bob_C said:
First rule of auditing, where you find resistance, there is either fraud or sloppiness lying below. So you work up from the accounting manager to the CFO to the audit committee. Usually the resistance loosens as you go up the chain, which indicates sloppiness in all likelihood. When it’s still there at the audit committee level, the fraud likelihood goes way up. No one that is clean gives this kind of resistance.MelloDawg said:
Still true. HTH.Bob_C said:Bump
HTH
-
That actually sounds logical. Either way, I’m sure you’ll get the confirmation bias you need when this is over.Bob_C said:
First rule of auditing, where you find resistance, there is either fraud or sloppiness lying below. So you work up from the accounting manager to the CFO to the audit committee. Usually the resistance loosens as you go up the chain, which indicates sloppiness in all likelihood. When it’s still there at the audit committee level, the fraud likelihood goes way up. No one that is clean gives this kind of resistance.MelloDawg said:
Still true. HTH.Bob_C said:Bump
HTH -
You know fuck all about auditing.MelloDawg said:
That actually sounds logical. Either way, I’m sure you’ll get the confirmation bias you need when this is over.Bob_C said:
First rule of auditing, where you find resistance, there is either fraud or sloppiness lying below. So you work up from the accounting manager to the CFO to the audit committee. Usually the resistance loosens as you go up the chain, which indicates sloppiness in all likelihood. When it’s still there at the audit committee level, the fraud likelihood goes way up. No one that is clean gives this kind of resistance.MelloDawg said:
Still true. HTH.Bob_C said:Bump
HTH
Stay in your lane, shill.
-
It sounds like some of us know about it though.PurpleThrobber said:
You know fuck all about auditing.MelloDawg said:
That actually sounds logical. Either way, I’m sure you’ll get the confirmation bias you need when this is over.Bob_C said:
First rule of auditing, where you find resistance, there is either fraud or sloppiness lying below. So you work up from the accounting manager to the CFO to the audit committee. Usually the resistance loosens as you go up the chain, which indicates sloppiness in all likelihood. When it’s still there at the audit committee level, the fraud likelihood goes way up. No one that is clean gives this kind of resistance.MelloDawg said:
Still true. HTH.Bob_C said:Bump
HTH
Stay in your lane, shill.
Either way, let’s talk about this for a long time. -
Who's the AC in this analogy?Bob_C said:
First rule of auditing, where you find resistance, there is either fraud or sloppiness lying below. So you work up from the accounting manager to the CFO to the audit committee. Usually the resistance loosens as you go up the chain, which indicates sloppiness in all likelihood. When it’s still there at the audit committee level, the fraud likelihood goes way up. No one that is clean gives this kind of resistance.MelloDawg said:
Still true. HTH.Bob_C said:Bump
HTH -
Of course we should talk about it- if the system if broken, you fix it.MelloDawg said:
It sounds like some of us know about it though.PurpleThrobber said:
You know fuck all about auditing.MelloDawg said:
That actually sounds logical. Either way, I’m sure you’ll get the confirmation bias you need when this is over.Bob_C said:
First rule of auditing, where you find resistance, there is either fraud or sloppiness lying below. So you work up from the accounting manager to the CFO to the audit committee. Usually the resistance loosens as you go up the chain, which indicates sloppiness in all likelihood. When it’s still there at the audit committee level, the fraud likelihood goes way up. No one that is clean gives this kind of resistance.MelloDawg said:
Still true. HTH.Bob_C said:Bump
HTH
Stay in your lane, shill.
Either way, let’s talk about this for a long time.
Not the 'you' in the singular sense because Ostrich Boys like singular you sweep bad systems under the rug and pretend nothing is wrong.
Shill.
-
How about a congressional hearing?MelloDawg said:
It sounds like some of us know about it though.PurpleThrobber said:
You know fuck all about auditing.MelloDawg said:
That actually sounds logical. Either way, I’m sure you’ll get the confirmation bias you need when this is over.Bob_C said:
First rule of auditing, where you find resistance, there is either fraud or sloppiness lying below. So you work up from the accounting manager to the CFO to the audit committee. Usually the resistance loosens as you go up the chain, which indicates sloppiness in all likelihood. When it’s still there at the audit committee level, the fraud likelihood goes way up. No one that is clean gives this kind of resistance.MelloDawg said:
Still true. HTH.Bob_C said:Bump
HTH
Stay in your lane, shill.
Either way, let’s talk about this for a long time. -
I prefer taking this issue through the legal process and having its day in court. Has that happened yet?RaceBannon said:
How about a congressional hearing?MelloDawg said:
It sounds like some of us know about it though.PurpleThrobber said:
You know fuck all about auditing.MelloDawg said:
That actually sounds logical. Either way, I’m sure you’ll get the confirmation bias you need when this is over.Bob_C said:
First rule of auditing, where you find resistance, there is either fraud or sloppiness lying below. So you work up from the accounting manager to the CFO to the audit committee. Usually the resistance loosens as you go up the chain, which indicates sloppiness in all likelihood. When it’s still there at the audit committee level, the fraud likelihood goes way up. No one that is clean gives this kind of resistance.MelloDawg said:
Still true. HTH.Bob_C said:Bump
HTH
Stay in your lane, shill.
Either way, let’s talk about this for a long time. -
Have the subpoenas been filled?MelloDawg said:
I prefer taking this issue through the legal process and having its day in court. Has that happened yet?RaceBannon said:
How about a congressional hearing?MelloDawg said:
It sounds like some of us know about it though.PurpleThrobber said:
You know fuck all about auditing.MelloDawg said:
That actually sounds logical. Either way, I’m sure you’ll get the confirmation bias you need when this is over.Bob_C said:
First rule of auditing, where you find resistance, there is either fraud or sloppiness lying below. So you work up from the accounting manager to the CFO to the audit committee. Usually the resistance loosens as you go up the chain, which indicates sloppiness in all likelihood. When it’s still there at the audit committee level, the fraud likelihood goes way up. No one that is clean gives this kind of resistance.MelloDawg said:
Still true. HTH.Bob_C said:Bump
HTH
Stay in your lane, shill.
Either way, let’s talk about this for a long time. -
Not until the Peoria Fraternal Order of Eagles have had the chance to conduct their own thorough audit with third-party providers of their choice will we consider this matter settled.MelloDawg said:
I prefer taking this issue through the legal process and having its day in court. Has that happened yet?RaceBannon said:
How about a congressional hearing?MelloDawg said:
It sounds like some of us know about it though.PurpleThrobber said:
You know fuck all about auditing.MelloDawg said:
That actually sounds logical. Either way, I’m sure you’ll get the confirmation bias you need when this is over.Bob_C said:
First rule of auditing, where you find resistance, there is either fraud or sloppiness lying below. So you work up from the accounting manager to the CFO to the audit committee. Usually the resistance loosens as you go up the chain, which indicates sloppiness in all likelihood. When it’s still there at the audit committee level, the fraud likelihood goes way up. No one that is clean gives this kind of resistance.MelloDawg said:
Still true. HTH.Bob_C said:Bump
HTH
Stay in your lane, shill.
Either way, let’s talk about this for a long time. -
Nope. This is a constitutionally elected AZ Senate audit that has been supported by the AZ Courts.
Deflection, is it working for you yet? -
You got yours in the selection. Hey 70K unregistered votes that got counted is OK right? Perfectly normal I'm sure.MelloDawg said:
That actually sounds logical. Either way, I’m sure you’ll get the confirmation bias you need when this is over.Bob_C said:
First rule of auditing, where you find resistance, there is either fraud or sloppiness lying below. So you work up from the accounting manager to the CFO to the audit committee. Usually the resistance loosens as you go up the chain, which indicates sloppiness in all likelihood. When it’s still there at the audit committee level, the fraud likelihood goes way up. No one that is clean gives this kind of resistance.MelloDawg said:
Still true. HTH.Bob_C said:Bump
HTH -
County elections board.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Who's the AC in this analogy?Bob_C said:
First rule of auditing, where you find resistance, there is either fraud or sloppiness lying below. So you work up from the accounting manager to the CFO to the audit committee. Usually the resistance loosens as you go up the chain, which indicates sloppiness in all likelihood. When it’s still there at the audit committee level, the fraud likelihood goes way up. No one that is clean gives this kind of resistance.MelloDawg said:
Still true. HTH.Bob_C said:Bump
HTH -
But I thought the AZ Senate is against this and, therefore, is now in on the steal? Sorry, I can’t keep track of who the good guys and bad guys are in this.doogie said:Nope. This is a constitutionally elected AZ Senate audit that has been supported by the AZ Courts.
Deflection, is it working for you yet? -
The Arizona senate is who authorized the audit and issued the subpoenas. But hey you're obviously up to date and well informed.MelloDawg said:
But I thought the AZ Senate is against this and, therefore, is now in on the steal? Sorry, I can’t keep track of who the good guys and bad guys are in this.doogie said:Nope. This is a constitutionally elected AZ Senate audit that has been supported by the AZ Courts.
Deflection, is it working for you yet? -
Right, it was the GOP election officials and GOP Sec. of State that are in on the steal, not the Senate, my mistake and I appreciate the clarification.Sledog said:
The Arizona senate is who authorized the audit and issued the subpoenas. But hey you're obviously up to date and well informed.MelloDawg said:
But I thought the AZ Senate is against this and, therefore, is now in on the steal? Sorry, I can’t keep track of who the good guys and bad guys are in this.doogie said:Nope. This is a constitutionally elected AZ Senate audit that has been supported by the AZ Courts.
Deflection, is it working for you yet? -
Why don’t you try pulling your head out of your ass and start trying to pay attention?MelloDawg said:
But I thought the AZ Senate is against this and, therefore, is now in on the steal? Sorry, I can’t keep track of who the good guys and bad guys are in this.doogie said:Nope. This is a constitutionally elected AZ Senate audit that has been supported by the AZ Courts.
Deflection, is it working for you yet? -
I do pay attention, I just come to different conclusions.doogie said:
Why don’t you try pulling your head out of your ass and start trying to pay attention?MelloDawg said:
But I thought the AZ Senate is against this and, therefore, is now in on the steal? Sorry, I can’t keep track of who the good guys and bad guys are in this.doogie said:Nope. This is a constitutionally elected AZ Senate audit that has been supported by the AZ Courts.
Deflection, is it working for you yet? -
The SOS is a democrat.MelloDawg said:
Right, it was the GOP election officials and GOP Sec. of State that are in on the steal, not the Senate, my mistake and I appreciate the clarification.Sledog said:
The Arizona senate is who authorized the audit and issued the subpoenas. But hey you're obviously up to date and well informed.MelloDawg said:
But I thought the AZ Senate is against this and, therefore, is now in on the steal? Sorry, I can’t keep track of who the good guys and bad guys are in this.doogie said:Nope. This is a constitutionally elected AZ Senate audit that has been supported by the AZ Courts.
Deflection, is it working for you yet?
Also, no one has suggested that Republicans are clean in this. -
That's true, got me again. I was thinking of the Georgia SOS that's a Republican (who I'm sure also did something wrong).Bob_C said:
The SOS is a democrat.MelloDawg said:
Right, it was the GOP election officials and GOP Sec. of State that are in on the steal, not the Senate, my mistake and I appreciate the clarification.Sledog said:
The Arizona senate is who authorized the audit and issued the subpoenas. But hey you're obviously up to date and well informed.MelloDawg said:
But I thought the AZ Senate is against this and, therefore, is now in on the steal? Sorry, I can’t keep track of who the good guys and bad guys are in this.doogie said:Nope. This is a constitutionally elected AZ Senate audit that has been supported by the AZ Courts.
Deflection, is it working for you yet?
Also, no one has suggested that Republicans are clean in this.
Sounds like a concerted effort though if both the Dems and Republicans are in on this. -
You sounds like a dumbass if you didn't see the GOP lined up against Trump the last 4 yearsMelloDawg said:
That's true, got me again. I was thinking of the Georgia SOS that's a Republican (who I'm sure also did something wrong).Bob_C said:
The SOS is a democrat.MelloDawg said:
Right, it was the GOP election officials and GOP Sec. of State that are in on the steal, not the Senate, my mistake and I appreciate the clarification.Sledog said:
The Arizona senate is who authorized the audit and issued the subpoenas. But hey you're obviously up to date and well informed.MelloDawg said:
But I thought the AZ Senate is against this and, therefore, is now in on the steal? Sorry, I can’t keep track of who the good guys and bad guys are in this.doogie said:Nope. This is a constitutionally elected AZ Senate audit that has been supported by the AZ Courts.
Deflection, is it working for you yet?
Also, no one has suggested that Republicans are clean in this.
Sounds like a concerted effort though if both the Dems and Republicans are in on this.
Not everyone is as fucking partisan as you are. Lot of GOP hated Trump. That was one of his best attributes
