Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
The Daily Orwell
TheKobeStopper
Member Posts: 5,959
in Tug Tavern
Comments
-
So he wrote about the wonders of socialism then?
-
-
-
Agree. Liberals definitely seem to hate actual science and logical thought.TheKobeStopper said: -
The right isn't going back through the history of "the arts" and canceling people. Dr Suess say HI!TheKobeStopper said:
Glen thinks 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 13 & 14 apply to you.
You monkey fucking idiot @TheKobeStopper.
-
That group is talented and has a valuable perspective, no doubt. But that is also the group that has no problem printing money to achieve their own ends, which are often selfish.TheKobeStopper said:
Not sure you've read 1984 (I personally think you haven't) but that book was 100% about the individual, and abhorred the collective and troglodytes. The first third of the book focused on nothing else in fact.
Maybe he was a socialist, but he wouldn't stood for the last year of bullshit in any way. -
The observant among us have poonted out the flipped of the TLAs for 4.5 years. It's bizarre.pawz said:
The right isn't going back through the history of "the arts" and canceling people. Dr Suess say HI!TheKobeStopper said:
Glen thinks 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 13 & 14 apply to you.
You monkey fucking idiot @TheKobeStopper. -
The Seuss estate chose to stop printing racist books that no one ever bought anyways. But you know that and continue to lie about it, it speaks volumes.pawz said:
The right isn't going back through the history of "the arts" and canceling people. Dr Suess say HI!TheKobeStopper said:
Glen thinks 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 13 & 14 apply to you.
You monkey fucking idiot @TheKobeStopper. -
Fuck commies, socialists, anarchists, democrats etc. Fuck 'em all!
Get the revolution going youngster I ain't getting any younger! -
It’s not “maybe”, he was a socialist.haie said:
That group is talented and has a valuable perspective, no doubt. But that is also the group that has no problem printing money to achieve their own ends, which are often selfish.TheKobeStopper said:
Not sure you've read 1984 (I personally think you haven't) but that book was 100% about the individual, and abhorred the collective and troglodytes. The first third of the book focused on nothing else in fact.
Maybe he was a socialist, but he wouldn't stood for the last year of bullshit in any way.
If you ever let that into your tiny little brains, we might be able to do something. Instead, you’ll continue to call capitalists using capitalism
to centralize power “communism”.
Orwell had what you’re looking for.
Capitalism is disappearing, but Socialism is not replacing it. What is now arising is a new kind of planned, centralised society which will be neither capitalist nor, in any accepted sense of the word, democratic. The rulers of this new society will be the people who effectively control the means of production: that is, business executives, technicians, bureaucrats and soldiers, lumped together by Burnham, under the name of ‘managers’. These people will eliminate the old capitalist class, crush the working class, and so organise society that all power and economic privilege remain in their own hands. Private property rights will be abolished, but common ownership will not be established. The new ‘managerial’ societies will not consist of a patchwork of small, independent states, but of great super-states grouped round the main industrial centres in Europe, Asia, and America. These super-states will fight among themselves for possession of the remaining uncaptured portions of the earth, but will probably be unable to conquer one another completely. Internally, each society will be hierarchical, with an aristocracy of talent at the top and a mass of semi-slaves at the bottom.
But as long as you insist on fighting the culture war and Medicare For All, you’re the problem.
