Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Leftist Shill denial POTD
Comments
-
Leftist shill denial poast has delivered!
-
Bountygate? You mean the suspected bounty on American troops that Daddy didn’t even ask Putin to admit or deny? #CommanderInChief!hardhat said:
You mean like bountygate and losers and suckers?HHusky said:
I recognize that there was a desire to prevent sensationalism from potentially deciding the election. Especially with foreign enemies anxious to exploit these stories. The press and big tech had been complicit in spreading bullshit in 2016. They were more paternalistic and cautious in 2020.hardhat said:
What does joe getting a cut have to do with the media, big tech, and yiu covering it up? Does that make it OK? And if it’s NO BIG DEAL, why the obfuscation.HHusky said:
That doesn’t answer the question. NY Post doesn’t have any records of Joe getting a “cut”, so they haven’t been prevented from publishing such records.hardhat said:
Remember when the Ny Post was locked out of twitter and couldn’t post the laptop story?HHusky said:Lots of Right Wing news outlets in this country. Why are they “covering up” for Joe?
-
Yes that one! That turned out to be false but was hyped and sensationalized. How many own goals are you going to score? Do you think Trump would have been afraid to ask if it wasn’t complete bullshit?HHusky said:
Bountygate? You mean the suspected bounty on American troops that Daddy didn’t even ask Putin to admit or deny? #CommanderInChief!hardhat said:
You mean like bountygate and losers and suckers?HHusky said:
I recognize that there was a desire to prevent sensationalism from potentially deciding the election. Especially with foreign enemies anxious to exploit these stories. The press and big tech had been complicit in spreading bullshit in 2016. They were more paternalistic and cautious in 2020.hardhat said:
What does joe getting a cut have to do with the media, big tech, and yiu covering it up? Does that make it OK? And if it’s NO BIG DEAL, why the obfuscation.HHusky said:
That doesn’t answer the question. NY Post doesn’t have any records of Joe getting a “cut”, so they haven’t been prevented from publishing such records.hardhat said:
Remember when the Ny Post was locked out of twitter and couldn’t post the laptop story?HHusky said:Lots of Right Wing news outlets in this country. Why are they “covering up” for Joe?
-
It hasn’t been proven false. And Daddy apparently didn’t think it was his place to ask his boss about it.hardhat said:
Yes that one! That turned out to be false but was hyped and sensationalized. How many own goals are you going to score? Do you think Trump would have been afraid to ask if it wasn’t complete bullshit?HHusky said:
Bountygate? You mean the suspected bounty on American troops that Daddy didn’t even ask Putin to admit or deny? #CommanderInChief!hardhat said:
You mean like bountygate and losers and suckers?HHusky said:
I recognize that there was a desire to prevent sensationalism from potentially deciding the election. Especially with foreign enemies anxious to exploit these stories. The press and big tech had been complicit in spreading bullshit in 2016. They were more paternalistic and cautious in 2020.hardhat said:
What does joe getting a cut have to do with the media, big tech, and yiu covering it up? Does that make it OK? And if it’s NO BIG DEAL, why the obfuscation.HHusky said:
That doesn’t answer the question. NY Post doesn’t have any records of Joe getting a “cut”, so they haven’t been prevented from publishing such records.hardhat said:
Remember when the Ny Post was locked out of twitter and couldn’t post the laptop story?HHusky said:Lots of Right Wing news outlets in this country. Why are they “covering up” for Joe?
-
Great your back to your weird usage of gals and daddy.HHusky said:
It hasn’t been proven false. And Daddy apparently didn’t think it was his place to ask his boss about it.hardhat said:
Yes that one! That turned out to be false but was hyped and sensationalized. How many own goals are you going to score? Do you think Trump would have been afraid to ask if it wasn’t complete bullshit?HHusky said:
Bountygate? You mean the suspected bounty on American troops that Daddy didn’t even ask Putin to admit or deny? #CommanderInChief!hardhat said:
You mean like bountygate and losers and suckers?HHusky said:
I recognize that there was a desire to prevent sensationalism from potentially deciding the election. Especially with foreign enemies anxious to exploit these stories. The press and big tech had been complicit in spreading bullshit in 2016. They were more paternalistic and cautious in 2020.hardhat said:
What does joe getting a cut have to do with the media, big tech, and yiu covering it up? Does that make it OK? And if it’s NO BIG DEAL, why the obfuscation.HHusky said:
That doesn’t answer the question. NY Post doesn’t have any records of Joe getting a “cut”, so they haven’t been prevented from publishing such records.hardhat said:
Remember when the Ny Post was locked out of twitter and couldn’t post the laptop story?HHusky said:Lots of Right Wing news outlets in this country. Why are they “covering up” for Joe?
You are one bizarre motherfucker
-
HHusky said:
You gals ever going to provide evidence that Joe got any money out of this? Seems like the Right Wing media would have an incentive to prove that.PurpleThrobber said:
Why would Cho Bai Den do that? Hunter is an earner.HHusky said:
Daddy made his relatives part of his administration and campaign.hardhat said:HHusky said:
I guess I "ran interference" by pointing out that Joe Biden was the candidate for President. Congrats to you girls for nailing one of his relatives.SFGbob said:
I recall you saying the laptop was Russian disinformation. And I also recall your silence when Joe claimed there was nothing to the story about Hunter getting paid by Burisma. In fact you ran interference saying shit like "well it's a good thing I'm not voting for Hunter."HHusky said:
You'll recall I believed he was simply trading on his last name.SFGbob said:
Interesting, because that wasn't the party line when Hunter was being hired for Ukrainian energy companies. Then is was Hunter was a highly qualified attorney who obviously belonged on the BODHHusky said:So Hunter is a fucking mess--long known--and the best you and Sean have is that Joe hasn't disowned him.
I haven't been this outraged since Obama asked for fancy mustard.
But Trump's 'relatives'. I was disturbed by the images of girls nailing Biden's relatives though. May have to flag.
You don’t take your top revenue producer off the road and put him in an office.
Hunter is an addict and a mess and apparently your star “witness”. An addict who unremarkably tried to justify his own actions.
NYT provided detailed information and documents on the felonies of the Trump Crime Family. That ultimately led to the resignation of Daddy’s sister from the federal bench.
Where are your documents?
Fuck off, shill.
-
Deflect Deflect DeflectHHusky said:
I recognize that there was a desire to prevent sensationalism from potentially deciding the election. Especially with foreign enemies anxious to exploit these stories. The press and big tech had been complicit in spreading bullshit in 2016. They were more paternalistic and cautious in 2020.hardhat said:
What does joe getting a cut have to do with the media, big tech, and yiu covering it up? Does that make it OK? And if it’s NO BIG DEAL, why the obfuscation.HHusky said:
That doesn’t answer the question. NY Post doesn’t have any records of Joe getting a “cut”, so they haven’t been prevented from publishing such records.hardhat said:
Remember when the Ny Post was locked out of twitter and couldn’t post the laptop story?HHusky said:Lots of Right Wing news outlets in this country. Why are they “covering up” for Joe?
I can’t wait for all the shit that was painfully obvious to me regarding Biden materializes and people that steadfastly defended him are left trying to rationalize the runaway train they enabled -
Zero evidence. If it was true this would still be a huge story. What were you saying about the media not wanting contribute to bullshit. Switch this to now, if ‘anonymous’ sources said this was true about Biden, you’d call them girls and say there’s no evidence. Or should we talk about Benghazi?HHusky said:
It hasn’t been proven false. And Daddy apparently didn’t think it was his place to ask his boss about it.hardhat said:
Yes that one! That turned out to be false but was hyped and sensationalized. How many own goals are you going to score? Do you think Trump would have been afraid to ask if it wasn’t complete bullshit?HHusky said:
Bountygate? You mean the suspected bounty on American troops that Daddy didn’t even ask Putin to admit or deny? #CommanderInChief!hardhat said:
You mean like bountygate and losers and suckers?HHusky said:
I recognize that there was a desire to prevent sensationalism from potentially deciding the election. Especially with foreign enemies anxious to exploit these stories. The press and big tech had been complicit in spreading bullshit in 2016. They were more paternalistic and cautious in 2020.hardhat said:
What does joe getting a cut have to do with the media, big tech, and yiu covering it up? Does that make it OK? And if it’s NO BIG DEAL, why the obfuscation.HHusky said:
That doesn’t answer the question. NY Post doesn’t have any records of Joe getting a “cut”, so they haven’t been prevented from publishing such records.hardhat said:
Remember when the Ny Post was locked out of twitter and couldn’t post the laptop story?HHusky said:Lots of Right Wing news outlets in this country. Why are they “covering up” for Joe?
-
Regardless of which side you lean to, you’re fooling yourself if you can identify any source of unbiased news
-
So Hunter whining to his sister about having to cut his Dad in isn't evidence. So, Tony Bubulinski having emails confirming that the Big Guy is getting 10% in the "deal" isn't evidence. But the dazzler having strong feelz about Trump colluding with the Russians is hard evidence.
