Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Tweet Of The Day - hryk

«13

Comments

  • hardhat
    hardhat Member Posts: 8,344
    edited March 2021
    Let's see here...just a few examples of things woketards are hyprocrites about

    anti-facists are facist
    anti racists are racist
    kids in cages

    voter ids are unfair and intrusive but vaccine passports are totally necessary
    amazon drivers are being treated unfairly vs crickets about a dead uber eats driver

    Also...THUD
  • Bob_C
    Bob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,435 Founders Club
    Seems straw-manny.
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,573
    Union were great for improving wages, benefits, and workplace safety. However, most unions are inefficient, and rely too much on seniority and not enough on actual job performance, which in turn can set a company back, and in the long run hurt the employees.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,772 Standard Supporter

    Union were great for improving wages, benefits, and workplace safety. However, most unions are inefficient, and rely too much on seniority and not enough on actual job performance, which in turn can set a company back, and in the long run hurt the employees.

    Ask GM who was required to keep non-working number of employees equal to 95% of the actual work force who were making 90% of their pay for staying home. We wonder why they go bankrupt?
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,573
    Sledog said:

    Union were great for improving wages, benefits, and workplace safety. However, most unions are inefficient, and rely too much on seniority and not enough on actual job performance, which in turn can set a company back, and in the long run hurt the employees.

    Ask GM who was required to keep non-working number of employees equal to 95% of the actual work force who were making 90% of their pay for staying home. We wonder why they go bankrupt?
    You can't have sweat shop conditions either. There is a balance that needs to happen.
  • TheKobeStopper
    TheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959

    Union were great for improving wages, benefits, and workplace safety. However, most unions are inefficient, and rely too much on seniority and not enough on actual job performance, which in turn can set a company back, and in the long run hurt the employees.

    You’re arguing that unions are great at doing their jobs. That’s it.

    They’re not supposed to be efficient for the company, their job is to help the worker. It’s an adversarial relationship and without representation you get the richest people in the world employing people who need food stamps to live.
  • TheKobeStopper
    TheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959
    Sledog said:

    Union were great for improving wages, benefits, and workplace safety. However, most unions are inefficient, and rely too much on seniority and not enough on actual job performance, which in turn can set a company back, and in the long run hurt the employees.

    Ask GM who was required to keep non-working number of employees equal to 95% of the actual work force who were making 90% of their pay for staying home. We wonder why they go bankrupt?
    They went bankrupt because sales were falling like a rock when we hit a recession. The fact that maybe, possibly, they could have survived if only they could have closed plants with no worker compensation and been paying workers so little that they needed food stamps to survive is a shit argument.

    If only they could have completely fucked the workers maybe the great corporation wouldn’t have gone bankrupt, bootlicker. That’s one of capitalism’s dirty little secrets, the “efficiency” you all marvel at is simply stolen from the worker.
  • Bob_C
    Bob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,435 Founders Club

    Sledog said:

    Union were great for improving wages, benefits, and workplace safety. However, most unions are inefficient, and rely too much on seniority and not enough on actual job performance, which in turn can set a company back, and in the long run hurt the employees.

    Ask GM who was required to keep non-working number of employees equal to 95% of the actual work force who were making 90% of their pay for staying home. We wonder why they go bankrupt?
    That’s one of capitalism’s dirty little secrets, the “efficiency” you all marvel at is simply stolen from the worker.
    Still on this shit argument I see. I’m sure the workers could pool their money together and build a car plant.
  • hardhat
    hardhat Member Posts: 8,344
    Communists workers are super happy, just what I'm hearing