Comrade Fow Chee has decreed: Masks Foreva
Comments
-
PM to Fou Che. GFY.
-
-
Fock you fauci
-
Suck my big purple throbber, Fow Chee. That ain't gonna be a thing.
Go give your pedo buddy Bill Gates a handy.
-
Mask update LaConner: about 40% masks. 60% free Most merchants ignoring their own signs on the door. Money > Masks it would appear.
-
I can’t wait for him to be sent to Gitmo and executed. He deserves it more than anyone.
-
Cant we just Gaddafi him?
-
Get fauci the fuck outta here. Bring in Desantis or Candace.
-
I'll chip in for his plane ticket to GITMO!
-
Do people actually think at all?
Why was the flu virtually nonexistent this year:
1) COVID effectively was a substitute for the flu
2) Because so many worked from home and we effectively eliminated much of the person to person interaction ... we effectively eliminated the spread of the flu through traditional means
3) Masks
Problem is that people like Fauci that clearly have agendas are going to anchor to masks as the savior. It’s at best a contributing factor but almost assuredly not the redeeming reason.
I wish more people would be able to think critically ... but we’re trying to eliminate that from schooling so what are you going to do -
EsophagealFeces said:
I can’t wait for him to be sent to Gitmo and executed. He deserves it more than anyone.
-
No flu because no money.
-
“So it is conceivable that as we go on, a year or two or more from now, that during certain seasonal periods when you have respiratory-borne viruses like the flu, people might actually elect to wear masks to diminish the likelihood that you’ll spread these respiratory-borne diseases,” Fauci added.
You guys are out of your fucking minds. -
Who are you calling you guys?TheKobeStopper said:“So it is conceivable that as we go on, a year or two or more from now, that during certain seasonal periods when you have respiratory-borne viruses like the flu, people might actually elect to wear masks to diminish the likelihood that you’ll spread these respiratory-borne diseases,” Fauci added.
You guys are out of your fucking minds. -
The oppressive white people.Tequilla said:
Who are you calling you guys?TheKobeStopper said:“So it is conceivable that as we go on, a year or two or more from now, that during certain seasonal periods when you have respiratory-borne viruses like the flu, people might actually elect to wear masks to diminish the likelihood that you’ll spread these respiratory-borne diseases,” Fauci added.
You guys are out of your fucking minds. -
You never know who/what Kobe is going to targetPurpleThrobber said:
The oppressive white people.Tequilla said:
Who are you calling you guys?TheKobeStopper said:“So it is conceivable that as we go on, a year or two or more from now, that during certain seasonal periods when you have respiratory-borne viruses like the flu, people might actually elect to wear masks to diminish the likelihood that you’ll spread these respiratory-borne diseases,” Fauci added.
You guys are out of your fucking minds. -
So no response to what Fauci actually said? You had 10,000 words for it before you actually read it.Tequilla said:
Who are you calling you guys?TheKobeStopper said:“So it is conceivable that as we go on, a year or two or more from now, that during certain seasonal periods when you have respiratory-borne viruses like the flu, people might actually elect to wear masks to diminish the likelihood that you’ll spread these respiratory-borne diseases,” Fauci added.
You guys are out of your fucking minds. -
You mean the Gateway Pundit warped the Fauci quote into a misleading headline to rile up a specific section of the population and people here were triggered by it as evidenced by almost every post in this thread? Get outta town.TheKobeStopper said:
So no response to what Fauci actually said? You had 10,000 words for it before you actually read it.Tequilla said:
Who are you calling you guys?TheKobeStopper said:“So it is conceivable that as we go on, a year or two or more from now, that during certain seasonal periods when you have respiratory-borne viruses like the flu, people might actually elect to wear masks to diminish the likelihood that you’ll spread these respiratory-borne diseases,” Fauci added.
You guys are out of your fucking minds. -
I did respond to what Fauci said and did so I’m far less than 10,000 words you ignorant prickTheKobeStopper said:
So no response to what Fauci actually said? You had 10,000 words for it before you actually read it.Tequilla said:
Who are you calling you guys?TheKobeStopper said:“So it is conceivable that as we go on, a year or two or more from now, that during certain seasonal periods when you have respiratory-borne viruses like the flu, people might actually elect to wear masks to diminish the likelihood that you’ll spread these respiratory-borne diseases,” Fauci added.
You guys are out of your fucking minds.
Simply put, the idea that the reason the flu is gone is because we mask is at best partial causation
I’m all for anything that gets us out of this pandemic and back to normal life sooner than later ...
I’m also able to think for myself and call out BS when I see it ...
Always good to keep in your mind the idea that if you give someone an inch they’ll take a mile ...
If you can’t see or understand the scope creep that has taken place in the last 12+ months then you’ve got your head in the sand -
@TheKobeStopper and @MelloDawg are little weasels that can't see how Fauci has contradicted himself many times over the course of this 'pandemic'. You two are pathetic.
-
The problem with Fauci is that he’s effectively an academic that spouts off a lot of theory with an abundance of changing his tune ... in other words he’s super reactionaryMelloDawg said:
You mean the Gateway Pundit warped the Fauci quote into a misleading headline to rile up a specific section of the population and people here were triggered by it as evidenced by almost every post in this thread? Get outta town.TheKobeStopper said:
So no response to what Fauci actually said? You had 10,000 words for it before you actually read it.Tequilla said:
Who are you calling you guys?TheKobeStopper said:“So it is conceivable that as we go on, a year or two or more from now, that during certain seasonal periods when you have respiratory-borne viruses like the flu, people might actually elect to wear masks to diminish the likelihood that you’ll spread these respiratory-borne diseases,” Fauci added.
You guys are out of your fucking minds.
Part of the problem we’ve had throughout the COVID period is frankly that we don’t have voices that are clear subject matter experts that people trust ... -
Experts like the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease?Tequilla said:
The problem with Fauci is that he’s effectively an academic that spouts off a lot of theory with an abundance of changing his tune ... in other words he’s super reactionaryMelloDawg said:
You mean the Gateway Pundit warped the Fauci quote into a misleading headline to rile up a specific section of the population and people here were triggered by it as evidenced by almost every post in this thread? Get outta town.TheKobeStopper said:
So no response to what Fauci actually said? You had 10,000 words for it before you actually read it.Tequilla said:
Who are you calling you guys?TheKobeStopper said:“So it is conceivable that as we go on, a year or two or more from now, that during certain seasonal periods when you have respiratory-borne viruses like the flu, people might actually elect to wear masks to diminish the likelihood that you’ll spread these respiratory-borne diseases,” Fauci added.
You guys are out of your fucking minds.
Part of the problem we’ve had throughout the COVID period is frankly that we don’t have voices that are clear subject matter experts that people trust ... -
You’re not good at thisTheKobeStopper said:
Experts like the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease?Tequilla said:
The problem with Fauci is that he’s effectively an academic that spouts off a lot of theory with an abundance of changing his tune ... in other words he’s super reactionaryMelloDawg said:
You mean the Gateway Pundit warped the Fauci quote into a misleading headline to rile up a specific section of the population and people here were triggered by it as evidenced by almost every post in this thread? Get outta town.TheKobeStopper said:
So no response to what Fauci actually said? You had 10,000 words for it before you actually read it.Tequilla said:
Who are you calling you guys?TheKobeStopper said:“So it is conceivable that as we go on, a year or two or more from now, that during certain seasonal periods when you have respiratory-borne viruses like the flu, people might actually elect to wear masks to diminish the likelihood that you’ll spread these respiratory-borne diseases,” Fauci added.
You guys are out of your fucking minds.
Part of the problem we’ve had throughout the COVID period is frankly that we don’t have voices that are clear subject matter experts that people trust ... -
masks can actually do harm.
“Masks work!”.
80-year-old at risk individual with COPD hears this and says OK I can safely go to the grocery store and pick out my own groceries because this cloth mask will protect me.
They get Covid.
“But I did everything right!”
If masks work at all, it would be on a population level. Slightly decreasing individual risk of spreading Covid multiplied times millions of people. They don’t work the way the vast majority of people think they work. They don’t protect better than any vaccine can (Redfield). They aren’t and were never the most powerful tool we have to fight Covid (Biden).
If officials were more honest in their messaging as to who was most at risk and how those people should best protect themselves there may have been better results. -
We’re in a thread of Trumpers throwing a fit because Fauci said “some people might elect to wear masks to prevent the flu”.Prestonluv said:masks can actually do harm.
“Masks work!”.
80-year-old at risk individual with COPD hears this and says OK I can safely go to the grocery store and pick out my own groceries because this cloth mask will protect me.
They get Covid.
“But I did everything right!”
If masks work at all, it would be on a population level. Slightly decreasing individual risk of spreading Covid multiplied times millions of people. They don’t work the way the vast majority of people think they work. They don’t protect better than any vaccine can (Redfield). They aren’t and were never the most powerful tool we have to fight Covid (Biden).
If officials were more honest in their messaging as to who was most at risk and how those people should best protect themselves there may have been better results.
I know this is how moderates water down the bat shit right. “Well a lot of people are concerned about election fraud” as Trumpers storm the capitol. But when person A says something completely reasonable and people B lie about what person A said, you don’t get to blame the “messaging”. -
Could you recommend someone more qualified? What’s Dr. Oz up to?Tequilla said:
You’re not good at thisTheKobeStopper said:
Experts like the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease?Tequilla said:
The problem with Fauci is that he’s effectively an academic that spouts off a lot of theory with an abundance of changing his tune ... in other words he’s super reactionaryMelloDawg said:
You mean the Gateway Pundit warped the Fauci quote into a misleading headline to rile up a specific section of the population and people here were triggered by it as evidenced by almost every post in this thread? Get outta town.TheKobeStopper said:
So no response to what Fauci actually said? You had 10,000 words for it before you actually read it.Tequilla said:
Who are you calling you guys?TheKobeStopper said:“So it is conceivable that as we go on, a year or two or more from now, that during certain seasonal periods when you have respiratory-borne viruses like the flu, people might actually elect to wear masks to diminish the likelihood that you’ll spread these respiratory-borne diseases,” Fauci added.
You guys are out of your fucking minds.
Part of the problem we’ve had throughout the COVID period is frankly that we don’t have voices that are clear subject matter experts that people trust ... -
No one cares about the capital protest. The left keeps trying to make it a thing. But it was a mildly interesting news story on some random workday.
-
Whatever Fauci's clinical expertise are, he's been too scattershot with a camera or microphone in his face. The Hollywood beatification of Fauci wasn't his fault, but he sure did like it.TheKobeStopper said:
Experts like the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease?Tequilla said:
The problem with Fauci is that he’s effectively an academic that spouts off a lot of theory with an abundance of changing his tune ... in other words he’s super reactionaryMelloDawg said:
You mean the Gateway Pundit warped the Fauci quote into a misleading headline to rile up a specific section of the population and people here were triggered by it as evidenced by almost every post in this thread? Get outta town.TheKobeStopper said:
So no response to what Fauci actually said? You had 10,000 words for it before you actually read it.Tequilla said:
Who are you calling you guys?TheKobeStopper said:“So it is conceivable that as we go on, a year or two or more from now, that during certain seasonal periods when you have respiratory-borne viruses like the flu, people might actually elect to wear masks to diminish the likelihood that you’ll spread these respiratory-borne diseases,” Fauci added.
You guys are out of your fucking minds.
Part of the problem we’ve had throughout the COVID period is frankly that we don’t have voices that are clear subject matter experts that people trust ...
-
Not my job to recommend a different personTheKobeStopper said:
Could you recommend someone more qualified? What’s Dr. Oz up to?Tequilla said:
You’re not good at thisTheKobeStopper said:
Experts like the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease?Tequilla said:
The problem with Fauci is that he’s effectively an academic that spouts off a lot of theory with an abundance of changing his tune ... in other words he’s super reactionaryMelloDawg said:
You mean the Gateway Pundit warped the Fauci quote into a misleading headline to rile up a specific section of the population and people here were triggered by it as evidenced by almost every post in this thread? Get outta town.TheKobeStopper said:
So no response to what Fauci actually said? You had 10,000 words for it before you actually read it.Tequilla said:
Who are you calling you guys?TheKobeStopper said:“So it is conceivable that as we go on, a year or two or more from now, that during certain seasonal periods when you have respiratory-borne viruses like the flu, people might actually elect to wear masks to diminish the likelihood that you’ll spread these respiratory-borne diseases,” Fauci added.
You guys are out of your fucking minds.
Part of the problem we’ve had throughout the COVID period is frankly that we don’t have voices that are clear subject matter experts that people trust ...
Good work though utilizing a classic Doog response though -
Could you use any more sweeping generalizations?TheKobeStopper said:
We’re in a thread of Trumpers throwing a fit because Fauci said “some people might elect to wear masks to prevent the flu”.Prestonluv said:masks can actually do harm.
“Masks work!”.
80-year-old at risk individual with COPD hears this and says OK I can safely go to the grocery store and pick out my own groceries because this cloth mask will protect me.
They get Covid.
“But I did everything right!”
If masks work at all, it would be on a population level. Slightly decreasing individual risk of spreading Covid multiplied times millions of people. They don’t work the way the vast majority of people think they work. They don’t protect better than any vaccine can (Redfield). They aren’t and were never the most powerful tool we have to fight Covid (Biden).
If officials were more honest in their messaging as to who was most at risk and how those people should best protect themselves there may have been better results.
I know this is how moderates water down the bat shit right. “Well a lot of people are concerned about election fraud” as Trumpers storm the capitol. But when person A says something completely reasonable and people B lie about what person A said, you don’t get to blame the “messaging”.
Is it possible that the reason people aren’t thrilled is because people are concerned that the government may overstep its boundaries going forward?
