XidenBros crushed again
Comments
-
oh no
-
The Dazzler is fine with lying insofar as it accomplishes the objective.HHusky said:oh no
But we've seen 2 years of his lying so that's already been established.
-
Did the WSJ lie too?PurpleThrobber said:
The Dazzler is fine with lying insofar as it accomplishes the objective.HHusky said:oh no
But we've seen 2 years of his lying so that's already been established. -
2 years? I've read this fraud's shitpoasts for more than a decade. When was he ever not lying?PurpleThrobber said:
The Dazzler is fine with lying insofar as it accomplishes the objective.HHusky said:oh no
But we've seen 2 years of his lying so that's already been established. -
Imagine this becoming about me . . . again.RoadTrip said:
2 years? I've read this fraud's shitpoasts for more than a decade. When was he ever not lying?PurpleThrobber said:
The Dazzler is fine with lying insofar as it accomplishes the objective.HHusky said:oh no
But we've seen 2 years of his lying so that's already been established.
I live in so many crazy places. -
No?HHusky said:
Did the WSJ lie too?PurpleThrobber said:
The Dazzler is fine with lying insofar as it accomplishes the objective.HHusky said:oh no
But we've seen 2 years of his lying so that's already been established. -
What does the WSJ have to do with your two years of lying?HHusky said:
Did the WSJ lie too?PurpleThrobber said:
The Dazzler is fine with lying insofar as it accomplishes the objective.HHusky said:oh no
But we've seen 2 years of his lying so that's already been established.
I'm calling you a liar. Man up and quit deflecting, liar.
-
Highly unlikely. But two years on HCH.RoadTrip said:
2 years? I've read this fraud's shitpoasts for more than a decade. When was he ever not lying?PurpleThrobber said:
The Dazzler is fine with lying insofar as it accomplishes the objective.HHusky said:oh no
But we've seen 2 years of his lying so that's already been established.
-
You made it about you. I didn't name you but you area self admitted XidenBro. Who lives in who's head?HHusky said:
Imagine this becoming about me . . . again.RoadTrip said:
2 years? I've read this fraud's shitpoasts for more than a decade. When was he ever not lying?PurpleThrobber said:
The Dazzler is fine with lying insofar as it accomplishes the objective.HHusky said:oh no
But we've seen 2 years of his lying so that's already been established.
I live in so many crazy places. -
You mean the media didn’t do their due diligence and then corrected the story after all relevant implications to the story being wrong no longer matter and can be swept under the rug?
I’d be more surprised at this point if the media had standards -
"The media" isn't a monolith. The WSJ broke the story.Tequilla said:You mean the media didn’t do their due diligence and then corrected the story after all relevant implications to the story being wrong no longer matter and can be swept under the rug?
I’d be more surprised at this point if the media had standards
The WaPo corrected two quotations that weren't accurate, yet in were no way substantively different than what Daddy did say. -
"The WaPo corrected two quotations that weren't accurate..." The dazzler and the MSM in a nutshell. Just like Dan Rather.
-
A newspaper corrected an error in its reporting. Gasbag says "That just proves . . . something . . . blah, blah blah . . . ."WestlinnDuck said:"The WaPo corrected two quotations that weren't accurate..." The dazzler and the MSM in a nutshell. Just like Dan Rather.
-
Kinda similar logic to Pelosi talking about fighting a certified election result where her candidate lost by 6 votes ...HHusky said:
"The media" isn't a monolith. The WSJ broke the story.Tequilla said:You mean the media didn’t do their due diligence and then corrected the story after all relevant implications to the story being wrong no longer matter and can be swept under the rug?
I’d be more surprised at this point if the media had standards
The WaPo corrected two quotations that weren't accurate, yet in were no way substantively different than what Daddy did say.
It’s all semantics right? -
An error? I see a pattern. You see an excuse. I pity your clients.HHusky said:
A newspaper corrected an error in its reporting. Gasbag says "That just proves . . . something . . . blah, blah blah . . . ."WestlinnDuck said:"The WaPo corrected two quotations that weren't accurate..." The dazzler and the MSM in a nutshell. Just like Dan Rather.
-
So far you've identified Dan Rather (2001?) and WaPo (2021).WestlinnDuck said:
An error? I see a pattern. You see an excuse. I pity your clients.HHusky said:
A newspaper corrected an error in its reporting. Gasbag says "That just proves . . . something . . . blah, blah blah . . . ."WestlinnDuck said:"The WaPo corrected two quotations that weren't accurate..." The dazzler and the MSM in a nutshell. Just like Dan Rather.
"Pattern!"
The geometry students among us will note two points does establish a line. Calling it a "pattern" is a stretch.
And far from "retracting" the story, as the hack from OAN says, the WaPo corrected the story. It's not really comparable to Rathergate, but you lost your ability to do nuance at the Second Battle of the Marne, I believe.
-
Democrats used the Fake quote as evidence in the last in Peach mint exercise
I’m sure it wasn’t sworn testimony because that would be against the law -
This has legs!
-
Sorry, was referencing the old WoodshedPurpleThrobber said:
Highly unlikely. But two years on HCH.RoadTrip said:
2 years? I've read this fraud's shitpoasts for more than a decade. When was he ever not lying?PurpleThrobber said:
The Dazzler is fine with lying insofar as it accomplishes the objective.HHusky said:oh no
But we've seen 2 years of his lying so that's already been established. -
Somebody play Schiff reading the Ukrainian "transcript" that was completely made up fan fiction.
It did what it was supposed to do and there were no consequences.
With zero accountability the system is broken. People are too busy playing PS5 and dancing on Tiktok to care.
It's a great time to be a politician.
https://youtu.be/ftJc2I4_CL4 -
Daddy released the transcript of his perfect telephone call. It didn't differ in substance from Schiff's interpretation.Doogles said:Somebody play Schiff reading the Ukrainian "transcript" that was completely made up fan fiction.
It did what it was supposed to do and there were no consequences.
With zero accountability the system is broken. People are too busy playing PS5 and dancing on Tiktok to care.
It's a great time to be a politician.https://youtu.be/ftJc2I4_CL4 -
LolHHusky said:
Daddy released the transcript of his perfect telephone call. It didn't differ in substance from Schiff's interpretation.Doogles said:Somebody play Schiff reading the Ukrainian "transcript" that was completely made up fan fiction.
It did what it was supposed to do and there were no consequences.
With zero accountability the system is broken. People are too busy playing PS5 and dancing on Tiktok to care.
It's a great time to be a politician.https://youtu.be/ftJc2I4_CL4
The actual call and what Schiff said aren't even close bro. It's almost like a pattern of the left changing words and phrases to fit their narrative is emerging... -
No quid pro quo like you and Shiff made up. Unlike Cho Bai Den's video explaining his threat of refusing government aid to the Ukraine unless they stopped the investigation into his son's corruption (along with the Big Guy's 10%). Could you suck any harder?
-
Yes, yes he can and does. The gentle giant was on his knees with his hands in the air like the innocent child he was before the shot him in the backWestlinnDuck said:No quid pro quo like you and Shiff made up. Unlike Cho Bai Den's video explaining his threat of refusing government aid to the Ukraine unless they stopped the investigation into his son's corruption (along with the Big Guy's 10%). Could you suck any harder?
-
Really quite amazing that the dazzler with his mythical law degree and MBA can get so many things wrong. Surprised he isn't on CNN as a regular contributor.RoadTrip said:
Yes, yes he can and does. The gentle giant was on his knees with his hands in the air like the innocent child he was before the shot him in the backWestlinnDuck said:No quid pro quo like you and Shiff made up. Unlike Cho Bai Den's video explaining his threat of refusing government aid to the Ukraine unless they stopped the investigation into his son's corruption (along with the Big Guy's 10%). Could you suck any harder?
-
Right. It only differed in actual words. That's all.HHusky said:
Daddy released the transcript of his perfect telephone call. It didn't differ in substance from Schiff's interpretation.Doogles said:Somebody play Schiff reading the Ukrainian "transcript" that was completely made up fan fiction.
It did what it was supposed to do and there were no consequences.
With zero accountability the system is broken. People are too busy playing PS5 and dancing on Tiktok to care.
It's a great time to be a politician.https://youtu.be/ftJc2I4_CL4 -
And now you know why the Dazzler doesn't care about lying, he does it all the time.HHusky said:
Daddy released the transcript of his perfect telephone call. It didn't differ in substance from Schiff's interpretation.Doogles said:Somebody play Schiff reading the Ukrainian "transcript" that was completely made up fan fiction.
It did what it was supposed to do and there were no consequences.
With zero accountability the system is broken. People are too busy playing PS5 and dancing on Tiktok to care.
It's a great time to be a politician.https://youtu.be/ftJc2I4_CL4 -
Yes, because those are the only two examples of the media being caught lying in the last 20 years.HHusky said:
So far you've identified Dan Rather (2001?) and WaPo (2021).WestlinnDuck said:
An error? I see a pattern. You see an excuse. I pity your clients.HHusky said:
A newspaper corrected an error in its reporting. Gasbag says "That just proves . . . something . . . blah, blah blah . . . ."WestlinnDuck said:"The WaPo corrected two quotations that weren't accurate..." The dazzler and the MSM in a nutshell. Just like Dan Rather.
"Pattern!"
The geometry students among us will note two points does establish a line. Calling it a "pattern" is a stretch.
And far from "retracting" the story, as the hack from OAN says, the WaPo corrected the story. It's not really comparable to Rathergate, but you lost your ability to do nuance at the Second Battle of the Marne, I believe. -
Dazzler prefers to hide behind weasel words. Lying, you see, takes balls and Dazzler is without.SFGbob said:
And now you know why the Dazzler doesn't care about lying, he does it all the time.HHusky said:
Daddy released the transcript of his perfect telephone call. It didn't differ in substance from Schiff's interpretation.Doogles said:Somebody play Schiff reading the Ukrainian "transcript" that was completely made up fan fiction.
It did what it was supposed to do and there were no consequences.
With zero accountability the system is broken. People are too busy playing PS5 and dancing on Tiktok to care.
It's a great time to be a politician.https://youtu.be/ftJc2I4_CL4 -
The dazzler has no remembering of any of the Fake News in the last 20 years. Leftards lie and love to be lied to.SFGbob said:
Yes, because those are the only two examples of the media being caught lying in the last 20 years.HHusky said:
So far you've identified Dan Rather (2001?) and WaPo (2021).WestlinnDuck said:
An error? I see a pattern. You see an excuse. I pity your clients.HHusky said:
A newspaper corrected an error in its reporting. Gasbag says "That just proves . . . something . . . blah, blah blah . . . ."WestlinnDuck said:"The WaPo corrected two quotations that weren't accurate..." The dazzler and the MSM in a nutshell. Just like Dan Rather.
"Pattern!"
The geometry students among us will note two points does establish a line. Calling it a "pattern" is a stretch.
And far from "retracting" the story, as the hack from OAN says, the WaPo corrected the story. It's not really comparable to Rathergate, but you lost your ability to do nuance at the Second Battle of the Marne, I believe.
