Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Audit Live @ AZAudit.org
Comments
-
That actually sounds logical. Either way, I’m sure you’ll get the confirmation bias you need when this is over.Bob_C said:
First rule of auditing, where you find resistance, there is either fraud or sloppiness lying below. So you work up from the accounting manager to the CFO to the audit committee. Usually the resistance loosens as you go up the chain, which indicates sloppiness in all likelihood. When it’s still there at the audit committee level, the fraud likelihood goes way up. No one that is clean gives this kind of resistance.MelloDawg said:
Still true. HTH.Bob_C said:Bump
HTH -
You know fuck all about auditing.MelloDawg said:
That actually sounds logical. Either way, I’m sure you’ll get the confirmation bias you need when this is over.Bob_C said:
First rule of auditing, where you find resistance, there is either fraud or sloppiness lying below. So you work up from the accounting manager to the CFO to the audit committee. Usually the resistance loosens as you go up the chain, which indicates sloppiness in all likelihood. When it’s still there at the audit committee level, the fraud likelihood goes way up. No one that is clean gives this kind of resistance.MelloDawg said:
Still true. HTH.Bob_C said:Bump
HTH
Stay in your lane, shill.
-
It sounds like some of us know about it though.PurpleThrobber said:
You know fuck all about auditing.MelloDawg said:
That actually sounds logical. Either way, I’m sure you’ll get the confirmation bias you need when this is over.Bob_C said:
First rule of auditing, where you find resistance, there is either fraud or sloppiness lying below. So you work up from the accounting manager to the CFO to the audit committee. Usually the resistance loosens as you go up the chain, which indicates sloppiness in all likelihood. When it’s still there at the audit committee level, the fraud likelihood goes way up. No one that is clean gives this kind of resistance.MelloDawg said:
Still true. HTH.Bob_C said:Bump
HTH
Stay in your lane, shill.
Either way, let’s talk about this for a long time. -
Who's the AC in this analogy?Bob_C said:
First rule of auditing, where you find resistance, there is either fraud or sloppiness lying below. So you work up from the accounting manager to the CFO to the audit committee. Usually the resistance loosens as you go up the chain, which indicates sloppiness in all likelihood. When it’s still there at the audit committee level, the fraud likelihood goes way up. No one that is clean gives this kind of resistance.MelloDawg said:
Still true. HTH.Bob_C said:Bump
HTH -
Of course we should talk about it- if the system if broken, you fix it.MelloDawg said:
It sounds like some of us know about it though.PurpleThrobber said:
You know fuck all about auditing.MelloDawg said:
That actually sounds logical. Either way, I’m sure you’ll get the confirmation bias you need when this is over.Bob_C said:
First rule of auditing, where you find resistance, there is either fraud or sloppiness lying below. So you work up from the accounting manager to the CFO to the audit committee. Usually the resistance loosens as you go up the chain, which indicates sloppiness in all likelihood. When it’s still there at the audit committee level, the fraud likelihood goes way up. No one that is clean gives this kind of resistance.MelloDawg said:
Still true. HTH.Bob_C said:Bump
HTH
Stay in your lane, shill.
Either way, let’s talk about this for a long time.
Not the 'you' in the singular sense because Ostrich Boys like singular you sweep bad systems under the rug and pretend nothing is wrong.
Shill.
-
How about a congressional hearing?MelloDawg said:
It sounds like some of us know about it though.PurpleThrobber said:
You know fuck all about auditing.MelloDawg said:
That actually sounds logical. Either way, I’m sure you’ll get the confirmation bias you need when this is over.Bob_C said:
First rule of auditing, where you find resistance, there is either fraud or sloppiness lying below. So you work up from the accounting manager to the CFO to the audit committee. Usually the resistance loosens as you go up the chain, which indicates sloppiness in all likelihood. When it’s still there at the audit committee level, the fraud likelihood goes way up. No one that is clean gives this kind of resistance.MelloDawg said:
Still true. HTH.Bob_C said:Bump
HTH
Stay in your lane, shill.
Either way, let’s talk about this for a long time. -
I prefer taking this issue through the legal process and having its day in court. Has that happened yet?RaceBannon said:
How about a congressional hearing?MelloDawg said:
It sounds like some of us know about it though.PurpleThrobber said:
You know fuck all about auditing.MelloDawg said:
That actually sounds logical. Either way, I’m sure you’ll get the confirmation bias you need when this is over.Bob_C said:
First rule of auditing, where you find resistance, there is either fraud or sloppiness lying below. So you work up from the accounting manager to the CFO to the audit committee. Usually the resistance loosens as you go up the chain, which indicates sloppiness in all likelihood. When it’s still there at the audit committee level, the fraud likelihood goes way up. No one that is clean gives this kind of resistance.MelloDawg said:
Still true. HTH.Bob_C said:Bump
HTH
Stay in your lane, shill.
Either way, let’s talk about this for a long time. -
Have the subpoenas been filled?MelloDawg said:
I prefer taking this issue through the legal process and having its day in court. Has that happened yet?RaceBannon said:
How about a congressional hearing?MelloDawg said:
It sounds like some of us know about it though.PurpleThrobber said:
You know fuck all about auditing.MelloDawg said:
That actually sounds logical. Either way, I’m sure you’ll get the confirmation bias you need when this is over.Bob_C said:
First rule of auditing, where you find resistance, there is either fraud or sloppiness lying below. So you work up from the accounting manager to the CFO to the audit committee. Usually the resistance loosens as you go up the chain, which indicates sloppiness in all likelihood. When it’s still there at the audit committee level, the fraud likelihood goes way up. No one that is clean gives this kind of resistance.MelloDawg said:
Still true. HTH.Bob_C said:Bump
HTH
Stay in your lane, shill.
Either way, let’s talk about this for a long time. -
Not until the Peoria Fraternal Order of Eagles have had the chance to conduct their own thorough audit with third-party providers of their choice will we consider this matter settled.MelloDawg said:
I prefer taking this issue through the legal process and having its day in court. Has that happened yet?RaceBannon said:
How about a congressional hearing?MelloDawg said:
It sounds like some of us know about it though.PurpleThrobber said:
You know fuck all about auditing.MelloDawg said:
That actually sounds logical. Either way, I’m sure you’ll get the confirmation bias you need when this is over.Bob_C said:
First rule of auditing, where you find resistance, there is either fraud or sloppiness lying below. So you work up from the accounting manager to the CFO to the audit committee. Usually the resistance loosens as you go up the chain, which indicates sloppiness in all likelihood. When it’s still there at the audit committee level, the fraud likelihood goes way up. No one that is clean gives this kind of resistance.MelloDawg said:
Still true. HTH.Bob_C said:Bump
HTH
Stay in your lane, shill.
Either way, let’s talk about this for a long time. -
Nope. This is a constitutionally elected AZ Senate audit that has been supported by the AZ Courts.
Deflection, is it working for you yet?
